Surface hydrophobicity changes of a series of nanocomposite films were evaluated as a function of roughness and ionomer concentration. Nanocomposite surfaces were created by coating a smooth silicon wafer and micro textured surfaces based on two types of 3M micro-replicated Brightness Enhancement Films (BEF). Multiple nanocomposite surfaces were evaluated as a function of Pt/C catalyst, a single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT), and ionomer concentration varying between 7.5 to 27.3 wt% Nafion. An increase in hydrophobicity was observed for all nanocomposite surfaces as compared to bare substrates coated with ionomer. Bare substrates had observed water contact angles of 32.5o on silicon, 50.8o on BEF type Y, and 91.2o on BEF type P. Nanocomposites coated on BEF type P surfaces had the greatest increase in apparent contact angle starting from 101.5o on a surface coated with ionomer to 140.6o for an ionomer composite containing 100 wt% Pt/C followed by BEF type Y (78.4o - 135.4o) and Si (76.9o - 135.8o). Nanocomposite roughness increased with increasing ionomer concentration and was inversely related to the apparent contact angle of water. Nanocomposite wetting properties were strongly dependent upon ionomer concentration and micro scale roughness contributed to wetting behavior transitioning between Wenzel and Cassie modes.
Published in | International Journal of Materials Science and Applications (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11 |
Page(s) | 69-76 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hydrophobicity, Contact Angle, Wetting, Wenzel and Cassie Model, Nanocomposite, Ionomer, Carbon Nanotube
[1] | D.Y. Ryu, K. Shin, E. Drockenmuller, C.J. Hawker, T.P. Russell, Science 308 (2005) 236. |
[2] | X Zhang, F. Shi, X. Yu, H. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Wang, L. Jiang, X. Li, Journal of the American Chemical Society 126 (2004). 3064. |
[3] | C. Zhang, H. Cai, B. Chen, W. Dong, Z. Mu, X. Zhang Chinese, Journal of Catalysis 29(1) (2008) 1. |
[4] | A. Marmur, Soft Matter 2 (2006) 12. |
[5] | J. I. Rosales-Leal, M. A. Rodríguez-Valverde, G. Mazzaglia, P.J. Ramón-Torregrosa, L. Díaz-Rodríguez, O. García-Martínez, M. Vallecillo-Capilla, C. Ruiz, and M. A. Cabrerizo-Vílchez, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering aspects 365 (2010) 222. |
[6] | A. Tuteja, W. Choi, M. Ma, J. M. Mabry, S. A. Mazzella, G. C. Rutledge, G. H. McKinley and R. H. Cohen, Science 318 (2007) 1618. |
[7] | L. Feng, S. Li, Y. Li, H. Li, L. Zhang, J. Zhai, Y. Song, B. Liu, L. Jiang, D. Zhu Advanced Materials 14 (2002) 1857. |
[8] | A. R. Thiam, R. V. Farese, T. C. Walther, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 14, (2013), 775. |
[9] | K. Grundke, K. Pöschel, A. Synytska, R. Frenzel, A. Drechsler, M. Nitschke, A.L. Cordeiro, P. Uhlmann, P.B. Welzel, Adv Colloid Interface Sci. (2014), doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.10.012 |
[10] | R. Menini,M. Farzaneh, Polymer International 57(1) (2008) 77. |
[11] | N. Zhao, Q. Xie, X. Kuang, S. Wang, Y. Li, X. Lu, S. Tan, J. Shen, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Xu, C.C. Han, Advanced Functional Materials 17(15) (2007) 2739. |
[12] | S. Naha, S. Sen, I.K. Puri, Carbon 45(8) (2007) 1702. |
[13] | J.D. Miller, S. Veeramasuneni, J. Drelich, M.R. Yalamanchili, G. Yamauchi, Polymer Engineering & Science 36(14) (1996) 1849. |
[14] | L. Zhang, Z. Zhou, B. Cheng, J.M. DeSimone, E.T. Samulski, Langmuir 22(20) (2006) 8576. |
[15] | L. Feng, Z. Yang, J. Zhai, Y. Song, B. Liu, Y. Ma, Z. Yang, L. Jiang, D. Zhu, Angewandte Chemie 115(35) (2003) 4349. |
[16] | C. Journet, S. Moulinet, C. Ybert, S.T. Purcell, L. Bocquet, Europhysics Letters 71(1) (2005) 104. |
[17] | S. Yang, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2(6) (2006) 501. |
[18] | V.M. Linkov, L.P. Bobrova, S.V. Timofeev, and R. D. Sanderson, Materials Letters 24(1-3) (1995) 147. |
[19] | C.D. Papaspyrides, J. Poulakis, Polymer International 27(2) (1992) 139. |
[20] | I.A. Levitsky, P.T. Kanelos, W.B. Euler, Materials Research Society Proceedings 785 (2004) D9.1.1. |
[21] | M.A. Scibioha, I.-H. Oha, T.H. Lima, S.A. Honga, H. Yong, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 77(3-4) (2008) 373. |
[22] | Y.T. Cheng, D.E. Rodak, Applied Physical Letters 86 (2005) 144101. |
[23] | R.N. Wenzel, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 28(8) (1936) 988. |
[24] | A.B.D Cassie, S. Baxter, Transactions of the Faraday Society 40 (1944) 546. |
[25] | A. Lafuma, D. Quere, Nature Materials 2(7) (2003) 457. |
[26] | G. Zhang, S. Sun, M.I. Ionescu, H. Liu, Y. Zhong, R. Li, X. Sun, Langmuir 26(6) (2010) 4346. |
[27] | L.M. Nikolic, L. Radonjic, V.V. Srdic, Ceramics International 31(2) (2005) 261. |
[28] | M. Nosonovsky, B. Bhushan, Microsystems Technology 11(7) (2005) 535. |
[29] | O. Tasuku, B. Ding, Y. Sone, S. Shiratori, Nanotechnology 18 (2007) 165607. |
[30] | Q.Y. Tong, T.H. Lee, U. Gosele, M. Reiche, J. Ramm, E. Beck, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 144(1) (1997) 384. |
[31] | P. van der Wal, U. Steiner, Soft Matter 3 (2007) 426. |
[32] | J.T. Han, Y. Zheng, J.H. Cho, X. Xu, K. Cho The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109(44) (2005) 20773. |
[33] | Y. Zhou, B. Wang, X. Song, E. Li, G. Li, S. Zhao, H. Yan, Applied Surface Science 253(5) (2006) 2690. |
[34] | Kah-Young Song, Han-Kyu Lee and Hee-Tak Kim Electrochemica Acta 53(2) (2007) 637. |
APA Style
Sonal Mazumder, Yanfang Fan, Chris J. Cornelius. (2015). Carbon-Ionomer Nanocomposite Wetting Properties: The Role of Ionomer Composition and Surface Roughness. International Journal of Materials Science and Applications, 4(2), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11
ACS Style
Sonal Mazumder; Yanfang Fan; Chris J. Cornelius. Carbon-Ionomer Nanocomposite Wetting Properties: The Role of Ionomer Composition and Surface Roughness. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2015, 4(2), 69-76. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11
AMA Style
Sonal Mazumder, Yanfang Fan, Chris J. Cornelius. Carbon-Ionomer Nanocomposite Wetting Properties: The Role of Ionomer Composition and Surface Roughness. Int J Mater Sci Appl. 2015;4(2):69-76. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11, author = {Sonal Mazumder and Yanfang Fan and Chris J. Cornelius}, title = {Carbon-Ionomer Nanocomposite Wetting Properties: The Role of Ionomer Composition and Surface Roughness}, journal = {International Journal of Materials Science and Applications}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, pages = {69-76}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmsa.20150402.11}, abstract = {Surface hydrophobicity changes of a series of nanocomposite films were evaluated as a function of roughness and ionomer concentration. Nanocomposite surfaces were created by coating a smooth silicon wafer and micro textured surfaces based on two types of 3M micro-replicated Brightness Enhancement Films (BEF). Multiple nanocomposite surfaces were evaluated as a function of Pt/C catalyst, a single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT), and ionomer concentration varying between 7.5 to 27.3 wt% Nafion. An increase in hydrophobicity was observed for all nanocomposite surfaces as compared to bare substrates coated with ionomer. Bare substrates had observed water contact angles of 32.5o on silicon, 50.8o on BEF type Y, and 91.2o on BEF type P. Nanocomposites coated on BEF type P surfaces had the greatest increase in apparent contact angle starting from 101.5o on a surface coated with ionomer to 140.6o for an ionomer composite containing 100 wt% Pt/C followed by BEF type Y (78.4o - 135.4o) and Si (76.9o - 135.8o). Nanocomposite roughness increased with increasing ionomer concentration and was inversely related to the apparent contact angle of water. Nanocomposite wetting properties were strongly dependent upon ionomer concentration and micro scale roughness contributed to wetting behavior transitioning between Wenzel and Cassie modes.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Carbon-Ionomer Nanocomposite Wetting Properties: The Role of Ionomer Composition and Surface Roughness AU - Sonal Mazumder AU - Yanfang Fan AU - Chris J. Cornelius Y1 - 2015/02/16 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11 T2 - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications JF - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications JO - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications SP - 69 EP - 76 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2643 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150402.11 AB - Surface hydrophobicity changes of a series of nanocomposite films were evaluated as a function of roughness and ionomer concentration. Nanocomposite surfaces were created by coating a smooth silicon wafer and micro textured surfaces based on two types of 3M micro-replicated Brightness Enhancement Films (BEF). Multiple nanocomposite surfaces were evaluated as a function of Pt/C catalyst, a single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT), and ionomer concentration varying between 7.5 to 27.3 wt% Nafion. An increase in hydrophobicity was observed for all nanocomposite surfaces as compared to bare substrates coated with ionomer. Bare substrates had observed water contact angles of 32.5o on silicon, 50.8o on BEF type Y, and 91.2o on BEF type P. Nanocomposites coated on BEF type P surfaces had the greatest increase in apparent contact angle starting from 101.5o on a surface coated with ionomer to 140.6o for an ionomer composite containing 100 wt% Pt/C followed by BEF type Y (78.4o - 135.4o) and Si (76.9o - 135.8o). Nanocomposite roughness increased with increasing ionomer concentration and was inversely related to the apparent contact angle of water. Nanocomposite wetting properties were strongly dependent upon ionomer concentration and micro scale roughness contributed to wetting behavior transitioning between Wenzel and Cassie modes. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -