This article discusses the optimization of portfolio stock selection using the Meta Goal Programming (MGP) model. The optimization problem of stock portfolio selection with the MGP model is solved by combining the weight of trust in each type of MGP and comparing it with the Goal Programming (GP) portfolio. The final result is in the form of the selection of five stocks which are designated as optimal portfolios. This new MGP portfolio produces a higher return value and a lower standard MGP portfolio deviation compared to the GP portfolio.
Published in | International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11 |
Page(s) | 33-39 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Goal Programming, Meta Goal Programming, Optimization, Portofolio, Stock
[1] | H. Babaei, M. Tootooni, K. Shahanaghi and A. Bakhsha, Lexicographic goal programming approach for portofolio optimization, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9 (2009), 63-75. |
[2] | S. Bahloul and F. Abid, A combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming approach to international portfolio selection in the presence of investment barriers, International Journal Multicriteria Decision Making, 3 (2013), 1-20. |
[3] | L. J. Bain and M. Engelhardt, Introduction to Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Duxbury, Pasific Grove, 1992. |
[4] | A. K. Bhargava, S. R. Singh and D. Bansal, Production planning using fuzzy meta goal programming model, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8 (2015), 34-42. |
[5] | J. P. Ignizio, Introduction to Linear Goal Programming, Sage Publication, California, 1985. |
[6] | D. Jones and M. Tamiz, A review of goal programming and its applications, Annals of Operations Research, 58 (1995), 39-53. |
[7] | D. Jones and M. Tamiz, Practical goal programming, Springer, London, 2010. |
[8] | F. Kucukbay and C. Araz, A comparison of fuzzy goal programming and linear physical programming, An International Journal of Optimization and Control, 6 (2016), 121-128. |
[9] | K. D. Lawrence, D. R. Pai and S. M. Lawrence, A multi criteria meta goal programming model based in morningstar sector grouping, Applications of Management Science, 17 (2015), 19-25. |
[10] | H. W. Lin, S. V. Nagalingam and G. C. I. Lin, Manufacturing decision-support using interactive meta goal programming, Australian Research, 2007, 331-341. |
[11] | H. Markowitz, Portofolio selection, The Journal of Finance, 7 (1952), 77-91. |
[12] | A. M. Parra, A. B. Terol and M. V. R. Uria, A fuzzy goal programming approach to portofolio selection, European Journal of Operational Research, 133 (2001), 287-297. |
[13] | H. Sakhari and M. Sabuohi, Application meta goal programming in agriculture case study Neyshabour city, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 26 (2012), 17. |
[14] | M. V. R. Uria, R. Caballero, F. Ruiz, and C. Romero, Meta goal programming, European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 422-429. |
[15] | M. R. T. Yazdi, S. Fallahpour, dan M. A. Moghaddam, Portfolio Selection using Meta Goal Programming and Extended Lexicographic Goal Programming, ResearchGate Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 591-612. |
[16] | M. R. T. Yazdi, S. Fallahpour, dan M. A. Moghaddam, Portfolio Selection using Meta Goal Programming, International Conference on Applied Research in Management and Accounting, 2016. |
APA Style
Eka Swastika Alwi Putri, Habibis Saleh, Moh Danil Hendry Gamal. (2019). Optimization of Portfolio Stock Selection with Meta Goal Programming. International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems, 5(2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11
ACS Style
Eka Swastika Alwi Putri; Habibis Saleh; Moh Danil Hendry Gamal. Optimization of Portfolio Stock Selection with Meta Goal Programming. Int. J. Manag. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 5(2), 33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11
AMA Style
Eka Swastika Alwi Putri, Habibis Saleh, Moh Danil Hendry Gamal. Optimization of Portfolio Stock Selection with Meta Goal Programming. Int J Manag Fuzzy Syst. 2019;5(2):33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11, author = {Eka Swastika Alwi Putri and Habibis Saleh and Moh Danil Hendry Gamal}, title = {Optimization of Portfolio Stock Selection with Meta Goal Programming}, journal = {International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {33-39}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmfs.20190502.11}, abstract = {This article discusses the optimization of portfolio stock selection using the Meta Goal Programming (MGP) model. The optimization problem of stock portfolio selection with the MGP model is solved by combining the weight of trust in each type of MGP and comparing it with the Goal Programming (GP) portfolio. The final result is in the form of the selection of five stocks which are designated as optimal portfolios. This new MGP portfolio produces a higher return value and a lower standard MGP portfolio deviation compared to the GP portfolio.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Optimization of Portfolio Stock Selection with Meta Goal Programming AU - Eka Swastika Alwi Putri AU - Habibis Saleh AU - Moh Danil Hendry Gamal Y1 - 2019/07/30 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11 T2 - International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems JF - International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems JO - International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems SP - 33 EP - 39 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-4947 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20190502.11 AB - This article discusses the optimization of portfolio stock selection using the Meta Goal Programming (MGP) model. The optimization problem of stock portfolio selection with the MGP model is solved by combining the weight of trust in each type of MGP and comparing it with the Goal Programming (GP) portfolio. The final result is in the form of the selection of five stocks which are designated as optimal portfolios. This new MGP portfolio produces a higher return value and a lower standard MGP portfolio deviation compared to the GP portfolio. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -