Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community

Osmundus John Mberwa; Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community

Osmundus John Mberwa, Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 4)

Received: 19 June 2022 Accepted: 20 July 2022 Published: 4 August 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The study aimed at investigating the socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider during cattle naming. The researchers decided to conduct the study in Haya speech community because it is in this community where people tend to bestow different names to cattle compared to other animals kept by Haya. Besides, the researchers wanted to investigate denotative and/or connotative meanings of the names bestowed to cattle. The study was guided by three theories, namely onomastics theory, semantic field theory and descriptive theory. Qualitative research approach was employed and the study was conducted at Bukoba district in Kagera region - Tanzania at Bujugo and Karabagaine wards. During data collection, interview and focus group discussions were employed where a total of 34 respondents were included in this study from four groups: cattle owners, Haya language experts, shepherds and people with knowledge in recitations. Snowball sampling was used to get the respondents. The total of seven socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider in cattle naming among the Haya were found. They include: colour of cattle, behaviour, structure and size of horn, origin/etymology of cattle, body size, sex of cattle, and structure of reproductive organs. The researchers conclude that, bestowing names to cattle, among other benefits, helps cattle owners to identify their cattle and it increases animal-human relationship.

Published in	International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
Page(s)	228-238
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

The Haya Speech Community, Cattle Naming, Naming, Name Giver, Haya, Socio-Cultural Factors, Cattle Naming Practice

References

[1]	Bertenshaw, C. & Rowlinson, P. (2009). Exploring Stock Manager’s Perceptions of the Human Animal Relationship on Dairy Farms and an Association with Milk Production Anthrozoo 22 (1) 59-69.
[2]	Boonpaisarnsatit, N. (2011). Names and Naming: Semiotic, Linguistic and Anthropological Perspectives. The Far Eastern University.
[3]	Borkfelt, S. (2011). What’s in a Name? Consequences of Naming Non-Human Animals. Aarhus University.
[4]	Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopaedia of language. Cambridge University Press.
[5]	Hoad, T. F. (1998). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins. Oxford University Press.
[6]	Kaarlenkaski, T. & Saarinen, K. (2012). Proper name or Number Sequence? The meanings and Changes of Naming Cows: TutkijainSeura.
[7]	Kimenyi, A. (2008). Cow Metaphors. California State University at Sacramento.
[8]	King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/
[9]	Malande, M. J. O. (2012). An Introduction to Language and Linguistic Theory: With insights from African Languages. Serengeti Educational Publishers (T) LTD.
[10]	Minelli, A., Ortall, G., & Sanga, G. (Eds.). (2005). Animal Names Venezia: Instituto Veneto diScienze. Lettere ed Art.
[11]	Molefe, L. (1992). An Analysis of the Praises of Domestic Animals (unpublished M. A. Thesis, University of Natal.
[12]	Mozer, M. C. (2011). Object Recognition: Theories. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Science.
[13]	Mphande, L. (2006). Naming and Linguistic Africanisms in African American Culture. Ohio State University.
[14]	Nilsen, A. P. (1996). Of Ladybugs and Billy Goats. What Animal Species Names Tell About Human Perceptions of Gender. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11, (4), 257-272.
[15]	Nordquist, R. (2019). What is Semantic Field Analysis? https://www.thoughtco.com/semantic-field-analysis-1691935
[16]	Olson, H. A. (2002). The power of name: Locating the limits of subject Representation in Libraries. Springer.
[17]	Oosthuizen, M. P. (1996). Uchibidolo: The Abundant Herds A Descriptive Study Of The Sanga Nguni Cattle Of The Zulu People With Special Reference To Colour-Pattern Terminology and Naming-Practice. University of Natal, Durban.
[18]	Resetar, D. & Radic, B. (2003). Animal Names Used in Addressing People in Serbian. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003) 1891-1902 https://www.scribd.com
[19]	Stevana Musica 24, 21000 Novi Sad Yugoslavia.
[20]	Tatiana, J. (2019). 75 Classic Cow Names. https://PetHelpful.com>farm-pets.cow-n.
[21]	The Citizen. (2013, August 27). Cattle in Burundi from Poetry to Milk Yields. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz
[22]	The United Kingdom (2006). A Guide to Names and Naming Practices. UK.
[23]	Thipa H. (1994). Sociolinguistics and Xhosa Names (Unpublished paper delivered at the 1st World Congress of African Linguistics, Univ. of Swaziland).
[24]	Turner N. S. (2000). Zulu Names and Indirect Expression: University of Durbin, Westville.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Osmundus John Mberwa, Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza. (2022). Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(4), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Osmundus John Mberwa; Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza. Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(4), 228-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Osmundus John Mberwa, Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza. Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community. Int J Lang Linguist. 2022;10(4):228-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12,
  author = {Osmundus John Mberwa and Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza},
  title = {Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {228-238},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221004.12},
  abstract = {The study aimed at investigating the socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider during cattle naming. The researchers decided to conduct the study in Haya speech community because it is in this community where people tend to bestow different names to cattle compared to other animals kept by Haya. Besides, the researchers wanted to investigate denotative and/or connotative meanings of the names bestowed to cattle. The study was guided by three theories, namely onomastics theory, semantic field theory and descriptive theory. Qualitative research approach was employed and the study was conducted at Bukoba district in Kagera region - Tanzania at Bujugo and Karabagaine wards. During data collection, interview and focus group discussions were employed where a total of 34 respondents were included in this study from four groups: cattle owners, Haya language experts, shepherds and people with knowledge in recitations. Snowball sampling was used to get the respondents. The total of seven socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider in cattle naming among the Haya were found. They include: colour of cattle, behaviour, structure and size of horn, origin/etymology of cattle, body size, sex of cattle, and structure of reproductive organs. The researchers conclude that, bestowing names to cattle, among other benefits, helps cattle owners to identify their cattle and it increases animal-human relationship.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community
AU  - Osmundus John Mberwa
AU  - Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza
Y1  - 2022/08/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 228
EP  - 238
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
AB  - The study aimed at investigating the socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider during cattle naming. The researchers decided to conduct the study in Haya speech community because it is in this community where people tend to bestow different names to cattle compared to other animals kept by Haya. Besides, the researchers wanted to investigate denotative and/or connotative meanings of the names bestowed to cattle. The study was guided by three theories, namely onomastics theory, semantic field theory and descriptive theory. Qualitative research approach was employed and the study was conducted at Bukoba district in Kagera region - Tanzania at Bujugo and Karabagaine wards. During data collection, interview and focus group discussions were employed where a total of 34 respondents were included in this study from four groups: cattle owners, Haya language experts, shepherds and people with knowledge in recitations. Snowball sampling was used to get the respondents. The total of seven socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider in cattle naming among the Haya were found. They include: colour of cattle, behaviour, structure and size of horn, origin/etymology of cattle, body size, sex of cattle, and structure of reproductive organs. The researchers conclude that, bestowing names to cattle, among other benefits, helps cattle owners to identify their cattle and it increases animal-human relationship.
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Osmundus John Mberwa

Department of Languages and Linguistics, St Augustine University of Tanzania, Mwanza, Tanzania
Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza

Department of Languages and Linguistics, St Augustine University of Tanzania, Mwanza, Tanzania

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Osmundus John Mberwa, Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza. (2022). Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(4), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Osmundus John Mberwa; Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza. Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2022, 10(4), 228-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Osmundus John Mberwa, Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza. Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community. Int J Lang Linguist. 2022;10(4):228-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12,
  author = {Osmundus John Mberwa and Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza},
  title = {Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {228-238},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20221004.12},
  abstract = {The study aimed at investigating the socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider during cattle naming. The researchers decided to conduct the study in Haya speech community because it is in this community where people tend to bestow different names to cattle compared to other animals kept by Haya. Besides, the researchers wanted to investigate denotative and/or connotative meanings of the names bestowed to cattle. The study was guided by three theories, namely onomastics theory, semantic field theory and descriptive theory. Qualitative research approach was employed and the study was conducted at Bukoba district in Kagera region - Tanzania at Bujugo and Karabagaine wards. During data collection, interview and focus group discussions were employed where a total of 34 respondents were included in this study from four groups: cattle owners, Haya language experts, shepherds and people with knowledge in recitations. Snowball sampling was used to get the respondents. The total of seven socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider in cattle naming among the Haya were found. They include: colour of cattle, behaviour, structure and size of horn, origin/etymology of cattle, body size, sex of cattle, and structure of reproductive organs. The researchers conclude that, bestowing names to cattle, among other benefits, helps cattle owners to identify their cattle and it increases animal-human relationship.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Influencing Cattle Naming in Haya Speech Community
AU  - Osmundus John Mberwa
AU  - Eustard Rutalemwa Tibategeza
Y1  - 2022/08/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 228
EP  - 238
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221004.12
AB  - The study aimed at investigating the socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider during cattle naming. The researchers decided to conduct the study in Haya speech community because it is in this community where people tend to bestow different names to cattle compared to other animals kept by Haya. Besides, the researchers wanted to investigate denotative and/or connotative meanings of the names bestowed to cattle. The study was guided by three theories, namely onomastics theory, semantic field theory and descriptive theory. Qualitative research approach was employed and the study was conducted at Bukoba district in Kagera region - Tanzania at Bujugo and Karabagaine wards. During data collection, interview and focus group discussions were employed where a total of 34 respondents were included in this study from four groups: cattle owners, Haya language experts, shepherds and people with knowledge in recitations. Snowball sampling was used to get the respondents. The total of seven socio-cultural factors that cattle name givers consider in cattle naming among the Haya were found. They include: colour of cattle, behaviour, structure and size of horn, origin/etymology of cattle, body size, sex of cattle, and structure of reproductive organs. The researchers conclude that, bestowing names to cattle, among other benefits, helps cattle owners to identify their cattle and it increases animal-human relationship.
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download