This paper explores the extent to which the Qur'anic discourse helps realize social variation from both a pragmatic and stylistic perspective. It theorizes that individuals coming from different functional and dysfunctional families often show a good degree of dissimilarities in their responses and behaviors. Thus, the paper aims to check whether these individual differences are reflected in the Noble Qur'an or not. It is also intended to examine mechanics of linguistic variability in the holy Script of Islam to mirror the various individual proclivities and tendencies. Data collection has been carried out through a concordance process in which certain key words in context (KWIC) related to kinship, such as brother, father, mother and clan, and family-resemblance categories, such as Jews, Christians, believers and Sabians, are listed in a corpus. The study applies a critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to the data collected. Therefore, it builds on Van Dijk's (1998) model of critical analysis at the syntactic, semantic and schematic levels. It has been found that the Qur'anic discourse mirrors variation among individuals from a stylistic, pragmatic and socio-pragmatic perspectives. Mechanics of linguistic variation in performance has included mainly shifting language styles and functions, re-ordering the relevant arguments in harmony with the context under discussion, qualifying speech to tell the truth and (accordingly) to address norms of polite address, and selecting certain figures of speech that help ideas to flow easily and beautifully.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14 |
Page(s) | 141-151 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pragma-stylistics, Socio-linguistic Variation, Semantics, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Arabic Syntax, The Qur'anic Discourse
[1] | Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. the MIT Press. |
[2] | Wales, K. (2014). A dictionary of stylistics. Routledge, P. 399. |
[3] | Levinson, S. C. (2001). Pragmatics. In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences: Vol. 17 (pp. 11948-11954). Pergamon. |
[4] | Kearns, K. (2000). Semantics. New York: St. Martin’s Press. |
[5] | Hickey, L. (Ed.). (2014). The Pragmatics of Style (RLE Linguistics B: Grammar). Routledge, p. 577. |
[6] | Black, E. (2005). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh University Press. |
[7] | Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Levinson, S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473 (7345), 79. |
[8] | Ning, C. (1993). The overt syntax of relativization and topicalization (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine). |
[9] | Geluykens, R., & Limberg, H. (2012). Gender variation, indirectness, and preference organization in threat responses. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 3. |
[10] | Schmitt, N. (editor: 2002) An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Hodder Education (pp. 74-91). |
[11] | Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (2011). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? International journal of epidemiology, 40 (3), 563-582. |
[12] | Vince, G. (2018). Evolution explains why we act differently online. Available at: www.bbc.com/future/story/20180403. [Accessed on 1/12/ 2018]. |
[13] | Fairclough, N. (2010). Language and power. Pearson Education. |
[14] | Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2013). The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction. Routledge. |
[15] | Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage. |
[16] | Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press. |
[17] | Rivkin, J. (2017). Literary theory: an anthology. John Wiley & Sons (p. 511). |
[18] | Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge. |
[19] | Kennedy, G. A. (2006). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. |
[20] | Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2017). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Routledge. |
APA Style
Sami Al-Heeh, Ghufran Ahmad. (2020). Mechanics of Sociolinguistic Variation and Pragma-stylistic Inclination in the Qur'anic Discourse. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 8(4), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14
ACS Style
Sami Al-Heeh; Ghufran Ahmad. Mechanics of Sociolinguistic Variation and Pragma-stylistic Inclination in the Qur'anic Discourse. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2020, 8(4), 141-151. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14
AMA Style
Sami Al-Heeh, Ghufran Ahmad. Mechanics of Sociolinguistic Variation and Pragma-stylistic Inclination in the Qur'anic Discourse. Int J Lang Linguist. 2020;8(4):141-151. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14, author = {Sami Al-Heeh and Ghufran Ahmad}, title = {Mechanics of Sociolinguistic Variation and Pragma-stylistic Inclination in the Qur'anic Discourse}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {8}, number = {4}, pages = {141-151}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20200804.14}, abstract = {This paper explores the extent to which the Qur'anic discourse helps realize social variation from both a pragmatic and stylistic perspective. It theorizes that individuals coming from different functional and dysfunctional families often show a good degree of dissimilarities in their responses and behaviors. Thus, the paper aims to check whether these individual differences are reflected in the Noble Qur'an or not. It is also intended to examine mechanics of linguistic variability in the holy Script of Islam to mirror the various individual proclivities and tendencies. Data collection has been carried out through a concordance process in which certain key words in context (KWIC) related to kinship, such as brother, father, mother and clan, and family-resemblance categories, such as Jews, Christians, believers and Sabians, are listed in a corpus. The study applies a critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to the data collected. Therefore, it builds on Van Dijk's (1998) model of critical analysis at the syntactic, semantic and schematic levels. It has been found that the Qur'anic discourse mirrors variation among individuals from a stylistic, pragmatic and socio-pragmatic perspectives. Mechanics of linguistic variation in performance has included mainly shifting language styles and functions, re-ordering the relevant arguments in harmony with the context under discussion, qualifying speech to tell the truth and (accordingly) to address norms of polite address, and selecting certain figures of speech that help ideas to flow easily and beautifully.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Mechanics of Sociolinguistic Variation and Pragma-stylistic Inclination in the Qur'anic Discourse AU - Sami Al-Heeh AU - Ghufran Ahmad Y1 - 2020/07/04 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 141 EP - 151 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.14 AB - This paper explores the extent to which the Qur'anic discourse helps realize social variation from both a pragmatic and stylistic perspective. It theorizes that individuals coming from different functional and dysfunctional families often show a good degree of dissimilarities in their responses and behaviors. Thus, the paper aims to check whether these individual differences are reflected in the Noble Qur'an or not. It is also intended to examine mechanics of linguistic variability in the holy Script of Islam to mirror the various individual proclivities and tendencies. Data collection has been carried out through a concordance process in which certain key words in context (KWIC) related to kinship, such as brother, father, mother and clan, and family-resemblance categories, such as Jews, Christians, believers and Sabians, are listed in a corpus. The study applies a critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to the data collected. Therefore, it builds on Van Dijk's (1998) model of critical analysis at the syntactic, semantic and schematic levels. It has been found that the Qur'anic discourse mirrors variation among individuals from a stylistic, pragmatic and socio-pragmatic perspectives. Mechanics of linguistic variation in performance has included mainly shifting language styles and functions, re-ordering the relevant arguments in harmony with the context under discussion, qualifying speech to tell the truth and (accordingly) to address norms of polite address, and selecting certain figures of speech that help ideas to flow easily and beautifully. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -