Linguistic imperialism is a controversial issue for its intricate nature and for its impact in a rapidly changing world. English is an imperialist language due to its growing stature in various domains around the world such as: formal education, media, world trade, diplomacy, etc. Hence, English is considered the lingua franca of the modern era, as the most preferred and widely used language in numerous global fields. English emerged as an imperialist language after the decline of minor languages and the dominance of the world imperialism. English as the language of technology and modernization lays its shadows on economics and politics, which affect the social, as well as the cultural identity of the world. English nowadays is significantly related to social and economic rise of people .Apparently, this rise is shown in the constant change of the norms of behavior, values, attitudes and beliefs, particularly among the young generations, as a result of their intensive exposure to English. Certainly, the significant impact of the global dominance of English manifests in constructing social inequalities between those who speak and use English and those who do not. The researcher of this study does not exclude what is called the hidden agenda aimed by the supper powers to reshape the global system through eliminating other cultures and identities and forming new ones. World efforts and procedures are required from scholars, governments and formal institutions to encounter such a phenomenon.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14 |
Page(s) | 61-68 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Linguistic Imperialism, Identity, Global, Dominance
[1] | Abbott, G. (1992) .Development, Education, and English language Teaching. ELT Journal 46/2: 172-178. |
[2] | Brown, D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education, San Francisco State University. |
[3] | Canagarajah, A.(1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[4] | Cohen, Robin. (1999).The Making of Ethnicity: A modest defense of primordia¬lism in: Mortimer, Edward (ed.). People, Nation & State. The Meaning of Ethnicity & Nationalism. London/New York: I.B. Tauris Publ, pp. 3-11. |
[5] | Corrigan, P. (2006).French-only laws Hurt Canadian life. The State News, October 4th, 2000 [Online] Available at: (Accessed August 10, 2006). |
[6] | Curtis, Mark (2004). Unpeople: Britain’s Secret Human Rights Abuses. London: Vintage. |
[7] | Crystal, D. (1997). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[8] | De Swaan, A. (1993). The Emergent World Language System: An introduction in: International Political Science Review, 14, 3, 219-226. |
[9] | De Swaan, A.(2005).Words of the World: The global language System. Cambridge, Polity Press. |
[10] | Eco, U.(1995). The Search for the Perfect Language, Oxford, Blackwell. |
[11] | Finch, A. E. (2000).A Formative Evaluation of Task-Based EFL Program for Korean University Students; Chapter 2 ‘The Situation’, Section 2.4.3, Unpublished PHD. Thesis, Manchester University, U.K. [Online] (Accessed). |
[12] | Friere, P. (1972).Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd. |
[13] | Graddole, D. and Goodman, S. (2002).Redesigning English: New texts, new identities, Rutledge. |
[14] | Hamel, R.E. (2006). The Development of Language Empire. In Ammon Urich. |
[15] | Holmes, J. (2001).An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Second Edition, Longman, Harlow. |
[16] | Kachrue, B.B. (1991). World Englishes and Applied Linguistics, in Tickoo, M.l (ed.). Languages and Standards: issues, attitudes, case studies, Anthology 26, Singapore, SEAMEO, Regional Language Centre. |
[17] | Krauss, N. (1992).The world's Language in Crisis. Language. Vol.68, no.1. |
[18] | Kennedy, C., Knowles, M., Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., Coulthard, M. (2001).Sociolinguistics, The University of Birmingham, Centre for English Language Studies, Department of English, Birmingham. |
[19] | Khubchandani, Lachman (1997). Revisualising boundaries. A plurilingualethos, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage. |
[20] | Mahant, Edelgard E. & Graeme S. Mount. (2001) .The U.S. Cultural Impact upon Canada. American Review of Canadian Studies. 31: 449-465. |
[21] | Maurais, Jacques, & Michael A. Morris.(2003).Languages in a Globalising World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[22] | McAndrew, Marie.(2010).Les majoritésfragilesetl’éducation. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal,. |
[23] | McMurtry, John.(2002). Value wars. The Global Market Versus the Life Economy. London: Pluto. |
[24] | Pattanayak, D.(1996). Change Language and Developing World, in Coleman H. and Cameron, L. (eds) Change and Language, Clevedon, BAAL, Multilingual Matters. |
[25] | Pilger, John .( 1998). Hidden Agendas. London: Vintage. |
[26] | Phillipson, R. ((1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford, Oxford University Press. |
[27] | Phillipson, R. (1997).Realities and Myths of Linguistic Imperialism, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,18/3,p.248. |
[28] | Rothkopf, David. (1997). In Phillipson, R. (1997).Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press. |
[29] | Schmid, Carol L. (2001). The politics of language. Conflict, identity and cultural pluralism in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[30] | Scollen, R. (2004). Teaching Language and Culture as Hegemonic Practice. Modern Language Journal,88,271-274. |
[31] | Spolsky, B.( 2004).Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[32] | Stiglitz, J.( 2002). Globalization and its Discontents. London, Penguin. |
[33] | Swales, J. (1993) .The English Language and its Teachers' thoughts: past, and present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[34] | Tully, M. (1997) .English: an advantage to India? ELT Journal 51/2: 157-164. |
[35] | Walker, R. (2001).International Intelligibility. English Teaching Professional, Issue 21, October. |
[36] | Wright, R. (2004). Stolen Continents: 500 Years of Conquest and Resistancein the Americas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. |
[37] | Wright, Sue(2004).Language Policy and language planning. From nationalism toglobalization. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Mc¬Millan. |
[38] | Zughoul, M.R. (2003).Globalization and EFL/ESL Pedagogy in the Arab World. Yarmik University, Jordan Journal of Language and Learning, Volume 1, Number 2,(Accessed on August 2, 2006). |
APA Style
Huda Kamal El-qassaby. (2015). Linguistic Imperialism and Reshaping the World's New Identity: A Research Paper in Linguistics. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14
ACS Style
Huda Kamal El-qassaby. Linguistic Imperialism and Reshaping the World's New Identity: A Research Paper in Linguistics. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2015, 3(2), 61-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14
AMA Style
Huda Kamal El-qassaby. Linguistic Imperialism and Reshaping the World's New Identity: A Research Paper in Linguistics. Int J Lang Linguist. 2015;3(2):61-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14, author = {Huda Kamal El-qassaby}, title = {Linguistic Imperialism and Reshaping the World's New Identity: A Research Paper in Linguistics}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {61-68}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20150302.14}, abstract = {Linguistic imperialism is a controversial issue for its intricate nature and for its impact in a rapidly changing world. English is an imperialist language due to its growing stature in various domains around the world such as: formal education, media, world trade, diplomacy, etc. Hence, English is considered the lingua franca of the modern era, as the most preferred and widely used language in numerous global fields. English emerged as an imperialist language after the decline of minor languages and the dominance of the world imperialism. English as the language of technology and modernization lays its shadows on economics and politics, which affect the social, as well as the cultural identity of the world. English nowadays is significantly related to social and economic rise of people .Apparently, this rise is shown in the constant change of the norms of behavior, values, attitudes and beliefs, particularly among the young generations, as a result of their intensive exposure to English. Certainly, the significant impact of the global dominance of English manifests in constructing social inequalities between those who speak and use English and those who do not. The researcher of this study does not exclude what is called the hidden agenda aimed by the supper powers to reshape the global system through eliminating other cultures and identities and forming new ones. World efforts and procedures are required from scholars, governments and formal institutions to encounter such a phenomenon.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Linguistic Imperialism and Reshaping the World's New Identity: A Research Paper in Linguistics AU - Huda Kamal El-qassaby Y1 - 2015/03/21 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 61 EP - 68 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150302.14 AB - Linguistic imperialism is a controversial issue for its intricate nature and for its impact in a rapidly changing world. English is an imperialist language due to its growing stature in various domains around the world such as: formal education, media, world trade, diplomacy, etc. Hence, English is considered the lingua franca of the modern era, as the most preferred and widely used language in numerous global fields. English emerged as an imperialist language after the decline of minor languages and the dominance of the world imperialism. English as the language of technology and modernization lays its shadows on economics and politics, which affect the social, as well as the cultural identity of the world. English nowadays is significantly related to social and economic rise of people .Apparently, this rise is shown in the constant change of the norms of behavior, values, attitudes and beliefs, particularly among the young generations, as a result of their intensive exposure to English. Certainly, the significant impact of the global dominance of English manifests in constructing social inequalities between those who speak and use English and those who do not. The researcher of this study does not exclude what is called the hidden agenda aimed by the supper powers to reshape the global system through eliminating other cultures and identities and forming new ones. World efforts and procedures are required from scholars, governments and formal institutions to encounter such a phenomenon. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -