The purpose of this study was to investigate how a learning environment went about for second language (L2) learning. Drawing on an ecological perspective, this work conceives an after-school program aimed for promoting a group of secondary-school students’ L2 learning as an ecosystem or a whole that was highly complex due to interrelated layers of any contextualized details. In this context, to understand how a group of L2 learners regulated their L2 learning strategies in the environment became a complexity issue. To take on this challenge, this study turned to activity theory in terms of semiotics of signs to transforming any contextualized details – drawn from observations over 12 lessons – into an interwoven set of ecosystem-wide characteristics found relevant to L2 learning. The research focused on a group of four secondary-school students in Hong Kong, in an after-school home environment over 12 lessons, examining a range of teaching-learning activities. Data consisted of videotaping and field notes during and after each class based on a participant perspective through observations. As a result, the L2 learning environment was on the one hand described to be one where meaning-making signs were diversified and interrelated while maintaining their informational dynamism. On the other hand, active engagement, guidance-oriented regulation and activity aims were also found to function together progressively for (1) reaching specific L2 meaning-making goals closer and closer and (2) increasing opportunities for making meaningful contributions to each other’s mental understanding in L2.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13 |
Page(s) | 54-69 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ecological Perspective, Activity Theory, Semiotics, Second Language Learning, Complexity Management, Ecosystem
[1] | Boer, N. I., Baalen, P. J., & Kumar, K. (2002). An activity theory approach for studying the situatedness of knowledge sharing. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved from www.hicss.hawaii.edu/HICSS_35/HICSSpapers/PDFdocuments/DTMKI01.pdf |
[2] | Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976). The experimental ecology of education. Educational Researcher, 5(9), 5–15. |
[3] | Bruner, J. S., & Sherwood, V. (1975). Peekaboo and the learning of rule structures. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. SyLantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[4] | Buell, J. G. (2002). COWS in the classroom: Technology introduction and teacher change through the lens of activity theory. Retrieved from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/meter/Documents/COWS_FollowUp.pdf |
[5] | Elleuch, N., Bellamine-Bensaoud, N., & Ben Ahmed, M. (2006). Designing educational systems for use: Case study of Tunisian primary schools. Information and Communication Technologies, 1(24-28), 66–71. |
[6] | Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-KonsultitOy. |
[7] | Engeström, Y. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[8] | Garner, M. (2004). Language: An ecological view. Bern: Peter Lang. |
[9] | Gay, G., &Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity centered design – An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable system. Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262072483chap1.pdf |
[10] | Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[11] | Li, Y. (2013). Three ESL students writing a policy paper assignment: An activity-analytic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 73–86. |
[12] | Peirce, C. S. (1992). Selected philosophical writings: Vol 1. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University PrPeirce, C. S. (1998). Selected Philosophical Writings: Vol 2. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. |
[13] | Peirce, C. S. (1998). Selected Philosophical Writings: Vol 2. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. |
[14] | Scalon, E., & Issroff, K. (2005). Activity theory and higher education: Evaluating learning technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 430–439. |
[15] | Thorne, S. L. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: Heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. In S. Herring & T. Erickson (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Thirty-third Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. New York: IEEE Press. Retrieved from http://language.la.psu.edu/~thorne/cmchicss33.html |
[16] | vanLier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman. |
[17] | vanLier, L. (2004). The ecological and semiotics of language learning: A Sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. |
[18] | vanLier, L. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 1 (1), 46—56. |
[19] | Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
[20] | Wiredu, G. O. (2004). Chapter 4: Learning as an activity. December. Retrieved from www.geocities.com/gowiredu/Theory. |
[21] | Wiredu, G. O. (2005). Mobile computing in work-integrated learning: Problems of remotely-distributed activities and technology use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/pdf/theses/wiredu.pdf. |
APA Style
Alan Wai Lun Lai. (2013). An Ecosystem-Wide Study of a Complex ESL Program through Activity Theory and Semiotics. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(2), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13
ACS Style
Alan Wai Lun Lai. An Ecosystem-Wide Study of a Complex ESL Program through Activity Theory and Semiotics. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2013, 1(2), 54-69. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13
AMA Style
Alan Wai Lun Lai. An Ecosystem-Wide Study of a Complex ESL Program through Activity Theory and Semiotics. Int J Lang Linguist. 2013;1(2):54-69. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13, author = {Alan Wai Lun Lai}, title = {An Ecosystem-Wide Study of a Complex ESL Program through Activity Theory and Semiotics}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {54-69}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20130102.13}, abstract = {The purpose of this study was to investigate how a learning environment went about for second language (L2) learning. Drawing on an ecological perspective, this work conceives an after-school program aimed for promoting a group of secondary-school students’ L2 learning as an ecosystem or a whole that was highly complex due to interrelated layers of any contextualized details. In this context, to understand how a group of L2 learners regulated their L2 learning strategies in the environment became a complexity issue. To take on this challenge, this study turned to activity theory in terms of semiotics of signs to transforming any contextualized details – drawn from observations over 12 lessons – into an interwoven set of ecosystem-wide characteristics found relevant to L2 learning. The research focused on a group of four secondary-school students in Hong Kong, in an after-school home environment over 12 lessons, examining a range of teaching-learning activities. Data consisted of videotaping and field notes during and after each class based on a participant perspective through observations. As a result, the L2 learning environment was on the one hand described to be one where meaning-making signs were diversified and interrelated while maintaining their informational dynamism. On the other hand, active engagement, guidance-oriented regulation and activity aims were also found to function together progressively for (1) reaching specific L2 meaning-making goals closer and closer and (2) increasing opportunities for making meaningful contributions to each other’s mental understanding in L2.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Ecosystem-Wide Study of a Complex ESL Program through Activity Theory and Semiotics AU - Alan Wai Lun Lai Y1 - 2013/08/10 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 54 EP - 69 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20130102.13 AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate how a learning environment went about for second language (L2) learning. Drawing on an ecological perspective, this work conceives an after-school program aimed for promoting a group of secondary-school students’ L2 learning as an ecosystem or a whole that was highly complex due to interrelated layers of any contextualized details. In this context, to understand how a group of L2 learners regulated their L2 learning strategies in the environment became a complexity issue. To take on this challenge, this study turned to activity theory in terms of semiotics of signs to transforming any contextualized details – drawn from observations over 12 lessons – into an interwoven set of ecosystem-wide characteristics found relevant to L2 learning. The research focused on a group of four secondary-school students in Hong Kong, in an after-school home environment over 12 lessons, examining a range of teaching-learning activities. Data consisted of videotaping and field notes during and after each class based on a participant perspective through observations. As a result, the L2 learning environment was on the one hand described to be one where meaning-making signs were diversified and interrelated while maintaining their informational dynamism. On the other hand, active engagement, guidance-oriented regulation and activity aims were also found to function together progressively for (1) reaching specific L2 meaning-making goals closer and closer and (2) increasing opportunities for making meaningful contributions to each other’s mental understanding in L2. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -