| Peer-Reviewed

Genetic Variability and Association Among Agronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Received: 29 March 2017     Accepted: 25 April 2017     Published: 11 November 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Field pea (Pisumsativum L.) is an annual herbaceous legume belonging to the family Fabaceae that adapted to cool moist climate with moderate temperature. The species P. sativumis dominant in Ethiopia even though wild and primitive forms are also known to exist in the high elevation of the country. No sufficient work has been done for understanding and describing the nature and extent of genetic variability on Field Pea. Thus use of genetic variability is suggested to alleviate the shortage of released varieties in Field pea. The studies of association characters solve the low yield of field pea in Ethiopia. Therefore, the present study was conducted to study genetic variability and association among agronomic characters of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes. The field experiment was conducted using 29 varieties and 7 accessions at Sinana Agricultural Research Centre during 2013/14 main growing season. Treatments were arranged in Simple Lattice design with two replications. The results obtained revealed that the mean squares of the genotypes were highly significant for most of the characters (p < 0.05) except for days to emergence, days to flowering, pods per plant, above ground biomass and harvest index implying that wide range of variability has been obtained for the traits studied. The genotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 2.91% for plant height to 37.9% for above ground biomass, while phenotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 6.28% for days to maturity to 62.6% for above ground biomass. The estimated broad sense heritability ranged from 6.9% for yield per plant to 93.0.0% for pod length. Correlation between different traits and seed yield indicated that there was marked positive and highly significant association of seed yield with days to emergence (rg=0.296**), days to maturity (rg=0.184**), seeds per pod (rg=0.325**) and harvest index (rg=0.341**) indicating the yield improvement perhaps be contributed to changes in these traits. The path analysis at phenotypic level revealed that maximum positive direct effect was exerted by 100 seed weight (1.754) followed by pod length (2.211) and days to emergence (2.056). These traits best contributing to yield variation that emphasis by breeders for future yield improvement of the crop. It can be conclude that Field pea yield can be successfully improved by studying genetic variability and its agronomic characters.

Published in International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 5, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11
Page(s) 63-75
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Genetic Advance, GCV, Heritability, PCV, Pisumsativum, Variability

References
[1] Ali, M. A., Nawad, N. N. Abbas, A. Zulkiffal, M. and Sajjad, M, 2009. Evaluation of selection criteria in Field pea (Pisumsativum L.) using correlation coefficients and path analysis. Australian Journal Crop Science 3(2): 65-70.
[2] Amare, G. and M. Adamu, 1994. Faba Bean and Field Pea Agronomy Research. In: Cool Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia, Tilaye, A. (Ed.). ICARDA., Alepo, Syria, pp: 199-227.
[3] Ambrose, M. J., Ellis T. H. N., Flavell, A. J., 2010. The genetic diversity and evolution of field pea (Pisum) studied by high throughput retrotransposon based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) marker analysis. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10(1): 44.
[4] Angaw, T. S. and W. Asnakew, 1994. Fertilizer Response Trials on High land Food Legumes. In: Cool-Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia, Asfaw, T. (Ed.). ICARDA. Alepo, Syria, pp: 279-292.
[5] Asfaw, T. D., Beyene and G. Tesfaye, 1994. Genetics and Breeding of Field Pea. In: Cool Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia, Asfaw, and T. (Ed.). ICARDA. Aleppo.
[6] Asfaw, Telaye, Tesfaye, Getachew and Beyene Demitsu (ed.). Cool-Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Proceeding of First National Cool-Season Food Legumes Review Conference, 16-20 December 1993, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[7] Allard, R. W, 1996. Principles of plant breeding, John wilky and sores inc, New York.
[8] Asnke Fikre and Getu Geletu, 2004. Breading field pea for wider adaptation. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Sponserd by ICARDA.
[9] Ben-Zeíev, N. and D. Zohary, 1973. Species relationship in the Genus Pisum. Israel Journalbotany 22: 73-91.
[10] Burton, G. W. and E. H. Devance, 1953. Estimation of heritability in tall Festuca (Festucaarudindces) from replicated colonial material Agronomy J. 45, 78-481.
[11] Burton. G. W, 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceediology of the 6th international grass congress 1: 277-283.
[12] Ceyan, E. Kahraman A., Ates, M. K., Karadas, S., 2012). Stability analysis on seed yield and its components in peas. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural sciences 18, 905-911.
[13] Cousin, R. A., Massager and A. Vingere, 1985. Breeding for Yield in Combining Peas. In: The Pea Crop: A Basis for Improvement, Hebbleth Waite, P. H., M. C. Heath., T. C. K. Dawkins (eds.). Butter worth, London, UK., pp: 115-129.
[14] Cochran., W. G. and G. M. Cox, 1957. Experimental Designs. 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, USA. Page: 648p.
[15] CSA, 2002. Agricultural Sample Survey 2000/01. Report on Area and Production of Crops Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season. Addis Ababa.
[16] CSA, 2008. Agricultural Sample Survey 2007/08. Report on Farm Management Practices. Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season. Addis Ababa. vol. III.
[17] CSA, 2009. Agricultural Sample Survey 2008/09. Report on Farm Management Practices. Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season. Addis Ababa. vol. III.
[18] CSA, 2010. Agricultural Sample Survey 2009/10 (2002 EC). Report on Area and Production of Crops Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season. Addis Ababa. vol. IV.
[19] CSA, 2011. Agricultural Sample Survey 2010/11 (2003 EC). Report on Area and Production of Crops Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season. Addis Ababa. vol. I.
[20] CSA, 2012. Crop production forecast sample survey. Report on area and production for major crops private peasant holdings, meher season. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[21] Demisew Tesfaye, 2010. Genetic gain in seed yield and Associated Traits of Early and Medium Maturing of Soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merrill]. An M Sc. Thesis presented to the School of Graduates Studies of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[22] Dewey, D. R and K. Lu, 1959. Acorrelation and path coefficient analysis on components of ceated wheat grass seed production. Agronomic Journal, 51; 515-518.
[23] Dereje Gorfu and Tesfaye Bashir, 1994. Pea Diseases in Ethiopia. pp. 317-327. In: Asfew, Telaye, Tesfye Getachew and Beyene Demitsu (eds.). Cool Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Proceeding of First Cool Season Food Legumes Review Conference, 16-20 December 1993, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[24] Duke, J. A., 1981. Hand book of legumes of world economic importance. Plenum Press, New York. p. 199-265.
[25] Ellis, T. H., N. Hofer J, Temmerman. Vaughan, G. M, Coyne, C. I, Hellenes R. p, 2011. Mendel 150 years on. Trends plant Sci. 16: 590-596.
[26] FAO, 1998. Recent developments in biotechnology as they relate to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, by C. Spillane. Background Study Paper 9. Rome.
[27] FAO, 1998. The State of World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
[28] FAOSTAT, 2012. Available Online: http://faostat,fao.org/September, 29, 2013.
[29] Girma, B., 2003. The state of grain marketing in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the EDRI/IFPRI, 2020 Network Policy Forum on Toward Sustainable Food Security in Ethiopia: Integrating the Agri-Food Chain, May 15-16, 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Gilbert, Z. Gardening in South Africa, C. Struik, Cape Town, 1983.
[30] Girma Taye, Yohannes Tilahun and Meaza Demissie, 2002. Design and Analysis of Field Experiments in Agriculture. Technical Manual No. 15. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp 63-71.
[31] Grafus (1994). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis studies in garden pea (Pisumsativum L.). Journal Agricultural Research 46(4): 333-340.
[32] ICARDA, 2011. International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria.
[33] Johnson, H, W., H, F. Robinson and R. E Comstock 1955 Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soy beans. Agronomy Journal, Society: 126-131.
[34] Johnson, H. W., H. F. Robinson and R, G, Cost tock, 1955. Genotypic and Phenotypic correlation Soya bean and their implication in Selection. Agronomy Journal v. 47: 477-483.
[35] Kalloo, G, 1988. Vegetables Breeding Vol. I. CRC press. inc. Bola Ration, Florida, 239P.
[36] Johnson, C. E and T. Hernadez, 1980. Heritability studies of early and total yield in field pea, Korti. SC 15: 280-285.
[37] Kebere Bezaweletaw, Ketema Belete and Prapa Sripichitt, 2006. Genetic Gain in yield potential and Associated Agronomic Traits in Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) Kasetsart Journal of Nature and Science. 40: 835-847.
[38] Kebede Tadesse, 2006. Temporal development of stem rust (Puccini a graminisf. sp. tritici ) and its effect on seed yield and protein contents of bread wheat in Bale, Ethiopia. An M Sc. Thesis presented to the School of Graduates Studies of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. 83p.
[39] Kemal Ali, Gemechu Keneni, Seid Ahmed, Malhotra, R. S., Beniwal, S. and Makkouk, K. (eds.). Food and Forage Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and prospects. Proceeding of the workshop on food and forage legumes 22-26, September, 2003. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo Syria.
[40] Keneni Abinasa, Amsalu Ayana and Geremew Bultosa, 2005. Genetic variability, heritability and traits association infield pea (pisumsativum) genotypes.
[41] Khan, T. N. Ramzan., A. Jillani., G. Mehamood. T, 2013. Morphological performance of peas (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes under Rain fed conditions of Potowar Region. J. Agric, Res., 51(10): 51-60.
[42] Manender Singh., S. Malik, Mukes Kumar., K. V. Singh., Sanjeev Kumar, Pavitra Devi, Vinuj Kumar, 2012. Studies of Variability, heritability and genetic advance in field pea (Pisumsativum L.) progressive Agriculture, 12(1); 219-222.
[43] Million, F., 2012. Variability, heritability and association o some morpho-agronomic traits in field pea (Pisumstivum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal. Biological. Science. 15: 358-366.
[44] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Mo ARD), 2006. Ministry of agriculture and rural development crop development department, crop variety register. Issue No. 9.
[45] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Mo ARD), 2010. Ministry of agriculture and rural development crop development department, crop variety register. Issue No. 19.
[46] Mulusew, F., Edossa, F., Tadele, T., and Teshome. L., 2009. Parametric stability analyses in field pea (Pisumsativum L.) under South Eastern Ethiopian Conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Science. 5 (2): 146-151.
[47] Mulusew, F., Tadele. T., Setegn. G., Bekele. H., 2010. Agronomic performance, disease reaction and yield stability of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) under South Eastern Ethiopian Conditions. Austraalian Journal Crops sciencces 4(4): 238- 246.
[48] Mussa Jarso, Tezera Wolabu and Gemechu Keneni, 2006. Review of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genetics and breeding research in Ethiopia. pp. 67-85.
[49] Nawab, N. N, Subhani, G. M, Mahmood K, Shakil Q, Saeed A (2009). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis studies in garden pea (Pisumsativum L.). Journal Agricultural Research 46(4): 333-340.
[50] Pandy and Tiwari. (1983) Variability, heritability and association of some morpho-agronomic traits in field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal Biological Science. 15: 358-366.
[51] Pan, Aaron D.; Jacobs, Bonnie F.; Herendeen, Patrick S. 2010. "Detarieaesensulato (Fabaceae) from the Late Oligocene (27.23 Ma) Guang River flora of north-western Ethiopia". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 163: 44-54.
[52] Ranjan, S., Kumar, M. and Pandey, S. S., 2006. Genetic variability in peas (Pisumsativum L.). Legume Research 29(4): 311-312.
[53] Pascal, 2004. "From pollen tubes to infection threads: Recruitment of Medicago floral pectic genes for symbiosis". The Plant Journal 39 (4): 587–98.
[54] Pesta, A., Titlow, A., Hansen, J., Berger, A., Furman, S., Luebbe, M., Erickson, G. and Jenkins, K. (2012). Effects of feeding field peas in combination with distiller grains plus soluble in finishing and growing diets on cattle performance and carcass characteristics. The Professional Animal Scientist 28(5): 534-540.
[55] Robertson. G. E., 1959. The sampling variance of genetic correlation coefficient Blo. 15; 469-485.
[56] Rasmusson, D. C and R, L Glass, 1967. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in peas crop Science 185-188.
[57] Rodino A. P., Hernandez-Nistal J., Hermida M., Santalla M., De Ron A. M. (2009). Sources of variation for sustainable field pea breeding. Euphytica 166: 95-107.
[58] Sentayehu Alamrew, 2009. Assessment of nutrient contents of different pea genotypes (Pisumsativum L.) in Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of health Science 19 (3): 187-192.
[59] Sarikamis, G., Yanmaz, R., Ermis, S., Bakir M., Yuksel C., 2010. Genetic characterization of pea (Pisumsativum) germplasm from Turkey using morphological and SSR markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 9: 591-600.
[60] Singh, B. D. 1990. Plant breeding principle and methods. Kalian publishers Ludhiana new. Delhi.
[61] Slinkard, A. E., G. Bascur and G. Hernandez-Bravo. 1994. Biotic and abiotic stresses of cool season food legumes in the western hemisphere. p. 195-203. In: F. J. Muehlbauer and W. J.
[62] Kaiser (eds.), Expanding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food Legumes. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[63] Santalla, M.; Amurrio, J. and De Ron, A. 2001. Food and feed potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetable pea germplasm. Canada Journal Plant Science. 8: 601-610.
[64] Singh. B. O, 1993 Plant breeding principles and methods. kalyani publishers Zudhlana. New Delhi.
[65] Singh, J. D. and Singh, I. P. 2004. Selection parameters for seed yield in field pea (Pisumsativum L.). National Journal Plant Improvement 6(1): 51-52.
[66] Singh, J. and Yadava, H. S., 2000. Factors determining seed yield in early generation of soybean. Crop Res. Hisar. 20: 239-243.
[67] Singh, B. O., 1990. plant breeding kalian, published new, Delli India 458P Toker, C. and Cagirgan,
[68] M. I., 2004. The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis in determining characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Hereditas.
[69] Singh, M. Kumar, B., and Singh, J. P. Genetic variability, Heritability and character Association in Dwarf Field pea (Pisumsativum L.), progressive Agriculture, 2007, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 102-104.
[70] Sharma, M. S., Rana, A., and Singh, Y. Genetic variability and Association studies for Green pod yield and component Horticultural Traits in Garden pea under High Hill Dry Temperature conditions, Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2007, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 410-414.
[71] Temene Temesgen, 2008. Genetic gain and morpho-agronomic basis of genetic improvement in seed yield potential achieved by faba bean breeding in Ethiopia. An M Sc. Thesis presented to the School of Graduates Studies of Hawasa University, Hawasa, Ethiopia. 83p.
[72] Teshome Legese, 2011. Genetic Gain in Grain Yield and yield related traits of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) in Ethiopia. An M Sc. Thesis presented to the School of Graduates Studies of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. pp. 45-57.
[73] Tesfaye G (1999). Genetic variability and association of characters in some Ethiopian field pea (Pisumsativum L.) germplasm. M. Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Ethiopia.
[74] Tezera W (2000). Genotype x Environment interaction in Field pea (Pisumsativum L.) for yield and other traits across central and southern Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Ethiopia.
[75] Togay, N., Y. Togay, B. Yildirin and Y. Dogan., 2008. Relationships between yield and some yield components in pea (Pisumsativumssparvense L.) genotypes by using correlation and path analysis. African Journal Biotechnology 7(23): 4285-4287. ISSN:
[76] Vander Maesen, L. J. G., W. J. Kaiser., G. A., Marx and M. Werede, 2011. Genetic basis for pulse crop improvement: collection, preservation, and genetic variation in relation to needed traits. In: R. J. Summerfield (ed.), World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[77] Valov, J. K. and Smart, I. P. 1926. Phylogeny and taxonomy study for field pea (Pisumsativum L.). National Journal Plant Improvement 6(1): 51-52.
[78] Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal Agricultural Research. 20: 557-585.
[79] Yasin Goa and Mathewos Ashamo. Evaluation of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes performance for yield and yield components at five growing environments of southern Ethiopia, Areka Agricultural Research Center, Areka, Ethiopia. Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 1(3), 65-76.
[80] Zakira. S., A. K. M., AIslam., M. K. Hasan Mitu and M. A. K. Milan, 2010. Genetic variability and character Association in Garden pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of science. Islamabad, Pakistan.
[81] Zohary, D. and Hopf, M. 1973. Domestication of pulses in the old world. Science.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Benti Ofga, Yohannis Petros. (2017). Genetic Variability and Association Among Agronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 5(6), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Benti Ofga; Yohannis Petros. Genetic Variability and Association Among Agronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2017, 5(6), 63-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Benti Ofga, Yohannis Petros. Genetic Variability and Association Among Agronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Int J Genet Genomics. 2017;5(6):63-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11,
      author = {Benti Ofga and Yohannis Petros},
      title = {Genetic Variability and Association Among Agronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics},
      volume = {5},
      number = {6},
      pages = {63-75},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20170506.11},
      abstract = {Field pea (Pisumsativum L.) is an annual herbaceous legume belonging to the family Fabaceae that adapted to cool moist climate with moderate temperature. The species P. sativumis dominant in Ethiopia even though wild and primitive forms are also known to exist in the high elevation of the country. No sufficient work has been done for understanding and describing the nature and extent of genetic variability on Field Pea. Thus use of genetic variability is suggested to alleviate the shortage of released varieties in Field pea. The studies of association characters solve the low yield of field pea in Ethiopia. Therefore, the present study was conducted to study genetic variability and association among agronomic characters of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes. The field experiment was conducted using 29 varieties and 7 accessions at Sinana Agricultural Research Centre during 2013/14 main growing season. Treatments were arranged in Simple Lattice design with two replications. The results obtained revealed that the mean squares of the genotypes were highly significant for most of the characters (p < 0.05) except for days to emergence, days to flowering, pods per plant, above ground biomass and harvest index implying that wide range of variability has been obtained for the traits studied. The genotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 2.91% for plant height to 37.9% for above ground biomass, while phenotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 6.28% for days to maturity to 62.6% for above ground biomass. The estimated broad sense heritability ranged from 6.9% for yield per plant to 93.0.0% for pod length. Correlation between different traits and seed yield indicated that there was marked positive and highly significant association of seed yield with days to emergence (rg=0.296**), days to maturity (rg=0.184**), seeds per pod (rg=0.325**) and harvest index (rg=0.341**) indicating the yield improvement perhaps be contributed to changes in these traits. The path analysis at phenotypic level revealed that maximum positive direct effect was exerted by 100 seed weight (1.754) followed by pod length (2.211) and days to emergence (2.056). These traits best contributing to yield variation that emphasis by breeders for future yield improvement of the crop. It can be conclude that Field pea yield can be successfully improved by studying genetic variability and its agronomic characters.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Genetic Variability and Association Among Agronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    AU  - Benti Ofga
    AU  - Yohannis Petros
    Y1  - 2017/11/11
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11
    T2  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    JF  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    JO  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
    SP  - 63
    EP  - 75
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7359
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20170506.11
    AB  - Field pea (Pisumsativum L.) is an annual herbaceous legume belonging to the family Fabaceae that adapted to cool moist climate with moderate temperature. The species P. sativumis dominant in Ethiopia even though wild and primitive forms are also known to exist in the high elevation of the country. No sufficient work has been done for understanding and describing the nature and extent of genetic variability on Field Pea. Thus use of genetic variability is suggested to alleviate the shortage of released varieties in Field pea. The studies of association characters solve the low yield of field pea in Ethiopia. Therefore, the present study was conducted to study genetic variability and association among agronomic characters of field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes. The field experiment was conducted using 29 varieties and 7 accessions at Sinana Agricultural Research Centre during 2013/14 main growing season. Treatments were arranged in Simple Lattice design with two replications. The results obtained revealed that the mean squares of the genotypes were highly significant for most of the characters (p < 0.05) except for days to emergence, days to flowering, pods per plant, above ground biomass and harvest index implying that wide range of variability has been obtained for the traits studied. The genotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 2.91% for plant height to 37.9% for above ground biomass, while phenotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 6.28% for days to maturity to 62.6% for above ground biomass. The estimated broad sense heritability ranged from 6.9% for yield per plant to 93.0.0% for pod length. Correlation between different traits and seed yield indicated that there was marked positive and highly significant association of seed yield with days to emergence (rg=0.296**), days to maturity (rg=0.184**), seeds per pod (rg=0.325**) and harvest index (rg=0.341**) indicating the yield improvement perhaps be contributed to changes in these traits. The path analysis at phenotypic level revealed that maximum positive direct effect was exerted by 100 seed weight (1.754) followed by pod length (2.211) and days to emergence (2.056). These traits best contributing to yield variation that emphasis by breeders for future yield improvement of the crop. It can be conclude that Field pea yield can be successfully improved by studying genetic variability and its agronomic characters.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Biology, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Department of Biology, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Sections