Functional jam from blends of banana, pineapple and watermelon pulp was produced and evaluated. The aim was to develop a locally but nutritionally rich, functional jam. Various blends of the fruit pulp were considered in order to select the best. The percentage compositions of the blends were 50:25:25; 25:50:25; 25:25:50 and 33.33:33.33:33.33 of banana, pineapple and watermelon pulps respectively. In addition to the pulp blends, 2.9% pectin produced from citrus peel was added together with citric acid, sodium benzoate and sugar. The entire mixture was heated at 110°C for 55 to enhance the viscosity of the blends. Proximate analyses, mineral analyses, brix, pH and Vitamin constituents of the sample were determined. The blend with the best result from the analyses was selected for rheological and sensory evaluations. The best blend was 25:25:50. The result of the proximate analyses of this best blend were 8.58% protein, 1.41% fibre, 0.38% ash, 3.92% fat, 2.52% moisture and 83.20% carbohydrate. The vitamin compositions were; 1.32 mg/100 g vitamin A, 8.22 mg/100 g vitamin C and 0.015 mg/100 g vitamin E. The pH was 4.16, viscosity 58.77 cp while the specific gravity was 1.016. The mineral compositions of the best blend were 0.34 ppm iron, 28.90 ppm sodium, 80.90 ppm potassium, 1.50 ppm calcium and 0.60 ppm magnesium.
| Published in | International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology (Volume 3, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12 |
| Page(s) | 7-14 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Jam, Functional, Watermelon, Minerals, Vitamins
| [1] | Awolu, O. O., Omoba, O. S., Olawoye, O., & Dairo, M. (2017). Optimization of production and quality evaluation of maize‐based snack supplemented with soybean and tiger‐nut (Cyperus esculenta) flour. Food science & nutrition, 5 (1), 3-13. |
| [2] | Awolu, O. O., Osemeke, R. O., & Ifesan, B. O. T. (2016). Antioxidant, functional and rheological properties of optimized composite flour, consisting wheat and amaranth seed, brewers’ spent grain and apple pomace. Journal of food science and technology, 53 (2), 1151-1163. |
| [3] | Ogundele, O., Awolu, O. O., Badejo, A. A., Nwachukwu, I. D., & Fagbemi, T. N. (2016). Development of functional beverages from blends of Hibiscus sabdariffa extract and selected fruit juices for optimal antioxidant properties. Food science & nutrition, 4 (5), 679-685. |
| [4] | Fila, W. A., Itam, E. H., Johnson, J. T., Odey, M. O., Effiong, E. E., Dasofunjo, K., Ambo, E. E (2013) Comparative Proximate Compositions of Watermelon, Squash, and Rambutan. International Journal of Science and Technology 2 (1). |
| [5] | Marjan Javanmard and Johari Endan (2010). A Survey on Rheological Properties of Fruit Jams. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, 1 (1): 31-37. |
| [6] | Ploetz, R. C., Kepler, A. K., Daniells, J. and Nelson, S. C. (2007). Banana and Plantain - An Overview with Emphasis on Pacific Island Cultivars. Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. (www. traditionaltree.org.), ver. 1. |
| [7] | Adejoro, M. A., Odubanjo, A. O. and Fagbola, B. O. (2010). Research Focus on Banana and Plantain (Musa Spp.) Nigerian Perspective. In: Dubois, F. (ed.). Proceedings on banana and plantain in Africa held at NIHORT, Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp 859-864. |
| [8] | George E. Boyhan, Darbie M. Granberry and W. Terry Kelley (2000). Commercial Watermelon Production. The University of Georgia. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U. S. Department of Agriculture cooperating, pp 1-32. |
| [9] | Adekunle, A. A., Fatunbi, A. O., Adisa, S. and Adeyemi, O. A. (2007). “Growing Watermelon Commercially in Nigeria: An illustrated guide”. USAID ICSNIGERIA and IITA. |
| [10] | Ackom N. B and K Tano-Debrah (2012). Processing Pineapple Pulp into Dietary Fibre Supplement. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 2 (6). |
| [11] | Othman O. C (2011). Physicochemical Characteristics and Levels of Inorganic Elements n Off-vine Ripened Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) fruits of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania KIST. Journal of Science and Technology, 1 (1): 23 – 30. |
| [12] | Barbara H. Ingham (2008). Making Jams, Jellies and Fruit Preserves. Wisconsin Safe Food Preservation Series. |
| [13] | AOAC (2000). Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Official Methods of Analysis 17th edition, Washington DC. |
| [14] | Awolu, O. O., Aderinola, T. A., & Adebayo, I. A. (2013). Physicochemical and rheological behavior of African Star apple (Chrysophyllum albidium) juice as affected by concentration and temperature variation. Journal of Food Processing and Technology, 4, 229. |
| [15] | AOAC, (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th Ed., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Md, USA. |
| [16] | Rattanathanalerk, M., Chiewchan, N., & Srichumpoung, W. (2005). Effect of thermal processing on the quality loss of pineapple juice. Journal of Food engineering, 66 (2), 259-265. |
| [17] | Eke-Ejiofor. J, Owuno. F. (2013). The Physico-chemical and Sensory Properties of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophilus) Jam. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 2 (3): 149-152. |
| [18] | Saka, J., Rapp, I., Akinnifesi, F., Ndolo, V. and Mhango, J. (2007). Physicochemical and Organoleptic characteristics of Uapacakirkiana, Strychnoscocculoides, Adansoniadigitata and Mangiferiaindica fruit products. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 42 (7): 836–841. |
| [19] | Ashaye, O. A. and Adeleke, T. O. (2009). Quality Attributes of Stored Roselle Jam. International Food Research Journal, 16: 363-371. |
| [20] | Ajenifujah-Solebo, S. O. and Aina, J. O. (2011). Physico-Chemical Properties and Sensory Evaluation of Jam Made from Black-Plum Fruit (Vitex Doniana). African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 11 (3). |
| [21] | Atef, A. M. Abou-Zaid, Nadia, I. Ibrahim, Mostafa T. Ramadan and A. Nadir (2013). Quality Evaluation of Sheets, Jam and Juice from Prickly Pear and Melon Blends. Life Science Journal; 10 (2): 200-208. |
| [22] | Franz Augstburger Franz, Jörn Berger, Udo Censkowsky, Petra Heid, Joachim Milz, Christine Streit (2001). Bananas Organic Farming in the Tropics and Subtropics. Naturlande. V, 2nd edition, pp 1-21. |
| [23] | Hanan M. K. E Youssef, Rasha M. A. Mousa (2012). Nutritional Assessment of Low Calorie Baladi Rose Petals Jams. Food and Public Health, 2 (6): 197-201. |
| [24] | Murray R. K., Granner D. K., Mayes P. A., Rodwell V. W., (2000). Harper’s Biochemistry, 25th Edition, McGraw-Hill, Health Profession Division, USA. |
| [25] | Soetan K. O., Olaiya C. O., and Oyewole O. E (2010). The Importance of Mineral Elements For Humans, Domestic Animals And Plants: A Review. African Journal of Food Science, 4 (5): 200-222. |
| [26] | Igual M., García-Martínez E., Camacho M. M., Martínez-Navarrete N. Vitamin Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Grapefruit Jams and Candies Obtained by Different Dehydration Methods. European Drying Conference – Euro Drying'2011 Palma. Balearic Island, Spain, 26-28 October, 2011. |
| [27] | Xu, G., Liu, D., Chen, J., Ye, X., Ma, Y., Shi, J. (2008). Juice Components and Antioxidant Capacity of Citrus Varieties Cultivated In China. Food Chemistry, 106: 545-551. |
| [28] | Annette Dickinson (2002). Recommended Intakes for Vitamins and Essential Minerals. from the Benefits of Nutritional Supplements, Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN). |
| [29] | Abdelazim A. M. Nour, Khalid S. M. Khalidand Gammaa A. M. Osman (2010). Suitability of some Sudanese Mango Varieties for Jam Making. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 2 (1): 17-23. |
APA Style
Olugbenga Olufemi Awolu, Grace Oluwaseun Okedele, Modupe Elizabeth Ojewumi, Funmilayo Grace Oseyemi. (2018). Functional Jam Production from Blends of Banana, Pineapple and Watermelon Pulp. International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 3(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12
ACS Style
Olugbenga Olufemi Awolu; Grace Oluwaseun Okedele; Modupe Elizabeth Ojewumi; Funmilayo Grace Oseyemi. Functional Jam Production from Blends of Banana, Pineapple and Watermelon Pulp. Int. J. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 3(1), 7-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12
AMA Style
Olugbenga Olufemi Awolu, Grace Oluwaseun Okedele, Modupe Elizabeth Ojewumi, Funmilayo Grace Oseyemi. Functional Jam Production from Blends of Banana, Pineapple and Watermelon Pulp. Int J Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018;3(1):7-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12,
author = {Olugbenga Olufemi Awolu and Grace Oluwaseun Okedele and Modupe Elizabeth Ojewumi and Funmilayo Grace Oseyemi},
title = {Functional Jam Production from Blends of Banana, Pineapple and Watermelon Pulp},
journal = {International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology},
volume = {3},
number = {1},
pages = {7-14},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfsb.20180301.12},
abstract = {Functional jam from blends of banana, pineapple and watermelon pulp was produced and evaluated. The aim was to develop a locally but nutritionally rich, functional jam. Various blends of the fruit pulp were considered in order to select the best. The percentage compositions of the blends were 50:25:25; 25:50:25; 25:25:50 and 33.33:33.33:33.33 of banana, pineapple and watermelon pulps respectively. In addition to the pulp blends, 2.9% pectin produced from citrus peel was added together with citric acid, sodium benzoate and sugar. The entire mixture was heated at 110°C for 55 to enhance the viscosity of the blends. Proximate analyses, mineral analyses, brix, pH and Vitamin constituents of the sample were determined. The blend with the best result from the analyses was selected for rheological and sensory evaluations. The best blend was 25:25:50. The result of the proximate analyses of this best blend were 8.58% protein, 1.41% fibre, 0.38% ash, 3.92% fat, 2.52% moisture and 83.20% carbohydrate. The vitamin compositions were; 1.32 mg/100 g vitamin A, 8.22 mg/100 g vitamin C and 0.015 mg/100 g vitamin E. The pH was 4.16, viscosity 58.77 cp while the specific gravity was 1.016. The mineral compositions of the best blend were 0.34 ppm iron, 28.90 ppm sodium, 80.90 ppm potassium, 1.50 ppm calcium and 0.60 ppm magnesium.},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Functional Jam Production from Blends of Banana, Pineapple and Watermelon Pulp AU - Olugbenga Olufemi Awolu AU - Grace Oluwaseun Okedele AU - Modupe Elizabeth Ojewumi AU - Funmilayo Grace Oseyemi Y1 - 2018/01/19 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12 T2 - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology JF - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology JO - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology SP - 7 EP - 14 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9643 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20180301.12 AB - Functional jam from blends of banana, pineapple and watermelon pulp was produced and evaluated. The aim was to develop a locally but nutritionally rich, functional jam. Various blends of the fruit pulp were considered in order to select the best. The percentage compositions of the blends were 50:25:25; 25:50:25; 25:25:50 and 33.33:33.33:33.33 of banana, pineapple and watermelon pulps respectively. In addition to the pulp blends, 2.9% pectin produced from citrus peel was added together with citric acid, sodium benzoate and sugar. The entire mixture was heated at 110°C for 55 to enhance the viscosity of the blends. Proximate analyses, mineral analyses, brix, pH and Vitamin constituents of the sample were determined. The blend with the best result from the analyses was selected for rheological and sensory evaluations. The best blend was 25:25:50. The result of the proximate analyses of this best blend were 8.58% protein, 1.41% fibre, 0.38% ash, 3.92% fat, 2.52% moisture and 83.20% carbohydrate. The vitamin compositions were; 1.32 mg/100 g vitamin A, 8.22 mg/100 g vitamin C and 0.015 mg/100 g vitamin E. The pH was 4.16, viscosity 58.77 cp while the specific gravity was 1.016. The mineral compositions of the best blend were 0.34 ppm iron, 28.90 ppm sodium, 80.90 ppm potassium, 1.50 ppm calcium and 0.60 ppm magnesium. VL - 3 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: