Preliminary studies of proximate composition, physical characteristics and sensory properties of bread formulated from blends of Soy protein isolate (SPI), High Quality Cassava Flour (HQCF) and wheat flour (WF) were carried out. Soy protein isolate and HQCF were used to replace wheat flour at 10, 15 and 20%. Proximate, physical characteristics were carried out using standard analytical procedures. The developed bread samples were subjected to sensory analyses using a 9- point Hedonic scale. Data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance ANOVA and means separated by Duncan Multiple Range test. Results showed that the 20% soy protein isolate fortified samples improved protein content of the bread sample (16.54%) than that of 15% fortified samples. It ranged from 4.69-16.54%. There was a significant increase in all the soy protein isolate fortified samples compared to the control sample that was not fortified with soy protein isolate. The soy protein fortified bread samples had higher loaf weights than the cassava bread. It ranged from 262.5g -287g, while a significant reduction (p<0.05) existed in the loaf volume and specific loaf volume of the soy fortified bread with increased level of soy protein isolate and cassava flour inclusion. It ranged from 600 -1000 cm3 and 2.23 -3.73cm3/g respectively. The mean sensory scores obtained revealed that all the fortified bread samples had acceptable loaf appearance, crust colour, crumb colour, texture and taste significantly comparable to those of non fortified bread. However, there was a slight significant difference in the overall acceptability of the fortified bread (6.80 and 6.40) to those of non fortified samples with the highest score of 7.13. Thus, composite blends of soy protein isolate and wheat flour up to 15% could be adopted as a means of supplementation without significant impairment of overall acceptability.
| Published in | International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11 |
| Page(s) | 38-42 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bread, Soy Protein Isolate (SPI), High Quality Cassava Flour (HQCF), Wheat Flour
| [1] | Riaz M (2006) Soy Application in Food. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. |
| [2] | El Gharras H (2009). Polyphenols: food sources, properties and applications – a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 44: 2512-2518. |
| [3] | Zhu D, Hettiarachchy N, Horax R, Chen P (2005). Isoflavone contents in germinated soybean seeds. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 60: 147-151. |
| [4] | Ibidapo Phebean Olubunmi, Kosoko Sulaimon Babatunde, Oluwole Oluwatoyin Bolanle, Saliu Olumide Seyioba, Latona-Tella Taiwo, Oloruntumise Ayodele Olukayode, Elemo Gloria Nwankego. (2015) Quality Evaluation of Fibre- Enriched Bread. Int. J of Nutri and Food Sci. Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 503-508. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150404.23. |
| [5] | De Conto L. C, R. S. P. Oliveira, L. G. P. Martin, Y. K. Chang, C. J. Steel (2012). Effects of the addition of microencapsulated omega-3 and rosemary extract on the technological and sensory quality of white pan bread. LWT, 45, 103-109. |
| [6] | Lin L, Liu H, Yu Y, Lin S, Mau J (2009). Quality and antioxidant property of buckwheat enhanced wheat bread. Food Chem., 37: 461-467. |
| [7] | Badifu, S. O., C. E. Chima, Y. I. Ajayi and A. F. Ogori, (2005). Influence of Mango Mesocarp flour supplement to Micronutrient; physical and organoleptic qualities of wheat-based bread. Nig. Food J., 23: 59-68. |
| [8] | Shittu T. A, Raji A. O and Sanni L. O (2007). Bread from composite cassava-wheat flour: I. Effect of baking time and temperature on some physical properties of bread loaf. Food Research International, 40: 280-290. |
| [9] | Bakke, A. and Vickers, Z. (2007). Consumer liking of refined and whole wheat breads. J. Food Sci. 72: S473-S480. |
| [10] | Jideani, V. and Onwubali, F. (2009). Optimisation of wheat-sprouted soybean flour bread using response surface methodology. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8: 6364-6373. |
| [11] | AACC (2000). Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. Inc. (10th ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota. |
| [12] | AOAC (2010). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th edition. Washington D. C. USA. |
| [13] | Iwe, M. O. (2010): Handbook of Sensory Methods and Analysis, 2nd Edition. Rojoint Communication Services, Enugu. Pp. 75-85. |
| [14] | Ihekoronye A. I and Ngoddy, P. O (1985). Integrated Food Science and Technology for the Tropics. 2 nd ed. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. London. |
| [15] | Agu, H. O., J. A. Ukonze and K. A. Paul, (2010). Quality characteristics of bread made from wheat and fluted pumpkin seed flour. Nig. Food J., 28: 188-198. |
| [16] | Okafor, J. N. C; Okafor G. I; Ozumba, A. U and. Elemo G. N (2012) Quality Characteristics of Bread Made from Wheat and Nigerian Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus plumonarius) Powder. Pak J of Nutri 11 (1): 5-10. |
| [17] | Tronsmo KM, Faergestad EM, Schofield JD, Magnus S (2003). Wheat protein quality in relation to baking performance evaluated by the Chorleywood bread process and a hearth bread baking test. Cereal Sci. 38: 205–215. |
| [18] | Tajul A. Yang; Feili R, Wahidu Zzaman, Wan Nadiah Wan Abdullah (2013): Physical and Sensory Analysis of High Fiber Bread Incorporated with Jackfruit Rind Flour. Food Sci and Tech 1 (2): 30-36, Horizon Research Publishing. |
| [19] | Narayana and M. S. Narasinga Rao, “Functional Properties of Raw and Heat Processed Winged Bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) Flour,” J of Food Sci, Vol. 47, No. 5, 1982, pp. 1534-1538. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb04976. |
| [20] | Kinsella J. E., “Functional Properties of Soy Proteins,” J of American Oil Chem Society, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1979, pp. 242-249. doi: 10.1007/BF02671468. |
| [21] | Serrem C, Kock H and Taylor J. (2011). Nutritional quality, sensory quality and consumer acceptability of sorghum and bread wheat biscuits fortified with defatted soy flour. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 46: 74-83. |
| [22] | Islam T, Chowdhury A, Islam M, Islam S (2007). Standardization of Bread Preparation from Soy Flour. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 2 (6): 15-20. |
| [23] | FAO⁄WHO⁄UNU Expert Consultation (1994). Food Nutrients Requirements, Report of a Joint FAO⁄WHO⁄UNU Expert Consultation. World Health Organization Technical Report Series 724. Geneva: WHO. |
| [24] | Ezeama CF (2007). Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Applications. Natural Prints Ltd. Lagos. |
| [25] | Mashayekh M, Mahmoodi MR, Enterazzi MH (2008). Effect of fortification of defatted soy flour on sensory and rheological properties of wheat bread. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol, 43: 1693-1698. |
| [26] | Singh R, Singh G, Chauhan GS (2000). Nutritional evaluation of soy fortified biscuits. J. Food Sci. Technol., 37: 162-164. |
| [27] | Awadelkareem AM, Mustafa AI, El Tinay AH (2008). Protein, mineral content and amino acid profile of sorghum flour as influenced by soybean protein concentrate supplementation. Pak. J. Nutr., 7: 475- 479. |
APA Style
Oluwatoyin Oluwole, Olubunmi Ibidapo, Olajumoke Odediran, Sulaimon Kosoko, Samuel Owolabi, et al. (2017). Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Soy Fortified Wheat-Cassava Composite Bread. International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2(2), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11
ACS Style
Oluwatoyin Oluwole; Olubunmi Ibidapo; Olajumoke Odediran; Sulaimon Kosoko; Samuel Owolabi, et al. Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Soy Fortified Wheat-Cassava Composite Bread. Int. J. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 2(2), 38-42. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11,
author = {Oluwatoyin Oluwole and Olubunmi Ibidapo and Olajumoke Odediran and Sulaimon Kosoko and Samuel Owolabi and Adetutu Adeyoju and Joy Onyibe and Deborah Ibekwe},
title = {Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Soy Fortified Wheat-Cassava Composite Bread},
journal = {International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {38-42},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfsb.20170202.11},
abstract = {Preliminary studies of proximate composition, physical characteristics and sensory properties of bread formulated from blends of Soy protein isolate (SPI), High Quality Cassava Flour (HQCF) and wheat flour (WF) were carried out. Soy protein isolate and HQCF were used to replace wheat flour at 10, 15 and 20%. Proximate, physical characteristics were carried out using standard analytical procedures. The developed bread samples were subjected to sensory analyses using a 9- point Hedonic scale. Data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance ANOVA and means separated by Duncan Multiple Range test. Results showed that the 20% soy protein isolate fortified samples improved protein content of the bread sample (16.54%) than that of 15% fortified samples. It ranged from 4.69-16.54%. There was a significant increase in all the soy protein isolate fortified samples compared to the control sample that was not fortified with soy protein isolate. The soy protein fortified bread samples had higher loaf weights than the cassava bread. It ranged from 262.5g -287g, while a significant reduction (p3 and 2.23 -3.73cm3/g respectively. The mean sensory scores obtained revealed that all the fortified bread samples had acceptable loaf appearance, crust colour, crumb colour, texture and taste significantly comparable to those of non fortified bread. However, there was a slight significant difference in the overall acceptability of the fortified bread (6.80 and 6.40) to those of non fortified samples with the highest score of 7.13. Thus, composite blends of soy protein isolate and wheat flour up to 15% could be adopted as a means of supplementation without significant impairment of overall acceptability.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Soy Fortified Wheat-Cassava Composite Bread AU - Oluwatoyin Oluwole AU - Olubunmi Ibidapo AU - Olajumoke Odediran AU - Sulaimon Kosoko AU - Samuel Owolabi AU - Adetutu Adeyoju AU - Joy Onyibe AU - Deborah Ibekwe Y1 - 2017/04/10 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11 T2 - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology JF - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology JO - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology SP - 38 EP - 42 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9643 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170202.11 AB - Preliminary studies of proximate composition, physical characteristics and sensory properties of bread formulated from blends of Soy protein isolate (SPI), High Quality Cassava Flour (HQCF) and wheat flour (WF) were carried out. Soy protein isolate and HQCF were used to replace wheat flour at 10, 15 and 20%. Proximate, physical characteristics were carried out using standard analytical procedures. The developed bread samples were subjected to sensory analyses using a 9- point Hedonic scale. Data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance ANOVA and means separated by Duncan Multiple Range test. Results showed that the 20% soy protein isolate fortified samples improved protein content of the bread sample (16.54%) than that of 15% fortified samples. It ranged from 4.69-16.54%. There was a significant increase in all the soy protein isolate fortified samples compared to the control sample that was not fortified with soy protein isolate. The soy protein fortified bread samples had higher loaf weights than the cassava bread. It ranged from 262.5g -287g, while a significant reduction (p3 and 2.23 -3.73cm3/g respectively. The mean sensory scores obtained revealed that all the fortified bread samples had acceptable loaf appearance, crust colour, crumb colour, texture and taste significantly comparable to those of non fortified bread. However, there was a slight significant difference in the overall acceptability of the fortified bread (6.80 and 6.40) to those of non fortified samples with the highest score of 7.13. Thus, composite blends of soy protein isolate and wheat flour up to 15% could be adopted as a means of supplementation without significant impairment of overall acceptability. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: