Adoption of technologies is vital to sustainable livelihood and socioeconomic development of rural households. The level of Adoption of introduced climate change adaptation strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria was assessed in this study. The study also investigated the factors influencing the adoption rate of the technologies with a view to identify the constraints vis-a-vis suggesting solutions for improving adoption. In an attempt to carry out the said objective, data were obtained through a structured questionnaire administered to 500 farmers within the study area. Descriptive statistics and multinational logit model were used to present the data and analyse the results. Result shows that gender, age educational level, number of plots access to extension services and credit facilities affect the adaptation rate of farmers to the technologies. Non adequate provision of extension services for follow-up activities may have accounted for the low adoption of the technologies. Therefore, for improved rate of adoption of technologies by farmers, agricultural extension services must be provided. Farmers are also encouraged to join farmers group for improved delivery of services by extension agents. Adequate provision of credit facilities must be provided relevant stakeholders and policy makers, targeting literate farmers, who are the major adopters of disseminated technologies for improved and sustainable food production.
Published in | International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11 |
Page(s) | 26-31 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Technology Adoption, Climate Change Adaptation, Improved Crop Yield, Farmers Coping Strategies
[1] | Adejuwon, JO. (2005). Food crop production in Nigeria: Present effects of climate variability, Climate Research, Inter-Research, Germany. |
[2] | Adimassu, Z, Kesser, A., Yirga, C. and Stroonidjer, L. (2013). Farmers’ perception of land degradation and their investment in land management. A case study in the central rift valley of Ethiopia. Environmental Management. 51 (5). |
[3] | Adesina, A A., Mbila, D., Nkamleu, GB., and Endamana, D. (2000). Economic analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southwest Cameroon. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 80: 255–265. |
[4] | Ayoade, JO. (2004): Introduction to Climatology for the Tropics. Spectrum Book Limited, Ibadan. |
[5] | Belay, TT. (2014). Factors influencing farmers’adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems, 110, pp 41-53. |
[6] | Birhanu, A. and Meseret, D. (2013). Structural soil and water conservation practices in Firta District, North western Ethiopia: An investigation on factors influencing continued use. 7552 (4), pp 114-121. |
[7] | Boko, MI. Niang, A. Nyong, C. Vogel and M. Medary (2007). Climate change 2007. Impact adaptation and vulnerability. African contribution of Working Group II to the 4th assessment report of the inter-governmental panel on climate change. |
[8] | Burke, MB., Lobell, DB. and Guarino, L. (2009). Shifts in African crop climates by 2050, and the implications for crop improvement. Global Environmental Change, 19, 317-325. |
[9] | Cramb, RA., Garcia, JM., Gerrits, RV., Saguiguit, GC. (2009). Small-hoder adoption of soil conservation technologies: evidence from upland projects in the Philippines. Land Degradation and Development 10 (5): 405–423. |
[10] | Desalew, M., Jaleta, M., and Mekuria, F. (2017). Technological forecasting and social change adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices in small holder sustems: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (3), pp 525-540. |
[11] | Duguma, B., Gockowski, J., and Bakala, J. (2001). Small-hoder cacao (Theobroma cacao Linn.) Cultivation in agroforestry systems of West and Central Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Agroforestry Systems 51: 177-188. |
[12] | Fischer, G., Shah, M. and VanVett (2002). Climate change and agricultural vulnerability. International Institute for Applied System Analysis. Report prepared under UN International Convent Agreement 1113 for world summit on sustainable development. Luxemburg, Austria. |
[13] | Greene, W. (2005). Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models. J Prod Anal 23, 7–32 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1. |
[14] | ICRISAT (2015). Nigeria and ICRISAT creating wealth through agricultural value chain. www.Icrisat.org |
[15] | Lobell, DB. and Burke, MB. (2008). Why are agricultural impacts on climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation. Env. Res. Lett. 3: 034007. |
[16] | Mani, M. Markandya, A. Viju, I. (2008). Policy and Institutional Reforms to Support Climate Change, Adaptation and Mitigation in Development Programs: A Practical Guide, Environment Department, Sustainable Development Network, The world Bank, DC. |
[17] | Meehl, GA., Washington, WM., Ammann, CM., Arblaster, JM., Wigley, TM. L and Tebaldi, C. (2004) Combinations of Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings in Twentieth-Century Climate. Journal of Climate 17, pp 3721-3727. |
[18] | Mendelson, R., Norhauds, WD., and Shaw, D. (2004). The impact of global warming on Agriculture; a Ricardian analysis. America Economic Rev 84 (4); 753-771. |
[19] | Meseret, D. (2013). From participation to adoption: Comparing the effectiveness of soil conservation program in the Peruvian Andes. Soil and Tillage Research, 173, pp 83-91. |
[20] | Mtega, P., Ngoepe, M. and Dube, L. (2016). Factors influencing access to agricultural knowledge: The case of smallholder rice farmers in Kilombero District, Tanzania South Africa Journal of Information Management. 18 (1). Pp 1-8. |
[21] | Odjugo, PAO. (2010). Quantifying the cost of climate change impact in Nigeria. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning 3 (6) pp 142–150. |
[22] | Okoye, AA. (1999). Factors Affecting Adoption Process by Farmers in Selected Local Government Areas of Anambra State, Journal of Agricultural Sociology of Nigeria,.7 (2), pp. 124-27. |
[23] | Oladele, O. I., Fawole, P. (2007): Farmers perception of the Relevance of Agricultural technologies in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Human resources and Ecology 21: 191-194. |
[24] | Rao, K. P., Verchot, L. V. and Joshi, L. M. (2007): Adaptation to climate change through sustainable management and development of agroforestry systems. J SAT Agric Res 4: 1–30. |
[25] | National Population Commission, NPC. (2006). Nigerian population census report 2006. |
[26] | Rogers, E. M., (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. |
[27] | Schmidhubar, J. and Tubiello, FN. (2007). Global food security under climate change. Proc. Nat. Acad. of Sci. USA 104 19703–19708. |
[28] | Wambura, R., Acker, D. and Mwasyete, K. (2012). Extension systems I Tanzania. Identifying gaps in research (Background papers for collaborative research workshop). https://docsgoogle/file/d/0B0k |
[29] | Yesuf, M., Di Falco, S., Deressa, T., Ringer,, C., and Kohlin, G. (2008). The impact of climate change and adaptation on food production in low-income countries; evidencies from Nile basin, Ethiopia. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) discussion paper, 00828. |
APA Style
Adetayo Adewale Olusola. (2022). Assessment of Adoption Rate of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 10(2), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11
ACS Style
Adetayo Adewale Olusola. Assessment of Adoption Rate of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2022, 10(2), 26-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11
AMA Style
Adetayo Adewale Olusola. Assessment of Adoption Rate of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2022;10(2):26-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11, author = {Adetayo Adewale Olusola}, title = {Assessment of Adoption Rate of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {26-31}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20221002.11}, abstract = {Adoption of technologies is vital to sustainable livelihood and socioeconomic development of rural households. The level of Adoption of introduced climate change adaptation strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria was assessed in this study. The study also investigated the factors influencing the adoption rate of the technologies with a view to identify the constraints vis-a-vis suggesting solutions for improving adoption. In an attempt to carry out the said objective, data were obtained through a structured questionnaire administered to 500 farmers within the study area. Descriptive statistics and multinational logit model were used to present the data and analyse the results. Result shows that gender, age educational level, number of plots access to extension services and credit facilities affect the adaptation rate of farmers to the technologies. Non adequate provision of extension services for follow-up activities may have accounted for the low adoption of the technologies. Therefore, for improved rate of adoption of technologies by farmers, agricultural extension services must be provided. Farmers are also encouraged to join farmers group for improved delivery of services by extension agents. Adequate provision of credit facilities must be provided relevant stakeholders and policy makers, targeting literate farmers, who are the major adopters of disseminated technologies for improved and sustainable food production.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Adoption Rate of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria AU - Adetayo Adewale Olusola Y1 - 2022/03/18 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11 T2 - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis JF - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis JO - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis SP - 26 EP - 31 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7667 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11 AB - Adoption of technologies is vital to sustainable livelihood and socioeconomic development of rural households. The level of Adoption of introduced climate change adaptation strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria was assessed in this study. The study also investigated the factors influencing the adoption rate of the technologies with a view to identify the constraints vis-a-vis suggesting solutions for improving adoption. In an attempt to carry out the said objective, data were obtained through a structured questionnaire administered to 500 farmers within the study area. Descriptive statistics and multinational logit model were used to present the data and analyse the results. Result shows that gender, age educational level, number of plots access to extension services and credit facilities affect the adaptation rate of farmers to the technologies. Non adequate provision of extension services for follow-up activities may have accounted for the low adoption of the technologies. Therefore, for improved rate of adoption of technologies by farmers, agricultural extension services must be provided. Farmers are also encouraged to join farmers group for improved delivery of services by extension agents. Adequate provision of credit facilities must be provided relevant stakeholders and policy makers, targeting literate farmers, who are the major adopters of disseminated technologies for improved and sustainable food production. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -