Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China

Xiaojing Chen

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

| Peer-Reviewed

Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China

Xiaojing Chen

Published in International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 3, Issue 5)

Received: 1 December 2015 Published: 1 December 2015

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In recent years, municipal solid waste management has bacame increasingly important in urban management, and waste classification is one of the very important parts in the waste management. Exactly how garbage classification and classification to what extent are the major problems in China to promote garbage classification and comprehensively promot policies faced. In this paper, we use life cycle assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) to assess the potential environmental impact of the four possible classification schemes, that source rough classification, the source of the general classification, the source detailed classification and fine classification source. Pudong New Area is in each case, and three indicators assessed: for the greenhouse effect (Global Warming, GW), acidified (Acidification) and eutrophication (Eutrophication). The results show that shame 3 is the optimal solution for the environment; followed by 2 and 4 programs; shame 1 is the worst environmental benefit program.

Published in	International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 3, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
Page(s)	347-350
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Municipal Solid Waste, Waste Classification, Life Cycle Assessment

References

[1]	蒋玉章.中国与发达国家垃圾分类开展情况分析[J].资源与环境,2012.10。
[2]	Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice by Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC). US-EPA, Contract NO.68-C02-067, 2006 May.
[3]	Wei Zhao, Ester van der Voet, Yu Zhang, et al., Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: Case study of Tianjin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407:1517-1526.
[4]	R.J.Hong, G.F.Wang, R.Z.Guo, et al..Life cycle assessment of BMT-based integrated municipal solid waste management: Case study in Pudong, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2006, 49:129-146.
[5]	Francesco Cherubini, Silvia Bargigli, Sergio Ulgiati. Life cycle assessment of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy, 2009, 34:2116-2123.
[6]	2013浦东新区废弃物管理年度报告。
[7]	王子彦,丁旭,周丹.中国城市生活垃圾分类回收问题研究—对日本城市垃圾分类经验的借鉴[J].东北大学学报,2008,10:501-504。
[8]	贺俏毅,陈松.加拿大城市生活垃圾分类经验对中国的启示[M].城市规划和科学发展.2009.9。
[9]	唐艳冬,杨玉川,王树堂等.借鉴国际经验推进中国农村生活垃圾管理[J].环境保护，2014，42（14）：70-73。
[10]	Changhong Chen, Cheng Huang, Qiguo Jing, et al.. On-road emission characteristics of heavy-duty diesel vehicles in Shanghai. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41:5334-5344.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Xiaojing Chen. (2015). Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 3(5), 347-350. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Xiaojing Chen. Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2015, 3(5), 347-350. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Xiaojing Chen. Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2015;3(5):347-350. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26,
  author = {Xiaojing Chen},
  title = {Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis},
  volume = {3},
  number = {5},
  pages = {347-350},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20150305.26},
  abstract = {In recent years, municipal solid waste management has bacame increasingly important in urban management, and waste classification is one of the very important parts in the waste management. Exactly how garbage classification and classification to what extent are the major problems in China to promote garbage classification and comprehensively promot policies faced. In this paper, we use life cycle assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) to assess the potential environmental impact of the four possible classification schemes, that source rough classification, the source of the general classification, the source detailed classification and fine classification source. Pudong New Area is in each case, and three indicators assessed: for the greenhouse effect (Global Warming, GW), acidified (Acidification) and eutrophication (Eutrophication). The results show that shame 3 is the optimal solution for the environment; followed by 2 and 4 programs; shame 1 is the worst environmental benefit program.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China
AU  - Xiaojing Chen
Y1  - 2015/12/01
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
SP  - 347
EP  - 350
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7667
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
AB  - In recent years, municipal solid waste management has bacame increasingly important in urban management, and waste classification is one of the very important parts in the waste management. Exactly how garbage classification and classification to what extent are the major problems in China to promote garbage classification and comprehensively promot policies faced. In this paper, we use life cycle assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) to assess the potential environmental impact of the four possible classification schemes, that source rough classification, the source of the general classification, the source detailed classification and fine classification source. Pudong New Area is in each case, and three indicators assessed: for the greenhouse effect (Global Warming, GW), acidified (Acidification) and eutrophication (Eutrophication). The results show that shame 3 is the optimal solution for the environment; followed by 2 and 4 programs; shame 1 is the worst environmental benefit program.
VL  - 3
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Xiaojing Chen

School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Xiaojing Chen. (2015). Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 3(5), 347-350. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Xiaojing Chen. Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2015, 3(5), 347-350. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Xiaojing Chen. Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2015;3(5):347-350. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26,
  author = {Xiaojing Chen},
  title = {Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis},
  volume = {3},
  number = {5},
  pages = {347-350},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20150305.26},
  abstract = {In recent years, municipal solid waste management has bacame increasingly important in urban management, and waste classification is one of the very important parts in the waste management. Exactly how garbage classification and classification to what extent are the major problems in China to promote garbage classification and comprehensively promot policies faced. In this paper, we use life cycle assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) to assess the potential environmental impact of the four possible classification schemes, that source rough classification, the source of the general classification, the source detailed classification and fine classification source. Pudong New Area is in each case, and three indicators assessed: for the greenhouse effect (Global Warming, GW), acidified (Acidification) and eutrophication (Eutrophication). The results show that shame 3 is the optimal solution for the environment; followed by 2 and 4 programs; shame 1 is the worst environmental benefit program.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Optimize the MSW Classification Schemes, Pudong, China
AU  - Xiaojing Chen
Y1  - 2015/12/01
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
SP  - 347
EP  - 350
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7667
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20150305.26
AB  - In recent years, municipal solid waste management has bacame increasingly important in urban management, and waste classification is one of the very important parts in the waste management. Exactly how garbage classification and classification to what extent are the major problems in China to promote garbage classification and comprehensively promot policies faced. In this paper, we use life cycle assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) to assess the potential environmental impact of the four possible classification schemes, that source rough classification, the source of the general classification, the source detailed classification and fine classification source. Pudong New Area is in each case, and three indicators assessed: for the greenhouse effect (Global Warming, GW), acidified (Acidification) and eutrophication (Eutrophication). The results show that shame 3 is the optimal solution for the environment; followed by 2 and 4 programs; shame 1 is the worst environmental benefit program.
VL  - 3
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download