Riparian habitats (RH) have been known for provision of essential service (Environmental conservation, scenic beauty and recreation) among others. In Kenya, these habitats are under pressure from human encroachment. Recently, the Kenya National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) demolished structures along RH to promote their health. The intervention could be rational with economic and environmental implications on RH protection, but empirical evidence is lacking. Therefore, understanding the role played by payment vehicle (PV) in valuation of welfare estimates could explain the observed behavior. Multistage sampling design was used to sample 774 households. Stochastic Payment Card (SPC) and Multiple Bound Discrete Choice Payment Card (MBDC) generated the data. Data were: - collected through interview schedule, analyzed using two stage random valuation model and processed with STATA. Tax exhibited a consistent and higher mean WTP value than Trust. Determinants (Age, Gender, Income, Necessity to protect RH (NPRH), Distance, Household size, Certainty of future incomes (CFI), Elicitation Format (EF) and PV significantly influenced WTP values. Standard deviations of WTP distributions were significantly influenced by (Distance, Education level, Age, EF, Change in PV, CFI, Household size, NPRH and Land ownership). Change in PV influenced welfare estimates at 1% significance level, thus rejection of overall null hypothesis (Changing the PV does not significantly affect individual welfare estimates towards RHP in Kenya). The Kenyan residents were willing to pay positive amounts for RHP and were supportive of the Tax fund given that it exhibited higher and consistent WTP estimates contrary to what is desirable in contingent valuation studies. Moreover, Tax as a PV worked well with SPC data generation format even though it overstated the WTP values, the estimates were consistent.
| Published in | International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11 |
| Page(s) | 75-86 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Contingent Valuation, Willingness to Pay, Stochastic Payment Card (SPC), Multiple Bound Discrete Choice Payment Card (MBDC), Payment Vehicle (PV), Tax, Trust
| [1] | Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P. and Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and How of it? Indian journal of medical specialties, Vol. 4 (2): 330-333. |
| [2] | Alberini, A., Boyle, K. and Welsh, M. P. (2003). Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and responses options allowing respondents to express uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 40–62. |
| [3] | Alberini, A., and Cooper, J. (2000). Application of the contingent valuation method in developing countries. Journal of Economic and Social Development 146: 7-22. |
| [4] | Barrena, J., Nahuelhual, L., Baez, A., Schiappacasse, I., Cerda, C. (2014). Valuing cultural ecosystem services: Agricultural heritage in Chiloe Island, Southern Chile. Journal of ecosystem services, Vol. 7 (2014), pp 66-75. |
| [5] | Braun, C., Rehdanz, K, Schmidt, U. (2016). Validity of Willingness to Pay Measures under Preference Uncertainty. PLoS ONE 11 (4): e0154078. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154078. |
| [6] | Broberg, T. and Brannlund, R. (2008). An alternative approach for analyzing multiple bounded WTP data - Certainty dependent payment card intervals. Journal of Resource and Energy Economics 30 (2008) 555–567. |
| [7] | Cameron, T. A. and Huppert, D. D. (1989). OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17: 230-246. |
| [8] | Campos, P., Capparos, A. Oviedo, J. (2007). Comparing Payment-Vehicle Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies for Recreational Use in Two protected Spanish Forests. Journal of leisure research. Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 60-85. |
| [9] | Carson, R. T., Florece. N. E., and Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Journal of environmental and resource economics vol. 19, pp. 173-210. |
| [10] | Colby, B. and Orr, P. (2005). Economic tradeoffs in preserving riparian habitat. Natural resources Journal vol. 45, Issue 1. |
| [11] | Constitution of Kenya, Article 69 (a) of 2010. Government Printer, Nairobi Kenya. |
| [12] | Cook, D., Eiríksdottir, K., Davíðsdottir, B., Kristofersson, D. M. (2018). The contingent valuation study of Heiðm€ork, Iceland: Willingness to pay for its preservation. Journal of environmental management vol. 209, pp 126-138. |
| [13] | CBS (2001). Economic Survey (2001). Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Nairobi, Kenya. |
| [14] | CBS (2019). Economic Survey (2001). Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Nairobi, Kenya. |
| [15] | Champ, P. A., and Bishop, R. C. (2006). Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicitation format? Journal of land economics, 82 (2), pp, 162–173. |
| [16] | Champ, P. A., and Bishop, R. C. (2001). Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19: 383–402, 2001. |
| [17] | Channel, O., Makhloufi, K., Abu-Zaineh, M. (2016). Can a circular payment card format effectively elicit preferences? Evidence from a survey on a mandatory health insurance scheme in Tunisia. Applied Health, equity and development research working paper No. 2/2016. |
| [18] | Cheryll, C. L., Teruyuki S., Yoshinori M. (2011). Island Villagers’ willingness to Work or Pay for Sustainability of a Marine Fishery Reserve: Case of San Miguel Island, Philippines. Journal of coastal management, 39: 5, 459-477. |
| [19] | Cristeche, E. R., Tello, D. S., de Prada, J. D. and Brescia, V. (2015). Contingent Valuation with Multiple Bounded Format and Uncertainty Response of a Rural Land Zoning Program in the South of Córdoba Province, Argentina. A paper presented to the international conference of agricultural economists held on 8th August, 2015 in Milan Italy. |
| [20] | Daly, C. A. K., Fraser, G. and Snowball, J. D. (2015). Willingness to pay for marine-based tourism in the Ponta do Ouro Partial Marine Reserve, Mozambique. African Journal of Marine Science, 37 (1), pp. 33-40, DOI: 10.2989/1814232X.2015.1012556. |
| [21] | Ebeto, C., (2017). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal. Vol. 5 (6). |
| [22] | Evans, M. F., Flores, N. E. and K. J. Boyle, (2003), ‘Multiple Bounded Uncertainty Choice Data as Probabilistic Intentions’. Land Economics, Vol. 79, Issue. 4, pp 549-60. |
| [23] | Fonta, W. M., Ichoku, H. E., Ogujiuba, K. K. (2011). Estimating willingness to pay with the stochastic payment card design: further evidence from rural Cameroon. Environ Dev Sustain (2010) 12: 179–193. DOI 10.1007/s10668-009-9188-1. |
| [24] | Gobbens, R. J. J. and Van Assen M. A. L. (2018). Associations of environmental factors with quality of life in older adults. The genontological society of America vol. 58, No. 1, pp 101-110. |
| [25] | Huhtala, A. (2004). What Price Recreation in Finland. A Contingent Valuation Study of Non-Market Benefits of Public Outdoor Recreation Areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 36 (1), pp. 23-44, DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2004.11950009. |
| [26] | Hung, L. T., Loomis, J. B., and Thinh, V. T. (2007). Comparing Money and Labour Payment in Contingent Valuation: The Case of Forest Fire Prevention In Vietnamese Context. Journal of International Development, 19, 173–185 (2007). |
| [27] | Ichoku, H. E., Fonta, W. M., Kedir, A. (2009). Measuring individuals’ valuation distributions using a stochastic payment card approach: application to solid waste management in Nigeria. Journal of Environ Dev Sustain, 11: 509–521. DOI 10.1007/s10668-007-9127-y. |
| [28] | IMF (2020). Regional economic outlook. Middle east and central Asia. International Monetary Fund, Publication Services P. O. Box 92780, Washington, DC 20090, USA Tel.: (202) 623-7430 Fax: (202) 623-7201. |
| [29] | Johnson, R. R., and Carothers, S. W. (1982). Riparian Habitats and Recreation: Interrelationships and Impacts in the Southwest and Rocky Mountain Region. Eisenhower Consortium Bulletin 12. |
| [30] | Kenya, Republic of. (2002a). Water Act 2002: Laws of Kenya. Nairobi: Government Printer. |
| [31] | Kumar, S., Mirajkar, P. P., Singh, Y. P., and Singh, R. (2011). Analysis of Willingness to Pay for Veterinary Services of the Livestock owners of Sangli District of Maharastra. Agricultural Economics Research Review Vol. 24, pp 149-153. |
| [32] | KNBS (2019). Population and Housing Census, Bungoma County projections. Nairobi, Government Printers, Kenya. |
| [33] | Kreye, M. M., Adams, D. C., Escobedo, F. J., and Soto, J. R. (2016). “Does policy process influence public values for forest-water resource protection in Florida?” Ecol. Econ., 129, 122–131. |
| [34] | Lamsal, P., Atreya, K., Pant K. P. and Kumar, L. (2015). An analysis of willingness to pay for community-based conservation activities at the Ghodaghodi Lake Complex, Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 11: 4, 341-348, DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2015.1055338. |
| [35] | Lewis, S. E., Popp, J. S., English, L. A., Odetola, T. O. (2017). Willingness to pay for riparian zones in Ozark watershed. Journal of water resource planning and management, Vol. 143 (5); 04017006. |
| [36] | Matunda, J. M. (2015). Sustainable Management of Riparian Areas in Kenya: A Critique of the inadequacy of the Legislative Framework Governing the Protection of Sustainable Management of Riparian Zones in Kenya. A Dissertation Submitted to the School of Law, University of Nairobi in Partial fulfillment of Requirements For the Award of A Master Of Laws Degree (Llm) Environmental Law. |
| [37] | Muketha, S. M. (2014). Riparian zone conservation in a changing urban land use environment: a case of Nairobi River basin, Kenya. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Nairobi, Department of Urban and Regional Planning School of Built Environment. |
| [38] | Messerk, K. D., Poe, GL., Schulze, W. D. (2008). The value of private risk versus the value of public risk: an experimental analysis of the Johannsson et al. conjecture. WP 2008-13 June 2008. Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-7801 USA. |
| [39] | Musharaf A. T., Mark J. K., and Roy, B. (2018). Accounting for implicit and explicit payment vehicles in a discrete choice experiment. Journal of environmental economics and policy, 2018. |
| [40] | National Research Council (NRC), (2002). Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management. National academy press, Washington, DC, U.S.A. https://doi.org/10.17226/10327. |
| [41] | Neupane, D., Kunwar, S., Bohara, A. K., Risch, T. S., Johnson, R. L. (2017). Willingness to pay for mitigatigating human elephant conflict by residents of Nepal. Journal of nature conservation, Vol. 36. pp 65-76. |
| [42] | Nicosia, K., et al. (2014). “Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed: A ninth grade investigation.” Ecol. Econ., 104, 145–151. |
| [43] | Ndambiri, H., Brouwer, R. and Mungatana, E. (2017). Scope effects of respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation, evidence from motorized emission reduction. in the city of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of environmental planning and management, DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1140024. |
| [44] | Ndambiri, H., Brouwer, R. and Mungatana, E. (2016). Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of environment and development economics, Vol. 21 (5). |
| [45] | Ndambiri, H., Brouwer, R. and Mungatana, E. (2015). Stated preferences for improved air quality management in the city of Nairobi, Kenya. European journal of applied economics, vol 12 (2), pp. 16-26. |
| [46] | Pate, J., and Loomis, J. (1997). The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Journal of Ecological Economics 20 (1997), pp 199 -207. |
| [47] | Qureshi, M. E and Harrison, S. (2002). Economic Instruments and Regulatory Approaches in Implementing Riparian Revegetation Options: Observations of the Queensland System. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 9: 2, 89-98, DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2002.10648547. |
| [48] | Ryan, R. L., Erickson, D. L., and Young, R. De. (2003). Farmers' Motivations for Adopting Conservation Practices along Riparian Zones in a Mid-Western Agricultural Watershed, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46: 1, 19-37, DOI: 10.1080/713676702. |
| [49] | Schismenos, S., Zaimes, G. N., Iakovoglou, V. and Emmanouloudis, D. (2018). Environmental sustainability and ecotourism of riparian and deltaic ecosystems: opportunities for rural Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, Greece, International Journal of Environmental Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2018.1510579. |
| [50] | Spindler, C., Dehnavi, J., and Wirl, F. (2018). Individuals' valuation of a publicly provided private good evidence from a field study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2018.1509734. |
| [51] | Svenningsen, L. S., Jacobsen, J. B. (2018). Testing the effect of changes in elicitation format, payment vehicle and bid range on the hypothetical bias for moral goods. Journal of Choice Modelling (2018), DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.08.001. |
| [52] | Vossler, C. A. and Poe, G. L. (2005). Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bid and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty: a comment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 197–200. |
| [53] | Vossler, C. A., Poe, G. L., Welsh, M. P. and Ethier, R. G. (2004). Bid Design Effects in Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 401–418, 2004. |
| [54] | Vossler, C. A., (2003). Multiple bounded discrete choice contingent valuation: parametric and nonparametric welfare estimation and a comparison to the payment card. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38867/ MPRA Paper No. 38867, posted 18 May 2012 12: 47 UTC. |
| [55] | Wang, H. and Jie, H. (2010). Estimating individual valuation distributions with multiple bounded discrete choice data', Applied Economics, First published on: 13 July 2010. To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00036840903299789. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840903299789. |
| [56] | Wang, H. and Whittington, D. (2005). Measuring individuals’ valuation distributions using a stochastic payment card approach, Journal of Ecological Economics, 55, 143–54. |
| [57] | Wang, H. (1997). Treatment of ‘don’t-know’ responses in contingent valuation surveys: a random valuation model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 219–32. |
| [58] | Water Act No. 43 of 2016 of the laws of Kenya, Environmental laws of Kenya. Kenya government press, Nairobi Kenya. |
| [59] | Welsh, M. and G. L. Poe (1998). Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, pp. 170-185. |
| [60] | Wiser, R. H. (2007). "Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles." Ecological Economics 62 (3–4): 419-432. |
| [61] | Zainudin, N., NurNaddia, N., and Halima, B. S. (2016). Survey Designing for Contingent Valuation Studies. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Economics & Banking 2016 (2nd ICEB) 24th – 25th May 2016, e-ISBN: 978-967-0850-40-5. |
| [62] | Zhong, H., Qing, P., and Hu, W. (2016). Farmers' willingness to participate in best management practices in Kentucky. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59: 6, pp 1015-1039. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1052379. |
APA Style
Esther Machana Magembe, Hilary Kabiru Ndambiri, Jared Isaboke Mose. (2022). Evaluating the Role of Payment Vehicles in the Non-market Valuation of Riparian Habitat Protection in Kenya. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 7(4), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11
ACS Style
Esther Machana Magembe; Hilary Kabiru Ndambiri; Jared Isaboke Mose. Evaluating the Role of Payment Vehicles in the Non-market Valuation of Riparian Habitat Protection in Kenya. Int. J. Econ. Energy Environ. 2022, 7(4), 75-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11,
author = {Esther Machana Magembe and Hilary Kabiru Ndambiri and Jared Isaboke Mose},
title = {Evaluating the Role of Payment Vehicles in the Non-market Valuation of Riparian Habitat Protection in Kenya},
journal = {International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment},
volume = {7},
number = {4},
pages = {75-86},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeee.20220704.11},
abstract = {Riparian habitats (RH) have been known for provision of essential service (Environmental conservation, scenic beauty and recreation) among others. In Kenya, these habitats are under pressure from human encroachment. Recently, the Kenya National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) demolished structures along RH to promote their health. The intervention could be rational with economic and environmental implications on RH protection, but empirical evidence is lacking. Therefore, understanding the role played by payment vehicle (PV) in valuation of welfare estimates could explain the observed behavior. Multistage sampling design was used to sample 774 households. Stochastic Payment Card (SPC) and Multiple Bound Discrete Choice Payment Card (MBDC) generated the data. Data were: - collected through interview schedule, analyzed using two stage random valuation model and processed with STATA. Tax exhibited a consistent and higher mean WTP value than Trust. Determinants (Age, Gender, Income, Necessity to protect RH (NPRH), Distance, Household size, Certainty of future incomes (CFI), Elicitation Format (EF) and PV significantly influenced WTP values. Standard deviations of WTP distributions were significantly influenced by (Distance, Education level, Age, EF, Change in PV, CFI, Household size, NPRH and Land ownership). Change in PV influenced welfare estimates at 1% significance level, thus rejection of overall null hypothesis (Changing the PV does not significantly affect individual welfare estimates towards RHP in Kenya). The Kenyan residents were willing to pay positive amounts for RHP and were supportive of the Tax fund given that it exhibited higher and consistent WTP estimates contrary to what is desirable in contingent valuation studies. Moreover, Tax as a PV worked well with SPC data generation format even though it overstated the WTP values, the estimates were consistent.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating the Role of Payment Vehicles in the Non-market Valuation of Riparian Habitat Protection in Kenya AU - Esther Machana Magembe AU - Hilary Kabiru Ndambiri AU - Jared Isaboke Mose Y1 - 2022/07/13 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11 T2 - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment JF - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment JO - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment SP - 75 EP - 86 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5021 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20220704.11 AB - Riparian habitats (RH) have been known for provision of essential service (Environmental conservation, scenic beauty and recreation) among others. In Kenya, these habitats are under pressure from human encroachment. Recently, the Kenya National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) demolished structures along RH to promote their health. The intervention could be rational with economic and environmental implications on RH protection, but empirical evidence is lacking. Therefore, understanding the role played by payment vehicle (PV) in valuation of welfare estimates could explain the observed behavior. Multistage sampling design was used to sample 774 households. Stochastic Payment Card (SPC) and Multiple Bound Discrete Choice Payment Card (MBDC) generated the data. Data were: - collected through interview schedule, analyzed using two stage random valuation model and processed with STATA. Tax exhibited a consistent and higher mean WTP value than Trust. Determinants (Age, Gender, Income, Necessity to protect RH (NPRH), Distance, Household size, Certainty of future incomes (CFI), Elicitation Format (EF) and PV significantly influenced WTP values. Standard deviations of WTP distributions were significantly influenced by (Distance, Education level, Age, EF, Change in PV, CFI, Household size, NPRH and Land ownership). Change in PV influenced welfare estimates at 1% significance level, thus rejection of overall null hypothesis (Changing the PV does not significantly affect individual welfare estimates towards RHP in Kenya). The Kenyan residents were willing to pay positive amounts for RHP and were supportive of the Tax fund given that it exhibited higher and consistent WTP estimates contrary to what is desirable in contingent valuation studies. Moreover, Tax as a PV worked well with SPC data generation format even though it overstated the WTP values, the estimates were consistent. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: