Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Role of the Concepts of «Smart Specialization» and «Open Innovation» in Stimulating the Advanced Development of the Manufacturing Sector in the Russian Federation

Received: 11 July 2026     Accepted: 23 September 2026     Published: 9 October 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to develop a model of innovation development, the "open innovator," with the definition of framework conditions, the role, and the place of the "open innovator" in this model, based on a combination of linear and nonlinear models of innovation development. The author's model of innovation development, the "open innovator," is based on the "triple helix" model with the addition of the "fifth helix." The formation of measures to implement mechanisms ensuring the advanced development of the scientific and technical potential of Russia's manufacturing industries, based on the principles of the concept of "smart specialization," is carried out within the "open innovator" model of innovation development. The methodological basis of the study is the "open innovator" model of innovation development, based on a combination of linear and non-linear models of innovation development, with the definition of framework conditions, the role, and the place of the "open innovator," and the concept of smart specialization. The methods used include analysis of scientific literature, the vector method for calculating the value and purposefulness of achieving management goals, and the systematization of activities based on the analysis of the national normative framework. Measures have been developed to implement mechanisms that ensure the accelerated development of the scientific and technical potential of Russia's manufacturing industries, both from the perspective of the industrial system and from the perspective of the innovator, within the framework of the "open innovator" model of innovation-driven development.

Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 14, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11
Page(s) 105-112
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Innovation Development Model, Innovation Model, Model of Innovation Development, Open Innovator, Manufacturing Industries, Manufacturing

1. Introduction
The study of the role of innovation as a factor of economic growth, the development of new models, and the evolution of existing models of innovative development are currently relevant topics of research in the scientific community. The development of innovation models in a historical perspective is in the process of formation of the "open innovator" model, the essence of which lies in defining the individual and framework conditions of the innovator's activity. Creating an integrated national innovation model (from idea to market) and defining the role of the innovator in it will ensure a high level of innovation activity . The structure of the innovation system should include innovation actors, infrastructure, and the legal and regulatory framework of innovation processes; at the same time, it depends significantly on the innovation strategy in a particular time period . Innovation is characterized by the uncertainty and unpredictability of the innovation process, which poses the challenge of creating management systems in models of innovative development (national innovation systems – hereinafter referred to as NIS) .
Industrial enterprises and organizations are also an integral part of the NIS, and their innovative development is essential to improving how the NIS functions. Practice shows, however, that developing the scientific and technical potential (hereinafter referred to as STP) of Russia's manufacturing industries through capital investment alone is insufficient; other mechanisms are required .
Recently, the concept of "smart specialization" has become widespread . It defines the strategic priorities of innovation policy and seeks to create mechanisms for managing and applying "smart policy" so as to maximize the realization and development of the available STP.
In this regard, the implementation of "smart specialization" in industry – aimed at introducing innovations and strengthening the STP of the industrial complex – is reasonable to consider as a mechanism for ensuring the advanced development of Russia's manufacturing industries and of the national economy as a whole, with a view to smart economic growth.
The concept of "smart specialization" is a driving force of structural change. It makes it possible to build models of innovation development and, as a sectoral policy that promotes bottom-up entrepreneurial initiative, occupies a special place within the NIS .
The purpose of the article is to propose and justify the use of the principles of the concept of "smart specialization" as a specific management mechanism in the author's model of innovation development "open innovator", and to form measures for the implementation of mechanisms to ensure the advanced development of STPt of manufacturing industries in Russia both from the perspective of the industrial system and from the perspective of the innovator in the model of innovation development "open innovator".
2. Materials and Methods
Well-organized NIS are powerful engines of economic growth, while poorly organized NIS can inhibit innovation . Innovation provides the formation of patterns of innovation development and acts as a basis for scientific and technological development . "Open innovation mainly takes place in industry" , utilizing open platforms to create and sustain innovations that can be promoted through governance mechanisms within the NIS. Russia's NIS is based on the "triple helix" model, which has the following features: an extensive network of organizations performing R&D; the leading role of the business sector as the main consumer of R&D results in the structure of funding sources; an institutional system of support for innovation activities; a diverse set of measures aimed at stimulating and supporting organizations that perform R&D for a long period of time; a counterflow of demand for innovation in industry . One of the examples of successful implementation of the "triple helix" model in Russia is the cooperation of Tomsk State University of Radioelectronics and Control Systems with industrial enterprises that are part of the educational, research and innovation complex, which results in the development of their own technologies, the development of STPt of industrial enterprises and the output of 80% of all knowledge-intensive products of the Tomsk region . At the present stage, the models of innovation development also distinguish "four-link" and "five-link" innovation spirals. Based on the trends in the formation of innovation development models, it is advisable to build an integral NIS of Russia on the basis of the modern model of innovation development "open innovator".
2.1. The Innovation Development Model «Open Innovator»
The model of innovation development, proposed by the author, is based on the Triple Helix and Quintuple Helix models. The author's hypothesis regarding the innovation development model (Figure 1) defines the framework conditions and the role and place of the «open innovator» :
1. The innovation development model proposed by the author is based on the Triple Helix and Quintuple Helix models. The author's hypothesis regarding the innovation development model (Figure 1) defines the framework conditions and the role and place of the “open innovator” :
Nm∈G⋁P⋁R⋁I⋁E⋁...m⋁In(1)
where Nm – innovator(s);
G,P,R,I,E – institutional systems, spaces;
In – innovations.
Nm⟹InorIn⟸Nm(2)
2. The framework conditions and the role and place of the “open innovator” are defined by the following conditions in the innovation creation phase:
Nm∈In(3)
Dm⟺Sm∈Tm(4)
where Dm – demand of the results of innovation;
Sm – suggestion of the results of innovation
Tm – time.
3. During the mastering phase of the innovation, the individual's conditions, role, and place as an "open innovator" are determined by the following factors:
In ⟹G⋁P⋁R⋁I⋁E⋁...m(5),
further along the cycle (item 1).
4. Conditions (2), (3), (4), and (5) are implemented through management mechanisms.
Figure 1. The innovation development model «open innovator».
Findings and expected outcomes: The framework conditions, role, and place of the «open innovator» in the innovation creation phase have the following characteristics:
a) From an institutional point of view, the role of the innovator can be performed by individual researchers as well as research teams, organisations, institutions, compounds, and associations; from a spatial point of view, it involves knowledge, insights, ideas, hypotheses, know-how, etc.
b) The suggestion of the result of innovation (S) and endogenous factors will contribute to the drive of Nm into the In zone, while the reverse process – the pull of Nm into the In zone – will be influenced by the demand for the result of innovation (D) and exogenous factors.
In the spreading phase of innovations, when Nm is in the In zone, individual «open innovator» conditions come into play, characterised by the fact that reaching the equilibrium value of the innovation results (Dm⟺Sm) – the actual start of the diffusion of innovations – for each innovator occurs at a specific time (T). Over time, the disseminated In will develop and transform into G⋁P⋁R⋁I⋁E…m. Institutionally, this may be characterised by the formation of new companies, organisations, and alliances, and spatially by the introduction and dissemination of new knowledge.
2.2. Management mechanisms in the "open innovator" innovation development model
The management mechanisms designed to ensure the advanced development of Russia's manufacturing sector, based on the principles of the "smart specialization" concept [7, 17], are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Mechanisms for Ensuring the Leading-Edge Development of the “Open Innovator” in Line with the “Smart Specialization” Concept within the Author’s Innovation Model

Mechanisms for ensuring the leading-edge development of an "open innovator" in accordance with the provisions of the "smart specialization" concept

Which conditions of the «open innovator» model of innovation are implemented by the mechanisms listed in column 1

Mechanisms of government support for fostering collaboration among the public, industrial, scientific, civil society, environmental, and other sectors

Nm∈G⋁P⋁R⋁I⋁E⋁...m⋁In

Mechanisms for developing and managing competitive advantages to identify a unique specialization and a competitive form of economic activity

In⟸Nm

Economic mechanisms to support entrepreneurial innovation and help businesses identify new opportunities

Nm⟹In

Mechanisms for interregional cooperation

Nm∈In

Organizational and economic mechanisms for stakeholder collaboration

Dm⟺Sm∈Tm

Legal and economic mechanisms for the development of new types of economic activities

In ⟹G⋁P⋁R⋁I⋁E⋁...m

*Compiled by the author.
The implementation of the "smart specialization" strategy can be based on strong knowledge-intensive clusters. Their formation relies on the triple helix concept – the interaction of universities, business, and government – which to some extent forms the innovation zone within the "open innovation" model of innovation development.
3. Results
The strategy of advanced development of the national economy should include accelerated growth of industries , stimulation of the existing STPt, and full disclosure of STPt. One of the possible solutions may be the stimulation of scientific and technological development of industry . It is the advanced development of STPt of manufacturing industries in Russia that will make it possible to solve the most important socio-economic tasks and ensure significant growth of the national economy. The formation of measures for the implementation of mechanisms to ensure the advanced development of STPt of manufacturing industries in Russia in the model of innovation development "open innovator" based on the principles of "smart specialization" should be based on "purposeful activity to acquire a high-quality state, to ensure progressive and sustainable development based on various factors that allow the efficient use of resources" , which will solve the challenges of the current decade for the national economy: to eliminate the shortcomings of the national economy and to ensure the sustainable development of the national economy.
In order to formulate measures for advanced development, it is necessary to identify specific components of the scientific and technical potential (STPt) of Russian manufacturing industries, the effective use of which will ensure the advanced development of this potential. In accordance with the 5th level (forecasting of STPt development) at the 8th stage of the author's forecast-management model for assessing scientific and technical potential , the development of the STPt index I_STPt is forecasted using MS Excel based on statistical data from Russian manufacturing industries for 2015–2023. This forecast serves as the goal of STPt management for Russian manufacturing industries (Table 2).
Table 2. Goal ISTPt of the Russian manufacturing industries management.

Forecast years

Forecast values of the STPt index

2024*

1,50

2025

1,49

2026

1,47

2027

1,45

2028

1,44

2029

1,42

2030

1,40

2031

1,38

2032

1,37

*Compiled by the author.
To achieve the set management goals – the forecast values of the STPt index for Russian manufacturing industries at the 6th stage – the value of management goal achievement σ at the 9th stage of the author's forecast-management model for assessing scientific and technical potential is presented in Table 2 and calculated according to the formula:
σ=B,AA2100%=∑i=1nbiai∑i=1nai2100%(6)
and purposefulness of achieving the management goal α according to the formula:
α=cosβ=B,ABA=∑i=1nbiai∑i=1nbi2∑i=1nai2(7)
groups, blocks, and sub-blocks of components of the STPt in Russia's manufacturing industries .
Table 3. Value of management goal achievement and purposefulness of achieving the management goal of STPt of manufacturing industries in Russia

Components

Value of management goal achievement σ

Purposefulness of achieving management goal α

Group of internal components

291,794

0,998

Block of personnel (labor) potential

94,046

0,992

Share of the number of employed persons by level of education and qualification

91,894

0,992

Share of personnel engaged in research and development

2,152

0,991

Block of material and technical potential

6,075

0,994

Material potential

1,649

0,995

Technical potential

4,426

0,991

Information capacity block

2,443

0,988

Block of innovation potential

15,350

0,979

Share of innovative goods, works, services

12,434

0,970

Block of technological potential

39,553

0,975

Intangible capacity block

0,054

0,870

Organizational capacity block

67,641

0,997

Legal capacity block

1,682

0,991

Financial capacity block

2,030

0,995

Investment potential block

1,538

0,987

Tax potential block

52,739

0,970

Fiscal capacity block

0,443

0,945

Share of expenditures on technological innovations by sources of budget financing

0,443

0,945

Block of entrepreneurial potential

8,202

0,871

Group of input components

0,537

0,983

Group of output components

0,057

0,859

*Compiled by the author.
The calculations of the value σ and purposefulness α of achieving the management goal indicate that the development of internal components, primarily organizational potential, is the most effective way for the advanced development of the STP of manufacturing industries in Russia.
To accelerate progress toward the future (projected) state of the scientific and technical potential (STP) of Russia's manufacturing sectors (Table 2), measures must be taken to implement mechanisms ensuring the accelerated development of STP in Russia's manufacturing sectors with regard to the organizational capacity component (Table 4).
Table 4. Measures to implement mechanisms ensuring the advanced development of STPt in Russia's manufacturing industries within the "open innovator" innovation model, based on the principles of the "smart specialization" concept.

Mechanisms for ensuring the leading-edge develop-ment of an "open innova-tor" in accordance with the provisions of the "smart specialization" concept2

Measures2

STPt of Russian manufacturing industries in the «open innovator» model of innovation development as an industrial system (I)

STPt of Russian manufacturing industries in the «open innovator» model of innovation development as innovator(s) (N)

Mechanisms of government support for fostering collaboration among the public, industrial, scientific, civil society, environmental, and other sectors

Establishing the legal framework for a new organizational and legal structure: a research consortium

Providing legal protection for the integration of innovative R&D projects into existing production at newly established demonstration zones for R&D implementation

Mechanisms for developing and managing competitive advantages to identify a unique specialization and a competitive form of economic activity

Establishing a legal framework for preferential innovative scientific and technical centers in specific territories and areas

Allowing innovators, startups, and fast-growing technology companies to apply experimental legal frameworks in specific sectors

Economic mechanisms to support entrepreneurial in-novation and help businesses identify new opportunities

Regulatory framework for supporting innovative projects involving high-risk investments in technology companies

Providing legal protection and removing regulatory barriers to innovation and the intellectual property market in the interests of developers, entrepreneurs, and investors

Mechanisms for interregional cooperation

Testing new organizational and legal structures in pilot areas established for the implementation of innovations and fundamentally new technologies

Development of uniform standards and guidelines for the operation of an interregional network of innovation and technology transfer centers

Organizational and economic mechanisms for stakeholder collaboration

Establishing and implementing-preferably at the national level-transparent and stable regulatory standards governing the conduct and interaction of actors in innovation and technological development

Regulation of the legal relationship between an innovator (rights holder) and the state regarding R&D projects initiated by innovators and funded with their own resources, which are necessary for state needs

Legal and economic mecha-nisms for the development of new types of economic activities

Providing legal protection for regarding R&D pro-jects that are being transformed into operational production facilities based on demonstration zones for the industrial development of regarding R&D

Providing legal protection for intellectual property rights of innovators, startups, and fast-growing technology companies

*Compiled by the author.
4. Conclusions
The author formulates measures to implement mechanisms ensuring the advanced development of the scientific and technological potential (STP) of Russian manufacturing industries, from the standpoint of applying this potential within the "open innovator" model of innovation development. This model is presented as a single platform for the formation of the national innovation system (NIS), the regional innovation system, and the sectoral innovation system, as an industrial system (I) and innovator(s) (N). The originality and value of the presented "open innovator" model of innovation development are as follows:
1. The framework conditions and the role and place of the "open innovator" in the model of innovation development are defined.
2. The management mechanisms in the refined "open innovator" model of innovation development are based on the provisions of the principles of the "smart specialization" concept.
Applying the provisions of the principles of "smart specialization" as a management mechanism within the "open innovator" model of innovative development to ensure the leading-edge development of the manufacturing sector will make it possible to create and develop networks of "innovators" to implement transformative measures and structural changes within the national (regional) economy.
The measures themselves correspond to the provisions of normative legal acts adopted within the framework of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation and the development of the manufacturing industry of the Russian Federation. The work systematizes the measures of normative legal acts for STP, the effective use of which, according to the results of calculations of the purposefulness of achieving the management goal, will ensure the advanced development of STP in the manufacturing industries of Russia within the innovation development model of the "open innovator." It is the implementation of these measures, as it seems, that will allow, according to the normative legal acts considered in the study, achieving national development goals by 2030–2035: the transition to innovation-oriented economic growth, maintaining annual growth rates of the manufacturing industries of Russia at a level of at least 104.5% in 2023–2025 and at least 103% in 2031–2035, and increasing the share of manufacturing industry organizations engaged in technological innovation by 1.6 times by 2030.
Funding
This work is not supported by any external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the outcome of this research work has been reported in this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Batov G. H., Kumisheva Z. H., Tlisov A. B. Technological Aspect in the Concept of Advanced Development. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitiye). 2019, 10(2), 275–287.
[2] Carayannis E. G., Barth T. D., Campbell D. F. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep. 2012, 1, 2
[3] Cassingena Harper J., Lubicka B., Lindqvist G. The role of clusters in smart specialisation strategies, Publications Office. 2013.
[4] Chernova O. A., Klimuk V. V. Four-Link Spiral Concept in Strategies Smart Specialization of Industrial Development, Estestvenno-gumanitarnyye issledovaniya. 2019, 25(3), 179–184.
[5] Cimolia M., Porcilec G. Sources of Learning Paths and Technological Capabilities: An Introductory Roadmap of Development Processes. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2009, 18(7), 675–694.
[6] Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy. 2000, 29, 109–123.
[7] Foray D., Eichler M., Keller, M. Smart specialization strategies—insights gained from a unique European policy experiment on innovation and industrial policy design. Rev Evol Polit Econ. 2021, 2, 83–103.
[8] Foray D. On the Policy Space of Smart Specialization Strategies. European Planning Studies. 2016, 24(8), 1428–1437.
[9] Glazyev S. Y. On the Creation of Systems of Strategic Planning and Management of Scientific and Technological Development. Innovatsii. 2020, 2(256), 14–23.
[10] Khudyakov V. V., Merzlov Y. I. Forecast-management model of assessing scientific and technical potential. Innovacionnaja dejatel'nost'. 2023, 2(65), 52-63.
[11] Kotsemir M., Abroskin A., Meissner D. Innovation Concepts and Typology – An Evolutionary Discussion. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 05/STI/2013, Available at SSRN:
[12] Krasnyanskaya O. V. Analysis of the State of Organization of Scientific and Technological Development of Industry in Russia and Abroad. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki. 2022, 3–4(69–70), 41–47.
[13] Meissner D. Approaches for Developing National STI Strategies, STI Policy Review. 2014, 5(1), 34-56.
[14] Midtkandal I., Sörvik J. What is smart specialisation. Nordregio News, 2012, 5, 3-6.
[15] Miller A., Miller M. Study of the Problems of Technological Integration in the Manufacturing Industry in Russia, Strategic Management. 2019, 24(3), 33–42.
[16] Naumova E. A., Sokolova E. V. Regional Aspects of the Application of the «Triple Helix» Model as a Factor in the Development of an Innovative Economy. Putevoditel’ predprinimatelya. 2022, 15(4), 45–51.
[17] Nauwelaers C, Kleibrink A., Stancova K. The Role of Science Parks in Smart Specialisation Strategies S3 Policy Brief Series No. 08/2014. EUR 26701 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; JRC90719.
[18] Pensky O. G. Mathematical Models for the Integral Assessment of the Attractiveness of Resort Facilities. 4th International Scientific-Practical Online Conference Formation of a Comfortable Mediterranean Environment, December 7–10, 2020, Netanya (Israel), Netanya: [online], 291–293.
[19] Petrovsky A. B., Pronichkin S. V., Sternin M. Yu., Shepelev G. I. National innovation systems: structures, goals, functions, ways of development. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. 2018, 45(1), 149-158.
[20] Prosalova V. S., Loksha A. V., Petrova N. I. Analysis of Rating of Scientific and Technical Development of Territorial Subjects of the Russian Federation. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravleniye. 2019, 1(26), 267–269.
[21] Rumyantseva S. Yu, Korostyshevskaya E. M., Samylov I. O. Etapy stanovleniya i razvitiya ponyatiya «innovatsii». Innovatsii. 2018, 3(233), 36-46.
[22] Shinkevich A. I., Kudryavtseva S. S., Chikisheva N. M., Korotun O. N., Fatikhova L. E., Gainullina R., Ostanina S. S. Scientific and Technical Potential of Russia as a Factor of Economic Growth in the Knowledge Economy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2017, 12(1), 47–56.
[23] Shirokova E. A., Kurnikova M. V. The Development of the Innovative Potential of Regional Industrial Complex Based on «Smart Specialization». Problemy razvitiya predpriyatiy: teoriya i praktika. 2020, 1–2, 99–103.
[24] Uskov V. S. Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Economy in the Transition to a New Technological Order. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020, 13(1), 70–86.
[25] Yun J. H. J., Liu Z. Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model. Sustainability. 2019, 11 (12).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Khudyakov, V. (2026). The Role of the Concepts of «Smart Specialization» and «Open Innovation» in Stimulating the Advanced Development of the Manufacturing Sector in the Russian Federation. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14(4), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Khudyakov, V. The Role of the Concepts of «Smart Specialization» and «Open Innovation» in Stimulating the Advanced Development of the Manufacturing Sector in the Russian Federation. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2026, 14(4), 105-112. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Khudyakov V. The Role of the Concepts of «Smart Specialization» and «Open Innovation» in Stimulating the Advanced Development of the Manufacturing Sector in the Russian Federation. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2026;14(4):105-112. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11,
      author = {Vladimir Khudyakov},
      title = {The Role of the Concepts of «Smart Specialization» and «Open Innovation» in Stimulating the Advanced Development of the Manufacturing Sector in the Russian Federation},
      journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
      volume = {14},
      number = {4},
      pages = {105-112},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20261404.11},
      abstract = {The purpose of this article is to develop a model of innovation development, the "open innovator," with the definition of framework conditions, the role, and the place of the "open innovator" in this model, based on a combination of linear and nonlinear models of innovation development. The author's model of innovation development, the "open innovator," is based on the "triple helix" model with the addition of the "fifth helix." The formation of measures to implement mechanisms ensuring the advanced development of the scientific and technical potential of Russia's manufacturing industries, based on the principles of the concept of "smart specialization," is carried out within the "open innovator" model of innovation development. The methodological basis of the study is the "open innovator" model of innovation development, based on a combination of linear and non-linear models of innovation development, with the definition of framework conditions, the role, and the place of the "open innovator," and the concept of smart specialization. The methods used include analysis of scientific literature, the vector method for calculating the value and purposefulness of achieving management goals, and the systematization of activities based on the analysis of the national normative framework. Measures have been developed to implement mechanisms that ensure the accelerated development of the scientific and technical potential of Russia's manufacturing industries, both from the perspective of the industrial system and from the perspective of the innovator, within the framework of the "open innovator" model of innovation-driven development.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Role of the Concepts of «Smart Specialization» and «Open Innovation» in Stimulating the Advanced Development of the Manufacturing Sector in the Russian Federation
    AU  - Vladimir Khudyakov
    Y1  - 2026/10/09
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11
    T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    SP  - 105
    EP  - 112
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7616
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261404.11
    AB  - The purpose of this article is to develop a model of innovation development, the "open innovator," with the definition of framework conditions, the role, and the place of the "open innovator" in this model, based on a combination of linear and nonlinear models of innovation development. The author's model of innovation development, the "open innovator," is based on the "triple helix" model with the addition of the "fifth helix." The formation of measures to implement mechanisms ensuring the advanced development of the scientific and technical potential of Russia's manufacturing industries, based on the principles of the concept of "smart specialization," is carried out within the "open innovator" model of innovation development. The methodological basis of the study is the "open innovator" model of innovation development, based on a combination of linear and non-linear models of innovation development, with the definition of framework conditions, the role, and the place of the "open innovator," and the concept of smart specialization. The methods used include analysis of scientific literature, the vector method for calculating the value and purposefulness of achieving management goals, and the systematization of activities based on the analysis of the national normative framework. Measures have been developed to implement mechanisms that ensure the accelerated development of the scientific and technical potential of Russia's manufacturing industries, both from the perspective of the industrial system and from the perspective of the innovator, within the framework of the "open innovator" model of innovation-driven development.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Management, Marketing and Commerce, Perm State University, Perm, Russia