There has been a growing interest by political pundits and scholars alike to predict the winner of the presidential elections. Although forecasting has now quite a history, we argue that the closeness of recent Kenyan presidential opinion polls and the wide accessibility of data should change how presidential election forecasting is conducted. We present a Bayesian forecasting model that concentrates on the national wide pre-election polls prior to 2013 general elections and considers finer details such as third-party candidates and self-proclaimed undecided voters. We incorporate our estimators into WinBUGS to determine the probability that a candidate will win an election. The model predicted the outright winner for the 2013 Kenyan election.
Published in | International Journal of Data Science and Analysis (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17 |
Page(s) | 58-63 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Presidential Elections, Election Forecasting, Operations Research, Bayesian Prediction Models
[1] | Abaramowitz, Alan I. 2012. “Forecasting in a Polarized Era: The Time for Change Model and the 2012 Presidential Election.” P. S. Political Science and Politics 45, 4, 618-619. |
[2] | Abramowitz, Alan I. 2008. “Forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election with the Time-for-Change Model.” P. S. Political Science and Politics 41, 4, 691-695. |
[3] | Abrams, Burton A. and James L. Butkiewicz. 1995. “The Influence of State-Level Economic Conditions on the 1992 U.S. Presidential Election.” Public Choice 85, 1, 1-10. |
[4] | Ahammed, M. S., Newaz, M. N., & Dey, A. (2019). Analyzing Political Opinions and Prediction of Voting Patterns in the US Election with Data Mining Approaches. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology. |
[5] | Althaus, S. L., Nardulli, P. F., & Shaw, D. R. (2002). Candidate appearances in presidential elections, 1972-2000. Political Communication, 19 (1), 49-72. |
[6] | Campbell, J. E. (2014). Issues in presidential election forecasting: election margins, incumbency, and model credibility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47 (2), 301-303. |
[7] | Campbell, J. E. (2016). The Trial-Heat and Seats-in-Trouble forecasts of the 2016 Presidential. |
[8] | Congressional elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49 (4), 664-668. |
[9] | Cohen, J. E. (2006). Public opinion in state politics. Stanford University Press. |
[10] | Cohen, J. E. (2015). Presidential Leadership in Public Opinion. Cambridge University Press. |
[11] | Dorsey, Margaret E., and Miguel Díaz-Barriga. "Senator Barack Obama and immigration reform." Journal of Black Studies 38, no. 1 (2007): 90-104. |
[12] | Feld, S. L., & Grofman, B. (2010). Puzzles and paradoxes involving averages: An intuitive approach. In Collective Decision Making (pp. 137-150). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
[13] | Gayo-Avello, D. (2013). A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Social Science Computer Review, 31 (6), 649-679. |
[14] | Gelman, A., Katz, J. N., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). The mathematics and statistics of voting power. Statistical Science, 420-435. |
[15] | Holbrook, T. M., & DeSart, J. A. (1999). Using state polls to forecast presidential election outcomes in the American states. International Journal of Forecasting, 15 (2), 137-142. |
[16] | Kennedy, R., Wojcik, S., & Lazer, D. (2017). Improving election prediction internationally. Science, 355 (6324), 515-520. |
[17] | Park, D. K., Gelman, A., & Bafumi, J. (2004). Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: State-level estimates from national polls. Political Analysis, 12 (4), 375-385. |
[18] | Wang, W., Rothschild, D., Goel, S., & Gelman, A. (2015). Forecasting elections with non-representative polls. International Journal of Forecasting, 31 (3), 980-991. |
APA Style
Jeremiah Kiingati, Samuel Mwalili, Anthony Waititu. (2020). Bayesian Trivariate Analysis of an Opinion Poll: With Application to the Kenyan Pollss. International Journal of Data Science and Analysis, 6(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17
ACS Style
Jeremiah Kiingati; Samuel Mwalili; Anthony Waititu. Bayesian Trivariate Analysis of an Opinion Poll: With Application to the Kenyan Pollss. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 2020, 6(1), 58-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17
AMA Style
Jeremiah Kiingati, Samuel Mwalili, Anthony Waititu. Bayesian Trivariate Analysis of an Opinion Poll: With Application to the Kenyan Pollss. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2020;6(1):58-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17, author = {Jeremiah Kiingati and Samuel Mwalili and Anthony Waititu}, title = {Bayesian Trivariate Analysis of an Opinion Poll: With Application to the Kenyan Pollss}, journal = {International Journal of Data Science and Analysis}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {58-63}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijdsa.20200601.17}, abstract = {There has been a growing interest by political pundits and scholars alike to predict the winner of the presidential elections. Although forecasting has now quite a history, we argue that the closeness of recent Kenyan presidential opinion polls and the wide accessibility of data should change how presidential election forecasting is conducted. We present a Bayesian forecasting model that concentrates on the national wide pre-election polls prior to 2013 general elections and considers finer details such as third-party candidates and self-proclaimed undecided voters. We incorporate our estimators into WinBUGS to determine the probability that a candidate will win an election. The model predicted the outright winner for the 2013 Kenyan election.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Bayesian Trivariate Analysis of an Opinion Poll: With Application to the Kenyan Pollss AU - Jeremiah Kiingati AU - Samuel Mwalili AU - Anthony Waititu Y1 - 2020/03/24 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17 T2 - International Journal of Data Science and Analysis JF - International Journal of Data Science and Analysis JO - International Journal of Data Science and Analysis SP - 58 EP - 63 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1891 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.17 AB - There has been a growing interest by political pundits and scholars alike to predict the winner of the presidential elections. Although forecasting has now quite a history, we argue that the closeness of recent Kenyan presidential opinion polls and the wide accessibility of data should change how presidential election forecasting is conducted. We present a Bayesian forecasting model that concentrates on the national wide pre-election polls prior to 2013 general elections and considers finer details such as third-party candidates and self-proclaimed undecided voters. We incorporate our estimators into WinBUGS to determine the probability that a candidate will win an election. The model predicted the outright winner for the 2013 Kenyan election. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -