Introduction: The limitation of cadaveric organ donations and the rapidly increasing number of patients with end stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation made living kidney donation indispensable. An important contribution to the revolution in living nephrectomy technique is hand assisted donor nephrectomy. Herein, we report our experience in hand assisted donor nephrectomy technique and its effect on the graft outcome. Methods: During the period from January 2012 till December 2015, 60 cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed including 35 females and 25 males with a median age of 46.3±11.6 years. Results: Our mean operative donors' time was 93±21.8 minutes, and mean warm ischemia time was 48±9.1 seconds. Donor hospitalization time was between 3 and 5 days (mean 4 days). Follow up of the graft function after one year revealed mean serum creatinine of 1.56±1.03 mg/dl, mean GFR of 39.8±10.9 ml/min/1.73m and renal Doppler resistive index of 0.62±0.15. Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with terminal hand assisted technique is a minimally invasive surgery that may improve donor acceptance and can become the procedure of choice in the near future. Also this technique has a good outcome concerning both warm ischemia time and graft outcome.
Published in | International Journal of Clinical Urology (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16 |
Page(s) | 23-26 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Renal Transplantation, Nephrectomy, Donor, Donor Nephrectomy, Laparoscopy, Hand Assisted
[1] | Fornara P, Doehn C, Friedrich HJ, Jocham D. Nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in 249 patients with benign renal disease. Eur Urol 2001; 40 (1): 24-31. |
[2] | Hamza A, Rettkowski O, Osten B, Fornara P. [Living donor and kidney transplantation]. Urologe A 2003; 42 (7): W961-72; quiz W973-4. |
[3] | Lenhard V, Dreikorn K, Opelz G. [Current immunologic aspects of kidney transplantation]. Urologe A 1982; 21 (5): 280-9. |
[4] | Wiborg MH, Toft A, Jahn H, Hansen LU, Lund L. Initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a single-centre experience over 5 years. Scand J Urol 2017; 51 (1): 73-77. |
[5] | Bemelman WA, van Doorn RC, de Wit LT, Kox C, Surachno J, Busch OR, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2001; 15 (5): 442-4. |
[6] | Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Schönberger B, Roigas J, Kroencke TJ, et al. [Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy of kidneys with multiple renal vessels]. Urologe A 2003; 42 (2): 225-32. |
[7] | Wolf JS Jr, Tchetgen MB, Merion RM. Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 1998; 52 (5): 885-7. |
[8] | Villeda-Sandoval CI, Rodríguez-Covarrubias F, Cortés-Aguilar G, Alberú-Gómez J, Vilatobá-Chapa M, Sotomayor M, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative and functional results in a tertiary care center in Mexico. Transplant Proc 2013; 45 (9): 3220-4. |
[9] | Rettkowski O, Hamza A, Markau S, Osten B, Fornara P. Ten years of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: retrospect and prospect from the nephrologist's point of view. Transplant Proc 2007; 39 (1): 30-3. |
[10] | Özdemir-van Brunschot DM, Koning GG, van Laarhoven KC, Ergün M, van Horne SB, Rovers MM, et al. A comparison of technique modifications in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10 (3): e0121131. |
[11] | Choi SW, Kim KS, Kim S, Choi YS, Bae WJ, Hong SH, et al. Hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a matched-cohort comparison over 10 yr at a single institute. Clin Transplant 2014; 28 (11): 1287-93. |
[12] | Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol. 2001; 166 (4): 1270-3; discussion 1273-4. |
[13] | Slakey DP, Wood JC, Hender D, Thomas R, Cheng S. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: advantages of the hand-assisted method. Transplantation 1999; 68 (4): 581-3. |
[14] | Alcaraz A, Rosales A, Guirado L, Díaz JM, Musquera M, Villavicencio H. Early experience of a living donor kidney transplant program. Eur Urol 2006; 50 (3): 542-7; discussion 547-8. |
[15] | Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A, Munda R, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2002; 2 (10): 983-8. |
[16] | Kercher K, Dahl D, Harland R, Blute R, Gallagher K, Litwin D. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia. Urology 2001; 58 (2): 152-6. |
[17] | Hamza A, Wagner S, Weigand K, Loertzer H, Rettkowski O, Jurzcok A, et al. Transperitoneal, hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: surveillance of renal function by immune monitoring. Transplant Proc. 2008; 40 (4): 895-901. |
[18] | Bum S, Ulanbek B, Hyeon H, Chang W, et al. Evaluation of the Learning Curve of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Ann Transplant 2018; 23: 546–553. |
[19] | Yakup K, Beat M, Omid G, Elias K, Georgios P, Mohammad Go, Felix N, Laura B, Philipp K, Markus D, Christian M, Martin Z, Markus B, Arianeb M, et al. Hand-Assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy PERiumbilical versus Pfannenstiel incision and return to normal physical ACTivity (HAPERPACT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Trials. 2018; 19: 377. |
[20] | akahisa H, Toshihide T, Kenta F, Manabu O, Norihiko G, Shunji N, Kazuharu U, Yoshihiko W, et al. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Living Donors with a History of Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Ann Transplant 2021; 26: e929752-1–e929752-10. |
APA Style
Ahmed Reda, Mahmoud Magdy, Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem, Ahmed Serag Safwat, Atef Mohammed Abdellatif, et al. (2022). Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Terminal Hand Assisted Technique: Experience in 60 Donors and Recipients. International Journal of Clinical Urology, 6(1), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16
ACS Style
Ahmed Reda; Mahmoud Magdy; Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem; Ahmed Serag Safwat; Atef Mohammed Abdellatif, et al. Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Terminal Hand Assisted Technique: Experience in 60 Donors and Recipients. Int. J. Clin. Urol. 2022, 6(1), 23-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16
AMA Style
Ahmed Reda, Mahmoud Magdy, Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem, Ahmed Serag Safwat, Atef Mohammed Abdellatif, et al. Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Terminal Hand Assisted Technique: Experience in 60 Donors and Recipients. Int J Clin Urol. 2022;6(1):23-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16, author = {Ahmed Reda and Mahmoud Magdy and Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem and Ahmed Serag Safwat and Atef Mohammed Abdellatif and Hassan Aboulella and Nashwa Azoz and Paolo Fornara and Nasreldin Mohammed}, title = {Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Terminal Hand Assisted Technique: Experience in 60 Donors and Recipients}, journal = {International Journal of Clinical Urology}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {23-26}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcu.20220601.16}, abstract = {Introduction: The limitation of cadaveric organ donations and the rapidly increasing number of patients with end stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation made living kidney donation indispensable. An important contribution to the revolution in living nephrectomy technique is hand assisted donor nephrectomy. Herein, we report our experience in hand assisted donor nephrectomy technique and its effect on the graft outcome. Methods: During the period from January 2012 till December 2015, 60 cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed including 35 females and 25 males with a median age of 46.3±11.6 years. Results: Our mean operative donors' time was 93±21.8 minutes, and mean warm ischemia time was 48±9.1 seconds. Donor hospitalization time was between 3 and 5 days (mean 4 days). Follow up of the graft function after one year revealed mean serum creatinine of 1.56±1.03 mg/dl, mean GFR of 39.8±10.9 ml/min/1.73m and renal Doppler resistive index of 0.62±0.15. Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with terminal hand assisted technique is a minimally invasive surgery that may improve donor acceptance and can become the procedure of choice in the near future. Also this technique has a good outcome concerning both warm ischemia time and graft outcome.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Terminal Hand Assisted Technique: Experience in 60 Donors and Recipients AU - Ahmed Reda AU - Mahmoud Magdy AU - Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem AU - Ahmed Serag Safwat AU - Atef Mohammed Abdellatif AU - Hassan Aboulella AU - Nashwa Azoz AU - Paolo Fornara AU - Nasreldin Mohammed Y1 - 2022/02/16 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16 T2 - International Journal of Clinical Urology JF - International Journal of Clinical Urology JO - International Journal of Clinical Urology SP - 23 EP - 26 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1355 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.16 AB - Introduction: The limitation of cadaveric organ donations and the rapidly increasing number of patients with end stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation made living kidney donation indispensable. An important contribution to the revolution in living nephrectomy technique is hand assisted donor nephrectomy. Herein, we report our experience in hand assisted donor nephrectomy technique and its effect on the graft outcome. Methods: During the period from January 2012 till December 2015, 60 cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed including 35 females and 25 males with a median age of 46.3±11.6 years. Results: Our mean operative donors' time was 93±21.8 minutes, and mean warm ischemia time was 48±9.1 seconds. Donor hospitalization time was between 3 and 5 days (mean 4 days). Follow up of the graft function after one year revealed mean serum creatinine of 1.56±1.03 mg/dl, mean GFR of 39.8±10.9 ml/min/1.73m and renal Doppler resistive index of 0.62±0.15. Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with terminal hand assisted technique is a minimally invasive surgery that may improve donor acceptance and can become the procedure of choice in the near future. Also this technique has a good outcome concerning both warm ischemia time and graft outcome. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -