Non-syndromic orofacial clefts are significantly linked to socioeconomic status. Because of limited access to proper medical care in rural areas of developing countries charity missions are highly required to mitigate negative outcome, but there is still a lack of data on humanitarian missions’ sustainability and success. A retrospective analysis of 125 patients who underwent cleft surgery during humanitarian missions in Myanmar was performed. Patients’ satisfaction with facial features and function was evaluated pre- and post-surgery. Furthermore, postoperative complications and satisfaction with follow-up care have been analyzed. Between 2008 and 2020 125 patients underwent cleft surgery by the Interplast team. The median patient’s age was 2,58 years (mean=7 years) with a range of 3 months to 54 years. Group 1 (patients with cleft lip only, n=58) was analyzed on satisfaction with facial aspects and significant improvement was found. All 125 patients were evaluated regarding function features like eating or drinking and their post-surgical satisfaction was significantly higher than before surgery. To analyze if hearing and nasal breathing difficulties in patients with cleft palate can be decreased by primary cleft surgery these parameters were analyzed in group 2 (n=67). Group 2 as well reported significant improvement. Even with limited medical infrastructure and later primary surgery than in developed countries, cleft surgeries can be performed successfully and sustainable by integrating local surgeons in charity missions. Patients benefit greatly by these missions and further investigation on humanitarian cleft missions should be conducted.
Published in | International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13 |
Page(s) | 28-35 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Orofacial Cleft, Cleft Surgery, Humanitarian Mission, Foundation-Based Medical Care, Interplast, Cleft Follow-up, Myanmar, Sustainability
[1] | Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, et al. Cleft lip and palate. The Lancet 2009; 374: 1773–85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4. |
[2] | Krapels IP, Vermeij-Keers C, Müller M, et al. Nutrition and genes in the development of orofacial clefting. Nutr Rev 2006; 64: 280–88; PMID: 16808114; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00211.x. |
[3] | Tanaka SA, Mahabir RC, Jupiter DC, et al. Updating the epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 511e-518e; PMID: 22374000; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402dd1. |
[4] | Clark JD, Mossey PA, Sharp L, et al. Socioeconomic status and orofacial clefts in Scotland, 1989 to 1998. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2003; 40: 481–85; PMID: 12943441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2003_040_0481_ssaoci_2.0.co_2. |
[5] | Hujoel PP, Bollen AM, Mueller BA. First-year mortality among infants with facial clefts. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 1992; 29: 451–55; PMID: 1472525; http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0451_fymaiw_2.3.co_2. |
[6] | Conway JC, Taub PJ, Kling R, et al. Ten-year experience of more than 35,000 orofacial clefts in Africa. BMC Pediatr 2015; 15: 8; PMID: 25884320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0328-5. |
[7] | Wong Riff KWY, Tsangaris E, Goodacre TEE, et al. What Matters to Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: An International Qualitative Study Informing the Development of the CLEFT-Q. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2018; 55: 442–50; PMID: 29437508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665617732854. |
[8] | Wong FK, Hagg U. An update on the aetiology of orofacial clefts. Hong Kong Med J 2004; 10: 331–36; PMID: 15479962. |
[9] | Van Aalst JA, Kolappa KK, Sadove M. MOC-PSSM CME article: Nonsyndromic cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1–14; PMID: 18182955; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000294706.05898.f3. |
[10] | Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. The Lancet 2008; 372: 139–44; PMID: 18582931; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8. |
[11] | Carlson LC, Hatcher KW, Tomberg L, et al. Inequitable Access to Timely Cleft Palate Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. World J Surg 2016; 40: 1047–52; PMID: 26669785; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3374-0. |
[12] | Cubitt JJ, Hodges AM, van Lierde KM, et al. Global variation in cleft palate repairs: an analysis of 352,191 primary cleft repairs in low- to higher-middle-income countries. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2014; 51: 553–56; PMID: 24102511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/12-270. |
[13] | Yao CA, Swanson J, Chanson D, et al. Barriers to Reconstructive Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study of 453 Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Patients in Vietnam. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 887e-895e; PMID: 27783003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002656. |
[14] | Eckstein DA, Wu RL, Akinbiyi T, et al. Measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients: currently available patient-reported outcomes measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 518e-526e; PMID: 22030513; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6a67. |
[15] | Wes AM, Paul N, Gerety PA, et al. A Sustainable Model for Patient follow-up following an International Cleft Mission: A Proof of Concept. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55: 977–82; PMID: 28085514; http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/16-159. |
[16] | Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC). The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2011; 48: 66–81; PMID: 20507242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/09-217. |
[17] | Mossey PA, Modell B. Epidemiology of oral clefts 2012: an international perspective. Front Oral Biol 2012; 16: 1–18; PMID: 22759666; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000337464. |
[18] | Maki J, Qualls M, White B, et al. Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care. BMC health services research 2008; 8: 121; PMID: 18518997; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-121. |
[19] | Furr MC, Larkin E, Blakeley R, et al. Extending multidisciplinary management of cleft palate to the developing world. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 237–41; PMID: 21055861; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.214. |
[20] | Goto T, Nishihara K, Kataoka K, et al. Outcomes of an international volunteer surgical project for patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate: A mission in developing Laos. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2018; 58: 112–16; PMID: 28949405; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cga.12255. |
[21] | Figus A, Fioramonti P, Morselli P, et al. Interplast Italy: a 20-year plastic and reconstructive surgery humanitarian experience in developing countries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1340–48; PMID: 19935321; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b5a2ef. |
[22] | Rittler M, Cosentino V, López-Camelo JS, et al. Associated anomalies among infants with oral clefts at birth and during a 1-year follow-up. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155: 1588–96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34046. |
[23] | Marcusson A, Paulin G, Ostrup L. Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2002; 36: 16–23; PMID: 11925823; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/028443102753478327. |
[24] | Thomas PT, Turner SR, Rumsey N, et al. Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 1997; 34: 226–31; PMID: 9167073; http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0226_swfaas_2.3.co_2. |
[25] | Sharma VP, Bella H, Cadier MM, et al. Outcomes in facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 1233–45; PMID: 22591614; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.001. |
[26] | Wong Riff KWY, Tsangaris E, Forrest CR, et al. CLEFT-Q: Detecting Differences in Outcomes among 2434 Patients with Varying Cleft Types. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144: 78e-88e; PMID: 31246826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005723. |
[27] | Braun TL, Louis MR, Dickey RM, et al. A Sustainable and Scalable Approach to the Provision of Cleft Care: A Focus on Safety and Quality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142: 463–69; PMID: 30045182; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004580. |
APA Style
Milena Pejkovic, Martin Gosau Heinrich Schoeneich, Khin Marlar Win, Thiha Wyain, Heinrich Schoeneich, et al. (2021). Sustainability and Success of Cleft Surgery in Developing Countries: Satisfaction Outcome of 125 Patients Operated in Myanmar. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 7(2), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13
ACS Style
Milena Pejkovic; Martin Gosau Heinrich Schoeneich; Khin Marlar Win; Thiha Wyain; Heinrich Schoeneich, et al. Sustainability and Success of Cleft Surgery in Developing Countries: Satisfaction Outcome of 125 Patients Operated in Myanmar. Int. J. Clin. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 7(2), 28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13
AMA Style
Milena Pejkovic, Martin Gosau Heinrich Schoeneich, Khin Marlar Win, Thiha Wyain, Heinrich Schoeneich, et al. Sustainability and Success of Cleft Surgery in Developing Countries: Satisfaction Outcome of 125 Patients Operated in Myanmar. Int J Clin Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;7(2):28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13, author = {Milena Pejkovic and Martin Gosau Heinrich Schoeneich and Khin Marlar Win and Thiha Wyain and Heinrich Schoeneich and Philipp Kauffmann and Silke Haerteis and Lukas Prantl and Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger and Thiha Aung}, title = {Sustainability and Success of Cleft Surgery in Developing Countries: Satisfaction Outcome of 125 Patients Operated in Myanmar}, journal = {International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, pages = {28-35}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcoms.20210702.13}, abstract = {Non-syndromic orofacial clefts are significantly linked to socioeconomic status. Because of limited access to proper medical care in rural areas of developing countries charity missions are highly required to mitigate negative outcome, but there is still a lack of data on humanitarian missions’ sustainability and success. A retrospective analysis of 125 patients who underwent cleft surgery during humanitarian missions in Myanmar was performed. Patients’ satisfaction with facial features and function was evaluated pre- and post-surgery. Furthermore, postoperative complications and satisfaction with follow-up care have been analyzed. Between 2008 and 2020 125 patients underwent cleft surgery by the Interplast team. The median patient’s age was 2,58 years (mean=7 years) with a range of 3 months to 54 years. Group 1 (patients with cleft lip only, n=58) was analyzed on satisfaction with facial aspects and significant improvement was found. All 125 patients were evaluated regarding function features like eating or drinking and their post-surgical satisfaction was significantly higher than before surgery. To analyze if hearing and nasal breathing difficulties in patients with cleft palate can be decreased by primary cleft surgery these parameters were analyzed in group 2 (n=67). Group 2 as well reported significant improvement. Even with limited medical infrastructure and later primary surgery than in developed countries, cleft surgeries can be performed successfully and sustainable by integrating local surgeons in charity missions. Patients benefit greatly by these missions and further investigation on humanitarian cleft missions should be conducted.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Sustainability and Success of Cleft Surgery in Developing Countries: Satisfaction Outcome of 125 Patients Operated in Myanmar AU - Milena Pejkovic AU - Martin Gosau Heinrich Schoeneich AU - Khin Marlar Win AU - Thiha Wyain AU - Heinrich Schoeneich AU - Philipp Kauffmann AU - Silke Haerteis AU - Lukas Prantl AU - Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger AU - Thiha Aung Y1 - 2021/08/18 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13 T2 - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery JF - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery JO - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery SP - 28 EP - 35 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1344 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20210702.13 AB - Non-syndromic orofacial clefts are significantly linked to socioeconomic status. Because of limited access to proper medical care in rural areas of developing countries charity missions are highly required to mitigate negative outcome, but there is still a lack of data on humanitarian missions’ sustainability and success. A retrospective analysis of 125 patients who underwent cleft surgery during humanitarian missions in Myanmar was performed. Patients’ satisfaction with facial features and function was evaluated pre- and post-surgery. Furthermore, postoperative complications and satisfaction with follow-up care have been analyzed. Between 2008 and 2020 125 patients underwent cleft surgery by the Interplast team. The median patient’s age was 2,58 years (mean=7 years) with a range of 3 months to 54 years. Group 1 (patients with cleft lip only, n=58) was analyzed on satisfaction with facial aspects and significant improvement was found. All 125 patients were evaluated regarding function features like eating or drinking and their post-surgical satisfaction was significantly higher than before surgery. To analyze if hearing and nasal breathing difficulties in patients with cleft palate can be decreased by primary cleft surgery these parameters were analyzed in group 2 (n=67). Group 2 as well reported significant improvement. Even with limited medical infrastructure and later primary surgery than in developed countries, cleft surgeries can be performed successfully and sustainable by integrating local surgeons in charity missions. Patients benefit greatly by these missions and further investigation on humanitarian cleft missions should be conducted. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -