Objectives: The present research was designed to assess of the maxillary sinus volume in patients of temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis. Patients and methods: Twelve patients (21 ankylotic joints) were selected suffering from TMJ bony ankylosis. Twenty one subject of control group (42 sinuses) had CT of maxillary sinus volume. Maxillary sinus volumes have been measured by CT and compared with that of ankylosis group. Results: Obvious reduction in the maxillary sinus volume has been detected preoperatively in TMJ ankylosis group and this reduction was statistical highly significant. This attributed to the reduction in size of the maxilla and the alveolar bone height secondary to TMJ bony ankylosis. Conclusion: obvious reduction in maxillary sinus volume in patients with TMJ bony ankylosis and this reduction increase with longer duration.
Published in | International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14 |
Page(s) | 24-30 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Maxillary Sinus, CT Scan, Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis
[1] | Dehis M: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis in Gizan region. Cairo dental journal 6:131; 1990. |
[2] | Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV& Cypriano RV: Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by gap arthroplasty. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 11:66-9; 2006. |
[3] | Anagnostopoulo S, Venieratos D& Antonopoulou M: Temporomandibular joint and correlated fissures. Anatomical and clinical consideration Cranio, 26:88-95; 2008. |
[4] | Jagannathan M: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Indian J Plast Surg. 42:187-8; 2009. |
[5] | Rajan R, Reddy NV, PotturiA, Jhawar D, Muralidhar PV& Reddy B: Gap arthroplasty of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by transoral access: a case series. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 43: 1468–72; 2014. |
[6] | Irfan ul Hassan Haji, Mohamed Siddiq, Abdur Rahman Al-Atram, Kamal Kiswani , Sripathi Rao BH & Gunachandra Rai: Comparison of gap arthroplasty versus creating a pseudoarthrosis – modified technique for surgical management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a new approach. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 7: 40- 44; 2014 |
[7] | Ashwini Deshpande, Darpan Bhargava, Savitha Kota, &D. B. Gandhi.: Computed tomography analysis of hyoid apparatus in temporomandibular joint ankylosis. International Jstomat.& Occ. Med.5: 99-103; 2012 |
[8] | Manganello-Souza LC & Mariani P B: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: Report of 14 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 32:24-9; 2003. |
[9] | Schobel G, Millesi W, Watzke IM & Hollmann K: Ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. Follow-up of thirteen patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 74:7-14; 1992. |
[10] | Erol B, Tanrikulu R& Gorgun B: A clinical study on ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 34: 100-6; 2006. |
[11] | U. S. Pal, Nimisha Singh, Laxman R. Malkunje, R. K. Singh, Chandan Gupta, &Sharad Chand: Correction of post ankylotic facial asymmetry with bimaxillary distraction osteogenesis—Case report. Open Journal of Stomatology 2: 255-259; 2012 |
[12] | Al-Moraissi EA, El-Sharkawy TM, Mounair RM, &El-Ghareeb TI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes for various surgical modalities in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 44: 470–82; 2015 |
[13] | Stabrun AE.: Impaired mandibular growth and micrognathic development in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. A longitudinal study of lateral cephalographs. Eur J Orthod, 13:423-34; 1991. |
[14] | Kjellberg H, Kiliaridis S, & Thilander B.: Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children withjuvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects. Eur J Orthod. 17:357-73; 1995. |
[15] | Solow B &Tallgren A: Head posture and craniofacial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol.44:417-36; 1976. |
[16] | Ko EW, Huang CS,Chen YR &Figueroa AA: Cephalometric Craniofacial Characteristics in Patients with TMJ AnkylosisChang Gung Med J 28; 456-66; 2005. |
[17] | Cho SH, Kim TH, Kim KR, Lee JM, Lee DK, Kim JH, Im JJ, Park CJ, & Hwang KG: Factors for maxillary sinus volume and craniofacial anatomical features in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 136:610-5; 2010 |
[18] | Karmody CS, Carter B,&Vincent ME: Developmental anomalies of the maxillary sinus.Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Opthalmol Otolaryngol84: 723–723-8; 1977. |
[19] | Márquez S,Lawson W,Schaefer S, &Laitman J: Anatomy of the nasal accessory sinuses. Wackym PA,Rice D,Schaefer SD, editors. Lippincott. Philadelphia, PA. Page153–193, 2002. |
[20] | Joshua BZ, Sachs O, Shelef I, Vardy-Sion N, Novack L, Vaiman M, &Puterman M: Comparison of clinical data, CT, and bone histopathology in unilateral chronic maxillary sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 148:145-50; 2013 |
[21] | Monje A, Catena A, Monje F, Gonzalez-García R, Galindo-Moreno P, Suarez F, &Wang HL.: Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and morphologic patterns in the atrophic posterior maxilla. J Periodontol.85:676-82; 2014 |
[22] | Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, & Akiyoshi T: A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 56:1158-63; 1998. |
[23] | Sahlstrand-Johnson P, Jannert M, Strömbeck A, Abul-Kasim K: Computed tomography measurements of different dimensions of maxillary and frontal sinuses. BMC Medical Imaging. 11:1-7; 2011. |
[24] | Emirzeoglu M., Sahin B.Bilgic S, Celebi M & Uzun A: Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computed tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx 34; 191-5; 2007. |
[25] | Moorthy AP& Finch LD: Interpositional arthroplasty for ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg., 55:545-52; 1983. |
[26] | Tasanen A. & Leikomaa H: Ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint of a child. Report of a case. Int J Oral Surg. 6:95-9; 1977. |
[27] | Björk A: Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 55:585-99; 1969. |
[28] | Moss ML & Salentijn L: The Capsular Matrix. Am J Orthod.56:474-90; 1969. |
[29] | Kjellberg H, Fasth A, Kiliaridis S, Wenneberg B, & Thilander B: Caniofacial structure in children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) compared with healthy children with ideal or post-normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 107:67-78; 1995. |
[30] | Kamal A: Effect of gap-arthroplasty on the tongue position in patients of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. (Dissertation) Cairo University. Egypt; 1999: Page 93 |
[31] | Khedr H: Effect of gap-arthroplasty on the position of hyoid bone in patients suffering from temporomandibular joint ankylosis. (Dissertation) Cairo University. Egypt; 2001: Page 99 |
[32] | Alaa MA: Effect of gap-arthroplasty on the upper airway in patients of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. (Dissertation) Cairo University. Egypt; 2000: Page 82 |
[33] | Munro IR, Chen YR, & Park BY: Simultaneous total correction of temporomandibular ankylosis and facial asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg.77:517-29; 1986. |
[34] | Guven, O: Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by a modified fossa prosthesis. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg., 32: 236-42; 2004. |
APA Style
Dehis M., Tantawi W., Kamal A., Atta M. (2015). Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Volume in Patients of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1(2), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14
ACS Style
Dehis M.; Tantawi W.; Kamal A.; Atta M. Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Volume in Patients of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis. Int. J. Clin. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 1(2), 24-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14, author = {Dehis M. and Tantawi W. and Kamal A. and Atta M.}, title = {Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Volume in Patients of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis}, journal = {International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {24-30}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcoms.20150102.14}, abstract = {Objectives: The present research was designed to assess of the maxillary sinus volume in patients of temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis. Patients and methods: Twelve patients (21 ankylotic joints) were selected suffering from TMJ bony ankylosis. Twenty one subject of control group (42 sinuses) had CT of maxillary sinus volume. Maxillary sinus volumes have been measured by CT and compared with that of ankylosis group. Results: Obvious reduction in the maxillary sinus volume has been detected preoperatively in TMJ ankylosis group and this reduction was statistical highly significant. This attributed to the reduction in size of the maxilla and the alveolar bone height secondary to TMJ bony ankylosis. Conclusion: obvious reduction in maxillary sinus volume in patients with TMJ bony ankylosis and this reduction increase with longer duration.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Volume in Patients of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis AU - Dehis M. AU - Tantawi W. AU - Kamal A. AU - Atta M. Y1 - 2015/08/01 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14 T2 - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery JF - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery JO - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery SP - 24 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1344 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.14 AB - Objectives: The present research was designed to assess of the maxillary sinus volume in patients of temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis. Patients and methods: Twelve patients (21 ankylotic joints) were selected suffering from TMJ bony ankylosis. Twenty one subject of control group (42 sinuses) had CT of maxillary sinus volume. Maxillary sinus volumes have been measured by CT and compared with that of ankylosis group. Results: Obvious reduction in the maxillary sinus volume has been detected preoperatively in TMJ ankylosis group and this reduction was statistical highly significant. This attributed to the reduction in size of the maxilla and the alveolar bone height secondary to TMJ bony ankylosis. Conclusion: obvious reduction in maxillary sinus volume in patients with TMJ bony ankylosis and this reduction increase with longer duration. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -