Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy; Eman A. El-Sharrawy; Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy, Eman A. El-Sharrawy, Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood

Published in International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Volume 1, Issue 2)

Received: 11 July 2015 Accepted: 24 July 2015 Published: 28 July 2015

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objectives: This study was carried out to study the efficacy and the anesthetic characters of using Articaine 4 % with 1:100,000 Epinephrine as a local anesthetic drug in surgical practice through inferior alveolar nerve block and comparing it with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Materials and methods: Thirty patients in two groups, fifteen patients each, undergo extraction of impacted mandibular third molar, Inferior Alveolar Nerve block had been carried out using either Articaine 4% or Lidocaine 2% Local anesthetic drugs. Results: Articaine was well-tolerated and it provided clinically effective pain relief during surgical procedures and it was as potent as Lidocaine and provided similar clinical effect to Lidocaine (Gold standard). Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, we recommend using Articaine 4% as local anesthetic drug in minor oral surgery

Published in	International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Volume 1, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
Page(s)	17-19
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Articaine, Lidocaine, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

References

[1]	Hunter JP and Simmonds MJ. Pain: Putting the Whole Person at the Centre. Physiother Can.; 62: 1–4, 2010.
[2]	Pozos AJ, Martínez R, Aguirre P, et al., Tramadol Administered in a Combination of Routes for Reducing Pain After Removal of an Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.J oral maxillofac sur.; Volume 65, Issue 8, Pages 1633–1639,2007
[3]	Mojumdar E. H. and Lyubartsev A. P. Molecular dynamics simulations of local anesthetic articaine in a lipid bilaye. Biophysical Chemistry; vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2010.
[4]	Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 4th ed Mosby, St.Louis, 1997.
[5]	Malamed SF. Clinical action of specific agents. In: Handbook of local anesthesia, 5th edn. Mosby, St Louis, pp 61–65 and 71–73. 2007.
[6]	Dugal A, Khanna R and Patankar A. A comparative study between 0.5% Centbucridine HCl and 2% Lignocaine HCl with adrenaline (1:200000). J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 8:221–223, 2009.
[7]	Moore PA, Boynes SG, Hersh EV et al., The anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine 1:200000 epinephrine. J Am Dent Assoc; 137:1572–1581, 2006.
[8]	Colombini BL, Modena KC, Calvo AM, et al., Articaine and Mepivacaine efficacy in post operative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, cross over study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod;102:169–174. 2006.
[9]	Rebolledo AS, Molina ED, Aytes LB et al., Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine versus 2% Lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 12:E139–E144, 2007.
[10]	Gregorio L, Giglio F, Sakai V, Modena KC et al ., A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine and 0.5% Bupivaciane (both with 1:200000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 106:19–28, 2008.
[11]	Shruthi R, Kedarnath N, Mamatha N, et al Articaine for surgical removal of impacted third molar; a comparison with lignocaine. J Int Oral Health; 5:48-53, 2013.
[12]	Gordon SM, Dionne RA, Brahim J et al., Blockade of peripheral neuronal barrage reduces postoperative pain. Pain; 70: 209-215, 1997.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy, Eman A. El-Sharrawy, Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood. (2015). Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1(2), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy; Eman A. El-Sharrawy; Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood. Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Int. J. Clin. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 1(2), 17-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy, Eman A. El-Sharrawy, Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood. Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Int J Clin Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;1(2):17-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12,
  author = {Mohamed Hossam Moselhy and Eman A. El-Sharrawy and Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood},
  title = {Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery},
  volume = {1},
  number = {2},
  pages = {17-19},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcoms.20150102.12},
  abstract = {Objectives: This study was carried out to study the efficacy and the anesthetic characters of using Articaine 4 % with 1:100,000 Epinephrine as a local anesthetic drug in surgical practice through inferior alveolar nerve block and comparing it with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Materials and methods: Thirty patients in two groups, fifteen patients each, undergo extraction of impacted mandibular third molar, Inferior Alveolar Nerve block had been carried out using either Articaine 4% or Lidocaine 2% Local anesthetic drugs. Results: Articaine was well-tolerated and it provided clinically effective pain relief during surgical procedures and it was as potent as Lidocaine and provided similar clinical effect to Lidocaine (Gold standard). Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, we recommend using Articaine 4% as local anesthetic drug in minor oral surgery},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine
AU  - Mohamed Hossam Moselhy
AU  - Eman A. El-Sharrawy
AU  - Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood
Y1  - 2015/07/28
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
T2  - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF  - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JO  - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
SP  - 17
EP  - 19
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-1344
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
AB  - Objectives: This study was carried out to study the efficacy and the anesthetic characters of using Articaine 4 % with 1:100,000 Epinephrine as a local anesthetic drug in surgical practice through inferior alveolar nerve block and comparing it with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Materials and methods: Thirty patients in two groups, fifteen patients each, undergo extraction of impacted mandibular third molar, Inferior Alveolar Nerve block had been carried out using either Articaine 4% or Lidocaine 2% Local anesthetic drugs. Results: Articaine was well-tolerated and it provided clinically effective pain relief during surgical procedures and it was as potent as Lidocaine and provided similar clinical effect to Lidocaine (Gold standard). Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, we recommend using Articaine 4% as local anesthetic drug in minor oral surgery
VL  - 1
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Eman A. El-Sharrawy

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy, Eman A. El-Sharrawy, Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood. (2015). Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1(2), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy; Eman A. El-Sharrawy; Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood. Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Int. J. Clin. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 1(2), 17-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohamed Hossam Moselhy, Eman A. El-Sharrawy, Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood. Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Int J Clin Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;1(2):17-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12,
  author = {Mohamed Hossam Moselhy and Eman A. El-Sharrawy and Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood},
  title = {Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery},
  volume = {1},
  number = {2},
  pages = {17-19},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcoms.20150102.12},
  abstract = {Objectives: This study was carried out to study the efficacy and the anesthetic characters of using Articaine 4 % with 1:100,000 Epinephrine as a local anesthetic drug in surgical practice through inferior alveolar nerve block and comparing it with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Materials and methods: Thirty patients in two groups, fifteen patients each, undergo extraction of impacted mandibular third molar, Inferior Alveolar Nerve block had been carried out using either Articaine 4% or Lidocaine 2% Local anesthetic drugs. Results: Articaine was well-tolerated and it provided clinically effective pain relief during surgical procedures and it was as potent as Lidocaine and provided similar clinical effect to Lidocaine (Gold standard). Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, we recommend using Articaine 4% as local anesthetic drug in minor oral surgery},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Clinical Assessment of Using Local Anesthetic Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Comparing It with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine
AU  - Mohamed Hossam Moselhy
AU  - Eman A. El-Sharrawy
AU  - Abdel Badia Abdallah Abdel Mabood
Y1  - 2015/07/28
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
T2  - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF  - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JO  - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
SP  - 17
EP  - 19
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-1344
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20150102.12
AB  - Objectives: This study was carried out to study the efficacy and the anesthetic characters of using Articaine 4 % with 1:100,000 Epinephrine as a local anesthetic drug in surgical practice through inferior alveolar nerve block and comparing it with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine. Materials and methods: Thirty patients in two groups, fifteen patients each, undergo extraction of impacted mandibular third molar, Inferior Alveolar Nerve block had been carried out using either Articaine 4% or Lidocaine 2% Local anesthetic drugs. Results: Articaine was well-tolerated and it provided clinically effective pain relief during surgical procedures and it was as potent as Lidocaine and provided similar clinical effect to Lidocaine (Gold standard). Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, we recommend using Articaine 4% as local anesthetic drug in minor oral surgery
VL  - 1
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download