The present study was evaluated the egg production performance, fertility, hatchability, embryonic mortality and chick quality from Cosmopolitan (C), Improved Horro (H), ♂Improved Horro*Cosmopolitan ♀ (HC), ♂ Cosmopolitan*Improved Horro ♀ (CH), Indigenous (L), and Koekoek (KK) genotypes. A Completely randomized design was used in the study. A total of 1800 eggs and 300 eggs of each genotype were used for the hatchability and fertility trials. A total of 360 chicks and 60 chicks of each genotype were used for chick quality study. A total of 720 genotypes (5female: 1 male) and 120 from each genotype were used for egg production. Age at first egg and age at peak varied across genotypes. KK had the highest egg production followed by CH, H, CH and C but L had the lowest egg production. KK had the highest weight and feed intake followed by HC, HC, and C, whereas had the lowest followed by H. Feed conversion ratio varied among genotypes. H had the highest egg fertility followed by CH. Conversely, C, HC, L and KK chicken genotypes were comparable and had the least egg fertility. H and CH showed the highest hatchability from set egg, whereas L showed the lowest hatchability from set egg followed by the intermediate KK, HC and C. CH indicated the highest hatchability from fertile egg set, while L confirmed that the lowest hatchability from fertile egg set followed by the intermediate KK, HC and C. The overall embryonic mortality of L was the highest, but CH had significantly lowest overall embryonic mortality followed by KK, HC and C. Chicks hatched from KK had the highest chick weight and chick length, but chicks hatched from L had the least chick weight and chick length. Eggs of L had the highest percentage egg weight yield followed by KK, whereas the CH, C, HC and H had intermediate yield percent during incubation. Conclusively: The genotype differences of hens substantially influenced egg production performance, fertility, embryonic mortality, hatchability and chick quality.
| Published in | International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 8, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14 |
| Page(s) | 55-65 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Egg Production, Fertility, Embryonic Mortality, Hatchability, Chick Quality
| [1] | Adedeji TA, Amao SR, Popoola AD Ogundipe R (2015). Fertility, Hatchability and Eggs Quality Traits of Nigerian Locally Adapted Chickens in the Derived Savanna Environment of Nigeria. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, Vol. 5, No. 17. ISSN 2224- 3208. |
| [2] | Adeleke M, Peters S, Ozoje M, Ikeobi C, Bamgbose A, Adebambo O. (2012). Effect of crossbreeding on fertility, hatchability and embryonic mortality of Nigerian local chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 44: 505–510. |
| [3] | Alsobayel, A. A., & Albadry, M. A. (2012). Effect of age and sex ratio on fertility and hatchability of Baladi and Leghorn laying hens. J. Anim. Plant Sci, 22(1), 15-19. |
| [4] | Alsobayel, A. A., Almarshade, M. A. and Albadry, M. A. 2013. Effect of breed, age and storage period on egg weight, egg weight loss and chick weight of commercial broiler breeders raised in Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 12: 53-57. |
| [5] | Arda Sözcü, Aydın ˙Ipek, ZüleyhaOguz, Stefan Gunnarsson and Anja B. Riber (2021) Comparison of Performance, Egg Quality, and Yolk Fatty Acid Profile in Two Turkish Genotypes (Atak-S and Atabey) in a Free-Range System. Animals, 11, 1458. El. |
| [6] | Bamidele, O., Sonaiya, E. B., Adebambo, O. A. and Dessie, T. 2019. On-station performance evaluation of improved tropically adapted chicken breeds for smallholder poultry production systems in Nigeria. Tropical Animal Health and Production. |
| [7] | Bedru, B. A. (2021). Comparative performance evaluation of local and tropical adapted exotic breeds of chickens in Ethiopia. Doctoral Dissertation, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. |
| [8] | Bernacki, Z., Kokoszynski, D. and Bawej, M. (2013) Laying Performance, Egg Quality and Hatching Results in Two Guinea Fowl Genotypes. European Poultry Science, 77, 109-115. |
| [9] | Bobbo, G. A., S. S. Baba and M. S. Yahaya, 2013. Egg Quality Characteristics of Three Phenotypes of Local Chickens in Adamawa State. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 4: 13-21. |
| [10] | Cavero, D., Schmutz, M., Icken, W. and Preisinger, R. 2011. Improving hatchability in white egg layer strains through breeding. Lohmann Information 46 (1). |
| [11] | Dawud, I. 2019. Comparative study of production and reproductive performance of parent stock and commercial layer chickens under different management conditions in Ethiopia. Doctoral Dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. |
| [12] | Dogara, M. U., Kalla, D. J. U., Mancha, Y. P. and Shuaibu, A. (2021) Evaluation of egg production and egg quality traits of Noiler chickens. Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 23 (2): 100-113. |
| [13] | Du, Y., Liu, L., He, Y., T. Dou, J. Jia & C. Ge (2020) Endocrine and genetic factors affecting egg laying performance in chickens: a review, British Poultry Science, 61: 5, 538-549. |
| [14] | Ebegbulen, V. N., Bassey, A. O. and Bassey, O. (2017) Genotype Influence on Production, Fertility and Hatchability of Eggs of Guinea Fowl (Numidameleagris) in a Tropical Rain Forest Zone of Nigeria. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4, 94-97. |
| [15] | Esatu, W., Ibrahim, D. and Melesse, A. (2011) Comparative Evaluation of Fertility and Hatchability of Horro, Fayoumi, Lohmann Silver and Pochefstroom Koekoek Breeds of Chicken. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 5, 124-129. |
| [16] | Fathi, M., Abou-Emera, O., Al-Homidan, I., Galal, A., & Rayan, G. (2022). Effect of genotype and egg weight on hatchability properties and embryonic mortality pattern of native chicken populations. Poultry Science, 101(11), 102129. |
| [17] | Getnet, Z., Urge, M., Animut, G., Esatu, W., & Dessie, T. (2020). Comparative Laying Performance, Egg Quality, Fertility and Hatchability of Guinea Fowl with Tilili, Horro and Potchefstroom Koekoek Chicken Breeds. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10(4), 665-682. |
| [18] | Grochowska, E., Kinal, A., Sobek, Z., Siatkowski, I., & Bednarczyk, M. (2019). Field study on the factors affecting egg weight loss, early embryonic mortality, hatchability, and chick mortality with the use of classification tree technique. Poultry Science, 98(9), 3626-3636. |
| [19] | Hailemariam, A., Esatu, W., Abegaz, S., Urge, M., Assefa, G., & Dessie, T. (2022). Sensory Characteristics, Nutritional Composition, and Quality of Eggs from Different Chickens. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 12(4), 591-615. |
| [20] | Hassen, H., Neser, F. W. C., De Kock, A., & van Marle-Köster, E. (2009). Study on the genetic diversity of native chickens in northwest Ethiopia using microsatellite markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(7). |
| [21] | Iqbal, J., Mukhtar, N., Ur Rehman, Z., Khan, S Ahmad, T., Anjum, M., Pasha, R. and Umar, S. 2017. Effects of egg weight on the egg quality, chick quality, and broiler performance at the later stages of production (week 60) in broiler breeders. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 26: 183-191. |
| [22] | Jahan, S. S., Islam, M. S., Howlider, M. A. R., Sarder, M. J. U., Islam, M. A. and Hossain, Z. M. A. 2015. Hatchability of Deshi, Fayoumi, RIR and Sonali chicken in forced draft incubator and under broody hens in Bangladesh. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 27 (15). |
| [23] | Kawole BW, Mengesha YT, Zeleke NA. On farm phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken ecotypes in west Hararghe zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. J Vet Med Animal Sci. 2019; 2(1): 1009. |
| [24] | Khawaja, T. 2013. Developing a hybridized chicken for rural poultry. Doctoral Dissertation, PirMehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. |
| [25] | King’Ori, A. M. (2011). Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchability in poultry. International Journal of poultry science, 10(6), 483-492. |
| [26] | Larivière, J. M., Michaux, C. and Leroy, P. 2009. Genetic parameters of embryonic viability traits in a traditional chicken breed, International Journal of Poultry Science, 8 (12), 1183–1188. |
| [27] | Madeddu, M., Zaniboni, L., Mangiagalli, M. G., Cassinelli, C., & Cerolini, S. (2013). Egg related parameters affecting fertility and hatchability in the Italian bantam breed Mericanel della Brianza. Animal Reproduction Science, 137(3-4), 214-219. |
| [28] | Muller, S. K. 2018. Meat and egg production with dual-purpose poultry: biological background, feed requirements and efficiency, meat and egg quality. Doctoral Dissertation, ETH Zurich University, Switzerland. |
| [29] | Narinç, D., and Aydemir, E. (2021). Chick quality: an overview of measurement techniques and influencing factors. World's Poultry Science Journal, 77(2), 313-329. |
| [30] | Nasri, H., Henry, Van den B., Najar, T. and Moncef, B. 2020. Interactions between egg storage duration and breeder age on selected egg quality, hatching results, and chicken quality. Animals, 10. |
| [31] | Ng’ambi, J. W., Thamaga, M. W., Norris, D., Mabelebele, M. and Alabi, O. J. 2013. Effects of egg weight on hatchability, chick hatch-weight and subsequent productivity of indigenous Venda chickens in Polokwane, South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science, 43: 69-74. |
| [32] | Obike, O. M., Nwachukwu, E. N. and Ukewulonu, I. E. (2014) Effect of Strain and Associations of Some Fertility and Hatchability Traits of Indigenous Guinea Fowls Raised in the Rain-Forest Zone of South-East Nigeria. Global Science Research Journals, 2, 98-102. |
| [33] | Osei-Amponsah, R., Kayang, B. B., Manu, H. and Naazie, A. 2014. Egg quality traits of local Ghanaian chickens and influence of storage period. Animal Genetic Resources, |
| [34] | Patrick MK, Moenyana M, Chawangwa D (2014). Influence of strain and egg size on the hatchability of Indigenous Tswana Chicken eggs. International Journal of Livestock Research, Vol. 4 (1): 63-73. |
| [35] | Peters, S. O., Ilori, B. M., Ozoje, M. O., Ikeobi, C. O. N and Adebambo, O. A. 2008. Gene segregation effects on fertility and hatchability of pure and crossbred chicken genotypes in the humid tropics, International Journal of Poultry Science, 7(10), 954–958. |
| [36] | Rakonjac S, Dosković V, Bošković SB, Škrbić Z, Lukić M, Petričević V, Petrović DM., (2021) Production Performance and Egg Quality of Laying Hens as Influenced by Genotype and Rearing System. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. |
| [37] | Reijrink, I. A. M., R. Meijerhof, B. Kemp, E. A. M. Graat, and H. van den Brand. 2009. Influence of prestorage incubation on embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality. Poult. Sci. 88: 2649–2660. |
| [38] | Serkalem, A., Aberra, M., Sandip, B. (2019) Egg Production and Egg Quality Traits of Local and Exotic Chicken Breeds Reared in Two Agro-ecologies under Traditional Management System. Research Journal of Food and Nutrition, Volume 3, Issue 1, PP 11-17 ISSN 2637-5583. |
| [39] | Tabinda Khawaja, Sohail Hassan Khan, Nasir Mukhtar, MianAsghar Ali, Tanveer Ahmed & Abdul Ghafar (2012) Comparative study of growth performance, egg production, egg characteristics and haemato-biochemical parameters of Desi, Fayoumi and Rhode Island Red chicken, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 40: 4, 273-283. |
| [40] | Stinckens, A., Vereijken, A., Ons, E., Konings, P., Van As, P., Cuppens, H., & Cassiman, J. J. (2015). Art meets science: The Cosmopolitan Chicken Research Project. Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 7(3), 163. |
| [41] | Tabinda, K., Sohail, H. K., Nasir, M., Nemat, U. & Abida, P., (2013) Production performance, egg quality and biochemical parameters of Fayoumi, Rhode Island Red and their reciprocal crossbred chickens, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 41: 2, 208-217. |
| [42] | Tahawy WS and Abdel-Rahman MM (2020). Molecular Breeding of Three Genes Associated with Egg Production Traits in Three Strains of Chickens. J. World Poult. Res., 10 (4): 605-614. |
| [43] | Taye, S., Goshu, G., & Abegaz, S. (2022). Effect of Crossbreeding on Growth Performance of Improved Horro Crosses with Koekoek and Kuroiler Chicken Breeds. Poultry Science Journal, 10(1), 35-44. |
| [44] | Tesfaye, E., Esatu, W., Melese, K. and Habte, T. (2019) Effect of Energy-Protein Optimization on the Growth and Production Performances of Local Chickens. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health, 3, 4-12. |
| [45] | Tona, K., Bamelis, F., De Ketelaere, B., Bruggeman, V., Moraes, V. M., Buyse, J., & Decuypere, E. (2003a). Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality, and chick juvenile growth. Poultry science, 82(5), 736-741. |
| [46] | Tona, K., Onagbesan, O. M., Jego, Y., Kamers, B., Decuypere, E., & Bruggeman, V. (2004). Comparison of embryo physiological parameters during incubation, chick quality, and growth performance of three lines of broiler breeders differing in genetic composition and growth rate. Poultry science, 83(3), 507-513. |
| [47] | Varun S, Thankur Y., Kotch S., Dogra P. 2015. Factors affecting fertility, hatchability and chick survivability in poultry germplasm under sub temperate conditions. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 41(1), 83-85. |
| [48] | Wondmeneh, E. W. (2015) Genetic improvement in indigenous chicken of Ethiopia. Ph. D. thesis. Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University. The Netherlands. |
APA Style
Fulla, S. T., Gebreslassie, A. H. (2024). Evaluation of Egg Production, Fertility, Hatchability, Embryonic Mortality and Chick Quality of Different Chickens. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 8(3), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14
ACS Style
Fulla, S. T.; Gebreslassie, A. H. Evaluation of Egg Production, Fertility, Hatchability, Embryonic Mortality and Chick Quality of Different Chickens. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2024, 8(3), 55-65. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14
AMA Style
Fulla ST, Gebreslassie AH. Evaluation of Egg Production, Fertility, Hatchability, Embryonic Mortality and Chick Quality of Different Chickens. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2024;8(3):55-65. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14,
author = {Shambel Taye Fulla and Atsbaha Hailemariam Gebreslassie},
title = {Evaluation of Egg Production, Fertility, Hatchability, Embryonic Mortality and Chick Quality of Different Chickens
},
journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
volume = {8},
number = {3},
pages = {55-65},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20240803.14},
abstract = {The present study was evaluated the egg production performance, fertility, hatchability, embryonic mortality and chick quality from Cosmopolitan (C), Improved Horro (H), ♂Improved Horro*Cosmopolitan ♀ (HC), ♂ Cosmopolitan*Improved Horro ♀ (CH), Indigenous (L), and Koekoek (KK) genotypes. A Completely randomized design was used in the study. A total of 1800 eggs and 300 eggs of each genotype were used for the hatchability and fertility trials. A total of 360 chicks and 60 chicks of each genotype were used for chick quality study. A total of 720 genotypes (5female: 1 male) and 120 from each genotype were used for egg production. Age at first egg and age at peak varied across genotypes. KK had the highest egg production followed by CH, H, CH and C but L had the lowest egg production. KK had the highest weight and feed intake followed by HC, HC, and C, whereas had the lowest followed by H. Feed conversion ratio varied among genotypes. H had the highest egg fertility followed by CH. Conversely, C, HC, L and KK chicken genotypes were comparable and had the least egg fertility. H and CH showed the highest hatchability from set egg, whereas L showed the lowest hatchability from set egg followed by the intermediate KK, HC and C. CH indicated the highest hatchability from fertile egg set, while L confirmed that the lowest hatchability from fertile egg set followed by the intermediate KK, HC and C. The overall embryonic mortality of L was the highest, but CH had significantly lowest overall embryonic mortality followed by KK, HC and C. Chicks hatched from KK had the highest chick weight and chick length, but chicks hatched from L had the least chick weight and chick length. Eggs of L had the highest percentage egg weight yield followed by KK, whereas the CH, C, HC and H had intermediate yield percent during incubation. Conclusively: The genotype differences of hens substantially influenced egg production performance, fertility, embryonic mortality, hatchability and chick quality.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Egg Production, Fertility, Hatchability, Embryonic Mortality and Chick Quality of Different Chickens AU - Shambel Taye Fulla AU - Atsbaha Hailemariam Gebreslassie Y1 - 2024/09/26 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14 T2 - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JF - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JO - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology SP - 55 EP - 65 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1312 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240803.14 AB - The present study was evaluated the egg production performance, fertility, hatchability, embryonic mortality and chick quality from Cosmopolitan (C), Improved Horro (H), ♂Improved Horro*Cosmopolitan ♀ (HC), ♂ Cosmopolitan*Improved Horro ♀ (CH), Indigenous (L), and Koekoek (KK) genotypes. A Completely randomized design was used in the study. A total of 1800 eggs and 300 eggs of each genotype were used for the hatchability and fertility trials. A total of 360 chicks and 60 chicks of each genotype were used for chick quality study. A total of 720 genotypes (5female: 1 male) and 120 from each genotype were used for egg production. Age at first egg and age at peak varied across genotypes. KK had the highest egg production followed by CH, H, CH and C but L had the lowest egg production. KK had the highest weight and feed intake followed by HC, HC, and C, whereas had the lowest followed by H. Feed conversion ratio varied among genotypes. H had the highest egg fertility followed by CH. Conversely, C, HC, L and KK chicken genotypes were comparable and had the least egg fertility. H and CH showed the highest hatchability from set egg, whereas L showed the lowest hatchability from set egg followed by the intermediate KK, HC and C. CH indicated the highest hatchability from fertile egg set, while L confirmed that the lowest hatchability from fertile egg set followed by the intermediate KK, HC and C. The overall embryonic mortality of L was the highest, but CH had significantly lowest overall embryonic mortality followed by KK, HC and C. Chicks hatched from KK had the highest chick weight and chick length, but chicks hatched from L had the least chick weight and chick length. Eggs of L had the highest percentage egg weight yield followed by KK, whereas the CH, C, HC and H had intermediate yield percent during incubation. Conclusively: The genotype differences of hens substantially influenced egg production performance, fertility, embryonic mortality, hatchability and chick quality. VL - 8 IS - 3 ER -
Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute Debrezeit Agricultural Research Center, Bishoftu, Ethiopia
Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute Debrezeit Agricultural Research Center, Bishoftu, Ethiopia
Information