Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods

Kibebew Wakjira; Taye Negera; Shimu Dabela; Tadele Alemu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods

Kibebew Wakjira, Taye Negera, Shimu Dabela, Tadele Alemu

Published in International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 3, Issue 3)

Received: 22 June 2019 Accepted: 6 August 2019 Published: 23 August 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A study was conducted in view of analyzing the responses of central highland honeybees (Apis mellifera bandasii) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen-rearing methods at Holeta for two consecutive active seasons. The result of the study revealed that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between the techniques in percentage of accepted larvae and sealed queen cells. The acceptance rates for Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods were 78.19 and 50.81%, respectively while the rates were 42.75 and 25.56% for sealing, respectively. However, the result of the study showed that the rate of hatching (out of the total given larvae) into virgin queen stage in Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting systems were about 23 and 23.8%, indicating no significant difference between the two techniques. From this study it is recommended that using Karl Jenter kit is an excellent option to overcome the problem of indentifying appropriate larvae for grafting under field conditions. However, there might be a difference in quality of the queens obtained from these two methods. Therefore, also further study recommended to evaluate the performance of queens reared using the two techniques.

Published in	International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 3, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
Page(s)	35-40
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Apis mellifera bandasii, Jenter, Honeybees, Cell Cup, Queen Rearing

References

[1]	G. Ahmet and A. Hasan, “Reproductive Characteristics Of Turkish Honeybee (Apis Mellifera L.) Genotypes,” J. Anim. Vet. Adv., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 864–870, 2005.
[2]	R. A. Morse, Rearing Queen Honey Bees: Second Edition 2nd ed. Edition. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Rearing Queen Honey Bees- Roger A Morse/dp/ 1878075055. 1993.
[3]	E. Crane, Bees and beekeeping: science, practice and world resources. 1990.
[4]	H. H. Laidlaw and R. E. Page, Queen rearing and bee breeding. https://www.amazon.com/Queen-Rearing-Breeding-Harry-Laidlaw/dp/187807508X. 1997.
[5]	D. M. R. Serrano, “Queen rearing, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.,” O Apic., vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 39–41, 1997.
[6]	R. Büchler et al., “Standard methods for rearing and selection of Apis mellifera queens,” J. Apic. Res., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2013.
[7]	N. Adgaba et al., “The responses of Apis mellifera jemenitica to different artificial queen rearing techniques,” Saudi J. Biol. Sci., pp. 4–9, 2018.
[8]	S. B. Ahmad and S. A. Dar, “Mass rearing of queen bees, apis mellifera l. (hym : apidae ) for bee colony development raised under the temperate conditions of kashmir,” vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 945–948, 2013.
[9]	K. Crailsheim et al., “Standard methods for artificial rearing of Apis mellifera larvae Standard methods for artificial rearing of Apis mellifera larvae,” vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2013.
[10]	S. W. Cobey, “Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee queens and factors affecting their performance,” vol. 38, pp. 14524–14531, 2013.
[11]	E. BUESCU (LIPAN), M. R. GURĂU, and A. I. BÎRȚOIU, “Artificial Insemination on Apis Mellifera – Aspects of Artificial Inseminated Queen Performances and Factors That May Affect Their Performance,” pp. 21–24, 2015.
[12]	A. Nuru and W. Dereje, “Response of Ethiopian honeybees to different queen rearing techniques,” in Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, 26–27 May 1999, pp. 125– 133., 1999, pp. 125–133.
[13]	A. Zewudu, L. Gemechis, and A. Tadele, “The response of central highland honeybee, Apis mellifera bandasii to grafting and natural cell cup of queen rearing techniques,” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 03 to 05, 2013.
[14]	B. Amssalu, A. Nuru, S. E. Radloff, and H. R. Hepburn, “Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ethiopian region,” Apidologie, vol. 35, pp. 71–81, 2004.
[15]	N. K. Dhaliwal, J. Singh, and P. K. Chhuneja, “Comparative evaluation of Doolittle, Cupkit and Karl Jenter techniques for rearing Apis mellifera Linnaeus queen bees during breeding season,” J. Appl. Nat. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1658–1661, 2017.
[16]	A. Nuru and W. Dereje, “Response of Ethiopian honeybees to different queen rearing techniques, Holeta Bee Research Center, P. O. Box 22, Holeta,” 1999.
[17]	A. Dodologlu, B. Emsen, and F. Gene, “Comparison of some characteristics of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera l.) reared by using doolittle method and natural queen cells,” J. Appl. Anim. Res., vol. 26, pp. 113–115, 2004.
[18]	M. Cengiz, B. Emsen, and A. Dodologlu, “Some characteristics of queenbees (Apis mellifera L.) rearing in queenright and queenless colonies,” J. Anim. Vet. Adv., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1083–1085, 2009.
[19]	K. ÖNK, M. M. CENGİZ, K. YAZICI, and T. KIRMIZIBAYRAK, “Effects of Rearing Periods on Some Reproductive Characteristics of Caucasian (Apis mellifera caucasica) Queen Bees,” Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bilim. Derg., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 259–259, 2016.
[20]	F. Gene, B. Emsen, and A. Dodologlu, “Effects of rearing period and grafting method on the queen bee rearing,” J. Appl. Anim. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2005.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kibebew Wakjira, Taye Negera, Shimu Dabela, Tadele Alemu. (2019). Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 3(3), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kibebew Wakjira; Taye Negera; Shimu Dabela; Tadele Alemu. Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2019, 3(3), 35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kibebew Wakjira, Taye Negera, Shimu Dabela, Tadele Alemu. Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2019;3(3):35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11,
  author = {Kibebew Wakjira and Taye Negera and Shimu Dabela and Tadele Alemu},
  title = {Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods},
  journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
  volume = {3},
  number = {3},
  pages = {35-40},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20190303.11},
  abstract = {A study was conducted in view of analyzing the responses of central highland honeybees (Apis mellifera bandasii) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen-rearing methods at Holeta for two consecutive active seasons. The result of the study revealed that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between the techniques in percentage of accepted larvae and sealed queen cells. The acceptance rates for Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods were 78.19 and 50.81%, respectively while the rates were 42.75 and 25.56% for sealing, respectively. However, the result of the study showed that the rate of hatching (out of the total given larvae) into virgin queen stage in Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting systems were about 23 and 23.8%, indicating no significant difference between the two techniques. From this study it is recommended that using Karl Jenter kit is an excellent option to overcome the problem of indentifying appropriate larvae for grafting under field conditions. However, there might be a difference in quality of the queens obtained from these two methods. Therefore, also further study recommended to evaluate the performance of queens reared using the two techniques.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods
AU  - Kibebew Wakjira
AU  - Taye Negera
AU  - Shimu Dabela
AU  - Tadele Alemu
Y1  - 2019/08/23
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
T2  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
JF  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
JO  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
SP  - 35
EP  - 40
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1312
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
AB  - A study was conducted in view of analyzing the responses of central highland honeybees (Apis mellifera bandasii) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen-rearing methods at Holeta for two consecutive active seasons. The result of the study revealed that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between the techniques in percentage of accepted larvae and sealed queen cells. The acceptance rates for Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods were 78.19 and 50.81%, respectively while the rates were 42.75 and 25.56% for sealing, respectively. However, the result of the study showed that the rate of hatching (out of the total given larvae) into virgin queen stage in Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting systems were about 23 and 23.8%, indicating no significant difference between the two techniques. From this study it is recommended that using Karl Jenter kit is an excellent option to overcome the problem of indentifying appropriate larvae for grafting under field conditions. However, there might be a difference in quality of the queens obtained from these two methods. Therefore, also further study recommended to evaluate the performance of queens reared using the two techniques.
VL  - 3
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Kibebew Wakjira

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Taye Negera

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Shimu Dabela

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Tadele Alemu

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kibebew Wakjira, Taye Negera, Shimu Dabela, Tadele Alemu. (2019). Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 3(3), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kibebew Wakjira; Taye Negera; Shimu Dabela; Tadele Alemu. Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2019, 3(3), 35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kibebew Wakjira, Taye Negera, Shimu Dabela, Tadele Alemu. Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2019;3(3):35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11,
  author = {Kibebew Wakjira and Taye Negera and Shimu Dabela and Tadele Alemu},
  title = {Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods},
  journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
  volume = {3},
  number = {3},
  pages = {35-40},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20190303.11},
  abstract = {A study was conducted in view of analyzing the responses of central highland honeybees (Apis mellifera bandasii) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen-rearing methods at Holeta for two consecutive active seasons. The result of the study revealed that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between the techniques in percentage of accepted larvae and sealed queen cells. The acceptance rates for Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods were 78.19 and 50.81%, respectively while the rates were 42.75 and 25.56% for sealing, respectively. However, the result of the study showed that the rate of hatching (out of the total given larvae) into virgin queen stage in Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting systems were about 23 and 23.8%, indicating no significant difference between the two techniques. From this study it is recommended that using Karl Jenter kit is an excellent option to overcome the problem of indentifying appropriate larvae for grafting under field conditions. However, there might be a difference in quality of the queens obtained from these two methods. Therefore, also further study recommended to evaluate the performance of queens reared using the two techniques.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods
AU  - Kibebew Wakjira
AU  - Taye Negera
AU  - Shimu Dabela
AU  - Tadele Alemu
Y1  - 2019/08/23
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
T2  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
JF  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
JO  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
SP  - 35
EP  - 40
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1312
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20190303.11
AB  - A study was conducted in view of analyzing the responses of central highland honeybees (Apis mellifera bandasii) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen-rearing methods at Holeta for two consecutive active seasons. The result of the study revealed that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between the techniques in percentage of accepted larvae and sealed queen cells. The acceptance rates for Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods were 78.19 and 50.81%, respectively while the rates were 42.75 and 25.56% for sealing, respectively. However, the result of the study showed that the rate of hatching (out of the total given larvae) into virgin queen stage in Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting systems were about 23 and 23.8%, indicating no significant difference between the two techniques. From this study it is recommended that using Karl Jenter kit is an excellent option to overcome the problem of indentifying appropriate larvae for grafting under field conditions. However, there might be a difference in quality of the queens obtained from these two methods. Therefore, also further study recommended to evaluate the performance of queens reared using the two techniques.
VL  - 3
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download