Ectoparasites represent a major source of livestock productivity loss. This study assessed different types as well as the predilection sites of ectoparasites on slaughtered cattle at Keffi abattoir. The fleas and lice were collected by combing the skin of the animal, while the ticks were carefully picked using a forceps. The ectoparasites found were preserved in 10% formalin in a sample tube and identified using standard techniques. A total of 300 cattle were surveyed, of which 202(67.33%) were infested with varieties of ectoparasites while 98(32.67%) were not infested. Nonetheless, 139(68.81%) of the cattle were infested with ticks of which 95(47.03%) represents Rhipicephalus spp. while only 44(21.78%) represents Amblyomma spp., while about one-fifth, 57(28.22%) of the infestation were caused by fleas; of which 39(19.31%) were of the Ctenocephalides canis while 18( 8.91%) were of the Ctenocephalides felis. However, 6(2.97%) of the infestation were due to Linognathus vituli specie of louse. Majority of the infestation were at the thigh, abdomen, neck and back. Using X2 analysis, the findings showed that there was a statistical significant difference between the prevalence of the ectoparasites by species, while no significant association was found with respect to the number of cattle infested by sex of the cattle surveyed and also by locations of survey. This study revealed a higher prevalence of ectoparasites of cattle in Keffi metropolis; infestation was found to be predominantly by two tick species: Amyblyomma spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. Thus cattle should be checked and treated regularly for ectoparasites as infestation may affect their health, productivity as well as the economic value of these animals.
Published in | International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14 |
Page(s) | 18-22 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ectoparasites, Slaughtered Cattle, Keffi Abattoir, Animal Protein, Predilection Site, Tick
[1] | Shiferaw, D. and Abebe, G. (2006). Cattle tick dynamics in different agro-ecological zones of Wolayta, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 10: 85-99. |
[2] | Wall, R., Rose, H., Ellse, L. and Morgan, E. (2011). Livestock ectoparasites integrated management in a changing climate. Veterinary Parasitology, 180: 82-89. |
[3] | Rony, S. A., Mondal, M. M. H., Begum, N., Islam, M. A. and Affroze, S. (2010). Epidemiology of ectoparasitic infestations in cattle at Bhawal Forest Area, Gazipur, Bangladesh. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 8: 27-33. |
[4] | Wall, R. (2007). Ectoparasites: future challenges in a changing world. Veterinary Parasitology, 148: 62-74. |
[5] | Tongjura, J. D. C., Amuga, G. A., Ombugadu, R. J., Aamu, Y. and Mafuyai, H. B. (2012). Ectoparasites infesting livestock in three local government areas of Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Science World Journal, 7(1): 15-17. |
[6] | Ayele, S., Asegid, W., Abera, M. A., Ahmed, M. M. and Belachew, H. (2003). Livestock marketing in Ethiopia. A view of structure, performance and development initiatives. Socio-Economic and Policy Research Work Paper, Nairobi, Kenya. 52: 121. |
[7] | Walker, A. R., Bouattour, A., Camicas, J. L., Estrada-pena, A., Horak, I. G., Latif, A. A, Pedgram R. G. and Preston, P. M. (2003). Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species, Bioscience Reports, Edinburgh, UK. Pp. 24-67. |
[8] | Onu, S. H. and Shiferaw, T. Z. (2012). Prevalence of ectoparasite infestations of cattle in Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Veterinary World, 6(6): 291-294. |
[9] | Taylor, M. A. (2001). Recent developments in ectoparasiticides. The Veterinary Journal, 161: 253–268. doi:10.1053/tvjl.2000.0549. |
[10] | Taylor, M. A. (2007). Veterinary Parasitology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom. ISBN 978-1-4051-1964-1. |
[11] | James-Rugu, N. N. and Jidayi, S. (2004). A survey on the ectoparasites of some livestock from some areas of Borno and Yobe States. Nigerian Veterinary Journal, 25(2): 48-55. |
[12] | Campbell, J. B. (2002). Livestock Insect of Cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 70(1): 70:4. |
[13] | Sonenshine, D. E. (2007). Biology of tick. Oxford University Press, New York. Vol.1 and 2, Pg; 44-45, 465. |
[14] | Tadesse, A., Fentaw, E., Mekbib, B., Abebe, R., Mekuria, S. and Zeuwdu, E. (2011). Study on the prevalence of ectoparasite infestation of ruminants in and around Kombolcha Tannary, Northeastern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 15: 87-101. |
[15] | Stork, M. G. (1979). The epidemiological and economic importance of fly infestation of meat and milk producing animals in Europe. Veterinarian Reviewed, 105: 341-343. |
[16] | Jongejan, F. and Uilenberg, G. (2004). The global importance of ticks. Parasitology, 129(1): 3-14. |
[17] | Nassarawa Geographical Information Services (NAGIS) (2015). GPS map of Nasarawa State showing all the Local Government Areas. www.nagis.gov.ng |
[18] | Akwa, V. L., Binbol, N. L., Samaila, K. L. and Marcus, N. D. (2007). Geographical perspective of Nasarawa State. Onaivi Printing and Publishers Ltd Keffi, Nigeria. |
[19] | James-Rugu, N. N. and Iwuala, M. O. E. (1998). Studies on the prevalence and factors conditioning ticks infestation of dogs, sheep and goat in Plateau State. Journal of Innovation in Life Science, 10: 20-30. |
[20] | Mathison, B. A. and Pritt, B. S. (2014). Laboratory identification of Arthropod Ectoparasite. Clinical Microbiology Review, 27(1): 56-64. |
[21] | Yahaya, M. A., Magami, I. M. and Bagida, I. M. (2015). Prevalence of ticks on camels and cattles brought to Dodoru Market Kebbi State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture, 2(4): 16-24. |
[22] | Gebreselama, M., Zeru, F. and Rohma, G. (2014). Identification and prevalence of ectoparasites in cattle and sheep in and around Bishoftu town, Central Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2(4): 124-129. |
[23] | Niratu, K. and Teshome, F. (2012). Population dynamics of cattle ectoparasite in Western Amhara National Region State, Ethiopia. Journal Veterinary Medical Animal Health, 4: 22-26. |
[24] | Pergam, G., Hoogsstraal, H. and Wassef, H. (1981). Tick Argasidae ixodidae of Ethiopia, distribution, ecology and host relationship of species infecting livestock. Bulletin of Entomology Research, 71: 339-359. |
[25] | Fantahun, B. and Mohamed A. (2012). Survey on the distribution of tick species in and around Assosa town, Ethiopia. Research Journal Veterinary Science, 5: 32-41. |
APA Style
Mukhtar O. Adamu, Abdullahi S. Onawo, Fatimat O. Adebayo. (2018). An Investigation of the Ectoparasites of Slaughtered Cattle at Keffi Abattoir in Nassarawa State of Nigeria, Sub-Sahara Africa. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14
ACS Style
Mukhtar O. Adamu; Abdullahi S. Onawo; Fatimat O. Adebayo. An Investigation of the Ectoparasites of Slaughtered Cattle at Keffi Abattoir in Nassarawa State of Nigeria, Sub-Sahara Africa. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2018, 2(1), 18-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14
AMA Style
Mukhtar O. Adamu, Abdullahi S. Onawo, Fatimat O. Adebayo. An Investigation of the Ectoparasites of Slaughtered Cattle at Keffi Abattoir in Nassarawa State of Nigeria, Sub-Sahara Africa. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2018;2(1):18-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14, author = {Mukhtar O. Adamu and Abdullahi S. Onawo and Fatimat O. Adebayo}, title = {An Investigation of the Ectoparasites of Slaughtered Cattle at Keffi Abattoir in Nassarawa State of Nigeria, Sub-Sahara Africa}, journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {18-22}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20180201.14}, abstract = {Ectoparasites represent a major source of livestock productivity loss. This study assessed different types as well as the predilection sites of ectoparasites on slaughtered cattle at Keffi abattoir. The fleas and lice were collected by combing the skin of the animal, while the ticks were carefully picked using a forceps. The ectoparasites found were preserved in 10% formalin in a sample tube and identified using standard techniques. A total of 300 cattle were surveyed, of which 202(67.33%) were infested with varieties of ectoparasites while 98(32.67%) were not infested. Nonetheless, 139(68.81%) of the cattle were infested with ticks of which 95(47.03%) represents Rhipicephalus spp. while only 44(21.78%) represents Amblyomma spp., while about one-fifth, 57(28.22%) of the infestation were caused by fleas; of which 39(19.31%) were of the Ctenocephalides canis while 18( 8.91%) were of the Ctenocephalides felis. However, 6(2.97%) of the infestation were due to Linognathus vituli specie of louse. Majority of the infestation were at the thigh, abdomen, neck and back. Using X2 analysis, the findings showed that there was a statistical significant difference between the prevalence of the ectoparasites by species, while no significant association was found with respect to the number of cattle infested by sex of the cattle surveyed and also by locations of survey. This study revealed a higher prevalence of ectoparasites of cattle in Keffi metropolis; infestation was found to be predominantly by two tick species: Amyblyomma spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. Thus cattle should be checked and treated regularly for ectoparasites as infestation may affect their health, productivity as well as the economic value of these animals.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Investigation of the Ectoparasites of Slaughtered Cattle at Keffi Abattoir in Nassarawa State of Nigeria, Sub-Sahara Africa AU - Mukhtar O. Adamu AU - Abdullahi S. Onawo AU - Fatimat O. Adebayo Y1 - 2018/01/19 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14 T2 - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JF - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JO - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology SP - 18 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1312 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20180201.14 AB - Ectoparasites represent a major source of livestock productivity loss. This study assessed different types as well as the predilection sites of ectoparasites on slaughtered cattle at Keffi abattoir. The fleas and lice were collected by combing the skin of the animal, while the ticks were carefully picked using a forceps. The ectoparasites found were preserved in 10% formalin in a sample tube and identified using standard techniques. A total of 300 cattle were surveyed, of which 202(67.33%) were infested with varieties of ectoparasites while 98(32.67%) were not infested. Nonetheless, 139(68.81%) of the cattle were infested with ticks of which 95(47.03%) represents Rhipicephalus spp. while only 44(21.78%) represents Amblyomma spp., while about one-fifth, 57(28.22%) of the infestation were caused by fleas; of which 39(19.31%) were of the Ctenocephalides canis while 18( 8.91%) were of the Ctenocephalides felis. However, 6(2.97%) of the infestation were due to Linognathus vituli specie of louse. Majority of the infestation were at the thigh, abdomen, neck and back. Using X2 analysis, the findings showed that there was a statistical significant difference between the prevalence of the ectoparasites by species, while no significant association was found with respect to the number of cattle infested by sex of the cattle surveyed and also by locations of survey. This study revealed a higher prevalence of ectoparasites of cattle in Keffi metropolis; infestation was found to be predominantly by two tick species: Amyblyomma spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. Thus cattle should be checked and treated regularly for ectoparasites as infestation may affect their health, productivity as well as the economic value of these animals. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -