In order to improve the management level of scientific research and development (R & D) funds in scientific research institutions, this paper explores the ways and methods to optimize the management of R & D funds of scientific institutions by using management accounting. According to the scope and characteristics of the factors influencing the management of R & D funds, the evaluation index of R & D funds management is defined as four secondary indexes and 14 third-level indicators. The four secondary indexes are R & D funds management organization, management system, management information and management process. Then fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is adopted, and an evaluation example named M is chosen to carry on the empirical analysis, the appraisal grade is calculated finally. The evaluation results are in good agreement with the actual situation of the R & D funds management of the evaluation example M. At last, this paper puts forward the measures to improve the R & D funds management of scientific research institutions, and provides the basis and reference for strengthening the overall planning and optimizing allocation of R & D funds.
Published in | International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13 |
Page(s) | 14-20 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Management Accounting, R & D funds Management, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method, Evaluation, Application
[1] | Lou Jiwei. Accelerating the Development of Managerial Accounting with Chinese Characteristics to Promote China Economic Transformation and Upgrading [EB/OL]. http://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caizhengxinwen/201408/t20140829_1133308.html |
[2] | Ji Huihong. Think on the Management of Scientific Research Funds in Colleges and Universities [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2014 (5): 121-122 |
[3] | Zhu Qingfeng, Xu Zhongping, Wang li. Analysis and Comparison of Corporation Control Activities Assessment based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Method and BP Neural Network Method [J], Business Review, 2013, 25 (8): 113-123 |
[4] | Wang Qiquan, Jin Longzhe. Analysis and Application of fuzzy comprehensive assessment methods in Large-scale Activities Stampede Accidents [J], China safety science journal, 2007, 17 (9): 124-128 |
[5] | Wang Qiquan, Tong Ruipeng. Analysis and Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method in Enterprise Safety Evaluation [J], Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology, 2006, 3 (4): 26-31 |
[6] | Han Li, Mei Qiang, Lu Yyumei, etc. Analysis and Research on AHP - Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J], China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14 (7): 86-89 |
[7] | Chen Xiaohong, Yang Zhihui. Research on Credit Evaluation System Based on Improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method - A Case Study of Small and Medium-sized Listed Companies in China [J], Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23 (1): 146-153 |
[8] | Yang Yang, Gao Gengjun. Research on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the Risk of the Chattel Mortgage Financing - Based on the TFN - AHP Model [J], Communication of Finance and Accounting, 2016 (32): 97-100 |
[9] | Tang Qiyi. DPS Date Processing System [M], Beijing: Science process, 2010: 1127-1138 |
[10] | Wang Huazhong, Qiang Fengjiao, Chen Xiaodun. Re - determination of Weight and Evaluation Principle in Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J], Statistics & Decision, 2015 (8): 24-27 |
[11] | Wang Li. Internal control construction of Instituition [J]. China Science and technology information, 2012 (1): 113-115 |
[12] | Huang Haiying, Chen Xiuyun. Discussion on Problems and Improvement Measures of Scientific Research Funds Management in Scientific Research Institutes [J]. Technology innovation and application, 2015 (18): 41-41 |
[13] | Song Yongjie. Discussion of the Whole Process Management of Scientific Research Funds [J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2009, (11): 3-7 |
APA Style
Wang Li. (2017). Application Research of Management Accounting in Science Institute. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 2(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13
ACS Style
Wang Li. Application Research of Management Accounting in Science Institute. Int. J. Account. Finance Risk Manag. 2017, 2(1), 14-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13, author = {Wang Li}, title = {Application Research of Management Accounting in Science Institute}, journal = {International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {14-20}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijafrm.20170201.13}, abstract = {In order to improve the management level of scientific research and development (R & D) funds in scientific research institutions, this paper explores the ways and methods to optimize the management of R & D funds of scientific institutions by using management accounting. According to the scope and characteristics of the factors influencing the management of R & D funds, the evaluation index of R & D funds management is defined as four secondary indexes and 14 third-level indicators. The four secondary indexes are R & D funds management organization, management system, management information and management process. Then fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is adopted, and an evaluation example named M is chosen to carry on the empirical analysis, the appraisal grade is calculated finally. The evaluation results are in good agreement with the actual situation of the R & D funds management of the evaluation example M. At last, this paper puts forward the measures to improve the R & D funds management of scientific research institutions, and provides the basis and reference for strengthening the overall planning and optimizing allocation of R & D funds.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Application Research of Management Accounting in Science Institute AU - Wang Li Y1 - 2017/01/14 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13 T2 - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management JF - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management JO - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management SP - 14 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9376 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20170201.13 AB - In order to improve the management level of scientific research and development (R & D) funds in scientific research institutions, this paper explores the ways and methods to optimize the management of R & D funds of scientific institutions by using management accounting. According to the scope and characteristics of the factors influencing the management of R & D funds, the evaluation index of R & D funds management is defined as four secondary indexes and 14 third-level indicators. The four secondary indexes are R & D funds management organization, management system, management information and management process. Then fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is adopted, and an evaluation example named M is chosen to carry on the empirical analysis, the appraisal grade is calculated finally. The evaluation results are in good agreement with the actual situation of the R & D funds management of the evaluation example M. At last, this paper puts forward the measures to improve the R & D funds management of scientific research institutions, and provides the basis and reference for strengthening the overall planning and optimizing allocation of R & D funds. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -