The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review

Siraj Shekmohammed

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

| Peer-Reviewed

The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review

Siraj Shekmohammed

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 7, Issue 5)

Received: 8 July 2022 Accepted: 16 August 2022 Published: 19 September 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Agricultural and forest ecosystems, as well as communities' means of subsistence, have been threatened by the effects of climate change caused by complicated weather-related phenomena. Agroforestry plays a significant part in climate change adaptation through diversified land use practices, sustainable livelihoods, income sources, increased forest and agricultural productivity, and decreased weather-related production losses, which increase resilience against climate impacts. It provides a variety of ecosystem services; however, evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking until recently. This paper aimed to provide empirical information on the role of agroforestry in ecosystem maintenance and climate change adaptation and mitigation provided by agroforestry. Agroforestry has played a greater role in the maintenance of the ecosystem and mitigation of CO₂ than monocropping and open cereal-based agriculture but less than natural forest. It is important for preserving biodiversity, CO₂ sequestration, and adapting to climate change. CO₂ sequestration through above and ground biomass, offsetting CO₂ emission from deforestation and microclimate modification are major climate change mitigation effects. Provision of numerous ecosystem services such as food, fodder, fuel wood, income source, and enhancing soil productivity helps the community sustain changing climate effects. Hence, considerable attention needs to be given to agroforestry to contribute considerable benefit to the maintenance of the ecosystem, and climate change mitigation and adaptation next to a forest.

Published in	International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 7, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
Page(s)	214-221
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biodiversity Preservation, Carbon Sequestration, Air and Water Clean, Soil Improvement, Socio-economic Benefits

References

[1]	Amare, D.; Wondie, M.; Mekuria, W.; Darr, D. 2019. Agroforestry of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia: Practices and Benefits. Small-Scale For, 18, 39–56. [CrossRef].
[2]	Mbow, C.; Van Noordwijk, M.; Luedeling, E.; Neufeldt, H.; Minang, P. A.; Kowero, G. 2014. Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain, 6, 61–67. [CrossRef].
[3]	Santoro, A.; Venturi, M.; Bertani, R.; Agnoletti, M. 2020. A Review of the Role of Forests and Agroforestry Systems in the FAO Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Programme. Forests, 11, 860. [CrossRef].
[4]	Bai, X.; Huang, Y.; Ren, W.; Coyne, M.; Jacinthe, P. -A.; Tao, B.; Hui, D.; Yang, J.; Matocha, C. 2019. Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate-smart agriculture practices: A meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol, 25, 2591–2606. [CrossRef].
[5]	Assogbadjo, A. E.; Kakaï, R. G.; Vodouhê, F. G.; Djagoun, C. A. M. S.; Codjia, J. T. C.; Sinsin, B. 2012. Biodiversity and socioeconomic factors supporting farmers’ choice of wild edible trees in the agroforestry systems of Benin (West Africa). For. Policy Econ, 14, 41–49. [CrossRef].
[6]	Santos, P. Z. F.; Crouzeilles, R.; Sansevero, J. B. B. 2019. Can agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in agricultural landscapes? A meta-analysis of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For. Ecol. Manag, 433, 140–145. [CrossRef].
[7]	Browder, J. O.; Wynne, R. H.; Pedlowski, M. A. 2005. Agroforestry diffusion and secondary forest regeneration in the Brazilian Amazon: Further findings from the Rondônia Agroforestry Pilot Project (1992–2002). Agrofor. Syst, 65, 99–111. [CrossRef].
[8]	Maia, A. G.; Eusebio, G. D. S.; Fasiaben, M. D. C. R.; Moraes, A. S.; Assad, E. D.; Pugliero, V. S. 2021. The economic impacts of the diffusion of agroforestry in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 108, 105489. [CrossRef].
[9]	Duffy, C.; Toth, G. G.; Hagan, R. P. O.; McKeown, P. C.; Rahman, S. A.; Widyaningsih, Y.; Sunderland, T. C. H.; Spillane, C. 2021. Agroforestry contributions to smallholder farmer food security in Indonesia. Agrofor. Syst, 95, 1109–1124. [CrossRef].
[10]	Kiptot, E.; Franzel, S.; Degrande, A. 2014. Gender, agroforestry, and food security in Africa. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 6, 104–109. [CrossRef].
[11]	Ripple, W. R., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Barnard, P. and Moomaw, W. R. 2019. World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency, BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088.
[12]	IPCC, 2019. IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse gas fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
[13]	SIWI, 2018. Water for productive and multifunctional landscapes. Stockholm International Water Institute, Report no. 38.
[14]	Harvey, C. A. & Villalobos, J. A. G., 2007. Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16 (8), 2257-2292.
[15]	Lin, B. B. 2011. Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification: Adaptive Management for Environmental Change. BioScience, 61 (3), 183-193.
[16]	Nair P. K. R, Garrity, D 2012. Agroforestry research and development: the way forward. In P. K. R. Nair & D. Garrity. (Eds.). Agroforestry - the future of global land use: advances in agroforestry. Volume 9.
[17]	Gebru, B. M.; Wang, S. W.; Kim, S. J.; Lee, W. -K. 2019. Socio-Ecological Niche and Factors Affecting Agroforestry Practice Adoption in Different Agroecologies of Southern Tigray, Ethiopia. Sustainability, 11, 3729. [CrossRef].
[18]	Roshetko, J. M.; Rohadi, D.; Perdana, A.; Sabastian, G.; Nuryartono, N.; Pramono, A. A.; Widyani, N.; Manalu, P.; Fauzi, M. A.; Sumardamto, P.; et al. 2013. Teak agroforestry systems for livelihood enhancement, industrial timber production, and environmental rehabilitation. For. Trees Livelihoods, 22, 241–256. [CrossRef].
[19]	Wollenberg, E.; Nawir, A. A. 2005. Turning straw into gold: Specialization among damar agroforest farmers in pesisir, sumatra. For. Trees Livelihoods, 15, 317–336. [CrossRef].
[20]	Suyanto, S.; Khususiyah, N.; Leimona, B. 2007. Poverty and Environmental Services: Case Study in Way Besai Watershed, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Ecol. Soc, 12, 13. [CrossRef].
[21]	Martinelli, G. D. C.; Schlindwein, M. M.; Padovan, M. P.; Vogel, E.; Ruviaro, C. F. 2019. Environmental performance of agroforestry systems in the Cerrado biome, Brazil. World Dev, 122, 339–348. [CrossRef].
[22]	Reynolds, P. E.; Simpson, J. A.; Thevathasan, N. V.; Gordon, A. M. 2007. Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecol. Eng, 29, 362–371. [CrossRef].
[23]	Iskandar, J.; Iskandar, B. S.; Partasasmita, R. 2016. Responses to environmental and socio-economic changes in the Karangwangi traditional agroforestry system, South Cianjur, West Java. Biodiversitas, 17, 332–341. [CrossRef].
[24]	Ollinaho, O. I.; Kröger, M. 2021. Agroforestry transitions: The good, the bad, and the ugly. J. Rural Stud, 82, 210–221. [CrossRef].
[25]	Ickowitz, A.; Rowland, D.; Powell, B.; Salim, M. A.; Sunderland, T. 2016. Forests, Trees, and Micronutrient-Rich Food Consumption in Indonesia. PLoS ONE, 11, e0154139. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
[26]	Pratiwi, A. and Suzuki, A. 2019. Reducing Agricultural Income Vulnerabilities through Agroforestry Training: Evidence from a Randomised Field Experiment in Indonesia. Bull. Indonesia. Econ. Stud, 55, 83–116. [CrossRef].
[27]	Sharma, N.; Bohra, B.; Pragya, N.; Ciannella, R.; Dobie, P.; Lehmann, S. 2016. Bioenergy from agroforestry can lead to improved food security, climate change, soil quality, and rural development. Food Energy Secure, 5, 165–183. [CrossRef].
[28]	Murthy, I. K., Gupta, M., Tomar, S., Munsi, M., Tiwari, R., Hegde, G. & Ravindranath, N. H. 2016. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems in India. J Earth Sci Climate Change, 4, 131.
[29]	Mukhlis, I., Rizaludin, M. S. and Hidayah, I., 2022. Understanding Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agroforestry on Rural Communities. Forests, 13 (4), p. 556.
[30]	Atangana, A., Khasa, D., Chang, S. and Degrande, A., 2014. Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. In Tropical Agroforestry (pp. 227-232). Springer, Dordrecht.
[31]	Jose, S., 2012. Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agroforestry Systems, 85 (1), pp. 1-8.
[32]	Harvey CA, Gonzales JG, Somarriba E. 2006. Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in the forest, indigenous agroforestry systems, and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodivers Conserv 15: 555–585.
[33]	Jose, S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforestry systems total, 76 (1), pp. 1-10.
[34]	Udawatta, R. P., Garrett, H. E. and Kallenbach, R., 2011. Agroforestry buffers for nonpoint source pollution reductions from agricultural watersheds. Journal of environmental quality, 40 (3), pp. 800-806.
[35]	Aldeen HS, Majid NM, Azani AM, Ghani ANA, Mohamed S. 2013. Agroforestry Impacts on Soil Fertility in the Rima'a Valley, Yemen. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 32: 3, 286-309, DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2012.654723.
[36]	Saha, R., P. K. Ghosh, V. K. Mishra, B. Majumdar, and J. M. S. Tomar. 2010. Can agroforestry be a resource conservation tool to maintain soil health in the fragile ecosystem of northeast India? Outlook Agric., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 191–196, Sep. 2010.
[37]	Dagar, J. C., Singh, A. K. and Arunachalam, A. eds., 2013. Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security & ecosystem services (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media.
[38]	Tyndall J, Colletti J. 2007. Mitigating swine odor with strategically designed shelterbelt systems: a review. Agrofor Syst 69: 45–65.
[39]	Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. and Befort, B. L. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 108 (50), pp. 20260-20264.
[40]	Montagnini, F., 2006. Environmental services of agroforestry systems (Vol. 21). CRC Press.
[41]	Jhariya MK, Yadav DK, Banerjee A. 2018b. Plant mediated transformation and habitat restoration: phytoremediation an eco-friendly approach. In: Gautam A, Pathak C (eds) Metallic contamination and its toxicity. Daya Publishing House, A Division of Astral International Pvt. Ltd New Delhi, pp 231–247. ISBN: 9789351248880.
[42]	Yadav GS, Babu S, Meena RS, Debnath C, Saha P, Debbaram C, Datta M. 2017. Effects of godawariphosgold and single supper phosphate on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) productivity, phosphorus uptake, phosphorus use efficiency, and economics. Indian J Agric Sci 87 (9): 1165–1169.
[43]	Raj, A., Jhariya, M. K., Yadav, D. K., Banerjee, A. and Meena, R. S. 2019. Agroforestry: a holistic approach for agricultural sustainability. In Sustainable agriculture, forest and environmental management (pp. 101-131). Springer, Singapore.
[44]	Nair PKR, Vimala DN, Kumar BM, Showalter JM. 2011. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108: 237–307.
[45]	Kumar BM, Nair PKR. 2012. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Opportunities and Challenges. Springer.
[46]	Sood KK, Mitchell CP. 2011. Household-level domestic fuel consumption and forest resource about agroforestry adoption: evidence against need-based approach. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 337-345.
[47]	Luedeling, E., Sileshi, G., Beedy, T., and Dietz, J., 2011. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems (pp. 61-83). Springer, Dordrecht.
[48]	Luedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T, Dietz J. 2012. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges vol. Advances in Agroforestry 8. Edited by Kumar BM, Nair PKR. Springer; 23.
[49]	Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Nair VD. 2008. Carbon stock and sequestration potential of traditional and improved agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 159-166.
[50]	Marone, D., Poirier, V., Coyea, M., Olivier, A. and Munson, A. D., 2017. Carbon storage in agroforestry systems in the semi-arid zone of Niayes, Senegal. Agroforestry Systems, 91 (5), pp. 941-954.
[51]	Kimaro AA, Isaac ME, Chamshama SAO. 2012. Carbon pools in tree biomass and soils under rotational woodlot systems in eastern Tanzania. In Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Edited by Kumar BM. Nair PKR: Springer; 142-156.
[52]	Glenday J. 2008. Carbon storage and emissions offset potential in an African dry forest, the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Environ Monitor Assess, 142: 85-95.
[53]	Jew, E. K., Dougill, A. J., Sallu, S. M., O’Connell, J. and Benton, T. G., 2016. Miombo woodland under threat: Consequences for tree diversity and carbon storage. Forest Ecology and Management, 361, pp. 144-153.
[54]	Lal, R., Follett, R. F., Stewart, B. A. and Kimble, J. M., 2007. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil science, 172 (12), pp. 943-956.
[55]	Gruenewald, H., Brandt, B. K., Schneider, B. U., Bens, O., Kendzia, G. and Hüttl, R. F., 2007. Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecological Engineering, 29 (4), pp. 319-328.
[56]	Kim, D. G., Kirschbaum, M. U. and Beedy, T. L., 2016. Carbon sequestration and net emissions of CH₄ and N₂O under agroforestry: Synthesizing available data and suggestions for future studies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 226, pp. 65-78.
[57]	Verchot, L. V., Van Noordwijk, M., Kandji, S., Tomich, T., Ong, C., Albrecht, A., Mackensen, J., Bantilan, C., Anupama, K. V. & Palm, C. 2007. Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change.
[58]	Carsan, S., Stroebel, A., Dawson, I., Kindt, R., Mbow, C., Mowo, J. & Jamnadass, R. 2014. Can agroforestry option values improve the functioning of drivers of agricultural intensification in Africa? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 35–40.
[59]	Lasco, R. P., Delfino, R. J., Catacutan, D. C., Simelton, E. & Wilson, D. 2014. Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers: the roles of trees and agroforestry. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 83-88.
[60]	Hoang, M. H., van Noordwijk, M., Fox, J., Thomas, D., Sinclair, F., Catacutan, D., Öborn, I. & Simons, T. 2014. Are trees buffering ecosystems and livelihoods in agricultural landscapes of the Lower Mekong Basin? Consequences for climate-change adaptation. Working Paper 177. Bogor, Indonesia: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Southeast Asia Regional Program.
[61]	Franzel, S., Carsan, S., Lukuyu, B., Sinja, J. & Wambugu, C. 2014. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 98– 103.
[62]	Bayala, J., Sanou, J., Teklehaimanot, Z., Kalinganire, A. & Oue ´ draogo, S. J. 2014. Parklands for buffering climate risk and sustaining agricultural production in the Sahel of West Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 28–34.
[63]	Iiyama, M., Neufeldt, H., Dobie, P., Njenga, M., Ndegwa, G. & Jamnadass, R. 2014. The potential of agroforestry in the provision of sustainable woodfuel in sub-Saharan Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6.
[64]	Asase, A. & Tetteh, D. A. 2010. The role of complex agroforestry systems in the conservation of forest tree diversity and structure in southeastern Ghana. Agroforest Syst, 79, 355–368.
[65]	Thorlakson, T. & Neufeldt, H. 2012. Reducing subsistence farmers’ vulnerability to climate change: evaluating the potential contributions of agroforestry in western Kenya. Agric Food Security, 1, 15.
[66]	Syampungani, S., Chirwa, P. W., Akkinifesi, F. K. & Ayayi, O. C. 2010. The potential of using agroforestry as a win-win solution to climate change mitigation and adaptation and meeting food security challenges in Southern Africa. Agric J., 5, 80-88.
[67]	Sileshi, G., Akinnifesi, F. K., Ajayi, O. C., Chakeredza, S., Kaonga, M. & Matakala, P. W. 2007. Contributions of agroforestry to ecosystem services in the Miombo eco-region of Eastern and Southern Africa. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1 (4), 68 -80.
[68]	Bachi, W. 2017. Determinants of Woody Species Diversity in Traditional Agroforestry Practices in South- Bench District, Southwest Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies, Dilla University.
[69]	Linge, E. 2014. Agro-ecosystem and socio-economic role of home garden agroforestry in Jabithenan District, North-Western Ethiopia: implication for climate change adaptation. Springer Plus, 3, 154.
[70]	Kassa, H., Dondeyne, S., Poesen, J., Frankl, A. & Nyssen, J. 2018. Agro-ecological implications of forest and agroforestry systems conversion to cereal-based farming systems in the White Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42 (2), 149–168.
[71]	Tadesse, E. G. 2013. Biodiversity and Livelihoods in Southwestern Ethiopia: Forest Loss and Prospects for Conservation in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems. A Ph. D. dissertation was submitted to the University of California.
[72]	Mekonen T, Giday M, Kelbessa E. 2015. Ethnobotanical study of home garden plants in Sebeta-Awas District of the Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11, 64.
[73]	Pretty, J., Toulmin, C. & Williams, S. 2011. Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 9 (1), 5-24.
[74]	Lin, B. B. 2007. Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 144 (1), 85-94.
[75]	Lin, B. B. 2014. Agroforestry adaptation and mitigation options for smallholder farmers vulnerable to climate change. Agroecology, Ecosystems, and Sustainability, 20, 221.
[76]	Youkhana, A. H. & Idol, T. W. 2010. Growth, Yield, and Value of Managed Coffee Agroecosystem in Hawaii. Pac. Agric. Nat. Resour., 2, 12-19.
[77]	De Souza, H. N., Ron de Goede, G. M., Brussaard, L., Cardoso, I. M, Duarte Edivania, M. G., Fernandes Raphael, B. A., Gomes, L. C. & Pulleman, M. M. 2012. Protective shade, tree diversity, and soil properties in coffee agroforestry systems in the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 146, 179– 196.
[78]	Bisseleua, D., Herve, B. & Stefan, V. 2008. Plant biodiversity and vegetation structure in traditional cocoa forest gardens in southern Cameroon under different management. Biodivers Conserv, 17, 1821–1835.
[79]	Kebebew, Z, Urgessa, K. 2011. Agroforestry Perspective in Land uses Pattern and Farmers Coping Strategy: Experience from Southwest Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Science, 73-77.
[80]	Schoeneberger, M. M. 2009. Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforestry Systems, 75, 27-37.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Siraj Shekmohammed. (2022). The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 7(5), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Siraj Shekmohammed. The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2022, 7(5), 214-221. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Siraj Shekmohammed. The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review. Int J Agric Econ. 2022;7(5):214-221. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12,
  author = {Siraj Shekmohammed},
  title = {The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {7},
  number = {5},
  pages = {214-221},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20220705.12},
  abstract = {Agricultural and forest ecosystems, as well as communities' means of subsistence, have been threatened by the effects of climate change caused by complicated weather-related phenomena. Agroforestry plays a significant part in climate change adaptation through diversified land use practices, sustainable livelihoods, income sources, increased forest and agricultural productivity, and decreased weather-related production losses, which increase resilience against climate impacts. It provides a variety of ecosystem services; however, evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking until recently. This paper aimed to provide empirical information on the role of agroforestry in ecosystem maintenance and climate change adaptation and mitigation provided by agroforestry. Agroforestry has played a greater role in the maintenance of the ecosystem and mitigation of CO2 than monocropping and open cereal-based agriculture but less than natural forest. It is important for preserving biodiversity, CO2 sequestration, and adapting to climate change. CO2 sequestration through above and ground biomass, offsetting CO2 emission from deforestation and microclimate modification are major climate change mitigation effects. Provision of numerous ecosystem services such as food, fodder, fuel wood, income source, and enhancing soil productivity helps the community sustain changing climate effects. Hence, considerable attention needs to be given to agroforestry to contribute considerable benefit to the maintenance of the ecosystem, and climate change mitigation and adaptation next to a forest.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review
AU  - Siraj Shekmohammed
Y1  - 2022/09/19
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 214
EP  - 221
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
AB  - Agricultural and forest ecosystems, as well as communities' means of subsistence, have been threatened by the effects of climate change caused by complicated weather-related phenomena. Agroforestry plays a significant part in climate change adaptation through diversified land use practices, sustainable livelihoods, income sources, increased forest and agricultural productivity, and decreased weather-related production losses, which increase resilience against climate impacts. It provides a variety of ecosystem services; however, evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking until recently. This paper aimed to provide empirical information on the role of agroforestry in ecosystem maintenance and climate change adaptation and mitigation provided by agroforestry. Agroforestry has played a greater role in the maintenance of the ecosystem and mitigation of CO2 than monocropping and open cereal-based agriculture but less than natural forest. It is important for preserving biodiversity, CO2 sequestration, and adapting to climate change. CO2 sequestration through above and ground biomass, offsetting CO2 emission from deforestation and microclimate modification are major climate change mitigation effects. Provision of numerous ecosystem services such as food, fodder, fuel wood, income source, and enhancing soil productivity helps the community sustain changing climate effects. Hence, considerable attention needs to be given to agroforestry to contribute considerable benefit to the maintenance of the ecosystem, and climate change mitigation and adaptation next to a forest.
VL  - 7
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Siraj Shekmohammed

Africa Center of Excellence for Climate Smart Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Siraj Shekmohammed. (2022). The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 7(5), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Siraj Shekmohammed. The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2022, 7(5), 214-221. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Siraj Shekmohammed. The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review. Int J Agric Econ. 2022;7(5):214-221. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12,
  author = {Siraj Shekmohammed},
  title = {The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {7},
  number = {5},
  pages = {214-221},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20220705.12},
  abstract = {Agricultural and forest ecosystems, as well as communities' means of subsistence, have been threatened by the effects of climate change caused by complicated weather-related phenomena. Agroforestry plays a significant part in climate change adaptation through diversified land use practices, sustainable livelihoods, income sources, increased forest and agricultural productivity, and decreased weather-related production losses, which increase resilience against climate impacts. It provides a variety of ecosystem services; however, evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking until recently. This paper aimed to provide empirical information on the role of agroforestry in ecosystem maintenance and climate change adaptation and mitigation provided by agroforestry. Agroforestry has played a greater role in the maintenance of the ecosystem and mitigation of CO2 than monocropping and open cereal-based agriculture but less than natural forest. It is important for preserving biodiversity, CO2 sequestration, and adapting to climate change. CO2 sequestration through above and ground biomass, offsetting CO2 emission from deforestation and microclimate modification are major climate change mitigation effects. Provision of numerous ecosystem services such as food, fodder, fuel wood, income source, and enhancing soil productivity helps the community sustain changing climate effects. Hence, considerable attention needs to be given to agroforestry to contribute considerable benefit to the maintenance of the ecosystem, and climate change mitigation and adaptation next to a forest.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Service and Climate Change Regulation: A Review
AU  - Siraj Shekmohammed
Y1  - 2022/09/19
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 214
EP  - 221
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220705.12
AB  - Agricultural and forest ecosystems, as well as communities' means of subsistence, have been threatened by the effects of climate change caused by complicated weather-related phenomena. Agroforestry plays a significant part in climate change adaptation through diversified land use practices, sustainable livelihoods, income sources, increased forest and agricultural productivity, and decreased weather-related production losses, which increase resilience against climate impacts. It provides a variety of ecosystem services; however, evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking until recently. This paper aimed to provide empirical information on the role of agroforestry in ecosystem maintenance and climate change adaptation and mitigation provided by agroforestry. Agroforestry has played a greater role in the maintenance of the ecosystem and mitigation of CO2 than monocropping and open cereal-based agriculture but less than natural forest. It is important for preserving biodiversity, CO2 sequestration, and adapting to climate change. CO2 sequestration through above and ground biomass, offsetting CO2 emission from deforestation and microclimate modification are major climate change mitigation effects. Provision of numerous ecosystem services such as food, fodder, fuel wood, income source, and enhancing soil productivity helps the community sustain changing climate effects. Hence, considerable attention needs to be given to agroforestry to contribute considerable benefit to the maintenance of the ecosystem, and climate change mitigation and adaptation next to a forest.
VL  - 7
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download