Although Bangladesh has achieved rice self-sufficiency, this does not imply to food security. Around 25% of the population is still food insecure. The fundamental factor is poverty. Despite improvements in many aspects of food security, the Bangladeshi people still lack dietary diversity, resulting in nutritional imbalance. The investigation's focus is on Bangladesh's northwestern region. Though numerous attempts have been made to comprehend rural people's food insecurity, ethnic minority communities are often overlooked. They make up about 1.25 percent of the Bangladeshi population. Many ethnic groups from the plains confront harsh living conditions, such as inadequate housing, contaminated drinking water, and insecurity. In this study the socioeconomic status, household food security, consumption status and dietary diversity of ethnic groups are compared with the majority Bengali community. Ethnic groups expenditure level exceeds their income. Although their income is very poor but the ethnic groups has more months’ of cereal food availability than non-ethnic groups. Most of them are landless. Whatever land they have, most of it is homestead area. They have three meals a day but their dietary diversity is not sufficient. It can be seen that 98.39% non-ethnic households and 97.04% ethnic households have access to safe drinking water. Both groups are vulnerable, marginal and poor. It is important to emphasis on poverty alleviation through income generating activities.
Published in | International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13 |
Page(s) | 75-81 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Food Security, Dietary Diversity, Ethnic, Poverty, Household Food Security
[1] | WFP reports, Food Assistance Fact Sheet-Bangladesh, 2020. |
[2] | Rashidi Chegini, K., Pakravan-Charvadeh, M., Rahimian, M. and Gholamrezaie, S., 2021. Is there a linkage between household welfare and income inequality, and food security to achieve sustainable development goals?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, p. 129390. |
[3] | Thorne-Lyman, A., Valpiani, N., Sun, K., Semba, R., Klotz, C., Kraemer, K., Akhter, N., de Pee, S., Moench-Pfanner, R., Sari, M. and Bloem, M., 2009. Household Dietary Diversity and Food Expenditures Are Closely Linked in Rural Bangladesh, Increasing the Risk of Malnutrition Due to the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Nutrition, 140 (1), pp. 182S-188S. nearly all households, even those in the poorest expenditure quintile, prioritize the purchase of staple foods. |
[4] | Sarker, M. M. R. & Fagun, A. N. (2021). COVID-19, Food Security, Food Prices and Urban-rural Interrelationship for Sustainable Food and Nutritional Security: A Study on Dhaka City. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6 (1), 47. |
[5] | Torlesse H, Kiess L, Bloem MW. Association of household rice expenditure with child nutritional status indicates a role for macroeconomic food policy in combating malnutrition. J Nutr. 2003; 133: 1320–5. |
[6] | Rashid DA, Smith L, Rahman T. Determinants of dietary quality: evidence from Bangladesh. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting; 2006 July 23–26; Long Beach, CA. Available from: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/21326/1/sp06ra11.pdf. |
[7] | Faridi, R., & Wadood, S. N. (2010). An Econometric Assessment of Household Food Security in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 33 (3), 97–111. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23339854 |
[8] | Roy, D., Sarker Dev, D. and Sheheli, S., 2019. Food Security in Bangladesh: Insight from Available Literature. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security. |
[9] | International Republican Institute, 2020. The Challenges Facing Plainland Ethnic Groups in Bangladesh: Land, Dignity and Inclusion. |
[10] | Tithi, Farhana & Barmon, Basanta & Rahman, Sanzidur. (2020). Income Inequality, Poverty and Food Security of Plain Land Ethnic Communities of Bangladesh. 11. 16-32. 10.22681/ADP.2020.11.1.16. |
[11] | Sarker, M. M. R. (2010). Determinants of arsenicosis patients’ perception and social implications of arsenic poisoning through groundwater in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7 (10), 3644–3656. |
[12] | Gujarati, D., & Porter, C. (2008). Basic Econometrics (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. |
[13] | Case, K. and Fair, R., 2006. Principles of economics. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall. |
[14] | Mosammod Mahamuda Parvin, Md. Mizanur Rahman Sarker. 2021. Economic Analysis of Tomato Production in Cumilla and Rangpur Districts of Bangladesh. International Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 6, No. 4, 2021, pp. 193-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210604.16. |
[15] | Akhter M. & Sarkar M. M. R. (2021) Impacts of Climate Factors Influencing Rice Production in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11 (1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i130336 |
[16] | Swindale A, Bilinsky 2006. Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide VERSION 2 Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA) Academy for Educational Development 1825 Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC 20009-5721 Website: www.fantaproject.org. |
[17] | Sarker, M. M. R. 2012. Spatial modeling of households’ knowledge about arsenic pollution in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 74: 1232–9. |
APA Style
M. Mizanur Rahman Sarker, Farah Hossain Jury, Maruf Khan. (2022). Micro Level Study of Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Households’ Food Security and Dietary Diversity. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 7(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13
ACS Style
M. Mizanur Rahman Sarker; Farah Hossain Jury; Maruf Khan. Micro Level Study of Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Households’ Food Security and Dietary Diversity. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2022, 7(2), 75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13
AMA Style
M. Mizanur Rahman Sarker, Farah Hossain Jury, Maruf Khan. Micro Level Study of Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Households’ Food Security and Dietary Diversity. Int J Agric Econ. 2022;7(2):75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13, author = {M. Mizanur Rahman Sarker and Farah Hossain Jury and Maruf Khan}, title = {Micro Level Study of Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Households’ Food Security and Dietary Diversity}, journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, pages = {75-81}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20220702.13}, abstract = {Although Bangladesh has achieved rice self-sufficiency, this does not imply to food security. Around 25% of the population is still food insecure. The fundamental factor is poverty. Despite improvements in many aspects of food security, the Bangladeshi people still lack dietary diversity, resulting in nutritional imbalance. The investigation's focus is on Bangladesh's northwestern region. Though numerous attempts have been made to comprehend rural people's food insecurity, ethnic minority communities are often overlooked. They make up about 1.25 percent of the Bangladeshi population. Many ethnic groups from the plains confront harsh living conditions, such as inadequate housing, contaminated drinking water, and insecurity. In this study the socioeconomic status, household food security, consumption status and dietary diversity of ethnic groups are compared with the majority Bengali community. Ethnic groups expenditure level exceeds their income. Although their income is very poor but the ethnic groups has more months’ of cereal food availability than non-ethnic groups. Most of them are landless. Whatever land they have, most of it is homestead area. They have three meals a day but their dietary diversity is not sufficient. It can be seen that 98.39% non-ethnic households and 97.04% ethnic households have access to safe drinking water. Both groups are vulnerable, marginal and poor. It is important to emphasis on poverty alleviation through income generating activities.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Micro Level Study of Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Households’ Food Security and Dietary Diversity AU - M. Mizanur Rahman Sarker AU - Farah Hossain Jury AU - Maruf Khan Y1 - 2022/03/23 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13 T2 - International Journal of Agricultural Economics JF - International Journal of Agricultural Economics JO - International Journal of Agricultural Economics SP - 75 EP - 81 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3843 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20220702.13 AB - Although Bangladesh has achieved rice self-sufficiency, this does not imply to food security. Around 25% of the population is still food insecure. The fundamental factor is poverty. Despite improvements in many aspects of food security, the Bangladeshi people still lack dietary diversity, resulting in nutritional imbalance. The investigation's focus is on Bangladesh's northwestern region. Though numerous attempts have been made to comprehend rural people's food insecurity, ethnic minority communities are often overlooked. They make up about 1.25 percent of the Bangladeshi population. Many ethnic groups from the plains confront harsh living conditions, such as inadequate housing, contaminated drinking water, and insecurity. In this study the socioeconomic status, household food security, consumption status and dietary diversity of ethnic groups are compared with the majority Bengali community. Ethnic groups expenditure level exceeds their income. Although their income is very poor but the ethnic groups has more months’ of cereal food availability than non-ethnic groups. Most of them are landless. Whatever land they have, most of it is homestead area. They have three meals a day but their dietary diversity is not sufficient. It can be seen that 98.39% non-ethnic households and 97.04% ethnic households have access to safe drinking water. Both groups are vulnerable, marginal and poor. It is important to emphasis on poverty alleviation through income generating activities. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -