Background: In emergency surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation, the time to effect of neuromuscular blocking drugs is a crucial time to avoid hypoxia and aspiration into the lungs. Various strategies have been undertaken to shorten this time. All these methods have positive results but some are associated with side effects. The effectiveness of a muscle relaxant can either be assessed using the train of four or intubating conditions on the Goldberg scale. In this study, we investigated the effects of a 20 ml saline bolus following intravenous rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg on the proportions of patients with excellent intubating conditions at one minute. Methodology: Fifty-two patients were randomly allocated to the saline bolus group or the no saline flush group. Anaesthesia was induced using propofol and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion (TCI) and maintained with the same. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg intravenous (IV) was administered followed by a 20 ml saline flush in the study group compared to administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium without a saline bolus in the control group. Intubation conditions were assessed using the Goldberg scale filled by the intubating doctor. The onset of neuromuscular block was assessed by the train of four T1 height depression with an accelerometer attached to the adductor pollicis muscle. Results: There were 25 patients in each group. Patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic profiles. In the group with a flush, 18 (62.1%) patients had “excellent” and seven (33.3%) patients had “good” intubating conditions as opposed to 11 (37.9%) having “excellent” and 14 (66.7%) having “good” intubating condition in the group without a flush. The distribution of intubating conditions for the two groups showed a difference of 24.2% in the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions which was statistically significant (P=0.042). There was no association between twitch height at one minute and intubating conditions. Conclusion: In this group of patients studied, the administration of a 20 ml saline flush after 0.6mg/kg rocuronium significantly increases the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions as compared to rocuronium without a saline flush.
Published in | International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16 |
Page(s) | 49-56 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Intubating Conditions, Rocuronium, Saline Flush, General Anaesthesia, Adult Patients
[1] | Sinclair RCF, Luxton MC. (2005). Rapid sequence induction. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 5 (2): 45-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mki016. |
[2] | D'souza J, Sharma SV. (2006). Monitoring the onset of neuromuscular block for predicting intubating conditions. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 50 (1): 32. |
[3] | Perry JJ, Lee J, Wells G. (2002). Are intubation conditions using rocuronium equivalent to those using succinylcholine? Acad Emerg Med. 9 (8): 813-23. https://doi.org/10.1197/aemj.9.8.813. |
[4] | Weiss JH, Gratz I, Goldberg ME, Afshar M, Insinga F, Larijani G. (1997). Double-blind comparison of two doses of rocuronium and succinylcholine for rapid-sequence intubation. J Clin Anesth. 9 (5): 379-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00065-2. |
[5] | Goldberg ME, Larijani GE, Azad SS, Sosis M, Seltzer JL, Ascher J, Weakly JN. (1989). Comparison of tracheal intubating conditions and neuromuscular blocking profiles after intubating doses of mivacurium chloride or succinylcholine in surgical outpatients. Anesth Analg. 69 (1): 93-9. |
[6] | Muñoz-Martínez T, Garrido-Santos I, Arévalo-Cerón R, Rojas-Viguera L, Cantera-Fernández T, Pérez-González R, Díaz-Garmendia E. (2015). Prevalencia de contraindicaciones a succinilcolina en unidades de cuidados intensivos [Contraindications to succinylcholine in the intensive care unit. A prevalence study]. Med Intensiva. 39 (2): 90-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2014.07.002. |
[7] | Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. (2008). Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 109 (5): 816-24. https://doi.og/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee. |
[8] | Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD.(1993). Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiology. 79 (5): 913-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199311000-00007. |
[9] | Cammu G. (2018). Sugammadex: Appropriate Use in the Context of Budgetary Constraints. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 8 (2): 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-018-0265-6. |
[10] | April MD, Arana A, Pallin DJ, Schauer SG, Fantegrossi A, Fernandez J, Maddry JK, Summers SM, Antonacci MA, Brown CA. (2018). 3rd; NEAR Investigators. Emergency Department Intubation Success with Succinylcholine Versus Rocuronium: A National Emergency Airway Registry Study. Ann Emerg Med. 72 (6): 645-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.042. |
[11] | Leeuwenburg T. (2015). Airway management of the critically ill patient: modifications of traditional rapid sequence induction and intubation. Critical Care Horizons. 1: 1-10. |
[12] | Takazawa T, Mitsuhata H, Mertes PM. (2016). Sugammadex and rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis. J Anesth. (2): 290-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2105-x. |
[13] | Chavan SG, Gangadharan S, Gopakumar AK. (2016). Comparison of rocuronium at two different doses and succinylcholine for endotracheal intubation in adult patients for elective surgeries. Saudi J Anaesth. 10 (4): 379-383. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.177330. |
[14] | Dong J, Gao L, Lu W, Xu Z, Zheng J. (2014). Pharmacological interventions for acceleration of the onset time of rocuronium: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 9 (12): e114231. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114231. |
[15] | Duke-Novakovski T, Ambros B, Auckland CD, Harding JC. (2012). The effects of succinylcholine or low-dose rocuronium to aid endotracheal intubation of adult sows. Can J Vet Res. 76 (1): 57-61. |
[16] | Shashank D, Singh NR, Singh LK. (2014). Effects of pretreatment with different neuromuscular blocking agents on facilitation of intubation with rocuronium: A prospective randomized comparative study. Indian J Anaesth. 58 (3): 303-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.135043. |
[17] | Szmuk P, Ezri T, Chelly JE, Katz J. (2000). The onset time of rocuronium is slowed by esmolol and accelerated by ephedrine. Anesth Analg. 90 (5): 1217-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200005000-00041. |
[18] | Ji, SM., Moon, EJ., Kim, TJ. Et al. (2018). Correlation between modified LEMON score and intubation difficulty in adult trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg 13 (1): 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0195-0. |
[19] | Stewart JC, Bhananker S, Ramaiah R. (2014). Rapid-sequence intubation and cricoid pressure. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 4 (1): 42-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.128012. |
[20] | Zhong B. (2009) How to calculate sample size in randomized controlled trial? J Thorac Dis. 1 (1): 51-4. |
[21] | Mencke T, Knoll H, Schreiber JU, Echternach M, Klein S, Noeldge-Schomburg G, Silomon M. (2006). Rocuronium is not associated with more vocal cord injuries than succinylcholine after rapid-sequence induction: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 102 (3): 943-9. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000194509.03916.02. |
[22] | Ishigaki S, Masui K, Kazama T. (2016). Saline Flush After Rocuronium Bolus Reduces Onset Time and Prolongs Duration of Effect: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 122 (3): 706-711. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001094. |
[23] | Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. (1998). Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg. 86 (3): 635-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199803000-00037. |
[24] | Martin-Flores M, Gleed RD, Basher KL, Scarlett JM, Campoy L, Kopman AF. (2012). TOF-Watch (R) monitor: failure to calculate the train-of-four ratio in the absence of baseline calibration in anaesthetized dogs. Br J Anaesth. 108 (2): 240-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer378. |
[25] | Goddard N, Smith D. Unintended awareness and monitoring of depth of anaesthesia. (2013). Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 13 (6): 213-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkt016. |
[26] | Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJ, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KH, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. (1997). Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 86 (1): 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199701000-00004. |
[27] | Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ.(1999). The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 90 (6): 1502-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003 |
[28] | Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J;. (2007).8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 51 (7): 789-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x. |
[29] | Gore MS, Harnagale KD. (2011). Evaluation of Intubating Conditions with Varying Doses of Propofol without Muscle Relaxants. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 27 (1): 27-30. |
[30] | McCourt KC, Salmela L, Mirakhur RK, Carroll M, Mäkinen MT, Kansanaho M, Kerr C, Roest GJ, Olkkola KT. (1998). Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for use during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 53 (9): 867-71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00342.x. |
[31] | Larsen PB, Hansen EG, Jacobsen LS, Wiis J, Holst P, Rottensten H, Siddiqui R, Wittrup H, Sørensen AM, Persson S, Engbaek J. (2005). Intubation conditions after rocuronium or succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction with alfentanil and propofol in the emergency patient. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 22 (10): 748-5 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021505001249. |
APA Style
Ian Odari, Vitalis Mung’ayi, Rajpreet Bal, David Odaba. (2021). The Effect of Saline Flush After Rocuronium Bolus on Intubating Conditions in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16
ACS Style
Ian Odari; Vitalis Mung’ayi; Rajpreet Bal; David Odaba. The Effect of Saline Flush After Rocuronium Bolus on Intubating Conditions in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Anesth. Clin. Med. 2021, 9(2), 49-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16
AMA Style
Ian Odari, Vitalis Mung’ayi, Rajpreet Bal, David Odaba. The Effect of Saline Flush After Rocuronium Bolus on Intubating Conditions in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Anesth Clin Med. 2021;9(2):49-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16, author = {Ian Odari and Vitalis Mung’ayi and Rajpreet Bal and David Odaba}, title = {The Effect of Saline Flush After Rocuronium Bolus on Intubating Conditions in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial}, journal = {International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {49-56}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijacm.20210902.16}, abstract = {Background: In emergency surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation, the time to effect of neuromuscular blocking drugs is a crucial time to avoid hypoxia and aspiration into the lungs. Various strategies have been undertaken to shorten this time. All these methods have positive results but some are associated with side effects. The effectiveness of a muscle relaxant can either be assessed using the train of four or intubating conditions on the Goldberg scale. In this study, we investigated the effects of a 20 ml saline bolus following intravenous rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg on the proportions of patients with excellent intubating conditions at one minute. Methodology: Fifty-two patients were randomly allocated to the saline bolus group or the no saline flush group. Anaesthesia was induced using propofol and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion (TCI) and maintained with the same. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg intravenous (IV) was administered followed by a 20 ml saline flush in the study group compared to administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium without a saline bolus in the control group. Intubation conditions were assessed using the Goldberg scale filled by the intubating doctor. The onset of neuromuscular block was assessed by the train of four T1 height depression with an accelerometer attached to the adductor pollicis muscle. Results: There were 25 patients in each group. Patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic profiles. In the group with a flush, 18 (62.1%) patients had “excellent” and seven (33.3%) patients had “good” intubating conditions as opposed to 11 (37.9%) having “excellent” and 14 (66.7%) having “good” intubating condition in the group without a flush. The distribution of intubating conditions for the two groups showed a difference of 24.2% in the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions which was statistically significant (P=0.042). There was no association between twitch height at one minute and intubating conditions. Conclusion: In this group of patients studied, the administration of a 20 ml saline flush after 0.6mg/kg rocuronium significantly increases the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions as compared to rocuronium without a saline flush.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of Saline Flush After Rocuronium Bolus on Intubating Conditions in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial AU - Ian Odari AU - Vitalis Mung’ayi AU - Rajpreet Bal AU - David Odaba Y1 - 2021/11/10 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16 T2 - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine JF - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine JO - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine SP - 49 EP - 56 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2997-2698 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20210902.16 AB - Background: In emergency surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation, the time to effect of neuromuscular blocking drugs is a crucial time to avoid hypoxia and aspiration into the lungs. Various strategies have been undertaken to shorten this time. All these methods have positive results but some are associated with side effects. The effectiveness of a muscle relaxant can either be assessed using the train of four or intubating conditions on the Goldberg scale. In this study, we investigated the effects of a 20 ml saline bolus following intravenous rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg on the proportions of patients with excellent intubating conditions at one minute. Methodology: Fifty-two patients were randomly allocated to the saline bolus group or the no saline flush group. Anaesthesia was induced using propofol and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion (TCI) and maintained with the same. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg intravenous (IV) was administered followed by a 20 ml saline flush in the study group compared to administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium without a saline bolus in the control group. Intubation conditions were assessed using the Goldberg scale filled by the intubating doctor. The onset of neuromuscular block was assessed by the train of four T1 height depression with an accelerometer attached to the adductor pollicis muscle. Results: There were 25 patients in each group. Patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic profiles. In the group with a flush, 18 (62.1%) patients had “excellent” and seven (33.3%) patients had “good” intubating conditions as opposed to 11 (37.9%) having “excellent” and 14 (66.7%) having “good” intubating condition in the group without a flush. The distribution of intubating conditions for the two groups showed a difference of 24.2% in the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions which was statistically significant (P=0.042). There was no association between twitch height at one minute and intubating conditions. Conclusion: In this group of patients studied, the administration of a 20 ml saline flush after 0.6mg/kg rocuronium significantly increases the proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions as compared to rocuronium without a saline flush. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -