In Ethiopia cotton varieties under production are characterized as medium fiber quality cultivars. In contrast, textile industries, ginneries and spinners become quality cotton fiber conscious. Thus, hybrid cotton (VBCHB 1527, VBCHB 1203 and VBCHB 1526) along two standard check cotton varieties (YD-211 and Deltapine 90) were tested with the objective of selecting better fiber quality cotton variety having considerable seed cotton and lint yield to meet the evolving needs of cotton producers, textile mills and others. The overall performance of six different irrigated areas indicated, VBCHB 1527 gave the highest of 2.64 ton/ha seed cotton yield, followed by VBCHB 1203 (2.35 ton/ha) and VBCHB 1526 (2.25 ton/ha). Accordingly, a seed cotton yield advantage of 40.37% (VBCHB 1527), 24.85% (VBCHB 1203) and 19.55% (VBCHB 1526) over the highest yielding standard check variety (Deltapine 90) is obtainable. A little differences among the hybrids and standard check varieties observed under different locations with regard to lint yield. Among the tested hybrid VBCHB 1527, exhibited extra-long fiber length within range of 35.59 mm to 38.51 mm and fiber strength ranging from 33.5 g/tex to 40.4 g/tex. Similarly, VBCHB 1203 exhibited 32.67 mm to 35.5 mm fiber length and 32.8 g/tex to 38.5 g/tex fiber strength. Overall, the two hybrids (VBCHB 1527 and VBCHB 1203) showed superior performance in seed cotton yield, lint yield, fiber quality and in other desirable agronomic parameters at all testing locations and could possibly better varieties for quality cotton fiber production.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15 |
Page(s) | 174-177 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fiber Quality, Hybrid Cotton, Lint Yield, VBCHB 1527, VBCHB 1203
[1] | Lee, J. A., & Fang, D. D. (2015). Cotton as a world crop: origin, history, and current status. Cotton, 57: 1-23. |
[2] | Lee, J. A. (1984). Cotton as a world crop. Cotton, 24: 1-25. |
[3] | Bouchaud, C., Tengberg, M. & Dal Prà, P. (2011). Cotton cultivation and textile production in the Arabian Peninsula during antiquity; the evidence from Madâ’in Sâlih (Saudi Arabia) and Qal’at al-Bahrain (Bahrain). Veget Hist Archaeobot, 20: 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-011-0296-0 |
[4] | Brown, H. B. (1938). Cotton: history species, varieties, morphology, breeding, culture, diseases, marketing, and uses. Cotton: history species, varieties, morphology, breeding, culture, diseases, marketing, and uses. Second edition. |
[5] | Ahmad, S., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2020). Cotton production and uses. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. (https://link. springer. com/book/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2). |
[6] | He, Z., Zhang, H., Tewolde, H., & Shankle, M. (2017). Chemical characterization of cotton plant parts for multiple uses. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 2 (1): 110044. |
[7] | Campbell, B. T., Hinze, L. O. R. I., & Singh, B. (2010). Cotton production, processing and uses of cotton raw material. Industrial crops and uses. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK, 259-276. |
[8] | Wegier, A., Alavez, V., &Piñero, D. (2016). Cotton: traditional and modern uses. In Ethnobotany of Mexico (pp. 439-456). Springer, New York, NY. |
[9] | Cook, O. F. (1904). Cotton culture in Guatemala. Department of Agriculture. |
[10] | Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Han, S., Macadam, I., & Li Liu, D. (2014). Prediction of cotton yield and water demand under climate change and future adaptation measures. Agricultural Water Management, 144, 42-53. |
[11] | Hake, S. J., Kerby, T. A., & Hake, K. D. (Eds.). (1996). Cotton production manual (Vol. 3352). University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources. |
[12] | Grose, L. (2009). Sustainable cotton production. Sustainable textiles, 33-62. |
[13] | Freeland Jr, T. B., Pettigrew, B., Thaxton, P., & Andrews, G. L. (2006). Agrometeorology and cotton production. World Meteorological Organization. |
[14] | Donis, G. (2019). Genetic diversity study of improved cotton (G. hirsutum L.) varieties in Ethiopia using simple sequence repeats markers. Academic Research. Journal of Biotechnology, 7 (2): 6-14. |
[15] | Gudeta B, Workie A, Shonga E, Gebregziabher A, Gebre D, Girma B (2017). Cotton Research in Ethiopia: Achievements, Challenges, Opportunities and Prospects. In: Dawit A, Eshetu D, Getnet A, Abebe K (eds) Agricultural Research for Ethiopian Renaissance: Challenges, Opportunities and Directions: Proceedings of the National Conference on Agricultural Research for Ethiopian Renaissance to mark the 50th Anniversary of the establishment of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) held at Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp 61-80. |
[16] | Gervers, M. (1990). Cotton and cotton weaving in Meroitic Nubia and medieval Ethiopia. Textile History, 21 (1): 13-30. |
[17] | Gervers M (2008). Weaving Cotton in Ethiopia and Nubia. In: Selin H (ed) Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer, Netherlands, pp 2235-2236. |
[18] | Nicholson, G., E. (1960). The production, history, uses and relationships of cotton (Gossypium spp.) in Ethiopia. Economic Botany, 14 (1): 3-36. |
[19] | Donis G., Arkebe, G., Zerihun, D., Ridwan, M. (2022). Agronomic, Yield and Fiber Quality Performance of Released Introduced Hybrid Cotton Varieties in Irrigated Agro Ecologies of Ethiopia. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 10 (2): 53-58. |
APA Style
Donis Gurmessa, Merdasa Balcha, Samuel Damtew, Arkebe Gebregziabher, Bedane Gudeta, et al. (2022). Yield and Fiber Quality Performance of Hybrid Cotton Varieties Under Potential Production Irrigated Areas of Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 174-177. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15
ACS Style
Donis Gurmessa; Merdasa Balcha; Samuel Damtew; Arkebe Gebregziabher; Bedane Gudeta, et al. Yield and Fiber Quality Performance of Hybrid Cotton Varieties Under Potential Production Irrigated Areas of Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2022, 8(4), 174-177. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15
AMA Style
Donis Gurmessa, Merdasa Balcha, Samuel Damtew, Arkebe Gebregziabher, Bedane Gudeta, et al. Yield and Fiber Quality Performance of Hybrid Cotton Varieties Under Potential Production Irrigated Areas of Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2022;8(4):174-177. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15, author = {Donis Gurmessa and Merdasa Balcha and Samuel Damtew and Arkebe Gebregziabher and Bedane Gudeta and Alehegn Workie}, title = {Yield and Fiber Quality Performance of Hybrid Cotton Varieties Under Potential Production Irrigated Areas of Ethiopia}, journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences}, volume = {8}, number = {4}, pages = {174-177}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20220804.15}, abstract = {In Ethiopia cotton varieties under production are characterized as medium fiber quality cultivars. In contrast, textile industries, ginneries and spinners become quality cotton fiber conscious. Thus, hybrid cotton (VBCHB 1527, VBCHB 1203 and VBCHB 1526) along two standard check cotton varieties (YD-211 and Deltapine 90) were tested with the objective of selecting better fiber quality cotton variety having considerable seed cotton and lint yield to meet the evolving needs of cotton producers, textile mills and others. The overall performance of six different irrigated areas indicated, VBCHB 1527 gave the highest of 2.64 ton/ha seed cotton yield, followed by VBCHB 1203 (2.35 ton/ha) and VBCHB 1526 (2.25 ton/ha). Accordingly, a seed cotton yield advantage of 40.37% (VBCHB 1527), 24.85% (VBCHB 1203) and 19.55% (VBCHB 1526) over the highest yielding standard check variety (Deltapine 90) is obtainable. A little differences among the hybrids and standard check varieties observed under different locations with regard to lint yield. Among the tested hybrid VBCHB 1527, exhibited extra-long fiber length within range of 35.59 mm to 38.51 mm and fiber strength ranging from 33.5 g/tex to 40.4 g/tex. Similarly, VBCHB 1203 exhibited 32.67 mm to 35.5 mm fiber length and 32.8 g/tex to 38.5 g/tex fiber strength. Overall, the two hybrids (VBCHB 1527 and VBCHB 1203) showed superior performance in seed cotton yield, lint yield, fiber quality and in other desirable agronomic parameters at all testing locations and could possibly better varieties for quality cotton fiber production.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Yield and Fiber Quality Performance of Hybrid Cotton Varieties Under Potential Production Irrigated Areas of Ethiopia AU - Donis Gurmessa AU - Merdasa Balcha AU - Samuel Damtew AU - Arkebe Gebregziabher AU - Bedane Gudeta AU - Alehegn Workie Y1 - 2022/08/10 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 174 EP - 177 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.15 AB - In Ethiopia cotton varieties under production are characterized as medium fiber quality cultivars. In contrast, textile industries, ginneries and spinners become quality cotton fiber conscious. Thus, hybrid cotton (VBCHB 1527, VBCHB 1203 and VBCHB 1526) along two standard check cotton varieties (YD-211 and Deltapine 90) were tested with the objective of selecting better fiber quality cotton variety having considerable seed cotton and lint yield to meet the evolving needs of cotton producers, textile mills and others. The overall performance of six different irrigated areas indicated, VBCHB 1527 gave the highest of 2.64 ton/ha seed cotton yield, followed by VBCHB 1203 (2.35 ton/ha) and VBCHB 1526 (2.25 ton/ha). Accordingly, a seed cotton yield advantage of 40.37% (VBCHB 1527), 24.85% (VBCHB 1203) and 19.55% (VBCHB 1526) over the highest yielding standard check variety (Deltapine 90) is obtainable. A little differences among the hybrids and standard check varieties observed under different locations with regard to lint yield. Among the tested hybrid VBCHB 1527, exhibited extra-long fiber length within range of 35.59 mm to 38.51 mm and fiber strength ranging from 33.5 g/tex to 40.4 g/tex. Similarly, VBCHB 1203 exhibited 32.67 mm to 35.5 mm fiber length and 32.8 g/tex to 38.5 g/tex fiber strength. Overall, the two hybrids (VBCHB 1527 and VBCHB 1203) showed superior performance in seed cotton yield, lint yield, fiber quality and in other desirable agronomic parameters at all testing locations and could possibly better varieties for quality cotton fiber production. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -