Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop and source of income for farmers. It is the most responsive crop to fertilizer application. Field experiment was carried out on farmer's field in 2016/17 and 2017/18 main cropping seasons to evaluate the response of bread wheat to different blended fertilizers types and rates at Adiyo district, Southwestern Ethiopia. Eight treatments: Control (T1), four rates of NPSB: (46N, 54P2O5, 10S, 1.07B (T2); 69N, 72P2O5, 13S, 1.4B (T3), 92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B (T4) and 92N, 36P2O5, 7S, 0.71B (T5)) and three rates of NPSB+Cu: T2+Cu (T6), T3+Cu (T7), T4+Cu (T8) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Crop parameters measured were analyzed using proc GLM procedures in the SAS 9.3 version. Analysis was also performed to investigate the economic feasibility of the fertilizers for wheat production. Results indicated that application of both types and three rates of each fertilizer significantly (p < 0.05) affected all tested parameters except thousand seed weight, which was improved by only T4. The highest biomass (14.80 ton ha-1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil. The application of NPSB+Cu (T8) also gave highest net benefit of Birr 46637.10 and acceptable MRR% was 151.02%. Hence farmers at the study area and similar agro-ecology could use NPSB+Cu @ a rate (92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B) and 600 gm Cu as foliar application. However, further verification study is needed to give reliable and consistent recommendation.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12 |
Page(s) | 264-268 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Blended Fertilizers, Bread Wheat, Economic Benefit, Foliar Application, Grain Yield
[1] | Abiye, A., Tekalign, M., Peden, D., and Diedhiou M. 2003. Participatory On-farm conservation tillage trial in Ethiopian highland vertisols: The impact of potassium application on crop yield. Experimental Agriculture 40: 369-379. |
[2] | Adiyo Woreda Agricultural and Natural Resource Development Office (AWANRDO). 2017. Annual Report for the year 2017-2018. Adiyo Woreda Agricultural and Natural Resource development Office. Adiyo Kaka, Ethiopia. |
[3] | Asgelil, D., Taye, B., and Yesuf, A. 2007. The status of micro-nutrients in Nitisols, Vertisols, Cambisols and Fluvisols in major Maize, Wheat, Teff and Citrus growing areas of Ethiopia. Proceedings of Agricultural Research Fund, pp. 77-96. |
[4] | ATA (Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Agency). 2016. Soil Fertility Status and Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas of the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Regional State, Ethiopia, Pp. 301. |
[5] | CIMMYT. 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations. An Economics Training Manual. Completely Revised Edition. CIMMYT, Mexico, D. F., Mexico. 79 pp. |
[6] | Dampney, P., Dyer, C., Goodlass, G., and Chambers, B. 2006b. Crop Responses. Component report for Defra Project NT2605 (CSA 6579). |
[7] | Diriba, S., Rut-Duga, D., and Wogayehu W. 2019. Effects of Blended Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Varieties on Growth and Yield Attributes. Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources 3 (3): 000170. |
[8] | Efrem, B., Hirut, K., and Getachew, B. 2000. Durum wheat in Ethiopia: An old crop in an ancient land. Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 68. |
[9] | EthioSIS (Ethiopian Soil Fertility Status, Ethiopian Soil Information System). 2016. Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas of the Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples' Regional State, Ethiopia. |
[10] | FAO. 1998. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, by ISSS–ISRIC–FAO. World Soil Resources Report No. 84. Rome. |
[11] | Fayera, A., Adugna, D., and Muktar, M. 2014. Evaluation of Teff [Eragrostistef (Zuccagni) Trotter] Responses to Different Rates of NPK Along With Zn and B in Didessa District, Southwestern Ethiopia, World Appl. Sci. J., 32 (11): 2245-2249. |
[12] | Franzen, D. W., McMullen, M., and Mossett, D. S. 2008. Spring wheat and durum yield and disease responses to copper fertilization of mineral soils. Agronomy Journal 100: 371-375. |
[13] | Gomez, K., and Gomez, A. 1984. Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. New York: John Willey and Sons Inc. |
[14] | Habtamu, A., Heluf, G., Bobe, B., and Enyew, A. 2015. Effects of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Maize at Wujiraba Watershed, Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia. Ame J Plant Nutrition Fertilization Technol 5 (1): 1-15. |
[15] | Jones, J. B. 2003. Agronomic Handbook: Management of Crops, Soils, and Their Fertility. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 482p. |
[16] | Knight, S., Kightley, S., Bingham, I., Hoad, S., Lang, B., Philpott, H., Stobart, R., Thomas, J., Barnes, A., and Ball, B. 2012. Desk study to evaluate contributory causes of the current ‘yield plateau’ in wheat and oilseed rape. AHDB Cereals & Oilseeds Project Report No. 502. |
[17] | Landon, J. R. 1991. Booker Tropical Soil Manual: a handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. |
[18] | Masresha, M. 2014. Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Application of Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Compost in Godere District, Gambella Region, Southwestern Ethiopia. Haramaya University, Ethiopia. |
[19] | Mulugeta, E., Shure, S., Tilahun, C., Chala, C., Negash, B. 2017. Optimization of Fertilizer Recommendations for Bread Wheat at Sinana District of Bale Zone, Southeastern Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Sci Qualitative Analysis 3 (6): 55-60. |
[20] | Noabur, R., and Jeff, S. 2020. Response of wheat, pea, and canola to micronutrient fertilization on five contrasting Prairie soils. Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. |
[21] | SAS Institute. 2011. SAS Institute, SAS/IML 9.3 user's guide. Inc., Cary, NC, USA. |
[22] | Tekalign, T. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa. |
[23] | Wassie, H., and Shiferaw, B. 2011. Response of Irish Potato (Solanum tuberosum) to the Application of Potassium at Acidic Soils of Chencha, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 13: 595–598. |
APA Style
Ute Guja, Konjit Abreham, Tatek Mekuria, Henok Tsegaye. (2021). Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizer Types and Rates for Better Production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 7(6), 264-268. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12
ACS Style
Ute Guja; Konjit Abreham; Tatek Mekuria; Henok Tsegaye. Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizer Types and Rates for Better Production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2021, 7(6), 264-268. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12
AMA Style
Ute Guja, Konjit Abreham, Tatek Mekuria, Henok Tsegaye. Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizer Types and Rates for Better Production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2021;7(6):264-268. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12, author = {Ute Guja and Konjit Abreham and Tatek Mekuria and Henok Tsegaye}, title = {Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizer Types and Rates for Better Production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia}, journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {6}, pages = {264-268}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20210706.12}, abstract = {Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop and source of income for farmers. It is the most responsive crop to fertilizer application. Field experiment was carried out on farmer's field in 2016/17 and 2017/18 main cropping seasons to evaluate the response of bread wheat to different blended fertilizers types and rates at Adiyo district, Southwestern Ethiopia. Eight treatments: Control (T1), four rates of NPSB: (46N, 54P2O5, 10S, 1.07B (T2); 69N, 72P2O5, 13S, 1.4B (T3), 92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B (T4) and 92N, 36P2O5, 7S, 0.71B (T5)) and three rates of NPSB+Cu: T2+Cu (T6), T3+Cu (T7), T4+Cu (T8) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Crop parameters measured were analyzed using proc GLM procedures in the SAS 9.3 version. Analysis was also performed to investigate the economic feasibility of the fertilizers for wheat production. Results indicated that application of both types and three rates of each fertilizer significantly (p -1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil. The application of NPSB+Cu (T8) also gave highest net benefit of Birr 46637.10 and acceptable MRR% was 151.02%. Hence farmers at the study area and similar agro-ecology could use NPSB+Cu @ a rate (92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B) and 600 gm Cu as foliar application. However, further verification study is needed to give reliable and consistent recommendation.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Different Blended Fertilizer Types and Rates for Better Production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia AU - Ute Guja AU - Konjit Abreham AU - Tatek Mekuria AU - Henok Tsegaye Y1 - 2021/11/12 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 264 EP - 268 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210706.12 AB - Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop and source of income for farmers. It is the most responsive crop to fertilizer application. Field experiment was carried out on farmer's field in 2016/17 and 2017/18 main cropping seasons to evaluate the response of bread wheat to different blended fertilizers types and rates at Adiyo district, Southwestern Ethiopia. Eight treatments: Control (T1), four rates of NPSB: (46N, 54P2O5, 10S, 1.07B (T2); 69N, 72P2O5, 13S, 1.4B (T3), 92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B (T4) and 92N, 36P2O5, 7S, 0.71B (T5)) and three rates of NPSB+Cu: T2+Cu (T6), T3+Cu (T7), T4+Cu (T8) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Crop parameters measured were analyzed using proc GLM procedures in the SAS 9.3 version. Analysis was also performed to investigate the economic feasibility of the fertilizers for wheat production. Results indicated that application of both types and three rates of each fertilizer significantly (p -1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil. The application of NPSB+Cu (T8) also gave highest net benefit of Birr 46637.10 and acceptable MRR% was 151.02%. Hence farmers at the study area and similar agro-ecology could use NPSB+Cu @ a rate (92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B) and 600 gm Cu as foliar application. However, further verification study is needed to give reliable and consistent recommendation. VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -