Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia

Wendimu Melese; Gezehagn Berecha; Deribew Belew

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia

Wendimu Melese, Gezehagn Berecha, Deribew Belew

Published in International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 3)

Received: 7 March 2020 Accepted: 8 April 2020 Published: 28 May 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to determine the response of snap bean varieties to different rates of cow dung vermicompost and their interaction effects. A 3×4 factorial experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was carried out under Lath house condition. Factor one consisted three varieties of snap bean (Plati, Faraday and BC4.4), while Factor two consisted four rates of cow dung vermicompost application rate and 1 recommended rate of NPS (R5). The results revealed that, the main effects of vermicompost rates and snap bean variety showed significant difference (P≤0.05) for all growth parameters studied except for total leaf chlorophyll content. Accordingly, the interaction effect of vermicompost rate and variety were significant for Plant dry weight. Therefore, taking the findings of the present study in to consideration, it may be tentatively concluded that, the farmers at the Jimma may apply the combination of 45t/ha cow dung vermicompost and Variety BC4.4 would help to improve the growth of Snap bean. However, repeating the same study across season and location at field condition would help to draw sound conclusion and recommendations. Hence, future studies should look in to these factors to develop cow dung vermicompost fertilizer and snap bean varieties recommendation for optimum growth of snap bean in Jimma area.

Published in	International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
Page(s)	26-34
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Vermicompost, Snap Bean, Growth, Variety

References

[1]	H. J. S. Finch, G. P. F. Lane, in Lockhart & Wiseman’s, 2014, crop husbandry including grassland, science direct journals and book, (9) 5: 396-430.
[2]	Megan Ware, 2018, everything you need to know about green beans, a newsletter, retrieved from, https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles.
[3]	Kerr, Lynn B., 1971, The Flat Pod Rogue in Snap Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, 67: 5-1971.
[4]	Gezahegne A, Dawit A 2006, food and forage legumes of Ethiopia; progress and prospectproceedings of the work shop on food and forage legume, 13 (7): 22- 26.
[5]	FAO stat, 2017, Green Bean World Statistics. Major food and agricultural commodities producers—Countries by commodity. Available online: www.faostat.fao.org.
[6]	Yosef Alemu, Sintayew Alamirew and Lemma Desalegn, 2013, Genetic variability in snap bean (phaseolus vulgaris) in central rift valley of Ethiopia, international journal of plant breeding and genetics, 7 (2): 124-131.
[7]	FAO 2018, Production year book, Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database. Available at www.faostat.org.
[8]	Damiany Pádua Oliveira, Sindynara Ferreira, Bruno Lima Soares, Paulo AdemarAvelar Ferreira, Augusto Ramalho de Morais, Fatima Maria de Souza Moreira, Messias José Bastos de Andrade, 2017, rhizobium strains selected from the Amazon region increase the yield of snap bean genotypes in protected cultivation, (10) 5, Pp 1678-1699.
[9]	Arora V. K., Singh C. B., Sidhu A. S., Thind S. S. 2011. Irrigation, tillage and mulching effects on soybean yield and water productivity in relation to soil texture, Agricultural Water Management 18 (6): 563-568.
[10]	Nagavallemma KP, Wani SP, Stephane Lacroix, Padmaja VV, Vineela C, Babu Rao M and Sahrawat KL, 2006, recycling wastes into valuable organic fertilizer, Andhra Pradesh, India, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 71: 20.
[11]	Hong Zhang, Swee Ngin Tan, Chee How Teo, Yan Ru Yew, Liya Ge, Xin Chen and Jean Wan Hong Yong, 2015, analysis of phytohormones in vermicompost using a novel combinative sample preparation strategy of ultrasound-assisted extraction and solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, Talanta, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.
[12]	Aggelides S. M., and Londra P. A. 1999, effect of compost produced from town waste and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil. Bioresource Technology, 71: 253-259.
[13]	Albiach R., Canet R., Pomares F., Ingelmo F. 2000, microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil, Bio-resource Technology, 75: 43-48.
[14]	Norman Q. Arancon and Clive A. Edwards, 2005, effects of vermicomposts on plant growth, Soil Ecology Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA, (8) 3: 1-25.
[15]	Arancon N. Q, Edwards C. A., Bierman P. 2006, influences of Vermicomposts on field strawberries: Part 2, effects on soil microbial and chemical properties, Bio-resource Technology, 97: 831-840.
[16]	Prabha K. P, Loretta Y. L., Usha R. K., 2007, an experimental study of vermin-bio-waste composting for agricultural soil improvement, bio-resource Technology, 4 (1): 1672-1681.
[17]	Rasool Azarmi, Parviz Sharifi Ziveh and Mohammad Reza Satari, 2008, effect of Vermicompost on Growth, Yield and Nutrition Status of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum), Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11 (14): 1797-1802.
[18]	Ekinci M., Dursun A., 2009, effects of different mulch materials on plant growth, some quality parameters and yield in melon (Cucumis melo L.) cultivars in high altitude environmental condition, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41 (4): 1891-1901.
[19]	Eswaran. N and Mariselvi, S, 2016, Efficacy of Vermicompost on growth and yield parameters of Lycopersicum esculentum (Tomato), International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6 (1): 2250-3153.
[20]	Abdel-Mawgoud A. M. R, M El Desuki, Sr Salman and Sd Abou Hussein, (2005), performance of snap bean varieties as affected by different level of mineral fertilizer, journal of agronomy, 4 (3): 242-247.
[21]	C. A. Edwards, I. Burrows and C. A. Edwards, E. F. Neuhauser (Eds.), 1988, the potential of earthworm composts as plant growth media, in:, Earthworms in Waste and Environmental Management, SPB Academic Publ. Co., the Hague, Netherlands, (16) 8: 211–219.
[22]	Hussien Mohammed Beshir, Bizuayehu Tesfaye, Rosalind Bueckertand Bunyamin Tar’an, 2015, African journal of agricultural research, 10 (32): 3157-3169.
[23]	Singh NI, Chauhan JS, 2009, response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield parameters under irrigated condition, Nat Sci, 7 (5): Pp 1545-1740.
[24]	K Chandrashekhar Reddy, K Malla Reddy - J. Res, 2005, different levels of vermicompost and nitrogen on growth and yield in onion (Allium cepa L.), (Raphanus sativus L.) cropping system, 16: 2224-3208.
[25]	Matt Ruark, A. J. Bussan, Don Caine, Del Monte, Amanda Gevens, Amanda Raster, Yi Wang and Jaimie West, 2012, nitrogen management on snap beans, Midwest Food Processors Assoc, 19: 27-28.
[26]	Tantawy AS, Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, Habib HAM, Hafez MM, 2009. Growth, productivity and pod quality responses of green bean plantsPhaseolus vulgaris to foliar application of nutrients and pollenextracts. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5 (6): 1032-1038.
[27]	S. Quaik, A. Embrandiri, P. F. Rupani, R. P. Singh and M. H. Ibrahim, 2001, effect of Vermi wash and Vermicomposting Leachate in Hydroponics Culture of Indian Borage (Plectranthus ambionicus) Plantlets. UMT 11th International Annual Symposium on Sustainability Science and Management, 3 (3): 210-214.
[28]	Gianfranco Minotta and, Simone Pinzauti, 1996, effects of light and soil fertility on growth, leaf chlorophyll content and nutrient use efficiency of beech (Fagus syluatica L.) seedlings, Forest Ecology and Management, 14: 61-71.
[29]	Su Lin Lim, Ta Yeong Wu, Pei Nie Lim, Katrina Pui Yee Shak, 2015, the use of vermicompost in organic farming, 95 (6): 1143-1156.
[30]	Sattelmacher B, Kuene R, Malagamba P, Moreno U. 1990. Evaluation of tuber bearing Solanum species belonging to different ploidy levels for its yielding potential at low soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 129, 227–233.
[31]	Marinari, S., Masciandaro, G., Ceccanti, B., and Grego, S., 2000, Influence of organic and mineral fertilizer on soil biological and mineral properties, Bioresource technonology 72: 9-17.
[32]	K. Mahanta, D. K. Jha, D. J. Rajkhowa & Manoj-Kumar (2012): Microbial enrichment of vermicompost prepared from different plant biomasses and their effect on rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth and soil fertility, Biological Agriculture & Horticulture: An International Journal for Sustainable Production Systems, 28: 4, 241-250.
[33]	Chris van Kessel and Christopher Hartley, 2000, Agricultural management of grain legumes: has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation?, Field Crops Research, 7 (3): 165–181.
[34]	Mohammad Aminul Islam, Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce, MdMotiorRahman, MohdSofianAzirunand Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf, 2016, effects of organic fertilizers on the growth and yield of bush bean, winged bean and yard long bean, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol, 13 (7): 2-9.
[35]	FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, 1998, Improving yield and nitrogen fixation of grain legumes in the tropics and sub-tropics of Asia, Results of a co-ordinated research program, (18) 8: 1011-1289.
[36]	Dušica Delić, Olivera Stajković, Nataša Rasulić, Djordje Kuzmanović, Dragana Jošić and Bogić Miličić, 2010, Nodulation and N2 Fixation Effectiveness of BradyrhizobiumStrains in Symbiosis with Adzuki Bean, Vignaangularis, 53 (2): 293-299.
[37]	Ruy Raposeiras, Ivanildo Evódio Marriel, Maria Rita Scotti Muzzi, Edilson Paiva, Israel Alexandre Pereira Filho, Lilia Costa Carvalhais, Raul Vinícius Magalhães Passos, Patrícia Pereira Pintoand Nadja Maria Horta de Sá, 2006, Rhizobium strains competitiveness on bean nodulation in Cerrado soils, Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília, 77: 439-447.
[38]	Guangfeng Chen, Hongzhu Cao, Jun Liang, Wenqi Ma, Lufang Guo, Shuhua Zhang, Rongfeng Jiang, Hongyan Zhang, Keith W. T. Goulding and Fusuo Zhang, 2018, factors affecting nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield of summer maize on smallholder farms in the North China Plain, 7: 2-18.
[39]	M. F. Hossain, 2006. Nutrients Removed in Harvested Portion of Crop by Continuous Corn Receiving Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers, Journal of Plant Sciences, 17: 264-272.
[40]	Dalia Salman Khudair and Ali Hussein Jasim, 2019, effect of bio- and chemical fertilizers on green pods yield of some broad bean cultivars, plant archive, 7: 339-343.
[41]	Chandan Singh Ahirwarand Azad Hussain, 2015, Effect of Vermicompost on Growth, Yield and Quality of Vegetable Crops, International Journal of Applied And Pure Science and Agriculture, (77) 5: 50-54.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wendimu Melese, Gezehagn Berecha, Deribew Belew. (2020). Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wendimu Melese; Gezehagn Berecha; Deribew Belew. Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2020, 6(3), 26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wendimu Melese, Gezehagn Berecha, Deribew Belew. Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2020;6(3):26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11,
  author = {Wendimu Melese and Gezehagn Berecha and Deribew Belew},
  title = {Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {26-34},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20200603.11},
  abstract = {The objective of this experiment was to determine the response of snap bean varieties to different rates of cow dung vermicompost and their interaction effects. A 3×4 factorial experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was carried out under Lath house condition. Factor one consisted three varieties of snap bean (Plati, Faraday and BC4.4), while Factor two consisted four rates of cow dung vermicompost application rate and 1 recommended rate of NPS (R5). The results revealed that, the main effects of vermicompost rates and snap bean variety showed significant difference (P≤0.05) for all growth parameters studied except for total leaf chlorophyll content. Accordingly, the interaction effect of vermicompost rate and variety were significant for Plant dry weight. Therefore, taking the findings of the present study in to consideration, it may be tentatively concluded that, the farmers at the Jimma may apply the combination of 45t/ha cow dung vermicompost and Variety BC4.4 would help to improve the growth of Snap bean. However, repeating the same study across season and location at field condition would help to draw sound conclusion and recommendations. Hence, future studies should look in to these factors to develop cow dung vermicompost fertilizer and snap bean varieties recommendation for optimum growth of snap bean in Jimma area.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia
AU  - Wendimu Melese
AU  - Gezehagn Berecha
AU  - Deribew Belew
Y1  - 2020/05/28
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
SP  - 26
EP  - 34
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7885
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
AB  - The objective of this experiment was to determine the response of snap bean varieties to different rates of cow dung vermicompost and their interaction effects. A 3×4 factorial experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was carried out under Lath house condition. Factor one consisted three varieties of snap bean (Plati, Faraday and BC4.4), while Factor two consisted four rates of cow dung vermicompost application rate and 1 recommended rate of NPS (R5). The results revealed that, the main effects of vermicompost rates and snap bean variety showed significant difference (P≤0.05) for all growth parameters studied except for total leaf chlorophyll content. Accordingly, the interaction effect of vermicompost rate and variety were significant for Plant dry weight. Therefore, taking the findings of the present study in to consideration, it may be tentatively concluded that, the farmers at the Jimma may apply the combination of 45t/ha cow dung vermicompost and Variety BC4.4 would help to improve the growth of Snap bean. However, repeating the same study across season and location at field condition would help to draw sound conclusion and recommendations. Hence, future studies should look in to these factors to develop cow dung vermicompost fertilizer and snap bean varieties recommendation for optimum growth of snap bean in Jimma area.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wendimu Melese

Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
Gezehagn Berecha

Department of Horticulture and Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, JimmaUniversity, Jimma, Ethiopia
Deribew Belew

Department of Horticulture and Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, JimmaUniversity, Jimma, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wendimu Melese, Gezehagn Berecha, Deribew Belew. (2020). Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wendimu Melese; Gezehagn Berecha; Deribew Belew. Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2020, 6(3), 26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wendimu Melese, Gezehagn Berecha, Deribew Belew. Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2020;6(3):26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11,
  author = {Wendimu Melese and Gezehagn Berecha and Deribew Belew},
  title = {Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {26-34},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20200603.11},
  abstract = {The objective of this experiment was to determine the response of snap bean varieties to different rates of cow dung vermicompost and their interaction effects. A 3×4 factorial experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was carried out under Lath house condition. Factor one consisted three varieties of snap bean (Plati, Faraday and BC4.4), while Factor two consisted four rates of cow dung vermicompost application rate and 1 recommended rate of NPS (R5). The results revealed that, the main effects of vermicompost rates and snap bean variety showed significant difference (P≤0.05) for all growth parameters studied except for total leaf chlorophyll content. Accordingly, the interaction effect of vermicompost rate and variety were significant for Plant dry weight. Therefore, taking the findings of the present study in to consideration, it may be tentatively concluded that, the farmers at the Jimma may apply the combination of 45t/ha cow dung vermicompost and Variety BC4.4 would help to improve the growth of Snap bean. However, repeating the same study across season and location at field condition would help to draw sound conclusion and recommendations. Hence, future studies should look in to these factors to develop cow dung vermicompost fertilizer and snap bean varieties recommendation for optimum growth of snap bean in Jimma area.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Cow Dung Vermicompost Rate on Growth of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties at Jimma, South Western Ethiopia
AU  - Wendimu Melese
AU  - Gezehagn Berecha
AU  - Deribew Belew
Y1  - 2020/05/28
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
SP  - 26
EP  - 34
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7885
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20200603.11
AB  - The objective of this experiment was to determine the response of snap bean varieties to different rates of cow dung vermicompost and their interaction effects. A 3×4 factorial experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was carried out under Lath house condition. Factor one consisted three varieties of snap bean (Plati, Faraday and BC4.4), while Factor two consisted four rates of cow dung vermicompost application rate and 1 recommended rate of NPS (R5). The results revealed that, the main effects of vermicompost rates and snap bean variety showed significant difference (P≤0.05) for all growth parameters studied except for total leaf chlorophyll content. Accordingly, the interaction effect of vermicompost rate and variety were significant for Plant dry weight. Therefore, taking the findings of the present study in to consideration, it may be tentatively concluded that, the farmers at the Jimma may apply the combination of 45t/ha cow dung vermicompost and Variety BC4.4 would help to improve the growth of Snap bean. However, repeating the same study across season and location at field condition would help to draw sound conclusion and recommendations. Hence, future studies should look in to these factors to develop cow dung vermicompost fertilizer and snap bean varieties recommendation for optimum growth of snap bean in Jimma area.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download