The essay deals with the relationship among (total) power, beauty, and sustainability, which is considered an integral part of architecture and town planning for the future. Although beauty (architecture) is closely related to the good that stimulates our desires, it is often distorted by the construct of power. Sustainability, beauty, and power are all relative, multifaceted, and challenging also in the field of constructions. Ever since the times of primordial human communities and civilisations, beauty and power have been consciously or accidentally connected, and this also applies to their connection to architecture. It is the bearer of both of these nouns. It demonstrates power, warns against it, pleases human senses through beauty and mutual proportional relationships, protects people, but it can also be a symbol of destruction, resistance. At the same time, it is a practical tool and means of expression capable of carrying a certain message, information. The paper delves into deep philosophical contemplations of the three main topics and shows their complicated ties, based on the insights of the most important world and local savants of all times, speaking different languages, and offering different cultural perspectives on the issue. History is confronted with the present and implications the future are presented.
| Published in | International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12 |
| Page(s) | 54-63 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Architecture, Monumentality, Culture, Ethics
| [1] | Sameh, S. H., 2013. Promoting earth architecture as a sustainable construction technique in Egypt. Journal of Cleaner Production. 65, 362-373. |
| [2] | Špaček, R., 2016. Stavebná kultúra a globálne výzvy (Construction culture and global challenges). In: Urbanita. 28(3-4), 67-70 (in Slovak). |
| [3] | Kim, J. Y. E., 2023. The Multi-Faceted Practice of Architectural Sustainability Found in the Regional Architecture of Vorarlberg, Austria. In: Sustainability. 15, 2430. |
| [4] | Salman, A. S., et al., 2019. Effect of Ethic Discourse in the Sustainability of Architecture. In: IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 518, 022081. |
| [5] | Conte, E., 2016. Sustainability and built environment: The role of higher education in architecture and building engineering. In: European Journal of Sustainable Development. 5(3), 1-10. |
| [6] | Harari, Y. N., 2017. Homo deus: Stručné dějiny zítřka (Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow). LEDA. Prague, Czech Republic (in Czech). |
| [7] |
Freedom this time, 2007. Image. WordPress.com.
https://freedomthistime.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/number_of_planets_scenarios2007.jpg |
| [8] | Fadaei, et. al., 2015. Architecture: A missing piece in real-estate studies of sustainable houses. Procedia Engineering. 118, 813-88. |
| [9] | Mersal, A., 2023. The future of the sustainable green architecture through technology. In: HBRC Journal. 19(1), 33-62. |
| [10] | Bay, J. H., 2010. Towards a Fourth Ecology: Social and Environmental Sustainability with Architecture and Urban Design. In: Journal of Green Building. 5(4), 176-197. |
| [11] | Naboni, E., 2013. A unified tool to design and define Architectural Sustainability 2.0. EAEA-11 Conference 2013 (Track 1) Visualizing Sustainability: making the invisible visible. Milan, Italy. |
| [12] | Giddings, B., et al., 2002. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. In: Sustainable Development. 10(4), 187-196. |
| [13] | Maywald, C., Riesser, F., 2016. Sustainability - the art of modern architecture. Procedia Engineering. 155, 238-248. |
| [14] | Salgado, M. S., 2019. Architecture and sustainability: the role of environmental rating systems - case study in Brazil. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 294, 1-10. |
| [15] | Kim, S., Kwon, H., 2018. Urban Sustainability through Public Architecture. In: Sustainability. 10(4), 1-21. |
| [16] | Purvis, B., et al., 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. In: Sustainability Science. 14, 681-695. |
| [17] | Hukmat, S., et al., 2020. The decorative orientations in the Mediterranean architecture and its influence on the development of cultural sustainability. In: European Journal of Sustainable Development. 9(1), 109-125. |
| [18] | Monno, V., Conte, E., 2015. Sustainability in the built environment: Integrating scales of action and evaluation. In: European Journal of Sustainable Development. 4(2), 51-60. |
| [19] | Ibrahim, I., 2016. Livable Eco-Architecture Masdar City, Arabian Sustainable City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 216, 46-55. |
| [20] | Architectural Institute of Japan, 2000. Architectural Charter for a Global Environment. |
| [21] | Peet, R., Watts, M., 1996. Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. Routledge, London, UK. |
| [22] |
United Nations, 2005. World Health Organization.
http://www.who.int/hiv/universalaccess2010/worldsummit.pdf (Accessed: 20 May 2011) |
| [23] | Avgeriou, P., et al., 2013. Architecture Sustainability (Guest editors’ introduction). In: IEEE Software. 30(6), 41-44. |
| [24] | Koziolek, H., et al., 2013. Measuring Architecture Sustainability. In: IEEE Software. 30(6), 54-62. |
| [25] | Huizinga, G., 1970. Maslow’s need hierarchy in the work situation. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, Netherlands. |
| [26] | Mihočková, E., 2017. Krása môže spasiť svet (Beauty can save the world). Trend. 50-51, 22-24 (in Slovak). |
| [27] | Scarry, E., 1998. On beauty and being just. Yale University, New Haven, USA. |
| [28] | Jakušová, M., 2012. Robert Špaček: Mesto je základná hodnota civilizácie (Robert Špaček: City is the basic value of civilization). In: Urbanita. 24(3), 43-49 (in Slovak). |
| [29] | Welsch, W., 1997. Mischung - Körper - Situation (Mixture - Body - Situation). Thesis 1/2 (in German). |
| [30] | Montjoy, V., 2023. Public and Cultural Buildings: A Tour of Copenhagen’s Architectural Masterpieces. ArchDaily. |
| [31] | Špaček, R., 1999. Urbánna demokracia ako fenomén mestského prostredia (Urban democracy as a phenomenon of the city environment). In: Životné prostredie. 33(2), 61-66 (in Slovak). |
| [32] | Batarags, L., 2021. China has at least 65 million empty homes - enough to house the population of France. Ift offers a glimpse into the country’s massive housing-market problem. Insider, Real Estate. |
| [33] |
Kawate, I., 2021. China’s largest ‘ghost city’ booms again thanks to education fever. Nikkei Asia, Society.
https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Society/China-s-largest-ghost-city-booms-again-thanks-to-education-fever (Accessed: 2 April 2023) |
| [34] |
Braddick, I., 2022. LEFT TO ROT Inside China’s apocalyptic ‘ghost cities’ where 65 million homes lay deserted as Communist Party faces economic chaos. The US Sun.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/7020446/china-haunting-ghost-cities-homes-abandoned/ |
| [35] | Špaček, R., 2014. Recenzia a/alebo zopár úvah (Review and/or a few reflections). In: ALFA - Architektonické listy Fakulty architektúry STU (Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU). 19(1), 42-47 (in Slovak). |
| [36] | Spáčil, J., Špaček, R. 2006. Kontexty pravdivosti, krásy a dobra v architektúre mesta (Context of truth, beauty and good in the city architecture). In: Životné prostredie. 40(1), 27-31 (in Slovak). |
| [37] | Dawkings, R., Krebs, J., 1998. Sobecký gen (Selfish gene). Mladá Fronta, Prague, Czech Republic (in Czech). |
| [38] | Špaček, R., 2011. Tá kniha je o inom! (That book is about something else!). In: ARCH. 10, 54-56 (in Slovak). |
| [39] | Paulsson, G., 1948. In Search of a New Monumentality. The Architectural Review. CIV. |
| [40] | Legény, J., 2022. Energetické kontexty mesta (Energy contexts of the city). SPEKTRUM STU, Bratislava, Slovakia (in Slovak). |
| [41] | Peňás, J., 2007. Symbolem modernity je krematorium II. Rozhovor s historikem Robertem Janem van Peltem (Crematorium II is a symbol of modernity. Interview with historian Robert Jan van Pelt). In: CS Magazin. 1. (in Czech) |
| [42] | Weber, M., 1964 (ed. Parsons, T.). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York, USA. |
| [43] | Hurst, C. E., 2007. Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences. Allyn and Bacon. Boston, USA. |
| [44] | Mňačko, L. Ako chutí moc (How power tastes). Slovenský spisovateľ. Bratislava, Slovakia (in Slovak). |
| [45] | Mann, M., 1986. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. |
| [46] | Wolf, E., 1999. Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis. University of California Press, California, USA. |
| [47] | Caine, I., 2017. Infrastructure and Illusion in the Age of Donald Trump. In: Log - Observation on architecture and the contemporary city. 39. |
| [48] | Steadman, S. R., 2015. Archaeology of Domestic Architecture and the Human Use of Space. Routledge, Oxford, UK. |
| [49] | Arendt, H., 2007. Vita activa. OIKOYMENH, Prague, Czech Republic (in Czech). |
| [50] | Sudji, D., 2011. The edifice complex: The architecture of power. Penguin Books, London, UK. |
| [51] |
Communistism, 2013. Bucharest Parliament Palace. WordPress.com.
https://communistism.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/bucharest-parliament-palace.jpg |
| [52] | Benkovičová, L., 2015. Obmedzovanie zločinnosti architektonickými prostriedkami (Limiting crime by architectural means). STU, Bratislava, Slovakia (in Slovak). |
| [53] | Foucault, M., 2004. Dozerať a trestať: Zrod väzenia (Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison). Kalligram, Bratislava, Slovakia (in Slovak). |
| [54] | Aaty, H. M. S., Slik, G. M. R. A., 2019. Iconic architecture and sustainability as a tool to attract the global attention. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 518, 022076. |
| [55] | Koolhaas, R., 1995. Bigness, or the Problem of Large. In: S, M, L, XL. The Monacelli Press, New York, USA. |
| [56] | Lynch, P., 2016. Five projects named finalists for the 2016 International Highrise Award. ArchDaily. |
| [57] | Cisek, E., Jaglarz, A., 2021, Architectural education in the current of deep ecology and sustainability. In: Buildings. 11(8), 358. |
| [58] | Jaglarz, A., 2015. Sustainable development in the concepts of modern bathrooms. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1638–1645. |
| [59] | Ragheb, A., et al., 2016. Green architecture: A concept of sustainability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 216, 778–787. |
| [60] | Feria, M., Amado, M., 2019. Architectural design: Sustainability in the decision-making process. Buildings. 9(5), 135. |
| [61] | Oh, S., 2017. From an ecodesign guide to a sustainable design guide: Complementing social aspects of sustainable product design guidelines. In: Archives of Design Research. 30(2), 47–64. |
APA Style
Benkovičová, L. (2024). Sustainability, Beauty, and Power in Architecture. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 10(3), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12
ACS Style
Benkovičová, L. Sustainability, Beauty, and Power in Architecture. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2024, 10(3), 54-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12
AMA Style
Benkovičová L. Sustainability, Beauty, and Power in Architecture. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2024;10(3):54-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12,
author = {Lucia Benkovičová},
title = {Sustainability, Beauty, and Power in Architecture
},
journal = {International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {54-63},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaaa.20241003.12},
abstract = {The essay deals with the relationship among (total) power, beauty, and sustainability, which is considered an integral part of architecture and town planning for the future. Although beauty (architecture) is closely related to the good that stimulates our desires, it is often distorted by the construct of power. Sustainability, beauty, and power are all relative, multifaceted, and challenging also in the field of constructions. Ever since the times of primordial human communities and civilisations, beauty and power have been consciously or accidentally connected, and this also applies to their connection to architecture. It is the bearer of both of these nouns. It demonstrates power, warns against it, pleases human senses through beauty and mutual proportional relationships, protects people, but it can also be a symbol of destruction, resistance. At the same time, it is a practical tool and means of expression capable of carrying a certain message, information. The paper delves into deep philosophical contemplations of the three main topics and shows their complicated ties, based on the insights of the most important world and local savants of all times, speaking different languages, and offering different cultural perspectives on the issue. History is confronted with the present and implications the future are presented.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Sustainability, Beauty, and Power in Architecture AU - Lucia Benkovičová Y1 - 2024/09/26 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12 T2 - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications JF - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications JO - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications SP - 54 EP - 63 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1131 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241003.12 AB - The essay deals with the relationship among (total) power, beauty, and sustainability, which is considered an integral part of architecture and town planning for the future. Although beauty (architecture) is closely related to the good that stimulates our desires, it is often distorted by the construct of power. Sustainability, beauty, and power are all relative, multifaceted, and challenging also in the field of constructions. Ever since the times of primordial human communities and civilisations, beauty and power have been consciously or accidentally connected, and this also applies to their connection to architecture. It is the bearer of both of these nouns. It demonstrates power, warns against it, pleases human senses through beauty and mutual proportional relationships, protects people, but it can also be a symbol of destruction, resistance. At the same time, it is a practical tool and means of expression capable of carrying a certain message, information. The paper delves into deep philosophical contemplations of the three main topics and shows their complicated ties, based on the insights of the most important world and local savants of all times, speaking different languages, and offering different cultural perspectives on the issue. History is confronted with the present and implications the future are presented. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -
Dean’s Office, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia
Information