Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia

Abdulkerim Kiflu; Nebyou Yonas

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia

Abdulkerim Kiflu, Nebyou Yonas

Published in International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications (Volume 8, Issue 1)

Received: 21 February 2022 Accepted: 18 March 2022 Published: 23 March 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The construction industry regarded as one of the pivotal aspects of achieving the objectives of sustainable development in communities. In this regard, the choice of building materials is one of the challenges in order to improve program performance with respect to sustainable development, and the use of sustainable materials is an effective step towards achieving sustainable construction. Selection of sustainable building materials represents an important strategy in the design and construction of buildings in Ethiopia. One of the principal challenges is the process of prioritizing and aggregating relevant criteria into a selection framework. Therefore, the purpose of this framework in building projects is to look at the complexity of the interactions between sustainability building materials and architects and to set up a knowledge-based decision support system. After conducting a thorough literature review, case study (BREEAM, LEED, CASBEE, LBC, and G-SEED), questionnaire, and discussion with selected experts, 27 sustainable building material selection criteria items identified based on the sustainable triple bottom line. A survey of Ethiopian architectural firms was conducted to capture their awareness of sustainable building materials. A total of 199 registered offices, based on Ethiopia's construction ministry in 2021. From among these, 51 offices chosen, as a sample size randomly. One of the study's limitations is that it excludes other stakeholders, such as the client, who may have an influence on material selection. Another drawback is that since elements are used to organize materials and components, Ratings are thus based solely on product performance within each constituent group. On the other hand, this study excluded several items. For example, "products" such as lighting, water fixtures, HVAC, and electrical fixtures are not included.

Published in	International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11
Page(s)	1-7
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sustainable Building Material, Theoretical Framework, Ecological Dimension, Economical Dimension, Social Dimension

References

[1]	Prüss-Üstün, A., & Corvalán, C. (2007). Reply to the recent article by Boffetta et al. [28 (5): 913–915] on attribution of cancer to the environment. Carcinogenesis, 28 (8), 1849-1849. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm169.
[2]	Kim, J., & Yu, C. (2014). Hazardous materials in buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 23 (1), 44-61. doi: 10.1177/1420326x14524073.
[3]	Passarelli, G. (2009). Sick building syndrome: An overview to raise awareness. Journal of Building Appraisal, 5 (1), 55-66. doi: 10.1057/jba.2009.20.
[4]	Materials for a Healthy, Ecological and Sustainable Built Environment: Principles for Evaluation by Emina Kristina Petrovic, Brenda Vale, and Maibritt Pedersen Zari. (2018). MRS Bulletin, 43 (4), 309-310. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2018.85.
[5]	Sun, Y., Hou, J., Cheng, R., Sheng, Y., Zhang, X., & Sundell, J. (2019). Indoor air quality, ventilation and their associations with sick building syndrome in Chinese homes. Energy and Buildings, 197, 112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.046.
[6]	World Health Institute-WHO (2016). WHO \| Improved building materials. Retrieved December 12, 2018, fromhttps://www.who.int/sustainable-development/housing/ strategies/building-materials/en/.
[7]	N. B. of E. (NBE). National Bank of Ethiopia 2017/18 annual report. 2018; 34 (1): 126.
[8]	Ugochukwu, I., & Chioma, M. (2015). Local Building Materials: Affordable Strategy for Housing the Urban Poor in Nigeria. Procedia Engineering, 118, 42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.402.
[9]	Celentano, G., Escamilla, E., Göswein, V., & Habert, G. (2019). A matter of speed: The impact of material choice in post-disaster reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.026.
[10]	Green Buildings Materials '96. (1998). Building Research & Information, 26 (3), 190-198. doi: 10.1080/096132198369968.
[11]	Brondizo, E., Leemans, R., & Solecki, W. (2014). Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Texas, U.S.A.: Elsevier Press Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 CC BY-NC-SALicense.
[12]	Grant, C. & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for ‘House’. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice and Research, Pp. 12-22 DOI: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9.
[13]	Membership List. (2022). Retrieved 21 March 2022, from http://e-ceaa.org/membership/membership-list/.
[14]	How to Determine the Correct Survey Sample Size. (2021). Retrieved 16 August 2021, from https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/determine-sample-size/.
[15]	Sample Size Calculator (Use in 60 Seconds) // Qualtrics. (2021). Retrieved 16 August 2021, from https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/calculating-sample-size/.
[16]	Abeje Eshete. (2020). Ethiopia environmental and forest research institute.
[17]	BACKGROUND: THE NATURAL RESOURCES BASE. (2021). Retrieved 29 June 2021, from http://www.fao.org/3/Y4818E/y4818e05.htm.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdulkerim Kiflu, Nebyou Yonas. (2022). Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdulkerim Kiflu; Nebyou Yonas. Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2022, 8(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdulkerim Kiflu, Nebyou Yonas. Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2022;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11,
  author = {Abdulkerim Kiflu and Nebyou Yonas},
  title = {Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-7},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaaa.20220801.11},
  abstract = {The construction industry regarded as one of the pivotal aspects of achieving the objectives of sustainable development in communities. In this regard, the choice of building materials is one of the challenges in order to improve program performance with respect to sustainable development, and the use of sustainable materials is an effective step towards achieving sustainable construction. Selection of sustainable building materials represents an important strategy in the design and construction of buildings in Ethiopia. One of the principal challenges is the process of prioritizing and aggregating relevant criteria into a selection framework. Therefore, the purpose of this framework in building projects is to look at the complexity of the interactions between sustainability building materials and architects and to set up a knowledge-based decision support system. After conducting a thorough literature review, case study (BREEAM, LEED, CASBEE, LBC, and G-SEED), questionnaire, and discussion with selected experts, 27 sustainable building material selection criteria items identified based on the sustainable triple bottom line. A survey of Ethiopian architectural firms was conducted to capture their awareness of sustainable building materials. A total of 199 registered offices, based on Ethiopia's construction ministry in 2021. From among these, 51 offices chosen, as a sample size randomly. One of the study's limitations is that it excludes other stakeholders, such as the client, who may have an influence on material selection. Another drawback is that since elements are used to organize materials and components, Ratings are thus based solely on product performance within each constituent group. On the other hand, this study excluded several items. For example, "products" such as lighting, water fixtures, HVAC, and electrical fixtures are not included.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia
AU - Abdulkerim Kiflu
AU - Nebyou Yonas
Y1 - 2022/03/23
PY - 2022
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11
DO - 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11
T2 - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
JF - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
JO - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
SP - 1
EP - 7
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2472-1131
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11
AB - The construction industry regarded as one of the pivotal aspects of achieving the objectives of sustainable development in communities. In this regard, the choice of building materials is one of the challenges in order to improve program performance with respect to sustainable development, and the use of sustainable materials is an effective step towards achieving sustainable construction. Selection of sustainable building materials represents an important strategy in the design and construction of buildings in Ethiopia. One of the principal challenges is the process of prioritizing and aggregating relevant criteria into a selection framework. Therefore, the purpose of this framework in building projects is to look at the complexity of the interactions between sustainability building materials and architects and to set up a knowledge-based decision support system. After conducting a thorough literature review, case study (BREEAM, LEED, CASBEE, LBC, and G-SEED), questionnaire, and discussion with selected experts, 27 sustainable building material selection criteria items identified based on the sustainable triple bottom line. A survey of Ethiopian architectural firms was conducted to capture their awareness of sustainable building materials. A total of 199 registered offices, based on Ethiopia's construction ministry in 2021. From among these, 51 offices chosen, as a sample size randomly. One of the study's limitations is that it excludes other stakeholders, such as the client, who may have an influence on material selection. Another drawback is that since elements are used to organize materials and components, Ratings are thus based solely on product performance within each constituent group. On the other hand, this study excluded several items. For example, "products" such as lighting, water fixtures, HVAC, and electrical fixtures are not included.
VL - 8
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Abdulkerim Kiflu

College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (AASTU), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Nebyou Yonas

Urban Design, Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development (EIABC), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdulkerim Kiflu, Nebyou Yonas. (2022). Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdulkerim Kiflu; Nebyou Yonas. Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2022, 8(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdulkerim Kiflu, Nebyou Yonas. Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2022;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11,
  author = {Abdulkerim Kiflu and Nebyou Yonas},
  title = {Developing Theoretical Sustainable Building Material Selection Framework for Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-7},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20220801.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaaa.20220801.11},
  abstract = {The construction industry regarded as one of the pivotal aspects of achieving the objectives of sustainable development in communities. In this regard, the choice of building materials is one of the challenges in order to improve program performance with respect to sustainable development, and the use of sustainable materials is an effective step towards achieving sustainable construction. Selection of sustainable building materials represents an important strategy in the design and construction of buildings in Ethiopia. One of the principal challenges is the process of prioritizing and aggregating relevant criteria into a selection framework. Therefore, the purpose of this framework in building projects is to look at the complexity of the interactions between sustainability building materials and architects and to set up a knowledge-based decision support system. After conducting a thorough literature review, case study (BREEAM, LEED, CASBEE, LBC, and G-SEED), questionnaire, and discussion with selected experts, 27 sustainable building material selection criteria items identified based on the sustainable triple bottom line. A survey of Ethiopian architectural firms was conducted to capture their awareness of sustainable building materials. A total of 199 registered offices, based on Ethiopia's construction ministry in 2021. From among these, 51 offices chosen, as a sample size randomly. One of the study's limitations is that it excludes other stakeholders, such as the client, who may have an influence on material selection. Another drawback is that since elements are used to organize materials and components, Ratings are thus based solely on product performance within each constituent group. On the other hand, this study excluded several items. For example, "products" such as lighting, water fixtures, HVAC, and electrical fixtures are not included.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download