Analysis of the Groundwater flow can help to understand future water potential. This study has explored the predicted groundwater flow dynamics with climate change and anthropogenic stress in Hormat-Golina Sub-basin. Groundwater flow modeling in this Sub-basin has provided information about groundwater quantity as well as the quality aspect for decision-makers about groundwater accessibility. The initial head measured values before and after irrigation season has varied to a maximum of 0.8 m. The groundwater head level before and after irrigation season was varying from 9.3 m to 8.26 m in the Southern boundary. The groundwater head was obtained from 41.5 m to 38.83 m in the northwestern of the Sub-basin. The maximum drawdown depth had found to 0.27 m and 2.6 m before and after irrigated season around the pumped wells. The increased pumping rate with decreased recharge rate was replying to the groundwater head at the end of 2021 decreased by 2.81 m in the northwestern boundary of the Sub-basin as compared as using constant pumping rate with recharge rate. While decreased pumping with increased recharge rate was replying to the groundwater head at the end of 2021 has increased by 2.23 m in the northwestern boundary of the Sub-basin as compared as using constant pumping rate. The impacts of climate change and human pressure on groundwater begot as the threats in those supply wells. Decreased pumping with increased recharge rate was accomplishing to restore and protect the groundwater resources, which is the best option for groundwater restoration and monitoring.
| Published in | Hydrology (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13 |
| Page(s) | 48-55 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Groundwater Head, Irrigation, Climate Change, Hormat-Golina, Ethiopia
| [1] | Anderson, M and Wossener, W. W. 1992. Applied groundwater modeling simulation of flow and advective transport, Florida. |
| [2] | Brouyere, S., Carabin, G. and Dassargues, A. 2004. Climate change impacts on groundwater resources: modeled deficits in a chalky aquifer, Geer basin, Belgium, Hydrogeology Journal, Volume. 12, P. 123-134. |
| [3] | Chiang, W. H. 2005. 3D groundwater modeling with PMWIN: A Simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and transport processes. Second edition, ISBN-13978-3-540-27590-9, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York. |
| [4] | Craig, C., Rick, E., Susan, H., Rafik, H., Gabrielle, P. and Carolina, P. 2010. Water and Climate Change: Impacts on groundwater resources and adaptation options. Water Working Notes are published by the Water Sector Board of the Sustainable Development Network of the World Bank Group. Note number, 25. |
| [5] | Crosbie, R., McCallum, J., Walker, G. and Chiew, F. 2010. Modeling in climate change impacts on groundwater recharge in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Hydrogeology Journal, Vol 18 No7, P. 1639-1656. |
| [6] | Delleur, J. 1999. The handbook of Groundwater Engineering. ISBN 0-8493-2698-2 (CRC Press), U.S.A and Canada ISBN 3-540-64745-7 (Springer-Verlag), Germany. |
| [7] | Herrera, P. M. and Hiscock, K. 2008. The effects of climate change on potential groundwater recharge in Great Britain. |
| [8] | Hogeboom, H. J. Pieter, R., Maarten, S. and Martijn, J. 2013. Modeling the Influence of Groundwater Abstractions on the Water Level of Lake Naivasha, Kenya Under Data-Scarce Conditions, University of Twente, Netherland. Department of Water Engineering & Management (WEM). Volume 29 issue 12, P. 4447–4463. |
| [9] | Semu Moges. 2012. Agricultural Use of Groundwater in Ethiopia: Assessment of Potential and Analysis of Economics, Policies, Constraints and Opportunities. Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. |
| [10] | Todd, D. K. 2005. Groundwater Hydrology. Third edition ISBN 0-471-05937-4 (cloth) and ISBN 0-471-45254-8 (WIE). |
APA Style
Mengesha Tesfaw, Tewodros Assefa Nigussie, Sirak Tekleab. (2021). Analysis of Groundwater Flow Modelling: The Case of Hormat-golina Sub-basin, Golina Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology, 9(2), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13
ACS Style
Mengesha Tesfaw; Tewodros Assefa Nigussie; Sirak Tekleab. Analysis of Groundwater Flow Modelling: The Case of Hormat-golina Sub-basin, Golina Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology. 2021, 9(2), 48-55. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13
AMA Style
Mengesha Tesfaw, Tewodros Assefa Nigussie, Sirak Tekleab. Analysis of Groundwater Flow Modelling: The Case of Hormat-golina Sub-basin, Golina Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology. 2021;9(2):48-55. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13,
author = {Mengesha Tesfaw and Tewodros Assefa Nigussie and Sirak Tekleab},
title = {Analysis of Groundwater Flow Modelling: The Case of Hormat-golina Sub-basin, Golina Basin, Ethiopia},
journal = {Hydrology},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {48-55},
doi = {10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hyd.20210902.13},
abstract = {Analysis of the Groundwater flow can help to understand future water potential. This study has explored the predicted groundwater flow dynamics with climate change and anthropogenic stress in Hormat-Golina Sub-basin. Groundwater flow modeling in this Sub-basin has provided information about groundwater quantity as well as the quality aspect for decision-makers about groundwater accessibility. The initial head measured values before and after irrigation season has varied to a maximum of 0.8 m. The groundwater head level before and after irrigation season was varying from 9.3 m to 8.26 m in the Southern boundary. The groundwater head was obtained from 41.5 m to 38.83 m in the northwestern of the Sub-basin. The maximum drawdown depth had found to 0.27 m and 2.6 m before and after irrigated season around the pumped wells. The increased pumping rate with decreased recharge rate was replying to the groundwater head at the end of 2021 decreased by 2.81 m in the northwestern boundary of the Sub-basin as compared as using constant pumping rate with recharge rate. While decreased pumping with increased recharge rate was replying to the groundwater head at the end of 2021 has increased by 2.23 m in the northwestern boundary of the Sub-basin as compared as using constant pumping rate. The impacts of climate change and human pressure on groundwater begot as the threats in those supply wells. Decreased pumping with increased recharge rate was accomplishing to restore and protect the groundwater resources, which is the best option for groundwater restoration and monitoring.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Analysis of Groundwater Flow Modelling: The Case of Hormat-golina Sub-basin, Golina Basin, Ethiopia AU - Mengesha Tesfaw AU - Tewodros Assefa Nigussie AU - Sirak Tekleab Y1 - 2021/06/04 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13 DO - 10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13 T2 - Hydrology JF - Hydrology JO - Hydrology SP - 48 EP - 55 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7617 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20210902.13 AB - Analysis of the Groundwater flow can help to understand future water potential. This study has explored the predicted groundwater flow dynamics with climate change and anthropogenic stress in Hormat-Golina Sub-basin. Groundwater flow modeling in this Sub-basin has provided information about groundwater quantity as well as the quality aspect for decision-makers about groundwater accessibility. The initial head measured values before and after irrigation season has varied to a maximum of 0.8 m. The groundwater head level before and after irrigation season was varying from 9.3 m to 8.26 m in the Southern boundary. The groundwater head was obtained from 41.5 m to 38.83 m in the northwestern of the Sub-basin. The maximum drawdown depth had found to 0.27 m and 2.6 m before and after irrigated season around the pumped wells. The increased pumping rate with decreased recharge rate was replying to the groundwater head at the end of 2021 decreased by 2.81 m in the northwestern boundary of the Sub-basin as compared as using constant pumping rate with recharge rate. While decreased pumping with increased recharge rate was replying to the groundwater head at the end of 2021 has increased by 2.23 m in the northwestern boundary of the Sub-basin as compared as using constant pumping rate. The impacts of climate change and human pressure on groundwater begot as the threats in those supply wells. Decreased pumping with increased recharge rate was accomplishing to restore and protect the groundwater resources, which is the best option for groundwater restoration and monitoring. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: