Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Educational Environment in Outcome-Based Medical Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of 25th Intake Interns at the Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar

Received: 26 August 2026     Accepted: 8 September 2026     Published: 20 September 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The educational environment is an important determinant of students’ learning experiences, engagement, satisfaction, and professional development, particularly during major curriculum reform. The Defence Services Medical Academy (DSMA), Myanmar, has implemented Outcome-Based Medical Education (OBME) to promote competency-oriented, student-centred learning and closer alignment between educational outcomes, teaching, and assessment. Continued evaluation among successive student cohorts is necessary to determine how the curriculum is experienced in practice. This study evaluated the educational environment and experiences of 25th Intake internship students undertaking the OBME programme at DSMA. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were obtained from 34 internship students using the 50-item Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) and analysed using descriptive statistics. The qualitative component used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to explore students’ experiences, challenges, expectations, faculty support, and peer interaction; qualitative data were analysed thematically using MAXQDA. The overall mean DREEM score was 130/200, indicating an educational environment perceived as more positive than negative. Domain scores were 31.2 ± 6.5 for Students’ Perceptions of Learning, 28.7 ± 5.8 for Students’ Perceptions of Teachers, 24.5 ± 4.7 for Students’ Academic Self-Perception, 27.3 ± 5.2 for Students’ Perceptions of Atmosphere, and 18.3 ± 4.0 for Students’ Social Self-Perception. Five qualitative themes were identified: adaptation to OBME, faculty support, peer interaction, expectations versus experience, and positive aspects of the learning environment. Students valued collaborative learning, educational resources, faculty guidance, and greater responsibility for their learning. However, challenges were identified in self-directed learning, assessment, workload, consistency of faculty accessibility, and social interaction. The findings indicate that the educational environment for 25th Intake interns was generally positive, while highlighting specific opportunities for curriculum improvement. Strengthened orientation, faculty development, clearer assessment communication, structured peer support, and regular cohort-based evaluation are recommended to support continued development of OBME at DSMA.

Published in Higher Education Research (Volume 11, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.her.20261105.14
Page(s) 164-174
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

DREEM, Educational Environment, Outcome-Based Medical Education, Medical Education, Mixed-Methods Study, Student Perception, Curriculum Evaluation, Myanmar

References
[1] Bland CJ, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorhead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. Curricular change in medical schools: How to succeed. Acad Med. 2000; 75(6): 575-594.
[2] Harden RM. The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ. 2000; 34(7): 551-557.
[3] Ross S, Hauer KE, van Melle E. Outcomes are what matter: Competency-based medical education gets us to our goal. MedEdPublish. 2018; 7.
[4] Touchie C, ten Cate O. The promise, perils, problems and progress of compe-tency-based medical education. Med Educ. 2016; 50(1): 93-100.
[5] Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001; 23(4): 337-344.
[6] Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed AU, Deza H, Groenen G, Primparyon P. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Envi-ronment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach. 1997; 19(4): 295-299.
[7] Noreen K, Khan KA, Nehra RA. Students’ perception of learning environment using Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) inventory. Pak J Public Health. 2018; 8(2): 112-116.
[8] Preston R, Gratani M, Owens K, Roche P, Zimanyi M, Malau-Aduli B. Exploring the impact of assessment on medical students’ learning. Assess Eval High Educ. 2020; 45(1): 109-124.
[9] Langness S, Rajapuram N, Marshall M, Rahman AS, Sammann A. Risk factors associated with student distress in medical school: Associations with faculty support and availability of wellbeing resources. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4): e0265869.
[10] Aung YP, Hein T, Phyo Z, Naing TT, Hlaing KH, Htun KA. Bridging expectations and reality: Student experiences in outcome-based medical education at Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar. ISRG J Arts Humanit Soc Sci. 2025; 3(2): 11-17.
[11] Naing TT, Hein T, Naing MT, Phyo Z, Kyaw PH, Tun T, Than MM, Tun T, Aung YP. A comprehensive mixed-method evaluation using the CIPP model: Assessing Defence Services Medical Academy’s Educator Training Programme. Higher EducRes. 2026; 11(4): 109-119.
[12] Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods. 2006; 18(1): 3-20.
[13] Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update (BEME Guide No. 40). Med Teach. 2016; 38(8): 769-786.
[14] Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006; 28(2): 117-128.
[15] Alharbi NS. Evaluating competency-based medical education: A systematized review of current practices. BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24: 612.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Aung, Y. P., Naing, T. T., Hein, T., Phyo, Z., Ya, S. T., et al. (2026). Educational Environment in Outcome-Based Medical Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of 25th Intake Interns at the Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar. Higher Education Research, 11(5), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20261105.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Aung, Y. P.; Naing, T. T.; Hein, T.; Phyo, Z.; Ya, S. T., et al. Educational Environment in Outcome-Based Medical Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of 25th Intake Interns at the Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar. High. Educ. Res. 2026, 11(5), 164-174. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20261105.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Aung YP, Naing TT, Hein T, Phyo Z, Ya ST, et al. Educational Environment in Outcome-Based Medical Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of 25th Intake Interns at the Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar. High Educ Res. 2026;11(5):164-174. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20261105.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.her.20261105.14,
      author = {Ye Phyo Aung and Tun Tun Naing and Tayzar Hein and Zaw Phyo and Soe Thu Ya and Pyi Hein Kyaw and Tin Tun},
      title = {Educational Environment in Outcome-Based Medical Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of 25th Intake Interns at the Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar},
      journal = {Higher Education Research},
      volume = {11},
      number = {5},
      pages = {164-174},
      doi = {10.11648/j.her.20261105.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20261105.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20261105.14},
      abstract = {The educational environment is an important determinant of students’ learning experiences, engagement, satisfaction, and professional development, particularly during major curriculum reform. The Defence Services Medical Academy (DSMA), Myanmar, has implemented Outcome-Based Medical Education (OBME) to promote competency-oriented, student-centred learning and closer alignment between educational outcomes, teaching, and assessment. Continued evaluation among successive student cohorts is necessary to determine how the curriculum is experienced in practice. This study evaluated the educational environment and experiences of 25th Intake internship students undertaking the OBME programme at DSMA. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were obtained from 34 internship students using the 50-item Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) and analysed using descriptive statistics. The qualitative component used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to explore students’ experiences, challenges, expectations, faculty support, and peer interaction; qualitative data were analysed thematically using MAXQDA. The overall mean DREEM score was 130/200, indicating an educational environment perceived as more positive than negative. Domain scores were 31.2 ± 6.5 for Students’ Perceptions of Learning, 28.7 ± 5.8 for Students’ Perceptions of Teachers, 24.5 ± 4.7 for Students’ Academic Self-Perception, 27.3 ± 5.2 for Students’ Perceptions of Atmosphere, and 18.3 ± 4.0 for Students’ Social Self-Perception. Five qualitative themes were identified: adaptation to OBME, faculty support, peer interaction, expectations versus experience, and positive aspects of the learning environment. Students valued collaborative learning, educational resources, faculty guidance, and greater responsibility for their learning. However, challenges were identified in self-directed learning, assessment, workload, consistency of faculty accessibility, and social interaction. The findings indicate that the educational environment for 25th Intake interns was generally positive, while highlighting specific opportunities for curriculum improvement. Strengthened orientation, faculty development, clearer assessment communication, structured peer support, and regular cohort-based evaluation are recommended to support continued development of OBME at DSMA.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Educational Environment in Outcome-Based Medical Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of 25th Intake Interns at the Defence Services Medical Academy, Myanmar
    AU  - Ye Phyo Aung
    AU  - Tun Tun Naing
    AU  - Tayzar Hein
    AU  - Zaw Phyo
    AU  - Soe Thu Ya
    AU  - Pyi Hein Kyaw
    AU  - Tin Tun
    Y1  - 2026/09/20
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20261105.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20261105.14
    T2  - Higher Education Research
    JF  - Higher Education Research
    JO  - Higher Education Research
    SP  - 164
    EP  - 174
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-935X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20261105.14
    AB  - The educational environment is an important determinant of students’ learning experiences, engagement, satisfaction, and professional development, particularly during major curriculum reform. The Defence Services Medical Academy (DSMA), Myanmar, has implemented Outcome-Based Medical Education (OBME) to promote competency-oriented, student-centred learning and closer alignment between educational outcomes, teaching, and assessment. Continued evaluation among successive student cohorts is necessary to determine how the curriculum is experienced in practice. This study evaluated the educational environment and experiences of 25th Intake internship students undertaking the OBME programme at DSMA. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were obtained from 34 internship students using the 50-item Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) and analysed using descriptive statistics. The qualitative component used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to explore students’ experiences, challenges, expectations, faculty support, and peer interaction; qualitative data were analysed thematically using MAXQDA. The overall mean DREEM score was 130/200, indicating an educational environment perceived as more positive than negative. Domain scores were 31.2 ± 6.5 for Students’ Perceptions of Learning, 28.7 ± 5.8 for Students’ Perceptions of Teachers, 24.5 ± 4.7 for Students’ Academic Self-Perception, 27.3 ± 5.2 for Students’ Perceptions of Atmosphere, and 18.3 ± 4.0 for Students’ Social Self-Perception. Five qualitative themes were identified: adaptation to OBME, faculty support, peer interaction, expectations versus experience, and positive aspects of the learning environment. Students valued collaborative learning, educational resources, faculty guidance, and greater responsibility for their learning. However, challenges were identified in self-directed learning, assessment, workload, consistency of faculty accessibility, and social interaction. The findings indicate that the educational environment for 25th Intake interns was generally positive, while highlighting specific opportunities for curriculum improvement. Strengthened orientation, faculty development, clearer assessment communication, structured peer support, and regular cohort-based evaluation are recommended to support continued development of OBME at DSMA.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections