Education has traditionally been viewed as an economic investment, a perspective that has strongly influenced policy agendas across the world. Yet this narrow focus on productivity often neglects education’s broader ethical, cultural, and social purposes. This study critically re-examines how the concept of human capital has evolved in higher education policy research from 2014 to 2024. Drawing on postmodern and intersectional perspectives, it explores how economic, cultural, and justice-oriented dimensions intersect in shaping contemporary understandings of education’s value. A systematic literature review was undertaken in line with established research protocols, analysing 43 peer-reviewed studies selected from 256 records. Bibliometric and network analyses were used to identify major thematic trends, influential authors, and institutional collaborations. Findings indicate that while the human capital framework remains dominant, recent scholarship has widened its scope to include social well-being, emotional development, and cultural participation. Evidence from varied national contexts shows that equity-oriented and context-responsive policies produce more sustainable and inclusive outcomes than market-driven approaches. The paper proposes a Tri-Anchor Framework connecting economic efficiency, cultural responsiveness, and intersectional equity, offering policymakers a conceptual tool to balance growth with inclusion. It concludes that higher education policy should move beyond productivity metrics towards advancing human flourishing, democratic participation, and long-term societal resilience.
| Published in | Higher Education Research (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.her.20251006.12 |
| Page(s) | 231-246 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Human Capital Theory, Education Policy, Postmodernism, Intersectionality, Systematic Literature Review, Cultural Responsiveness
| [1] | Apostu, S. A., Mukli, L., Panait, M., Gigauri, I., & Hysa, E. (2022). Economic Growth through the Lenses of Education, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation. Administrative Sciences, 12(3). |
| [2] | Autor, D. H. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science, 344(6186), 843-851. |
| [3] | Bairoliya, N., & Miller, R. (2021). Demographic transition, human capital and economic growth in China. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 127, Article 104117. |
| [4] | Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of political economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9-49. |
| [5] | Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of political economy, 101(3), 385-409. |
| [6] | Becker, G. S. (2007). Health as human capital: synthesis and extensions. Oxford Economic Papers, 59(3), 379-410. |
| [7] | Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago press. |
| [8] | Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Lyotard and Postmodern Gaming. In S. Best & D. Kellner (Eds.), Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations (pp. 146-180). Macmillan Education UK. |
| [9] | Buchmann, C., & Hannum, E. (2001). Education and stratification in developing countries: A review of theories and research. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 77-102. |
| [10] | Campbell, A. C., & Mawer, M. (2019). Clarifying Mixed Messages: International Scholarship Programmes in the Sustainable Development Agenda. HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 32(2), 167-184. |
| [11] | Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). 1185 A Critique of the Human Capital Theory: Various Perspectives. In S. Chattopadhyay (Ed.), Education and Economics: Disciplinary Evolution and Policy Discourse (pp. 0). Oxford University Press. |
| [12] | Checchi, D., & Van De Werfhorst, H. G. (2018). Policies, skills and earnings: how educational inequality affects earnings inequality. SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 16(1), 137-160. |
| [13] | Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 359-377. |
| [14] | Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1-40. |
| [15] | Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593-608. |
| [16] | Crenshaw, K. (2017). On intersectionality: essential writings. The New Press. |
| [17] | David, M., Alessandro, L., Jennifer, T., & Douglas, G. A. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, b2535. |
| [18] | Davin, M. (2014). Public Education Spending, Sectoral Taxation, and Growth. REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 124(4), 553-570. |
| [19] | Djajic, S., Docquier, F., & Michael, M. S. (2019). Optimal education policy and human capital accumulation in the context of brain drain. JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHIC ECONOMICS, 85(4), 271-303. |
| [20] | ÉEgert, B., Botev, J., & Turner, D. (2020). The contribution of human capital and its policies to per capita income in Europe and the OECD. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 129, Article 103560. |
| [21] | Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. |
| [22] | Falch, R. (2022). How do people trade off resources between quick and slow learners? EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 150, Article 104285. |
| [23] | Fényes, H., Mohácsi, M., & Pallay, K. (2021). CAREER CONSCIOUSNESS AND COMMITMENT TO GRADUATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE. ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 14(1), 61-75. |
| [24] | Han, Y., & Liang, Y. (2023). Scientific Knowledge Map Study of Therapeutic Landscapes and Community Open Spaces: Visual Analysis with CiteSpace. SUSTAINABILITY, 15(20). |
| [25] | Hanushek, E., Rivkin, S., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458. |
| [26] | Harden, K. P., Domingue, B. W., Belsky, D. W., Boardman, J. D., Crosnoe, R., Malanchini, M., Nivard, M., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harris, K. M. (2020). Genetic associations with mathematics tracking and persistence in secondary school. NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING, 5(1), Article 1. |
| [27] | Hunkin, E. (2016). Deploying Foucauldian genealogy: Critiquing 'quality' reform in early childhood policy in Australia. POWER AND EDUCATION, 8(1), 35-53. |
| [28] | Iqbal, J., Kousar, S., & ul Hameed, W. (2018). Antecedents of Sustainable Social Entrepreneurship Initiatives in Pakistan and Outcomes: Collaboration between Quadruple Helix Sectors. SUSTAINABILITY, 10(12), Article 4539. |
| [29] | Kaffenberger, M., & Pritchett, L. (2021). Effective investment in women's futures: Schooling with learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 86, 102464. |
| [30] | Kaya, V., Çelik, A. K., & Kutlu, M. (2020). Personal income distribution in Turkey: A generalized ordered logit analysis. ECONOMIC JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 12(2), 138-150. |
| [31] | Kim, M. J. (2023). Happiness, politics and education reform in South Korea: building 'happy human capital' for the future. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 59(4), 489-505. |
| [32] | Koo, A. (2016). Expansion of vocational education in neoliberal China: hope and despair among rural youth. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 31(1), 46-59. |
| [33] | Lavy, V. (2004). Do Gender Stereotypes Reduce Girls’ or Boys’ Human Capital Outcomes? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2083-2105. |
| [34] | Liasidou, A., & Liasidou, S. (2023). Sunflowers, hidden disabilities and power inequities in higher education: Some critical considerations and implications for disability-inclusive education policy reforms. POWER AND EDUCATION. |
| [35] | Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Vol. 10). U of Minnesota Press. |
| [36] | McCowan, T. (2019). Higher Education for and beyond the Sustainable Development Goals (1st 2019 ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. |
| [37] | Minor, R. (2023). How tuition fees affected student enrollment at higher education institutions: the aftermath of a German quasi-experiment. JOURNAL FOR LABOUR MARKET RESEARCH, 57(1), Article 28. |
| [38] | Mkondiwa, M. (2023). Is wealth found in the soil or in the brain? Investing in farm people in Malawi. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 27(1), 134-157. |
| [39] | Obara, T. (2019). Optimal human capital policies under the endogenous choice of educational types. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMIC THEORY, 21(3), 512-536. |
| [40] | Ono, T., & Uchida, Y. (2018). Human capital, public debt, and economic growth: A political economy analysis. JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 57, 1-14. |
| [41] | Patrinos, A. H., & Psacharopoulos, G. (2002). Returns to investment in education: a further update. The World Bank. |
| [42] | Potochnick, S. (2014). How states can reduce the dropout rate for undocumented immigrant youth: The effects of in-state resident tuition policies. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 45, 18-32. |
| [43] | Ransom, J. S. (1997). Foucault's Discipline: The Politics of Subjectivity. Duke University Press. |
| [44] | Schofer, E., Ramirez, F., & Meyer, J. (2020). The Societal Consequences of Higher Education. Sociology of Education, 94, 003804072094291. |
| [45] | Schultz, T. W. (1960). Capital formation by education. Journal of political economy, 68(6), 571-583. |
| [46] | Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51(1), 1-17. |
| [47] | Schultz, T. W. (1975). The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of economic literature, 13(3), 827-846. |
| [48] | Schultz, T. W. (1980). Nobel lecture: The economics of being poor. Journal of political economy, 88(4), 639-651. |
| [49] | Schultz, T. W. (1993). The economic importance of human capital in modernization. Education Economics, 1(1), 13-19. |
| [50] | Sim, S. (2013). The Routledge companion to postmodernism. Routledge. |
| [51] | Spohrer, K., & Bailey, P. L. J. (2020). Character and resilience in English education policy: social mobility, self-governance and biopolitics. CRITICAL STUDIES IN EDUCATION, 61(5), 561-576. |
| [52] | Stofkova, J., Poliakova, A., Stofkova, K. R., Malega, P., Krejnus, M., Binasova, V., & Daneshjo, N. (2022). Digital Skills as a Significant Factor of Human Resources Development. SUSTAINABILITY, 14(20), Article 13117. |
| [53] | Tomlinson, M. (2021). Employers and Universities: Conceptual Dimensions, Research Evidence and Implications. HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 34(1), 132-154. |
| [54] | UNESCO. (2018). Global education monitoring report 2019: migration, displacement and education: building bridges, not walls. |
| [55] | Usher, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. Routledge. |
| [56] | Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95-108. |
| [57] | Walker, J. (2009). Language and Culture Requirements in International Business Majors at AACSB-Accredited Business Schools. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 20(4), 293-311. |
| [58] | Weymann, A. (2018). The Rise and Limits of Education Policy. Gendered Education. ENCOUNTERS IN THEORY AND HISTORY OF EDUCATION, 19, 6-34. |
| [59] | Woodward, K., & Jones, J. P. (2008). The condition of postmodernity (1989): David Harvey. In (pp. 125-134). |
| [60] | World Bank. (2011). Learning for all: investing in people's knowledge and skills to promote development - World Bank Group education strategy 2020: executive summary (English). |
APA Style
Ma, Z. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review of Human Capital and Education Policy 2014-2024. Higher Education Research, 10(6), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.12
ACS Style
Ma, Z. A Systematic Literature Review of Human Capital and Education Policy 2014-2024. High. Educ. Res. 2025, 10(6), 231-246. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20251006.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.her.20251006.12,
author = {Zhi Ma},
title = {A Systematic Literature Review of Human Capital and Education Policy 2014-2024
},
journal = {Higher Education Research},
volume = {10},
number = {6},
pages = {231-246},
doi = {10.11648/j.her.20251006.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20251006.12},
abstract = {Education has traditionally been viewed as an economic investment, a perspective that has strongly influenced policy agendas across the world. Yet this narrow focus on productivity often neglects education’s broader ethical, cultural, and social purposes. This study critically re-examines how the concept of human capital has evolved in higher education policy research from 2014 to 2024. Drawing on postmodern and intersectional perspectives, it explores how economic, cultural, and justice-oriented dimensions intersect in shaping contemporary understandings of education’s value. A systematic literature review was undertaken in line with established research protocols, analysing 43 peer-reviewed studies selected from 256 records. Bibliometric and network analyses were used to identify major thematic trends, influential authors, and institutional collaborations. Findings indicate that while the human capital framework remains dominant, recent scholarship has widened its scope to include social well-being, emotional development, and cultural participation. Evidence from varied national contexts shows that equity-oriented and context-responsive policies produce more sustainable and inclusive outcomes than market-driven approaches. The paper proposes a Tri-Anchor Framework connecting economic efficiency, cultural responsiveness, and intersectional equity, offering policymakers a conceptual tool to balance growth with inclusion. It concludes that higher education policy should move beyond productivity metrics towards advancing human flourishing, democratic participation, and long-term societal resilience.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Systematic Literature Review of Human Capital and Education Policy 2014-2024 AU - Zhi Ma Y1 - 2025/12/03 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.12 DO - 10.11648/j.her.20251006.12 T2 - Higher Education Research JF - Higher Education Research JO - Higher Education Research SP - 231 EP - 246 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-935X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.12 AB - Education has traditionally been viewed as an economic investment, a perspective that has strongly influenced policy agendas across the world. Yet this narrow focus on productivity often neglects education’s broader ethical, cultural, and social purposes. This study critically re-examines how the concept of human capital has evolved in higher education policy research from 2014 to 2024. Drawing on postmodern and intersectional perspectives, it explores how economic, cultural, and justice-oriented dimensions intersect in shaping contemporary understandings of education’s value. A systematic literature review was undertaken in line with established research protocols, analysing 43 peer-reviewed studies selected from 256 records. Bibliometric and network analyses were used to identify major thematic trends, influential authors, and institutional collaborations. Findings indicate that while the human capital framework remains dominant, recent scholarship has widened its scope to include social well-being, emotional development, and cultural participation. Evidence from varied national contexts shows that equity-oriented and context-responsive policies produce more sustainable and inclusive outcomes than market-driven approaches. The paper proposes a Tri-Anchor Framework connecting economic efficiency, cultural responsiveness, and intersectional equity, offering policymakers a conceptual tool to balance growth with inclusion. It concludes that higher education policy should move beyond productivity metrics towards advancing human flourishing, democratic participation, and long-term societal resilience. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -
International Affairs Office, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, China
Information