The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System

Fenping Wang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

| Peer-Reviewed

The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System

Fenping Wang

Published in Higher Education Research (Volume 6, Issue 5)

Received: 31 August 2021 Accepted: 14 September 2021 Published: 23 September 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Application-oriented professions are developing rapidly, but the evaluation criteria for the quality of application-oriented professions are rare, By referring to the quality evaluation and Accreditation standards of science and engineering majors in various countries, the quality evaluation standards of science and engineering majors have been formulated, and the weights of the evaluation standards have been determined through questionnaire surveys. Three levels of indicators, the first level indicators include Curriculum construction, Professional skills training and competency, Faculty and Staff Resources, Employer cooperation. Each first-level indicator contains several second-level indicators, a total of 13 second-level indicators, each second-level indicator contains several third-level indicators, a total of 38 third-level indicators. The Index System Embodies the Student-Centered and Pragmatic Educational Concepts, It reflects the requirements for the professional skills of graduates of applied majors, and also reflects the requirements for training in cooperation with employers, It also reflects the requirements for the innovative ability of undergraduate graduates, requiring applied universities to pay attention to their social responsibilities. Applied engineering technology majors lack specific curriculum guidance, and it is necessary to strengthen school-enterprise cooperation and increase dual-qualified teachers with practical experience in engineering technology.

Published in	Higher Education Research (Volume 6, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
Page(s)	126-131
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Applied Bachelor Degree, Professional Quality, Evaluation Index

References

[1]	Kim, Yun-Jeong; Kim, Min-Jung; Choi, Hye-Kyong. Study on the Improvement of Quality Evaluation Index for Community Social Service Investment: With a Focus on Fuzzy Analysis on Quality Evaluation Index. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information; Koganei Vol. 20, Iss. 5B, (May 2017): 3479-3488.
[2]	Bernd Wächter, Maria Kelo, Et al. university quality indicators: a critical assessment. 2015, pp: 23-49.
[3]	National Research Council. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. pp: 1-2.
[4]	Bourner, Tom, Ed.; Katz, Tim, Ed.; Watson, David, Ed. New Directions in Professional Higher Education. Open University Press, 2000.
[5]	Alan J. Dutson, Robert H. Todd, Spencer P. Magleby, Carl D. Sorensen’study. A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses. The reseach Journal for Engineering Education, 02 January 2013, Volume 86, Issue 1, January 1997, pp: 17-28.
[6]	Norman L. Fortenberry. Teaching the Practical Skills. Mechanical Engineering. Dec 2011, 133 (12): 36-40.
[7]	Elmira Robertovna Khairullina, Et al. Features of the Programs Applied Bachelor Degree in Secondary and Higher Vocational Education, Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 4; 2015, pp: 214.
[8]	Yuan Dong. Construction of Educational Quality Evaluation Index System Based on Project Management. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS) 202012 (2), pp: 11.
[9]	Abbas Mehrabi Boshrabadi & M. Reza Hosseini. Designing collaborative problem solving assessment tasks in engineering: an evaluative judgement perspective, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 Oct 2020, pp: 913-927.
[10]	Zeitz, Leigh E. Developing a Technology Workshop Series for Your Faculty and Staff. Computing Teacher, v22 n7, Apr 1995, pp: 62-64.
[11]	Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwicha Krista D. Glazewskib Timothy J. New by Peggy A. Ertmer. Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education Volume 55, Issue 3, November 2010, Pages 1321-1335.
[12]	Ana Afonso, Juan J. Ramírez etc. University-Industry Cooperation in the Education Domain to Foster Competitiveness and Employment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 46, 2012, Pages 3947-3953.
[13]	Alo Lilles. Indicators Measuring University-Industry Cooperation, Discussions on Estonian Economic Policy, Vol. 20, Issue 1, p. 204, January 2012.
[14]	Abraham Flexner. Universities: American, Englishi, German. Routledge. July in 1994, pp: 3-6.
[15]	Annikki Jarvinen & Viljo Kohonen. Promoting. Professional Development in Higher Education through Portfolio Assessment. 10 Feb 2011, pp: 25-36.
[16]	Kichan Yoon, Gyubeom Park, and Munjae Lee. How Should the Social Service Quality Evaluation in South Korea Be Verified? Focusing on Community Care Services. Healthcare 2020, 8 (3), pp: 294.
[17]	Johnny J Moye, William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE, and Kendall N. Starkweather, DTE. The Status of Technology and Engineering Education in the United States: A Fourth Report ofthe Findings from the States (2011-12), May/June 2012, pp: 25-30.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fenping Wang. (2021). The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System. Higher Education Research, 6(5), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fenping Wang. The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System. High. Educ. Res. 2021, 6(5), 126-131. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fenping Wang. The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System. High Educ Res. 2021;6(5):126-131. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.her.20210605.15,
  author = {Fenping Wang},
  title = {The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System},
  journal = {Higher Education Research},
  volume = {6},
  number = {5},
  pages = {126-131},
  doi = {10.11648/j.her.20210605.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20210605.15},
  abstract = {Application-oriented professions are developing rapidly, but the evaluation criteria for the quality of application-oriented professions are rare, By referring to the quality evaluation and Accreditation standards of science and engineering majors in various countries, the quality evaluation standards of science and engineering majors have been formulated, and the weights of the evaluation standards have been determined through questionnaire surveys. Three levels of indicators, the first level indicators include Curriculum construction, Professional skills training and competency, Faculty and Staff Resources, Employer cooperation. Each first-level indicator contains several second-level indicators, a total of 13 second-level indicators, each second-level indicator contains several third-level indicators, a total of 38 third-level indicators. The Index System Embodies the Student-Centered and Pragmatic Educational Concepts, It reflects the requirements for the professional skills of graduates of applied majors, and also reflects the requirements for training in cooperation with employers, It also reflects the requirements for the innovative ability of undergraduate graduates, requiring applied universities to pay attention to their social responsibilities. Applied engineering technology majors lack specific curriculum guidance, and it is necessary to strengthen school-enterprise cooperation and increase dual-qualified teachers with practical experience in engineering technology.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System
AU  - Fenping Wang
Y1  - 2021/09/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
T2  - Higher Education Research
JF  - Higher Education Research
JO  - Higher Education Research
SP  - 126
EP  - 131
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-935X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
AB  - Application-oriented professions are developing rapidly, but the evaluation criteria for the quality of application-oriented professions are rare, By referring to the quality evaluation and Accreditation standards of science and engineering majors in various countries, the quality evaluation standards of science and engineering majors have been formulated, and the weights of the evaluation standards have been determined through questionnaire surveys. Three levels of indicators, the first level indicators include Curriculum construction, Professional skills training and competency, Faculty and Staff Resources, Employer cooperation. Each first-level indicator contains several second-level indicators, a total of 13 second-level indicators, each second-level indicator contains several third-level indicators, a total of 38 third-level indicators. The Index System Embodies the Student-Centered and Pragmatic Educational Concepts, It reflects the requirements for the professional skills of graduates of applied majors, and also reflects the requirements for training in cooperation with employers, It also reflects the requirements for the innovative ability of undergraduate graduates, requiring applied universities to pay attention to their social responsibilities. Applied engineering technology majors lack specific curriculum guidance, and it is necessary to strengthen school-enterprise cooperation and increase dual-qualified teachers with practical experience in engineering technology.
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fenping Wang

School of Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fenping Wang. (2021). The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System. Higher Education Research, 6(5), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fenping Wang. The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System. High. Educ. Res. 2021, 6(5), 126-131. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fenping Wang. The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System. High Educ Res. 2021;6(5):126-131. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210605.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.her.20210605.15,
  author = {Fenping Wang},
  title = {The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System},
  journal = {Higher Education Research},
  volume = {6},
  number = {5},
  pages = {126-131},
  doi = {10.11648/j.her.20210605.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20210605.15},
  abstract = {Application-oriented professions are developing rapidly, but the evaluation criteria for the quality of application-oriented professions are rare, By referring to the quality evaluation and Accreditation standards of science and engineering majors in various countries, the quality evaluation standards of science and engineering majors have been formulated, and the weights of the evaluation standards have been determined through questionnaire surveys. Three levels of indicators, the first level indicators include Curriculum construction, Professional skills training and competency, Faculty and Staff Resources, Employer cooperation. Each first-level indicator contains several second-level indicators, a total of 13 second-level indicators, each second-level indicator contains several third-level indicators, a total of 38 third-level indicators. The Index System Embodies the Student-Centered and Pragmatic Educational Concepts, It reflects the requirements for the professional skills of graduates of applied majors, and also reflects the requirements for training in cooperation with employers, It also reflects the requirements for the innovative ability of undergraduate graduates, requiring applied universities to pay attention to their social responsibilities. Applied engineering technology majors lack specific curriculum guidance, and it is necessary to strengthen school-enterprise cooperation and increase dual-qualified teachers with practical experience in engineering technology.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Study of Application-oriented Profession Quality Evaluation Index System
AU  - Fenping Wang
Y1  - 2021/09/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
T2  - Higher Education Research
JF  - Higher Education Research
JO  - Higher Education Research
SP  - 126
EP  - 131
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-935X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.15
AB  - Application-oriented professions are developing rapidly, but the evaluation criteria for the quality of application-oriented professions are rare, By referring to the quality evaluation and Accreditation standards of science and engineering majors in various countries, the quality evaluation standards of science and engineering majors have been formulated, and the weights of the evaluation standards have been determined through questionnaire surveys. Three levels of indicators, the first level indicators include Curriculum construction, Professional skills training and competency, Faculty and Staff Resources, Employer cooperation. Each first-level indicator contains several second-level indicators, a total of 13 second-level indicators, each second-level indicator contains several third-level indicators, a total of 38 third-level indicators. The Index System Embodies the Student-Centered and Pragmatic Educational Concepts, It reflects the requirements for the professional skills of graduates of applied majors, and also reflects the requirements for training in cooperation with employers, It also reflects the requirements for the innovative ability of undergraduate graduates, requiring applied universities to pay attention to their social responsibilities. Applied engineering technology majors lack specific curriculum guidance, and it is necessary to strengthen school-enterprise cooperation and increase dual-qualified teachers with practical experience in engineering technology.
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download