Introduction: This study examines the viability of the Departmental Health Insurance Unit (UDAM) of Koungheul in Senegal, an innovative model of a professionally managed health insurance scheme, implemented as part of universal health coverage. Unlike traditional community-based health insurance schemes, UDAMs are entirely managed by a salaried team, with elected leaders playing only a supervisory role. The study aims to assess the viability of this alternative model and analyze the perceptions of various stakeholders. Methodology: The study adopted a mixed approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative analysis, based on a theoretical framework developed by the International Labor Office (ILO), assessed the viability of the UDAM across four dimensions: institutional, technical, functional, and financial/economic. Data collected in 2022 were analyzed. For the qualitative component, individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with various actors, including beneficiaries, non-beneficiaries, community leaders, UDAM officials, and healthcare providers. Results: The study reveals a contrasting situation for the UDAM of Koungheul. On the institutional and technical levels, the UDAM has a solid foundation with legal status, agreements with healthcare providers, and risk control mechanisms. Functional viability shows positive signs, with a membership growth rate of 16.15% and a high penetration rate of 76.66%. However, the contribution collection rate is low (52.29%), and the average payment delay to providers is long (7 months). The financial situation is concerning: the immediate liquidity ratio is low (0.248), the reserve rate is insufficient (0.93 months), and the loss ratio is high (90.34%). Stakeholder perceptions are generally positive, but significant practical difficulties are identified, including lack of information, funding problems, and procedural complexity. Conclusion: The study highlights the progress of the UDAM model compared to traditional schemes. However, persistent challenges, particularly in terms of financial viability, underscore the need for continuous evolution of the model. A more integrated approach, involving deeper integration into the national social protection system and stronger state investment, could be beneficial in consolidating the gains of the UDAM model.
| Published in | International Journal of Health Economics and Policy (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13 |
| Page(s) | 117-125 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Viability, Professionally Managed, Health Insurance
| [1] | Letourmy A. Aspects pratiques du montage et du fonctionnement de l’assurance maladie en Afrique francophone. In: L’assurance maladie en Afrique francophone Améliorer l’accès aux soins et lutter contre la pauvreté. 2006 |
| [2] | B. Boidin, «L’extension de la couverture maladie par les mutuelles communautaires en Afrique: mythes et réalités», Bull. Société Pathol. Exot., vol. 108, no 1, p. 63‑69, févr. 2015, |
| [3] | Alenda-Demoutiez J. Les mutuelles de santé dans l’extension de la couverture maladie au Sénégal : une lecture par les conventions et l’économie sociale et solidaire [Internet]. |
| [4] | Ridde V, Antwi AA, Boidin B, Chemouni B, Touré FH et L. Les défis des mutuelles communautaires en Afrique de l’Ouest. In: Vers une couverture sanitaire universelle en 2030 ?. Québec: Éditions science et bien commun; 2021. |
| [5] | Jütting JP. Do Community-based Health Insurance Schemes Improve Poor People’s Access to Health Care? Evidence From Rural Senegal. World Dev. 1 févr 2004; 32(2): 273‑88, |
| [6] | Mbow NB, Senghor I, Ridde V. The resilience of two professionalized departmental health insurance units during the COVID-19 pandemic in Senegal. J Glob Health. déc 2020; 10(2): 020394, |
| [7] | Ridde V, Ba MF, Guyot M, Kane B, Mbow NB, Senghor I, et al. Factors that foster and challenge the sustainability of departmental health insurance units in Senegal. Int Soc Secur Rev. 2022; 75(2): 97‑117, |
| [8] | Ridde V, Kane B, Mbow NB, Senghor I, Faye A. The sustainability of two departmental health insurance units in Senegal: A qualitative study. SSM - Health Syst. 1 juin 2024; 2: 100006, |
| [9] | Bureau International du Travail (BIT). CIDR : Guide de suivi et d’évaluation des systèmes de micro-assurance santé. 2001. |
| [10] | Atnafu DD, Tilahun H, Alemu YM. Community-based health insurance and healthcare service utilisation, North-West, Ethiopia: a comparative, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 8 août 2018; 8(8): e019613 |
| [11] | Ashagrie B, Biks GA, Belew AK. Community-Based Health Insurance Membership Dropout Rate and Associated Factors in Dera District, Northwest Ethiopia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020; 13: 2835‑44, |
| [12] | Basaza R, Criel B, Van der Stuyft P. Community health insurance in Uganda: why does enrolment remain low? A view from beneath. Health Policy Amst Neth. août 2008; 87(2): 172‑84, |
| [13] | Chemouni B. The political path to universal health coverage: Power, ideas and community-based health insurance in Rwanda. World Dev. juin 2018; 106: 87‑98, |
| [14] | Ridde V, Asomaning Antwi A, Boidin B, Chemouni B, Hane F, Touré L. Time to abandon amateurism and volunteerism: addressing tensions between the Alma-Ata principle of community participation and the effectiveness of community-based health insurance in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(Suppl 3): e001056, |
| [15] | Ly MS, Bassoum O, Faye A. Universal health insurance in Africa: a narrative review of the literature on institutional models. BMJ Glob Health. 1 avr 2022; 7(4): e008219, |
| [16] | Daff BM, Diouf S, Diop ESM, Mano Y, Nakamura R, Sy MM, et al. Reforms for financial protection schemes towards universal health coverage, Senegal. Bull World Health Organ. 1 févr 2020; 98(2): 100‑8, |
| [17] | Defourny J, Failon J. Les déterminants de l’adhésion aux mutuelles de santé en Afrique subsaharienne : un inventaire des travaux empiriques. Mondes En Dev. 18 avr 2011; n°153(1): 7‑26. |
| [18] | Diop N, Leye PMMM, Sougou DNM. Etude de la viabilité de l’UDAM de Foundiougne en 2017 et perceptions des populations [Mémoire Economie de la Santé: 25ème Promotion DES Santé Publique]. ISED; 2017. |
| [19] | Ndiaye M, Leye PMMM, Sougou DNM. Etude de la viabilité de l’UDAM de Diourbel en 2019 et perceptions des populations [Mémoire Economie de la Santé: 26ème Promotion DES Santé Publique]. ISED; 2019. |
| [20] | Ladriere F, Ndiaye E, Gaye PK, Mbow NB, Senghor I, Diouf S, et al. Rapport de capitalisation. La mise en œuvre et les résultats des UDAM au Sénégal. 2017 mai. |
| [21] | Adeyemo O. Towards Universal Health Coverage in Nigeria: Can Community-Based Health Insurance Be Scaled Up? 2015. |
| [22] | Ly MS, Faye A, Ba MF. Impact of community-based health insurance on healthcare utilisation and out-of-pocket expenditures for the poor in Senegal. BMJ Open. 20 déc 2022; 12(12): e063035, |
| [23] | Yazbeck AS, Soucat AL, Tandon A, Cashin C, Kutzin J, Watson J, et al. Addiction to a bad idea, especially in low- and middle-income countries: Contributory health insurance. Soc Sci Med 1982. mars 2023; 320: 115168, |
| [24] | Akazili J, Welaga P, Bawah A, Achana FS, Oduro A, Awoonor-Williams JK, et al. Is Ghana’s pro-poor health insurance scheme really for the poor? Evidence from Northern Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 14 déc 2014; 14: 637, |
| [25] | Averill C, Mariott A. Universal Health Coverage: Why health insurance schemes are leaving the poor behind. 2013; Oxfam International, 2013. |
| [26] | Kalisa I, Musange S, Collins D, Saya U, Kunda T. The Development of Community-Based Health Insurance in Rwanda - Experiences and Lessons. Medford, MA: University of Rwanda and Management Sciences for Health, 2016. |
| [27] | Eseta WA, Lemma TD, Geta ET. Magnitude and Determinants of Dropout from Community-Based Health Insurance Among Households in Manna District, Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Clin Outcomes Res CEOR. 2020; 12: 747‑60, |
| [28] | Herberholz C, Fakihammed WA. Determinants of Voluntary National Health Insurance Drop-Out in Eastern Sudan. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. avr 2017; 15(2): 215‑26, |
| [29] | Mebratie AD, Sparrow R, Yilma Z, Alemu G, Bedi AS. Dropping out of Ethiopia’s community-based health insurance scheme. Health Policy Plan. déc 2015; 30(10): 1296‑306, |
| [30] | Nsiah-Boateng E, Nonvignon J, Aryeetey GC, Salari P, Tediosi F, Akweongo P, et al. Sociodemographic determinants of health insurance enrolment and dropout in urban district of Ghana: a cross-sectional study. Health Econ Rev. 6 juill 2019; 9(1): 23, |
| [31] | Diop CT, Evaluation de la viabilité des 05 mutuelles de santé communautaires dans le district sanitaire d’Oussouye en 2018, Mali Santé Publique, p. 1 7, 2021 |
| [32] | Faye A, Amar S, Tal-Dia A. Déterminants de l’adhésion aux mutuelles de santé en milieu rural sénégalais. Rev Depidémiologie Santé Publique. 1 sept 2016; 64: S259, |
| [33] | Agence de la CMU du Sénégal. Rapport de Performance de l’année 2018. 2019. |
| [34] | Adewole DA, Adeniji FIP, Adegbrioye SE, Dania OM, Ilori T. Enrollees’ Knowledge and Satisfaction with National Health Insurance Scheme Service Delivery in a Tertiary Hospital, Southwest Nigeria. Niger Med J J Niger Med Assoc. févr 2020; 61(1): 27‑31, |
| [35] | Mitiku Kebede K, Geberetsadik SM. Household satisfaction with community-based health insurance scheme and associated factors in piloted Sheko district; Southwest Ethiopia. PloS One. 2019; 14(5): e0216411, |
| [36] | Seck I, Dia AT, Sagna O, Leye MM. Déterminants de l’adhésion et de la fidélisation aux mutuelles de santé dans la région de Ziguinchor (Sénégal). Sante Publique. 14 mars 2017; Vol. 29(1): 105‑14. |
APA Style
Tacko, D. C., Malick, N. E. H., Mareme, S. N., Selly, L. M., Coly, B. M., et al. (2024). Assessing the Viability of a Professionally Managed community-Based Health Insurance Scheme in Koungheul, Senegal: Perspectives for Universal Health Coverage. International Journal of Health Economics and Policy, 9(4), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13
ACS Style
Tacko, D. C.; Malick, N. E. H.; Mareme, S. N.; Selly, L. M.; Coly, B. M., et al. Assessing the Viability of a Professionally Managed community-Based Health Insurance Scheme in Koungheul, Senegal: Perspectives for Universal Health Coverage. Int. J. Health Econ. Policy 2024, 9(4), 117-125. doi: 10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13
AMA Style
Tacko DC, Malick NEH, Mareme SN, Selly LM, Coly BM, et al. Assessing the Viability of a Professionally Managed community-Based Health Insurance Scheme in Koungheul, Senegal: Perspectives for Universal Health Coverage. Int J Health Econ Policy. 2024;9(4):117-125. doi: 10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13
@article{10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13,
author = {Diop Cheikh Tacko and Niang El Hadji Malick and Sougou Ndeye Mareme and Ly Mamadou Selly and Bop Martial Coly and Gueye Boubacar and Leye Mamadou Mactar Mbacke and Ka Ousseynou},
title = {Assessing the Viability of a Professionally Managed community-Based Health Insurance Scheme in Koungheul, Senegal: Perspectives for Universal Health Coverage
},
journal = {International Journal of Health Economics and Policy},
volume = {9},
number = {4},
pages = {117-125},
doi = {10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hep.20240904.13},
abstract = {Introduction: This study examines the viability of the Departmental Health Insurance Unit (UDAM) of Koungheul in Senegal, an innovative model of a professionally managed health insurance scheme, implemented as part of universal health coverage. Unlike traditional community-based health insurance schemes, UDAMs are entirely managed by a salaried team, with elected leaders playing only a supervisory role. The study aims to assess the viability of this alternative model and analyze the perceptions of various stakeholders. Methodology: The study adopted a mixed approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative analysis, based on a theoretical framework developed by the International Labor Office (ILO), assessed the viability of the UDAM across four dimensions: institutional, technical, functional, and financial/economic. Data collected in 2022 were analyzed. For the qualitative component, individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with various actors, including beneficiaries, non-beneficiaries, community leaders, UDAM officials, and healthcare providers. Results: The study reveals a contrasting situation for the UDAM of Koungheul. On the institutional and technical levels, the UDAM has a solid foundation with legal status, agreements with healthcare providers, and risk control mechanisms. Functional viability shows positive signs, with a membership growth rate of 16.15% and a high penetration rate of 76.66%. However, the contribution collection rate is low (52.29%), and the average payment delay to providers is long (7 months). The financial situation is concerning: the immediate liquidity ratio is low (0.248), the reserve rate is insufficient (0.93 months), and the loss ratio is high (90.34%). Stakeholder perceptions are generally positive, but significant practical difficulties are identified, including lack of information, funding problems, and procedural complexity. Conclusion: The study highlights the progress of the UDAM model compared to traditional schemes. However, persistent challenges, particularly in terms of financial viability, underscore the need for continuous evolution of the model. A more integrated approach, involving deeper integration into the national social protection system and stronger state investment, could be beneficial in consolidating the gains of the UDAM model.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing the Viability of a Professionally Managed community-Based Health Insurance Scheme in Koungheul, Senegal: Perspectives for Universal Health Coverage AU - Diop Cheikh Tacko AU - Niang El Hadji Malick AU - Sougou Ndeye Mareme AU - Ly Mamadou Selly AU - Bop Martial Coly AU - Gueye Boubacar AU - Leye Mamadou Mactar Mbacke AU - Ka Ousseynou Y1 - 2024/12/12 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13 DO - 10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13 T2 - International Journal of Health Economics and Policy JF - International Journal of Health Economics and Policy JO - International Journal of Health Economics and Policy SP - 117 EP - 125 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9309 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20240904.13 AB - Introduction: This study examines the viability of the Departmental Health Insurance Unit (UDAM) of Koungheul in Senegal, an innovative model of a professionally managed health insurance scheme, implemented as part of universal health coverage. Unlike traditional community-based health insurance schemes, UDAMs are entirely managed by a salaried team, with elected leaders playing only a supervisory role. The study aims to assess the viability of this alternative model and analyze the perceptions of various stakeholders. Methodology: The study adopted a mixed approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative analysis, based on a theoretical framework developed by the International Labor Office (ILO), assessed the viability of the UDAM across four dimensions: institutional, technical, functional, and financial/economic. Data collected in 2022 were analyzed. For the qualitative component, individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with various actors, including beneficiaries, non-beneficiaries, community leaders, UDAM officials, and healthcare providers. Results: The study reveals a contrasting situation for the UDAM of Koungheul. On the institutional and technical levels, the UDAM has a solid foundation with legal status, agreements with healthcare providers, and risk control mechanisms. Functional viability shows positive signs, with a membership growth rate of 16.15% and a high penetration rate of 76.66%. However, the contribution collection rate is low (52.29%), and the average payment delay to providers is long (7 months). The financial situation is concerning: the immediate liquidity ratio is low (0.248), the reserve rate is insufficient (0.93 months), and the loss ratio is high (90.34%). Stakeholder perceptions are generally positive, but significant practical difficulties are identified, including lack of information, funding problems, and procedural complexity. Conclusion: The study highlights the progress of the UDAM model compared to traditional schemes. However, persistent challenges, particularly in terms of financial viability, underscore the need for continuous evolution of the model. A more integrated approach, involving deeper integration into the national social protection system and stronger state investment, could be beneficial in consolidating the gains of the UDAM model. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -