Housing accessibility and utilities constitute the intangible services available to a particular building by a community or any activity or groups of activities operated within the community. This research examines the effect of the decays in these infrastructures on rental values. The more accessible a dwelling is relative to other activity areas, the more useful will the dwelling be. Generally, infrastructural utilities include such goods and services as the provision of potable water, electricity, sewage, telephone, gas and roads. The provision of these utilities is not without cost and this cost is usually included in or forms part of the cost of housing. Many developing countries, particularly in Africa, accord relatively low priority to housing in their overall scheme of national development, and the volume of construction generally falls short of housing demands. The approach to housing policy in Nigeria has tended to oscillate between the welfare mixed economy and the free market model. The conventional wisdom is that governments should focus on providing good investment climates, infrastructure and mortgage facilities to low and middle income families. Nigerian cities are largely characterized by the public provision of urban infrastructural services such as electricity, water supply, drainage, sewage, access road and solid waste collection and disposal. The three tiers of government federal, state and local are often involved in one way or the other in the provision of these services in the urban centers. Although the provision of infrastructures such as roads and power supply lies with the government, communal efforts are still put together to fast track the process of making the infrastructures reach the people. Sometimes it is preferable not to wait for the government due to administrative bottlenecks and sometimes corruption by government officials.
Published in | Engineering Mathematics (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12 |
Page(s) | 12-20 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Infrastructure, Housing Facilities, Rental Values, Electricity, Basic Amenities, Correlation Coefficient, Regression, Estate Management
[1] | Ekenta, C. (2010). Infrastructures Provision on Real Property Value: A Comparative Study of Agbama and Ehimiri Housing Estate, Umuahia, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment, Ecology, Family and Urban Studies. 4: 9-20 |
[2] | Hanson, G. and Lloyd, R. (2004). Evaluation of the Social Housing Programme. Yukon: Housing Corporation, Yukon |
[3] | Canning, D. andBennathan, E. (2000). The Social Rate of Return on Infrastructure Investments: World Bank Working Paper No. 23-90. |
[4] | Biehl, D. (1986). The Contribution of Infrastructure to Regional Development. Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg. |
[5] | Ekwueme, J. P (2000). “Government Involvement in Housing” In Effective Housing in 21stCentury Nigeria, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria, 9–14 |
[6] | Aigbokhan, B. E (1999). Evaluating investment in basic infrastructure in Nigeria, in proceedings of the 8th annual conference on the Zoirah research organized by the research Department, CBN at I-Lamdala Hotel Kaduna, 11th–15th June 199Pp 208. |
[7] | Babaride, J. A. (1998). Analysis of Industrial location in relation to housing and infrastructure services in metropolitan Lagos:The Lagos Journal of environmental Studies. 1: 97-108. |
[8] | Ajanlekoko, J. S. (2001). Sustainable Housing Development in Nigeria – The Financial and Infrastructural Implication:Journal of sustainable development. 4:5-6 (2011). |
[9] | Okusikpe M. O (1999) Environmental Quality and Urban Planning:A case of metropolitan Lagos Nigeria. The Lagos journal of Environmental Studies. 2: 53-63. |
[10] | Akinmoladun, O. I and Oluwoye, J. (2007). An Assessment of Why the Problems of Housing Shortages Persist in Developing Countries: A case of Study of Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Science 4(4), 589-598. |
[11] | Buhr, W. (2003) what is Infrastructure: Department of Economics, School of Economic Disciplines, University of Siegen. Siegen Discussion Paper No. 107-03. |
[12] | Albala-Bertrand, J. M. and Mamatzakis, E. C. (2004). The Impact of Public Infrastructure on the Productivity of the Chilean Economy: Review of Development Economics 8, 266-278. |
[13] | Darlow, C. (1984) Valuation and development appraisal. London: Estate Gazette. |
[14] | Canning, D. and Pedroni, P. (1999). Infrastructure and Long RunEconomic Growth. New York: Mimeo publication. |
[15] | Cartier-Bresson, J. (1997). Corruption Networks, TransactionSecurity and Illegal Social Exchange. Political Studies 45: 463-476. |
[16] | Biehl, D. (1991). The Role of Infrastructure in Regional Development, London: Pion publication |
[17] | Brett Freshman, R. A. (2007). Infrastructure commons in economic perspective:White paper for the Brennan centre of justice. 12:6-4. |
[18] | Ebie, A. I (2012). Impacts of Inadequate Impact of the Private Provision of Infrastructural Facilities on Housing Cost. B. Tech Project. Federal University of Technology, Akure, Department of Estate Management. |
[19] | Olatubara, C. O. andFatoye, E. O. (2007). Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Occupants of the Abesan Public Low-Cost Housing Estate in Lagos State, Nigeria:The Nigerian journal of Economic and Social Studies 49:1-3. |
[20] | Yusif, A. (1998). An Appraisal of Corporate Property Maintenance Practices in Lagos and Oyo State: Journal of Environmental Design and Management. 1:121–132. |
[21] | Facakin, A. (2004). An African Perspective: In UN-HABITAT Debate.10: 4-12. |
[22] | Federal Republic of Nigeria (1997) Official gazette on 1991 population census. |
[23] | Federal Republic of Nigeria (1991) National Housing Policy. Lagos: Federal Government Press |
[24] | Fugita, M. (1990) urban economic theory. London: Cambridge Press. |
[25] | Fulmer, A. (2009)."Evaluating the Effectivenes of Maintenance Strategies: "Journal of Qualityin Maintenance 12(1):7-20. |
[26] | Harvey, J.(1993). Urbanlandeconomics. London: Macmillan Education Limited. |
[27] | Hansen, A. (1965). The Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development, Linkages and Limitations: Ethicsandthe Environment. 5:3-21. |
[28] | Casmir On yeneke, et.al. (2018). Weibull Transformation Approach to Formulation of Reliability Model for Analysis of Filth Formation Using Zenith Grinding Machine. American Journal of Aerospace Engineering. Vol. 5, No.1, 2018, pp. 30-38. doi:10.11648/j.ajae.20180501.15. |
[29] | Onyeneke C. C. (2015). Multivariate Approach to Partial Correlation Analysis: Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 165-170. doi:10.11648/j.sjams.20150303.20 |
[30] | Onyeneke C. C., Effanga O. E. (2016). Application of Reduced Second Order Response Surface Model of Convex Optimizationin Paper Producing Industries: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2016, pp. 13-23. doi:10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13. |
APA Style
Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke, Chibuzor Eguzouwa. (2018). Assessment, Determination and Modeling Effects of Infrastructural Decay on Rental Values in Nigeria (Case Study of Ehimiri, Agbama and Isieke Housing Estates). Engineering Mathematics, 2(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12
ACS Style
Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke; Chibuzor Eguzouwa. Assessment, Determination and Modeling Effects of Infrastructural Decay on Rental Values in Nigeria (Case Study of Ehimiri, Agbama and Isieke Housing Estates). Eng. Math. 2018, 2(1), 12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12
AMA Style
Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke, Chibuzor Eguzouwa. Assessment, Determination and Modeling Effects of Infrastructural Decay on Rental Values in Nigeria (Case Study of Ehimiri, Agbama and Isieke Housing Estates). Eng Math. 2018;2(1):12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12
@article{10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12, author = {Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke and Chibuzor Eguzouwa}, title = {Assessment, Determination and Modeling Effects of Infrastructural Decay on Rental Values in Nigeria (Case Study of Ehimiri, Agbama and Isieke Housing Estates)}, journal = {Engineering Mathematics}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {12-20}, doi = {10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.engmath.20180201.12}, abstract = {Housing accessibility and utilities constitute the intangible services available to a particular building by a community or any activity or groups of activities operated within the community. This research examines the effect of the decays in these infrastructures on rental values. The more accessible a dwelling is relative to other activity areas, the more useful will the dwelling be. Generally, infrastructural utilities include such goods and services as the provision of potable water, electricity, sewage, telephone, gas and roads. The provision of these utilities is not without cost and this cost is usually included in or forms part of the cost of housing. Many developing countries, particularly in Africa, accord relatively low priority to housing in their overall scheme of national development, and the volume of construction generally falls short of housing demands. The approach to housing policy in Nigeria has tended to oscillate between the welfare mixed economy and the free market model. The conventional wisdom is that governments should focus on providing good investment climates, infrastructure and mortgage facilities to low and middle income families. Nigerian cities are largely characterized by the public provision of urban infrastructural services such as electricity, water supply, drainage, sewage, access road and solid waste collection and disposal. The three tiers of government federal, state and local are often involved in one way or the other in the provision of these services in the urban centers. Although the provision of infrastructures such as roads and power supply lies with the government, communal efforts are still put together to fast track the process of making the infrastructures reach the people. Sometimes it is preferable not to wait for the government due to administrative bottlenecks and sometimes corruption by government officials.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment, Determination and Modeling Effects of Infrastructural Decay on Rental Values in Nigeria (Case Study of Ehimiri, Agbama and Isieke Housing Estates) AU - Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke AU - Chibuzor Eguzouwa Y1 - 2018/07/09 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12 DO - 10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12 T2 - Engineering Mathematics JF - Engineering Mathematics JO - Engineering Mathematics SP - 12 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-088X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.12 AB - Housing accessibility and utilities constitute the intangible services available to a particular building by a community or any activity or groups of activities operated within the community. This research examines the effect of the decays in these infrastructures on rental values. The more accessible a dwelling is relative to other activity areas, the more useful will the dwelling be. Generally, infrastructural utilities include such goods and services as the provision of potable water, electricity, sewage, telephone, gas and roads. The provision of these utilities is not without cost and this cost is usually included in or forms part of the cost of housing. Many developing countries, particularly in Africa, accord relatively low priority to housing in their overall scheme of national development, and the volume of construction generally falls short of housing demands. The approach to housing policy in Nigeria has tended to oscillate between the welfare mixed economy and the free market model. The conventional wisdom is that governments should focus on providing good investment climates, infrastructure and mortgage facilities to low and middle income families. Nigerian cities are largely characterized by the public provision of urban infrastructural services such as electricity, water supply, drainage, sewage, access road and solid waste collection and disposal. The three tiers of government federal, state and local are often involved in one way or the other in the provision of these services in the urban centers. Although the provision of infrastructures such as roads and power supply lies with the government, communal efforts are still put together to fast track the process of making the infrastructures reach the people. Sometimes it is preferable not to wait for the government due to administrative bottlenecks and sometimes corruption by government officials. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -