Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca; Charles Peter Tilbery; Wilze Laura Bruscato

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

| Peer-Reviewed

Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca, Charles Peter Tilbery, Wilze Laura Bruscato

Published in European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6)

Received: 21 October 2021 Accepted: 8 November 2021 Published: 7 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The present work was the result of a research project to obtain the title of Master in Health Sciences at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo. Objective: To identify the coping strategies used by patients with SPMS, and their relation with the personality profile. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 23 patients undergoing treatment at CATEM, ISCMSP. A Sociodemographic Form, the Factorial Personality Inventory II, and the Ways of Coping with Problems Scale were used. To analyze the results, we used descriptive and inferential analyses, and explored sociodemographic variables, personality characteristics, and coping resources with the use of statistical tests suitable for the study. Results: The results showed the predominance of females, aged 51 years, with an EDSS equal to 7.0 and in need of some type of support. Fantasy was the main coping resource used, with its components spirituality, religious beliefs, and faith. Aggressiveness was the main personality trait: it was not found to be an aspect related to activities having a hostile character, but rather to active tendencies towards the outside world and self-assertion; it might even be deemed constructive if we consider aggressiveness as a combative aspect, strictly related to survival. This inclination was confirmed as we went on to identify other relevant personality traits that are indicative of individuals who seek affection and external support, but also crave some degree of independence, autonomy, self-sufficiency, freedom, and dominance over their lives so that they can accomplish something with tenacity and perseverance as a way of personal satisfaction and overcoming limits. Conclusion: These findings make it evident that patients with SPMS can bring specific demands and needs in terms of a multidisciplinary therapeutic treatment.

Published in	European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
Page(s)	146-154
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Personality, Coping

References

[1]	Kalb, R. C. (2000). Esclerose múltipla: perguntas e respostas. São Paulo: ABEM.
[2]	Maia, L., Viegas, J., & Amaral, M. (2008). Esclerose múltipla: conhecer para desmitificar. O Portal dos Psicólogos. Available from: https://www.psicologia.pt/artigos/ver_artigo.php?codigo=A0453 (accessed 20 Out. 2020).
[3]	Alves, G. A. S., Leme, I. F. A. S., & Rabelo, I. S. (2019). IFP II Inventário Fatorial de Personalidade. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
[4]	Abneuro. (2015). Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. Available from: http://abneuro.org.br/publicacoes/listar/abnews (accessed 04 Nov. 2019).
[5]	Van Munster, C. E. P., & Uitdehaag, B. M. J. (2017). Outcome measures in clinical trials for multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs, 31 (3), 217-236.
[6]	Leary, S. M., Porter, B., & Thompson, A. J. (2005). Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis and the management of acute relapses. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81 (955), 302-308.
[7]	Loma, I., & Heyman, R. (2011). Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Current Neuropharmacology, 9 (3), 409-416.
[8]	McDonald, W., Compston, A., Edan, G., Goodkin, D., Hartung, H. P., Lublin, F. D., McFarland, H. F., et al. (2001). Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 50 (1), 1-10.
[9]	Lublin, F. D., Reingold, S. C., Cohen, J. A., Cutter, G. R., Per Sørensen, S., Thompson, A. J., et al. (2014). Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology, 83 (3), 278-286.
[10]	De Stefano, N., Giorgio, A., Battaglini, M., Rovaris, M., Sormani, M. P., Barkhof, F., et al. (2011). Assessing brain atrophy rates in a large population of untreated multiple sclerosis subtypes. Neurology, 74 (23), 1868-1876.
[11]	Frota, E. R. C., Mendes, M. F., &Vasconcelos, C. C. F. (2016). Recomendações no tratamento da esclerose múltipla e neuromielite óptica. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, São Paulo: Editora e Eventos Omnifarma.
[12]	Doshi, A., & Chataway, J. (2017). Multiple sclerosis, a treatable disease. Clinical Medicine: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 16 (6), 53-59.
[13]	Dumitrescu, L., Constantinescu, C. S., & Tanasescu, R. (2019). Siponimod for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 20 (2), 143-150.
[14]	Frankel, D. I. (1994). Esclerose múltipla. In: Umphred DA (org). Fisioterapia Neurológica. São Paulo: Manole, 233p.
[15]	Pereira, W. R. G. (2002). Esclerose Múltipla: conheça a doença e esclareça algumas dúvidas. ASAPEM (Associação de Apoio aos Portadores de EM). Belo Horizonte, 245p.
[16]	Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33 (11), 1444-1452.
[17]	Morales, R. R., Morales, N. M., Rocha, F. C. G., Fenelon, S. B., Pinto, R. M. C.,& Silva, C. H. M. (2007). Qualidade de vida em portadores de esclerose múltipla. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 65 (2-B), 454-460.
[18]	Pereira, A. G. (2013). Evolução das funções cognitivas psíquicas e motoras dos pacientes portadores de esclerose múltipla. Tese (Doutorado). Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina.
[19]	Hart, F. M., & Bainbridge, J. (2016). Current and emerging treatment of multiple sclerosis. The American Journal of Managed Care, 22 (6), 159-170.
[20]	Fazekas, F., Baumhackl, U., Berger, T., Deisenhammer, F., Kristoferitsch, W., Ladurner, G., et. al. (2010). Decision-making for and impact of early immunomodulatory treatment: the Austrian Clinically Isolated Syndrome Study (ACISS). European Journal of Neurology, 17 (6), 852-860.
[21]	Young-Blood, M. R., Chirichela, I. A., Pucci Filhom C. R., Camargo, C. H. F., & Fonseca, R. C. V. (2017). Ansiedade e depressão em pacientes com esclerose múltipla. Revista Psico FAE, 5 (5), 31-46.
[22]	Smith, T. W. (2006). Altruism and empathy in America: trends and correlates. National Opinion Research Center (Chicago). Available from: https://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/06/060209.altruism.pdf. (accessed10 Abr. 2020).
[23]	Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2004). Teorias da personalidade: da teoria clássica à pesquisa moderna (Honorato, N. Trans.). São Paulo: Prentice Hall.
[24]	Ploubidis, G. B., & Grundy, E. (2009). Personality and all cause mortality: evidence for indirect links. Personality and Individual Differences, 47 (3), 203-208.
[25]	Thomas, C. V., & Castro, E. K. D. (2012). Personalidade, comportamentos de saúde e adesão ao tratamento a partir do modelo dos cinco grandes fatores: uma revisão de literatura. Psicologia Saúde & Doenças, 13 (1), 100-109.
[26]	Frankl, V. E. (2005). Um sentido para a vida: psicoterapia e humanismo. São Paulo: Ideias & Letras.
[27]	Gazzaniga, M. S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2005). Ciência psicológica: mente, cérebro e comportamento. São Paulo: Artmed.
[28]	Pinto, E. B. (2009). Formação e personalidade: conceitos e orientações. Available from: http://www.crpsp.org.br/diverpsi/arquivos/formacao-e-personalidade-conceitos-e-orientacoes.pdf (accessed 24 Out. 2018).
[29]	Allport, G. W. (1966). Personalidade: padrões e desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Herder.
[30]	D’Andrea, F. F. (1984). Desenvolvimento da personalidade. São Paulo: Difusão Editorial S. A.
[31]	Gimenez, M. G. (1997). A teoria do enfrentamento e suas implicações para sucessos e insucessos em psiconcologia. In Gimenez, M. G. (Org.). A mulher e o cancer. Campinas: Editoral Psy. 111-147p.
[32]	Straub, R. O. (2002). Psicologia da saúde: uma abordagem biopsicossocial. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
[33]	Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
[34]	Antoniazzi, A. S., Dell’Aglio, D. D., & Bandeira, D. R. (1998). O conceito de coping: uma revisão teórica. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 3 (2), 273-294.
[35]	Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2009). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61 (3), 679-704.
[36]	Jeammet, P., Reynaud, M., & Consoli, S. (2000). Manual de psicologia médica. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI.
[37]	Simonetti, A. (2004). Manual de psicologia hospitalar: o mapa da doença. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
[38]	Tavares, J. S. C., & Trad, L. A. B. (2010). Estratégias de enfrentamento do câncer de mama: um estudo de caso com famílias de mulheres mastectomizadas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 15 (1), 1349-1358.
[39]	Tilbery, C. P. (2005). Esclerose múltipla no Brasil: aspectos clínicos e terapêuticos. São Paulo: Atheneu.
[40]	Alves, B., Angeloni, R., Azzalis, L., Pereira, E., Perazzo, F., Rosa, P. C., et al. (2014). Esclerose múltipla: revisão dos principais tratamentos da doença. Saúde e Meio Ambiente: Revista Interdisciplinar, 3 (2), 19-34.
[41]	Oliveira, D. S. (2009). Relações entre perfis cognitivos de personalidade e estratégia de coping em adultos. Tese (Mestrado). Uberlândia: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia.
[42]	Seidl, E. M. F., Troccoli, B. T., & Zannon, C. M. L. C. (2001). Factorial analysis of a coping measure. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 17 (3), 225-243.
[43]	Bertamoni, T., Ebert, G., & Dornelles, V. G. (2013). Estudo correlacional sobre diferentes perfis de estratégias de coping de acordo com os traços de personalidade. Aletheia, 42, 92-105.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca, Charles Peter Tilbery, Wilze Laura Bruscato. (2021). Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, 7(6), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca; Charles Peter Tilbery; Wilze Laura Bruscato. Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile. Eur. J. Clin. Biomed. Sci. 2021, 7(6), 146-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca, Charles Peter Tilbery, Wilze Laura Bruscato. Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile. Eur J Clin Biomed Sci. 2021;7(6):146-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19,
  author = {Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca and Charles Peter Tilbery and Wilze Laura Bruscato},
  title = {Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile},
  journal = {European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {6},
  pages = {146-154},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejcbs.20210706.19},
  abstract = {The present work was the result of a research project to obtain the title of Master in Health Sciences at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo. Objective: To identify the coping strategies used by patients with SPMS, and their relation with the personality profile. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 23 patients undergoing treatment at CATEM, ISCMSP. A Sociodemographic Form, the Factorial Personality Inventory II, and the Ways of Coping with Problems Scale were used. To analyze the results, we used descriptive and inferential analyses, and explored sociodemographic variables, personality characteristics, and coping resources with the use of statistical tests suitable for the study. Results: The results showed the predominance of females, aged 51 years, with an EDSS equal to 7.0 and in need of some type of support. Fantasy was the main coping resource used, with its components spirituality, religious beliefs, and faith. Aggressiveness was the main personality trait: it was not found to be an aspect related to activities having a hostile character, but rather to active tendencies towards the outside world and self-assertion; it might even be deemed constructive if we consider aggressiveness as a combative aspect, strictly related to survival. This inclination was confirmed as we went on to identify other relevant personality traits that are indicative of individuals who seek affection and external support, but also crave some degree of independence, autonomy, self-sufficiency, freedom, and dominance over their lives so that they can accomplish something with tenacity and perseverance as a way of personal satisfaction and overcoming limits. Conclusion: These findings make it evident that patients with SPMS can bring specific demands and needs in terms of a multidisciplinary therapeutic treatment.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile
AU  - Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca
AU  - Charles Peter Tilbery
AU  - Wilze Laura Bruscato
Y1  - 2021/12/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
T2  - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
JF  - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
JO  - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
SP  - 146
EP  - 154
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
AB  - The present work was the result of a research project to obtain the title of Master in Health Sciences at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo. Objective: To identify the coping strategies used by patients with SPMS, and their relation with the personality profile. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 23 patients undergoing treatment at CATEM, ISCMSP. A Sociodemographic Form, the Factorial Personality Inventory II, and the Ways of Coping with Problems Scale were used. To analyze the results, we used descriptive and inferential analyses, and explored sociodemographic variables, personality characteristics, and coping resources with the use of statistical tests suitable for the study. Results: The results showed the predominance of females, aged 51 years, with an EDSS equal to 7.0 and in need of some type of support. Fantasy was the main coping resource used, with its components spirituality, religious beliefs, and faith. Aggressiveness was the main personality trait: it was not found to be an aspect related to activities having a hostile character, but rather to active tendencies towards the outside world and self-assertion; it might even be deemed constructive if we consider aggressiveness as a combative aspect, strictly related to survival. This inclination was confirmed as we went on to identify other relevant personality traits that are indicative of individuals who seek affection and external support, but also crave some degree of independence, autonomy, self-sufficiency, freedom, and dominance over their lives so that they can accomplish something with tenacity and perseverance as a way of personal satisfaction and overcoming limits. Conclusion: These findings make it evident that patients with SPMS can bring specific demands and needs in terms of a multidisciplinary therapeutic treatment.
VL  - 7
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca

Psychology Department, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de S?o Paulo, S?o Paulo, Brazil
Charles Peter Tilbery

Neurology Department, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, S?o Paulo, Brazil
Wilze Laura Bruscato

Psychology Department, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, S?o Paulo, Brazil

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca, Charles Peter Tilbery, Wilze Laura Bruscato. (2021). Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, 7(6), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca; Charles Peter Tilbery; Wilze Laura Bruscato. Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile. Eur. J. Clin. Biomed. Sci. 2021, 7(6), 146-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca, Charles Peter Tilbery, Wilze Laura Bruscato. Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile. Eur J Clin Biomed Sci. 2021;7(6):146-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19,
  author = {Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca and Charles Peter Tilbery and Wilze Laura Bruscato},
  title = {Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile},
  journal = {European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {6},
  pages = {146-154},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejcbs.20210706.19},
  abstract = {The present work was the result of a research project to obtain the title of Master in Health Sciences at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo. Objective: To identify the coping strategies used by patients with SPMS, and their relation with the personality profile. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 23 patients undergoing treatment at CATEM, ISCMSP. A Sociodemographic Form, the Factorial Personality Inventory II, and the Ways of Coping with Problems Scale were used. To analyze the results, we used descriptive and inferential analyses, and explored sociodemographic variables, personality characteristics, and coping resources with the use of statistical tests suitable for the study. Results: The results showed the predominance of females, aged 51 years, with an EDSS equal to 7.0 and in need of some type of support. Fantasy was the main coping resource used, with its components spirituality, religious beliefs, and faith. Aggressiveness was the main personality trait: it was not found to be an aspect related to activities having a hostile character, but rather to active tendencies towards the outside world and self-assertion; it might even be deemed constructive if we consider aggressiveness as a combative aspect, strictly related to survival. This inclination was confirmed as we went on to identify other relevant personality traits that are indicative of individuals who seek affection and external support, but also crave some degree of independence, autonomy, self-sufficiency, freedom, and dominance over their lives so that they can accomplish something with tenacity and perseverance as a way of personal satisfaction and overcoming limits. Conclusion: These findings make it evident that patients with SPMS can bring specific demands and needs in terms of a multidisciplinary therapeutic treatment.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Coping Strategies for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, and Their Relation with the Personality Profile
AU  - Rodrigo Noronha da Fonseca
AU  - Charles Peter Tilbery
AU  - Wilze Laura Bruscato
Y1  - 2021/12/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
T2  - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
JF  - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
JO  - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
SP  - 146
EP  - 154
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.19
AB  - The present work was the result of a research project to obtain the title of Master in Health Sciences at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo. Objective: To identify the coping strategies used by patients with SPMS, and their relation with the personality profile. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 23 patients undergoing treatment at CATEM, ISCMSP. A Sociodemographic Form, the Factorial Personality Inventory II, and the Ways of Coping with Problems Scale were used. To analyze the results, we used descriptive and inferential analyses, and explored sociodemographic variables, personality characteristics, and coping resources with the use of statistical tests suitable for the study. Results: The results showed the predominance of females, aged 51 years, with an EDSS equal to 7.0 and in need of some type of support. Fantasy was the main coping resource used, with its components spirituality, religious beliefs, and faith. Aggressiveness was the main personality trait: it was not found to be an aspect related to activities having a hostile character, but rather to active tendencies towards the outside world and self-assertion; it might even be deemed constructive if we consider aggressiveness as a combative aspect, strictly related to survival. This inclination was confirmed as we went on to identify other relevant personality traits that are indicative of individuals who seek affection and external support, but also crave some degree of independence, autonomy, self-sufficiency, freedom, and dominance over their lives so that they can accomplish something with tenacity and perseverance as a way of personal satisfaction and overcoming limits. Conclusion: These findings make it evident that patients with SPMS can bring specific demands and needs in terms of a multidisciplinary therapeutic treatment.
VL  - 7
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download