Purpose: We present our experience in the diagnosis, follow-up and planning therapy of thoracic, abdominal and retroperitoneal liquid collections in different emergency patients using conventional and interventional ultrasound. Material and Methods: The right and left oblique and poly positionning view was used in 235 patients (159 male and 76 female) for US examination to identify fluids in the thorax and peritoneal or retroperitoneal space. The examination was performed after the clinical survey with patients supine. Positive findings of US were compared with those provided by CT, punctures under US control or surgery. US machine supplied with linear and convex transducers, CT machine, needles and catheters were used. Results: 197 of all 235 US examined patients had fluid collections, confirmed by CT scan, surgery or clinival course. In 156 patients we performed FN diagnostic punctures under US control. There was 155 true-positives, 25 true-negatives, 5 false-positives and 2 false-negative results. Overall this demonstrated that ultrasonography hamaunt of d a sensitivity of 98.72%, specificity of 83.33% and accuracy of 96.25%. The PPV is 96.87% and the NPV – 92.59%. Conclusions: Our experience and literature reports support the opinion that US examination can and should be used as a primary method for diagnosis and follow-up of clinically suspected free and organaised fluids in the thorax, abdomen and retroperitoneum.
| Published in | European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12 |
| Page(s) | 81-85 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Thoracic, Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Liquid Collections, US Examination, CT Machine, Interventional Procedures
| [1] | Phillips Perera, Josh Ennis, Geoffrey Schultz, Sarah WilliamsUltrasound for Detection of Ascites and for Guidance of the Paracentesis Procedure: Technique and Review of the Literature, January 2014, International Journal of Clinical Medicine 05 (20): 1277-1293 DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.520163. |
| [2] | Joel Cho, MD RDMS RDCS, Trevor P. Jensen, MD MS, Kreegan Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Abdominal Paracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine Published Online Only January 2, 2019. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3095 | 10.12788/jhm.3095. |
| [3] | Joel Cho, MD RDMS RDCS, Trevor P. Jensen, MD MS, Kreegan 29 Intra-Abdominal Fluid Collections, 2020, 10.1055/b-0038-1629002. |
| [4] | Brian C Allen, Huiman Barnhart, Mustafa Bashir, Christopher Nieman, Steven Breault, Tracy A JaffeDiagnostic accuracy of intra-abdominal fluid collection characterization in the era of multidetector computed tomography, Am Surg. 22 Feb; 78 (2): 185-9. |
| [5] | Osvaldo Chiara, Stefania Cimbanassi, Fabio Castelli, Rosario Spagnolo, Paolo Girotti. Protocol-driven approach of bleeding abdominal and pelvic trauma. World J Emerg Surg. 2006; 1: 17. |
| [6] | Yao DC, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Mirvis SE, Weekes A, Federle MP, Kim C, Lane MJ, Prabhakar P, Radin R, Ralls PW. Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution. Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 17–20. |
| [7] | Mullinix AJ, Foley WD. Multidetector computed tomography and blunt thoracoabdominal trauma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jul-Aug; 28 Suppl 1: S20-7. |
| [8] | Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, O'Keefe GE, Scalea TM. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruption. J Trauma. 2002; 53: 446–451. |
| [9] | M. Valentino, C. Sera, G. Zironi, C. De Luca, P. Pavlica, and L. Barozzi. Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Emergency Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Detection of Solid Organ Injuries. Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186 (5): 1361-1367. |
| [10] | B. C. Lee, E. L. Ormsby, J. P. McGahan, G. M. Melendres, J. R. Richards. The Utility of Sonography for the Triage of Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients to Exploratory Laparotomy. AJR 2007; 188: 415-421. |
| [11] | M. Christie-Large, D. Michaelidesand, S. James. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma: the FAST scan Trauma, April 1, 2008; 10 (2): 93-101. |
| [12] | E Azoulay. Diagnosis and management of pleural effusions in critically III patients, PubMed, March 2005, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires 22 (1 Pt 1): 71-9. |
| [13] | Cassia Lemos Moura, Priscila Pulita Azevedo Barros, Cristiane Mota Oliveira, Rogerio Colaiácovo, Juliana Marques Drigo, Augusto Pincke Cruz Carbonari, Tercio de Campos, Lucio Giovani Batista Rossini, Minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: A case report with images and review of the literature, Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. Vol. 63 no. 3 SãoPaulo Mar. 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.03.207 |
| [14] | Manuela Stoicescu, The surprise of diagnosis of a fluid collection around the spleen: Case report, 5th International Conference and Exhibition on Surgery & ENT Alicante, Spain, Surgery Curr Res 2016, 6: 6 (Suppl) http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-1076.C1.026 |
| [15] | Redden MD, Chin TY, van Driel ML (March 2017). "Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 3: CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2. ISSN 1469493X. PMC 6464687. PMID 28304084. |
| [16] | Ji Young Bang and Shyam Varadarajulu. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of postoperative abdominal fluid collections: What should we do to improve outcomes? Digestive Endoscopy 2015; 27: 727–728 doi: 10.1111/den.12492. |
APA Style
Atanas Dimitrov Hilendarov, Alexandar Asenov Georgiev, Lyubomir Georgiev Chervenkov. (2021). Diagnosis and Therapy of Liquid Collections Under Ultrasound Control. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, 7(5), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12
ACS Style
Atanas Dimitrov Hilendarov; Alexandar Asenov Georgiev; Lyubomir Georgiev Chervenkov. Diagnosis and Therapy of Liquid Collections Under Ultrasound Control. Eur. J. Clin. Biomed. Sci. 2021, 7(5), 81-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12
AMA Style
Atanas Dimitrov Hilendarov, Alexandar Asenov Georgiev, Lyubomir Georgiev Chervenkov. Diagnosis and Therapy of Liquid Collections Under Ultrasound Control. Eur J Clin Biomed Sci. 2021;7(5):81-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12,
author = {Atanas Dimitrov Hilendarov and Alexandar Asenov Georgiev and Lyubomir Georgiev Chervenkov},
title = {Diagnosis and Therapy of Liquid Collections Under Ultrasound Control},
journal = {European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences},
volume = {7},
number = {5},
pages = {81-85},
doi = {10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejcbs.20210705.12},
abstract = {Purpose: We present our experience in the diagnosis, follow-up and planning therapy of thoracic, abdominal and retroperitoneal liquid collections in different emergency patients using conventional and interventional ultrasound. Material and Methods: The right and left oblique and poly positionning view was used in 235 patients (159 male and 76 female) for US examination to identify fluids in the thorax and peritoneal or retroperitoneal space. The examination was performed after the clinical survey with patients supine. Positive findings of US were compared with those provided by CT, punctures under US control or surgery. US machine supplied with linear and convex transducers, CT machine, needles and catheters were used. Results: 197 of all 235 US examined patients had fluid collections, confirmed by CT scan, surgery or clinival course. In 156 patients we performed FN diagnostic punctures under US control. There was 155 true-positives, 25 true-negatives, 5 false-positives and 2 false-negative results. Overall this demonstrated that ultrasonography hamaunt of d a sensitivity of 98.72%, specificity of 83.33% and accuracy of 96.25%. The PPV is 96.87% and the NPV – 92.59%. Conclusions: Our experience and literature reports support the opinion that US examination can and should be used as a primary method for diagnosis and follow-up of clinically suspected free and organaised fluids in the thorax, abdomen and retroperitoneum.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Diagnosis and Therapy of Liquid Collections Under Ultrasound Control AU - Atanas Dimitrov Hilendarov AU - Alexandar Asenov Georgiev AU - Lyubomir Georgiev Chervenkov Y1 - 2021/11/17 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12 T2 - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences JF - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences JO - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences SP - 81 EP - 85 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5005 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210705.12 AB - Purpose: We present our experience in the diagnosis, follow-up and planning therapy of thoracic, abdominal and retroperitoneal liquid collections in different emergency patients using conventional and interventional ultrasound. Material and Methods: The right and left oblique and poly positionning view was used in 235 patients (159 male and 76 female) for US examination to identify fluids in the thorax and peritoneal or retroperitoneal space. The examination was performed after the clinical survey with patients supine. Positive findings of US were compared with those provided by CT, punctures under US control or surgery. US machine supplied with linear and convex transducers, CT machine, needles and catheters were used. Results: 197 of all 235 US examined patients had fluid collections, confirmed by CT scan, surgery or clinival course. In 156 patients we performed FN diagnostic punctures under US control. There was 155 true-positives, 25 true-negatives, 5 false-positives and 2 false-negative results. Overall this demonstrated that ultrasonography hamaunt of d a sensitivity of 98.72%, specificity of 83.33% and accuracy of 96.25%. The PPV is 96.87% and the NPV – 92.59%. Conclusions: Our experience and literature reports support the opinion that US examination can and should be used as a primary method for diagnosis and follow-up of clinically suspected free and organaised fluids in the thorax, abdomen and retroperitoneum. VL - 7 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: