The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements

Wondimu Tegegne

doi:doi:10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

| Peer-Reviewed

The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements

Wondimu Tegegne

Published in Education Journal (Volume 4, Issue 5)

Received: 27 September 2015 Accepted: 8 October 2015 Published: 24 October 2015

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

It is argued that learning is better and more successful when conducted in the variety spoken by students. In addition, it is claimed that the use of students’ variety in education enables students to use their own potential and helps them to achieve ‘deep learning.’ Besides, the use of students’ native dialect in education enhances the social, cognitive, emotional and linguistic development of learners’ in and out of school. For these reasons, it is argued that students need to be educated through their own variety. However, in multidialectal society, the issue of dialect and education in general and the issue of choosing the variety to be used as a Language of Instruction(LOI) in particular has been a great concern to linguists, educationalist and researchers for a long period of time (Yiakoumetti, 2007). This is because selecting the variety to be used as a LOI in multidialectal society is difficult as well as controversial. Besides, deciding the LOI largely depends on a variety of factors such as historical, economic, pedagogical, sociolinguistic, cultural, ideological, theoretical or/and political (UNESCO, 2003). For these reasons, the incorporation of dialects in educational system is questionable and contentious. This article is, therefore, intended to describe the use of dialects in education. Specifically, it will describes variations within the same language, social and regional dialects, standard and nonstandard varieties and their use in education the social evaluation of language varieties and its influence on their use in education, deficit and difference views and their influence on educational practice and the impacts of using dialects in education on students’ learning and achievements.

Published in	Education Journal (Volume 4, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
Page(s)	263-269
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Language, Dialect, Standard Variety, Non Standard Varieties, Education, Learning, Achievement

References

[1]	Adger, C. and Christian, D. (2007). Sociolinguistic variation and education. In Bayley, R. andLucas, C. (Eds). (2007). Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications (237-253) Retrieved from: WWW.Cambridge.Org/9780521871273
[2]	Adger, C., Wolfram, M. and Detwyler, J. (1993). Confronting dialect minority issues in special education: Reactive and proactive perspectives. Third National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student: Focus on middle and high school issues.
[3]	Chambers, J. K. (2008). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In Chambers, J.K, Trudgill, P. and Schilling-Estes, N. (Eds). (2008). Handbook of language variation and change (7-15). Retrieved fromhttp://www.blackwellreference.com/ subscriber/book?
[4]	Chambers, J.K. and Trudgill, P. (2004). Dialectology (2^nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5]	Cheshire, J. and Trudgill, P. (1989). Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. In Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., Munstermann, H. and Weltens., B. (Eds). (1989). Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (94-112). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
[6]	Cheshire, J. (2005). Sociolinguistics and mother tongue education. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N. and Trudgill, P.(Eds). (2005). Sociolinguistics: An introductory handbook of the science of language and society (2^nd) (2341-2350). Berlin: Moutonde Gruyter.
[7]	Cheshire, J.(2007). Dialect and education: Responses from sociolinguistics. In Papapavou, A. and Pavlos, P. (Eds). (2007). Sociolinguistics and pedagogical dimensions of dialect in education (14-33). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[8]	Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9]	Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A.(Eds).(1997). Sociolinguistics: A reader and course book. New York: Pal grave Macmillan.
[10]	Curran, M.E. (2003). Linguistic diversity and classroom management. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 334-340.
[11]	Edwards, J. (1995). Multilingualism. London: Penguin Books.
[12]	Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. and Hyams, N 2003). An introduction to language (7ed).Boston: Michael Rosenberg
[13]	Gee, P. (2002). Educational Linguistics. In Aronoff, M. And Rees-Miller, J,. (Eds). (2002). The handbook of linguistics (485-496). Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from: http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/book?id=g9781405102520_9781405102520
[14]	Hagen, A. (1989).Dialect, Frisian and education in the Netherlands. In Cheshire et al., (Eds). (1989). Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (48-61).Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
[15]	Halliday, M.A. K. and Hassan, R. (1990). Language context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[16]	Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to Sociolinguistics. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
[17]	Hudson, R.A. (2001). Sociolinguistics (2^nd ed).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[18]	Jorgensen, J.N. and Pedersen, K. M.(1989). Dialect and education in Denmark. In Cheshireetal., (Eds). (1989).Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (30-47). Philadelphia. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
[19]	Kagas, T. (1999). Education of minorities. In Fishman,J.(Eds). (1999).Hand book of language and ethnic identity (42 -59).Oxford. Oxford University Press.
[20]	Labov, W. (2003). Some sociolinguistic principles. In Pauloston, B and Tucker, R. (Eds).(2003).The Sociolinguistic: The essential readings(234-301). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[21]	Lehmann, W.P. (1976). Descriptive Linguistics: An introduction. New York: Random House.
[22]	Maybin, J. (2007). Language and education. In Liamas, C., Mullany, L.,and Stockwell, P.(Eds). (2007). The Rutledge companion to Sociolinguistics (157-163). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
[23]	Milroy, J.(2007). The Ideology of standard language. In Liamas et al., (Eds). (2007).The Rutledge companion to Sociolinguistics (133-139). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
[24]	Mohammed, T.(2002). An exploration of students’ and teachers’ attitude towards Ebonics in a Community College Writng Program, Retrieved from: ERIC database (Ed 479490).
[25]	Papapavou, A and Pavlos, P.(Eds).(2007).Sociolinguistics and pedagogical dimensions of dialect in education. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[26]	Reaser, J. and Adger, C. (2008). Vernacular language varieties in educational settings: Research and development. In Spolisky, B. and Hult, M.(Eds). (2008).The handbook of educational Linguistics (161-173). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[27]	Romaine, S.(2000). Language in society: An introduction to Sociolinguistics (2^nd ed). Oxford: OUP.
[28]	Rosenberg, P. (1989). Dialect and education in West Germany. InCheshire et al., (Eds). (1989).Dialect and education: Some European perspectives (62-93).Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
[29]	Sailzmann, Z. (2007). Language, Culture and society (Fourth edition). USA: West view Press.
[30]	Solano-Flores, G. and Li, M. (2006). The use of generalizability (G) theory in the testing of linguistic minorities. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(1), 13-22.
[31]	Syal, P and Jindal, D. V. (2005). An introduction to Linguistics: Language, grammar and semantics. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
[32]	Trudgill, P. (2001). Dialects: Language workbooks. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[33]	Ugorjii, U.C. (2005). Dialect communities and language vitality: The case of Igbo. Journal of West African Languages, 32, (1), 33-43.
[34]	UNESCO (2003). Education in a Multilingual World and Mother Tongue Education. France: UNESCO
[35]	Wardhaugh, R.(2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (6^th ed). Cambridge: Blackwell Black well Publishing Ltd.
[36]	Washington, J. A. (2001). Early literacy skills in African American children: Research considerations. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 213-221.
[37]	Wolfram, et al. (1999). Dialects in schools and communities. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
[38]	Wolfram, W. (1991). Dialect differences and testing. Retrieved from: ERIC database (Ed323813).
[39]	Wolfram, W. (1998). Dialect in society. In Coulmas, F.(Ed). (1998).Hand book of sociolinguistics (75-87).Retrieved from http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?
[40]	Yiakoumetti, A. (2007). Choice of classroom language in bi-dialectal communities: To include or to exclude the dialect? Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 51-66.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wondimu Tegegne. (2015). The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements. Education Journal, 4(5), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wondimu Tegegne. The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements. Educ. J. 2015, 4(5), 263-269. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wondimu Tegegne. The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements. Educ J. 2015;4(5):263-269. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22,
  author = {Wondimu Tegegne},
  title = {The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {263-269},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20150405.22},
  abstract = {It is argued that learning is better and more successful when conducted in the variety spoken by students. In addition, it is claimed that the use of students’ variety in education enables students to use their own potential and helps them to achieve ‘deep learning.’ Besides, the use of students’ native dialect in education enhances the social, cognitive, emotional and linguistic development of learners’ in and out of school. For these reasons, it is argued that students need to be educated through their own variety. However, in multidialectal society, the issue of dialect and education in general and the issue of choosing the variety to be used as a Language of Instruction(LOI) in particular has been a great concern to linguists, educationalist and researchers for a long period of time (Yiakoumetti, 2007). This is because selecting the variety to be used as a LOI in multidialectal society is difficult as well as controversial. Besides, deciding the LOI largely depends on a variety of factors such as historical, economic, pedagogical, sociolinguistic, cultural, ideological, theoretical or/and political (UNESCO, 2003). For these reasons, the incorporation of dialects in educational system is questionable and contentious. This article is, therefore, intended to describe the use of dialects in education. Specifically, it will describes variations within the same language, social and regional dialects, standard and nonstandard varieties and their use in education the social evaluation of language varieties and its influence on their use in education, deficit and difference views and their influence on educational practice and the impacts of using dialects in education on students’ learning and achievements.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements
AU  - Wondimu Tegegne
Y1  - 2015/10/24
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 263
EP  - 269
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
AB  - It is argued that learning is better and more successful when conducted in the variety spoken by students. In addition, it is claimed that the use of students’ variety in education enables students to use their own potential and helps them to achieve ‘deep learning.’ Besides, the use of students’ native dialect in education enhances the social, cognitive, emotional and linguistic development of learners’ in and out of school. For these reasons, it is argued that students need to be educated through their own variety. However, in multidialectal society, the issue of dialect and education in general and the issue of choosing the variety to be used as a Language of Instruction(LOI) in particular has been a great concern to linguists, educationalist and researchers for a long period of time (Yiakoumetti, 2007). This is because selecting the variety to be used as a LOI in multidialectal society is difficult as well as controversial. Besides, deciding the LOI largely depends on a variety of factors such as historical, economic, pedagogical, sociolinguistic, cultural, ideological, theoretical or/and political (UNESCO, 2003). For these reasons, the incorporation of dialects in educational system is questionable and contentious. This article is, therefore, intended to describe the use of dialects in education. Specifically, it will describes variations within the same language, social and regional dialects, standard and nonstandard varieties and their use in education the social evaluation of language varieties and its influence on their use in education, deficit and difference views and their influence on educational practice and the impacts of using dialects in education on students’ learning and achievements.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wondimu Tegegne

College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wolayita Soddo University, Wolayita Soddo, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wondimu Tegegne. (2015). The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements. Education Journal, 4(5), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wondimu Tegegne. The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements. Educ. J. 2015, 4(5), 263-269. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wondimu Tegegne. The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements. Educ J. 2015;4(5):263-269. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22,
  author = {Wondimu Tegegne},
  title = {The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {263-269},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20150405.22},
  abstract = {It is argued that learning is better and more successful when conducted in the variety spoken by students. In addition, it is claimed that the use of students’ variety in education enables students to use their own potential and helps them to achieve ‘deep learning.’ Besides, the use of students’ native dialect in education enhances the social, cognitive, emotional and linguistic development of learners’ in and out of school. For these reasons, it is argued that students need to be educated through their own variety. However, in multidialectal society, the issue of dialect and education in general and the issue of choosing the variety to be used as a Language of Instruction(LOI) in particular has been a great concern to linguists, educationalist and researchers for a long period of time (Yiakoumetti, 2007). This is because selecting the variety to be used as a LOI in multidialectal society is difficult as well as controversial. Besides, deciding the LOI largely depends on a variety of factors such as historical, economic, pedagogical, sociolinguistic, cultural, ideological, theoretical or/and political (UNESCO, 2003). For these reasons, the incorporation of dialects in educational system is questionable and contentious. This article is, therefore, intended to describe the use of dialects in education. Specifically, it will describes variations within the same language, social and regional dialects, standard and nonstandard varieties and their use in education the social evaluation of language varieties and its influence on their use in education, deficit and difference views and their influence on educational practice and the impacts of using dialects in education on students’ learning and achievements.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Use of Dialects in Education and Its Impacts on Students’ Learning and Achievements
AU  - Wondimu Tegegne
Y1  - 2015/10/24
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 263
EP  - 269
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150405.22
AB  - It is argued that learning is better and more successful when conducted in the variety spoken by students. In addition, it is claimed that the use of students’ variety in education enables students to use their own potential and helps them to achieve ‘deep learning.’ Besides, the use of students’ native dialect in education enhances the social, cognitive, emotional and linguistic development of learners’ in and out of school. For these reasons, it is argued that students need to be educated through their own variety. However, in multidialectal society, the issue of dialect and education in general and the issue of choosing the variety to be used as a Language of Instruction(LOI) in particular has been a great concern to linguists, educationalist and researchers for a long period of time (Yiakoumetti, 2007). This is because selecting the variety to be used as a LOI in multidialectal society is difficult as well as controversial. Besides, deciding the LOI largely depends on a variety of factors such as historical, economic, pedagogical, sociolinguistic, cultural, ideological, theoretical or/and political (UNESCO, 2003). For these reasons, the incorporation of dialects in educational system is questionable and contentious. This article is, therefore, intended to describe the use of dialects in education. Specifically, it will describes variations within the same language, social and regional dialects, standard and nonstandard varieties and their use in education the social evaluation of language varieties and its influence on their use in education, deficit and difference views and their influence on educational practice and the impacts of using dialects in education on students’ learning and achievements.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download