Historically, the Wechsler Memory Scales have been one of the most commonly used measures of memory in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. There are limited published reports, however, analyzing the performance of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on the Fourth Edition of the test. The aim of this investigation was to describe the utility of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) in detecting and characterizing the memory deficits associated with relapsing-remitting MS. Thirty-four outpatients with clinically definite relapsing-remitting MS were administered the WMS-IV and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Means for age, education, and duration of MS diagnosis were 43.15, 14.88, and 8.41 years, respectively. Index scores did not differ significantly across the five WMS-IV domains. Comparison of actual WMS-IV indexes with those predicted by the WAIS-IV General Ability Index revealed that in every instance predicted index means were significantly higher than actual index means. Only 6 (17.6%) of 34 patients had all five actual and predicted index scores at comparable levels; whereas, 28 (82.4%) had ≥ 1 actual indexes significantly below the predicted level. Contrary to prior research using earlier versions of these measures, more patients demonstrated relatively reduced performances on the WMS-IV Visual Working Memory Index than on the WAIS-IV Processing Speed Index. Results support the use of the WMS-IV in evaluating learning and memory in individuals with MS. Findings also challenge the notion that the information processing deficits in MS are more reflective of reduced processing speed than impaired working memory.
Published in | Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12 |
Page(s) | 13-17 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Learning, Neuropsychology, Processing Speed, Working Memory
[1] | Rao, S. M., Grafman, J., DiGiulio, D., Mittenberg, W., Bernardin, L., Leo, G. J., Unverzagt, F. (1993). Memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: Its relation to working memory, semantic encoding, and implicit learning. Neuropsychology, 7, 364-374. |
[2] | Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology, 41, 685-691. |
[3] | Rao, S. M., Leo, G. L., & St. Aubin-Faubert, P. (1989). On the nature and memory disturbance in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 699-712. |
[4] | Amato, M. P., Portaccio, E., Goretti, B., Zipoli, V., Hakiki, B., Giannini, M., Razzolini, L. (2010). Cognitive impairment in early stages of multiple sclerosis. Neurological Sciences, 31 (Suppl. 2), S211-S214. |
[5] | Amato, M. P., Zipoli, V., & Portaccio, E. (2006). Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 245, 41-46. |
[6] | Rao, S. M. (1995). Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis. Current Opinion in Neurology, 8, 216-220. |
[7] | Benedict, R. H. B., DeLuca, J., Enzinger, C., Geurts, J. J. G., Krupp, L. B., & Rao, S. M. (2017). Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis: Looking back and moving forward. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23, 832-842. |
[8] | Beatty, W. W. (2008). Assessment for rehabilitation of multiple sclerosis. In S. T. Gontkovsky & C. J. Golden (Eds.), Neuropsychology within the inpatient rehabilitation environment (pp. 99-131). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science. |
[9] | Meshkova, K. S., & Damulin, I. V. (2011). Memory disorders in multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 41, 871-877. |
[10] | Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. |
[11] | Benedict, R. H. B., Fischer, J. S., Archibald, C. J., Arnett, P. A., Beatty, W. W., Bobholz, J., Munschauer, F. (2002). Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: A consensus approach. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 381-397. |
[12] | Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33-65. |
[13] | Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. |
[14] | Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. |
[15] | Clemmons, D. C., Fraser, R. T., Rosenbaum, G., Getter, A., & Johnson, E. (2004). An abbreviated neuropsychological battery in multiple sclerosis vocational rehabilitation: Findings and implications. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 100-105. |
[16] | Drew, M., Tippett, L. J., Starkey, N. J., & Isler, R. B. (2008). Executive dysfunction and cognitive impairment in a large community-based sample with multiple sclerosis from New Zealand: A descriptive study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 1-19. |
[17] | Fischer, J. S. (1988). Using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised to detect and characterize the memory deficits of multiple sclerosis. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2, 149-172. |
[18] | DeLuca, J., Chelune, G. J., Tulsky, D. S., Lengenfelder, J., & Chiaravalloti, N. D. (2004). Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 550-562. |
[19] | Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. |
[20] | Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. |
[21] | Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. |
[22] | Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Wolinsky, J. S. (2011). Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald Criteria. Annals of Neurology, 69, 292-302. |
[23] | Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33, 1444-1452. |
[24] | Wechsler, D. (2009). WMS-IV: Technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. |
[25] | American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073. |
[26] | The Psychological Corporation. (2002). WAIS-III/WMS-III: Technical manual (Updated). San Antonio, TX: Author. |
[27] | Zakzanis, K. K. (2000). Distinct neurocognitive profiles in multiple sclerosis subtypes. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 115-136. |
[28] | Ryan, J. J., Gontkovsky, S. T., Kreiner, D. S., & Tree, H. A. (2012). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition performance in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 571-579. |
[29] | Galioto, R., Dhima, K., Berenholz, O., & Busch, R. (2020). Performance validity testing in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617720000466. |
[30] | Genova, H. M., Lengenfelder, J., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Moore, N. B., & DeLuca, J. (2012). Processing speed versus working memory: Contributions to an information processing task in multiple sclerosis. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 19, 132-140. |
APA Style
Samuel Thomas Gontkovsky, Joseph John Ryan, Laura Glass Umfleet. (2021). Performance of Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV): Preliminary Clinical Findings. Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience, 5(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12
ACS Style
Samuel Thomas Gontkovsky; Joseph John Ryan; Laura Glass Umfleet. Performance of Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV): Preliminary Clinical Findings. Clin. Neurol. Neurosci. 2021, 5(2), 13-17. doi: 10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12
AMA Style
Samuel Thomas Gontkovsky, Joseph John Ryan, Laura Glass Umfleet. Performance of Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV): Preliminary Clinical Findings. Clin Neurol Neurosci. 2021;5(2):13-17. doi: 10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12
@article{10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12, author = {Samuel Thomas Gontkovsky and Joseph John Ryan and Laura Glass Umfleet}, title = {Performance of Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV): Preliminary Clinical Findings}, journal = {Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {13-17}, doi = {10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cnn.20210502.12}, abstract = {Historically, the Wechsler Memory Scales have been one of the most commonly used measures of memory in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. There are limited published reports, however, analyzing the performance of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on the Fourth Edition of the test. The aim of this investigation was to describe the utility of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) in detecting and characterizing the memory deficits associated with relapsing-remitting MS. Thirty-four outpatients with clinically definite relapsing-remitting MS were administered the WMS-IV and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Means for age, education, and duration of MS diagnosis were 43.15, 14.88, and 8.41 years, respectively. Index scores did not differ significantly across the five WMS-IV domains. Comparison of actual WMS-IV indexes with those predicted by the WAIS-IV General Ability Index revealed that in every instance predicted index means were significantly higher than actual index means. Only 6 (17.6%) of 34 patients had all five actual and predicted index scores at comparable levels; whereas, 28 (82.4%) had ≥ 1 actual indexes significantly below the predicted level. Contrary to prior research using earlier versions of these measures, more patients demonstrated relatively reduced performances on the WMS-IV Visual Working Memory Index than on the WAIS-IV Processing Speed Index. Results support the use of the WMS-IV in evaluating learning and memory in individuals with MS. Findings also challenge the notion that the information processing deficits in MS are more reflective of reduced processing speed than impaired working memory.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Performance of Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV): Preliminary Clinical Findings AU - Samuel Thomas Gontkovsky AU - Joseph John Ryan AU - Laura Glass Umfleet Y1 - 2021/04/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12 T2 - Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience JF - Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience JO - Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience SP - 13 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8930 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20210502.12 AB - Historically, the Wechsler Memory Scales have been one of the most commonly used measures of memory in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. There are limited published reports, however, analyzing the performance of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on the Fourth Edition of the test. The aim of this investigation was to describe the utility of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) in detecting and characterizing the memory deficits associated with relapsing-remitting MS. Thirty-four outpatients with clinically definite relapsing-remitting MS were administered the WMS-IV and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Means for age, education, and duration of MS diagnosis were 43.15, 14.88, and 8.41 years, respectively. Index scores did not differ significantly across the five WMS-IV domains. Comparison of actual WMS-IV indexes with those predicted by the WAIS-IV General Ability Index revealed that in every instance predicted index means were significantly higher than actual index means. Only 6 (17.6%) of 34 patients had all five actual and predicted index scores at comparable levels; whereas, 28 (82.4%) had ≥ 1 actual indexes significantly below the predicted level. Contrary to prior research using earlier versions of these measures, more patients demonstrated relatively reduced performances on the WMS-IV Visual Working Memory Index than on the WAIS-IV Processing Speed Index. Results support the use of the WMS-IV in evaluating learning and memory in individuals with MS. Findings also challenge the notion that the information processing deficits in MS are more reflective of reduced processing speed than impaired working memory. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -