The study examined the potential use of starch obtained from cassava and yam sources for the production of stable industrial adhesives that can be utilized in the production of composites. Cassava and yam tubers used in the study were obtained from Mowe and Ile-Ife (both in southwestern Nigeria) and washed free of sand and impurities before sun-drying. Starch and protein were then extracted from the cassava and yam tubers. The results indicated that both cassava and yam starches were suitable for this purpose. However, the particle size of the starch granules was found to be an important factor in determining the physicochemical properties of the adhesive. Composites produced with cassava starch adhesive were found to be more resistant to moisture than those produced with yam starch. Additionally, cassava adhesive was able to utilize more lignocellulosic fibers while still maintaining stability, provided that its limit was not exceeded. Furthermore, the addition of 2% metal additive (Fe3+ ions) improved the properties of the composites through coordination. Cassava starch-based composites were found to exhibit higher crystallinity than those produced with yam starch. The adhesive produced from these starch samples was found to be competitive with formaldehyde-based resins, with the added advantage of being non-toxic and capable of neutralizing the protons of acids with their excessive hydroxyl groups. Overall, the use of these cellulosic materials in the production of composites presents an environmentally friendly solution to the problem of waste and pollution. The study findings suggest that the starting materials are inexpensive, widely available, and environmentally friendly, and that they can produce products of greater economic importance.
| Published in | Composite Materials (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12 |
| Page(s) | 7-18 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cassava, Yam, Starch, Composite, Cellulose
| [1] | B. Huang, X. Wang, H. Kua, Y. Geng, R. Bleischwitz, J. Ren, Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 129 (2018) 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029. |
| [2] | J. Boggs, The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Economic Geography, by Trevor J. Barnes, JamiePeck, and EricSheppard. 2012. West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. 646 + xvii. ISBN 978-1-4443-3680-1, $199.95, Journal of Regional Science 54 (2014) 155–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12088. |
| [3] | M. Rasel, M. Parvez, Environmental Impact Assessment for Rapid Urbanization in the Coastal Area of Bangladesh: A Case Study on Cox’s Bazar Sadar Upazila, Journal of City and Development 3 (2021) 48–59. |
| [4] | UN.2018, World Urbanization Prospects. United Nations Department of Public Information 1–5. |
| [5] | M. S. Aslam, B. Huang, L. Cui, Review of construction and demolition waste management in China and USA, Waste Manag. 264 (2020) 110445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110445. |
| [6] | H. Wu, J. Zuo, H. Yuan, G. Zillante, J. Wang, A review of performance assessment methods for construction and demolition waste management, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 150 (2019a) 104407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104407. |
| [7] | N. Chileshe, R. Rameezdeen, M. R. Hosseini, I. Martek, H. X. Li, P. Panjehbashi-Aghdam, Factors driving the implementation of reverse logistics: A quantified model for the construction industry, Waste Manag. 79 (2018) 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.013. |
| [8] | B. Nikmehr, M. R. Hosseini, R. Rameezdeen, N. Chileshe, P. Ghoddousi, M. Arashpour, An integrated model for factors affecting construction and demolition waste management in Iran, ECAM 24 (2017) 1246–1268. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0015. |
| [9] | M. Yeheyis, K. Hewage, M. S. Alam, C. Eskicioglu, R. Sadiq, An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability, Clean Techn Environ Policy 15 (2013) 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6. |
| [10] | J. Pickin, C. Wardle, K. O’Farrell, P. Nyunt, S. Donovan, National Waste Report 2020, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Blue Environment Pty Ltd. |
| [11] | S. Shooshtarian, T. Maqsood, M. Khalfan, R. J. Yang, P. Wong, Landfill Levy Imposition on Construction and Demolition Waste: Australian Stakeholders’ Perceptions, Sustainability 12 (2020) 4496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114496. |
| [12] | R. Jin, B. Li, T. Zhou, D. Wanatowski, P. Piroozfar, An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 126 (2017) 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.034. |
| [13] | K. Slowey, Report: Global construction waste will almost double by 2025|Construction Dive, 2018. |
| [14] | S. Kaza, L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, F. van Woerden, K. lonkova, J. Morton, R. A. Poveda, M. Sarraf, F. Malkawi, A. S. Harinath, F. Banna, G. An, H. Imoto, D. Levine, What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA, 2018. |
| [15] | A. Laurent, I. Bakas, J. Clavreul, A. Bernstad, M. Niero, E. Gentil, M. Z. Hauschild, T. H. Christensen, Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives, Waste Manag. 34 (2014b) 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045. |
| [16] | A. Allesch, P. H. Brunner, Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review, Waste Manag. Res. 32 (2014) 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14535653. |
| [17] | P. H. Brunner, H. Rechberger, Waste to energy--key element for sustainable waste management, Waste Manag. 37 (2015) 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.003. |
| [18] | A. Laurent, J. Clavreul, A. Bernstad, I. Bakas, M. Niero, E. Gentil, T. H. Christensen, M. Z. Hauschild, Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice, Waste Manag. 34 (2014a) 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.004. |
| [19] | J. Wang, H. Wu, V. W. Tam, J. Zuo, Considering life-cycle environmental impacts and society's willingness for optimizing construction and demolition waste management fee: An empirical study of China, Journal of Cleaner Production 206 (2019) 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.170. |
| [20] | R. G. Anuardo, M. Espuny, A. C. F. Costa, O. J. Oliveira, Toward a cleaner and more sustainable world: A framework to develop and improve waste management through organizations, governments and academia, Heliyon 8 (2022) e09225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09225. |
| [21] | H. Etzkowitz, Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Social Science Information 42 (2003) 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002. |
| [22] | V. T. Nunhes, V. E. Garcia, M. Espuny, Santos, Vitor Homem de Mello, R. Isaksson, O. J. de Oliveira, Where to Go with Corporate Sustainability? Opening Paths for Sustainable Businesses through the Collaboration between Universities, Governments, and Organizations, Sustainability 13 (2021) 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031429. |
| [23] | H. Snyder, Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines, Journal of Business Research 104 (2019) 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. |
| [24] | Y. Bhatt, K. Ghuman, A. Dhir, Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production 260 (2020) 120988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120988. |
| [25] | A. C. F. Costa, Santos, Vitor Homem de Mello, O. J. de Oliveira, Towards the revolution and democratization of education: a framework to overcome challenges and explore opportunities through Industry 4.0, Informatics in Education 21 (2022) 1–32. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.01. |
| [26] | Questel, Orbit Intelligence - Search Patent & Patent Database, 2022. https://www.questel.com/ip-intelligence-software/orbit-intelligence/. |
| [27] | O. J. de Oliveira, F. F. de Silva, F. Juliani, Barbosa, Luis César Ferreira Motta, T. V. Nunhes (Eds.), Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects, Suad Kunosic and Enver Zerem, IntechOpen, 2019. |
| [28] | Elsevier, What is the difference between ScienceD…ta_ - Data as a Service Support Center, 2022. https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/28240/supporthub/dataasaservice/p/17729/. |
| [29] | Santos, Vitor Homem de Mello, T. L. R. Campos, M. Espuny, O. J. de Oliveira, Towards a green industry through cleaner production development, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29 (2022) 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16615-2. |
| [30] | Reis, José Salvador da Motta, M. Espuny, T. V. Nunhes, N. A. d. S. Sampaio, R. Isaksson, F. C. de Campos, O. J. de Oliveira, Striding towards Sustainability: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0, Sustainability 13 (2021) 5232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095232. |
| [31] | Orbit, 2022, Orbit. https://www.orbit.com/ (accessed 18 November 2022). |
| [32] | Eastman 2022a, About Eastman. https://www.eastman.com/en/who-we-are (accessed 18 November 2022). |
| [33] | B. DARYL, X. WU, S. D. EUGENE, P. M. GARY CN 114630882 A, 2020. |
| [34] | S. D. EUGENE, B. DARYL, P. K. RANDOLPH, P. M. GARY, T. W. LEWIS, X. WU CN 114728868 A, 2020. |
| [35] | X. WU, P. M. GARY, P. K. RANDOLPH, B. DARYL, S. D. EUGENE CN 114630883 A, 2020. |
| [36] | S. J. PETRUS CN 107406862 A, 2017. |
| [37] | Z. Li, G. Huang, Q. Qin, Z. Zhong, B. Yu, Y. Lin CN209980309 U, 2020. |
| [38] | Z. Li, B. Yu, G. Huang, Q. Qin, Y. Lin CN110348620 A, 2019. |
| [39] | J. Wang, B. Yu, Z. Li, J. Zhang, F. Zhou, M. Zhou CN 109034073 A, 2018. |
| [40] | J. Wang, B. Yu, J. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Wang, Z. Zhong CN 109063638 A, 2018. |
| [41] | B. YE, H. Yuan, An Overview of C&D Waste Management Regulations in the Central China: ICCREM 2014: Smart Construction and Management in the Context of New Technology (2014) 45–52. |
| [42] | H. Yuan, A. R. Chini, Y. Lu, L. Shen, A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste, Waste Manag. 32 (2012) 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.006. |
| [43] | C.-L. Peng, D. E. Scorpio, C. J. Kibert, Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations, Construction Management and Economics 15 (1997) 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373105. |
| [44] | C. Shi, Y. Li, J. Zhang, W. Li, L. Chong, Z. Xie, Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate – A review, Journal of Cleaner Production 112 (2016) 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.057. |
| [45] | Y.-Y. Lai, L.-H. Yeh, P.-F. Chen, P.-H. Sung, Y.-M. Lee, Management and Recycling of Construction Waste in Taiwan, Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 (2016) 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.077. |
| [46] | U. A. Umar, N. Shafiq, A. Malakahmad, M. F. Nuruddin, M. F. Khamidi, A review on adoption of novel techniques in construction waste management and policy, J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19 (2017) 1361–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0534-8. |
| [47] | J. Wang, V. W. Y. Tam, Construction industry carbon dioxide emissions in Shenzhen, China, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management 169 (2016) 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.15.00009. |
| [48] | H. Duan, D. Yu, J. Zuo, B. Yang, Y. Zhang, Y. Niu, Characterization of brominated flame retardants in construction and demolition waste components: HBCD and PBDEs, Sci. Total Environ. 572 (2016) 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.165. |
| [49] | H. Wu, H. Duan, L. Zheng, J. Wang, Y. Niu, G. Zhang, Demolition waste generation and recycling potentials in a rapidly developing flagship megacity of South China: Prospective scenarios and implications, Construction and Building Materials 113 (2016) 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.130. |
| [50] | CHONGQING UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE OF ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, CHOGQING UNIVERSITY, 11/3/22. |
| [51] | Shenzhen University, Lab for Optimizing Design of Built Environment, 11/3/22. |
| [52] | Tongji University, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, 11/3/22. |
| [53] | Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Science, Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Recycling, 11/23/15. |
| [54] | M. Tang, L. Ma, S. Xing, T. Li, The Management Mode of the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: An Exploratory Study, Science and Technology Management Research (2011) 77–81. |
| [55] | NSFC, 2018, National Natural Science Fund Guide to Programs 2019. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/english/site1/pdf/NationalNaturalScienceFundGuidet oPrograms2019.pdf. |
| [56] | X. WU, B. DARYL, P. K. RANDOLPH, P. M. GARY, S. D. EUGENE US20210130262 A1, 2021. |
| [57] | S. Jesper, J. Kenneth, N.-G. Soeren AU2017294066 A1, 2017. |
| [58] | R. F. Winther, P. R. Alexander, D. Steffen, H. P. Kamp AU2017294067 A1, 2017. |
| [59] | R. Jin, Q. Chen, Overview of Concrete Recycling Legislation and Practice in the United States, J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2019) 82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001630. |
| [60] | U. S. EPA 2019a, Industrial, Construction and Demolition (C&D) Landfills, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, U. S. EPA, 2019. |
| [61] | U. S. EPA 2019b, Advancing Sustainable Materials Management. 2017 Fact Sheet United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Land and Emergency Management (5306P) Washington, DC 20460/EPA530-F-19-007, U. S. EPA, 2019. |
| [62] | C. Clark, J. Jambeck, T. Townsend, A Review of Construction and Demolition Debris Regulations in the United States, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 36 (2006) 141–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380500531197. |
| [63] | T. G. Townsend, W. W. Ingwersen, B. Niblick, P. Jain, J. Wally, CDDPath: A method for quantifying the loss and recovery of construction and demolition debris in the United States, Waste Manag. 84 (2019) 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.048. |
| [64] | A. Bakchan, K. M. Faust, Construction waste generation estimates of institutional building projects: Leveraging waste hauling tickets, Waste Manag. 87 (2019) 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.024. |
| [65] | A. Bakchan, K. M. Faust, F. Leite, Seven-dimensional automated construction waste quantification and management framework: Integration with project and site planning, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 146 (2019) 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.020. |
| [66] | University of Florida, College of Design Construction and Planning. https://dcp.ufl.edu/admissions/ (accessed 23 November 2022). |
| [67] | Yale University, Regulated Waste _ Yale Environmental Health & Safety, 2020. https://ehs.yale.edu/regulated-waste. |
| [68] | K. Ebrahimi, L. A. North, Effective strategies for enhancing waste management at university campuses, IJSHE 18 (2017) 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2016-0017. |
| [69] | University of Texas at Austin, Center for Sustainable Development _ Texas Architecture _ UTSOA, 2022. https://soa.utexas.edu/libraries-centers/center-sustainable-development. |
| [70] | EPA, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency _ US EPA, NOVEMBER 15, 2022. https://www.epa.gov/. |
| [71] | Australian Government 2018, National Waste Policy: Less Waste More Resources (2018). https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/protection/waste/publications/national-waste-policy-2018. |
| [72] | S. Shooshtarian, T. Maqsood, P. S. Wong, R. J. Yang, M. Khalfan, Review of waste strategy documents in Australia: analysis of strategies for construction and demolition waste, Int. J. Environmental Technology and Management 23 (2020) 1–21. |
| [73] | H. Wu, J. Zuo, H. Yuan, G. Zillante, J. Wang, Cross-regional mobility of construction and demolition waste in Australia: An exploratory study, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 156 (2020) 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104710. |
| [74] | H. Wu, J. Zuo, G. Zillante, J. Wang, H. Duan, Environmental impacts of cross-regional mobility of construction and demolition waste: An Australia Study, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 174 (2021) 105805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105805. |
| [75] | K. Kabirifar, M. Mojtahedi, C. Changxin Wang, V. W. Tam, Effective construction and demolition waste management assessment through waste management hierarchy; a case of Australian large construction companies, Journal of Cleaner Production 312 (2021) 127790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127790. |
| [76] | Wijewickrama, M. K. C. S. Chileshe, N., R. Rameezdeen, J.J. Ochoa, Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties fo…tics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste, Sustainability 13 (2021). |
| [77] | Western Sydney University, Western Sydney University, 2022. https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/. |
| [78] | University of Adelaide, University of Adelaide, 2022. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/microscopy/. |
| [79] | RMIT University, RMIT University, 2022. https://www.rmit.edu.au/. |
| [80] | O. O. Akinade, L. O. Oyedele, S. O. Ajayi, M. Bilal, H. A. Alaka, H. A. Owolabi, O. O. Arawomo, Designing out construction waste using BIM technology: Stakeholders’ expectations for industry deployment, Journal of Cleaner Production 180 (2018) 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.022. |
| [81] | M. R. Esa, A. Halog, L. Rigamonti, Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 120 (2017) 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.014. |
| [82] | J.-L. Gálvez-Martos, D. Styles, H. Schoenberger, B. Zeschmar-Lahl, Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 136 (2018) 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016. |
| [83] | A. Mastrucci, A. Marvuglia, E. Popovici, U. Leopold, E. Benetto, Geospatial characterization of building material stocks for the life cycle assessment of end-of-life scenarios at the urban scale, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 123 (2017) 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.003. |
| [84] | M. Rahimi, V. Ghezavati, Sustainable multi-period reverse logistics network design and planning under uncertainty utilizing conditional value at risk (CVaR) for recycling construction and demolition waste, Journal of Cleaner Production 172 (2018) 1567–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.240. |
| [85] | P. Vitale, N. Arena, F. Di Gregorio, U. Arena, Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building, Waste Management 60 (2017) 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.002. |
| [86] | J. Won, J. Cheng, Identifying potential opportunities of building information modeling for construction and demolition waste management and minimization, Automation in Construction 79 (2017) 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.02.002. |
| [87] | Z. Wu, A. Yu, L. Shen, Investigating the determinants of contractor’s construction and demolition waste management behavior in Mainland China, Waste Management 60 (2017) 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.001. |
| [88] | H. Yang, J. Xia, J. R. Thompson, R.J. Flower, Urban construction and demolition waste and landfill failure in Shenzhen, China, Waste Management 63 (2017) 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.026. |
| [89] | H. Yuan, Barriers and countermeasures for managing construction and demolition waste: A case of Shenzhen in China, Journal of Cleaner Production 157 (2017) 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.137. |
| [90] | R. Cardoso, R. V. Silva, J. Brito, R. Dhir, Use of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste in geotechnical applications: A literature review, Waste Management 49 (2016) 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.021. |
| [91] | Q. Chen, Q. Zhang, C. Qi, A. Fourie, C. Xiao, Recycling phosphogypsum and construction demolition waste for cemented paste backfill and its environmental impact, Journal of Cleaner Production 186 (2018) 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.131. |
| [92] | R. Islam, T. H. Nazifa, A. Yuniarto, A. Shanawaz Uddin, S. Salmiati, S. Shahid, An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling, Waste Management 95 (2019) 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.049. |
| [93] | W. Lu, C. Webster, Y. Peng, X. Chen, X. Zhang, Estimating and calibrating the amount of building-related construction and demolition waste in urban China, International Journal of Construction Management 17 (2017) 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1166548. |
| [94] | J. Won, J. Cheng, G. Lee, Quantification of construction waste prevented by BIM-based design validation: Case studies in South Korea, Waste Management 49 (2016) 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.026. |
| [95] | M. Yazdani, K. Kabirifar, B. E. Frimpong, M. Shariati, M. Mirmozaffari, A. Boskabadi, Improving construction and demolition waste collection service in an urban area using a simheuristic approach: A case study in Sydney, Australia, Journal of Cleaner Production 280 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124138. |
| [96] | L. Zheng, H. Wu, H. Zhang, H. Duan, J. Wang, W. Jiang, B. Dong, G. Liu, J. Zuo, Q. Song, Characterizing the generation and flows of construction and demolition waste in China, Construction and Building Materials 136 (2017) 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.055. |
| [97] | Z. Bao, W. Lu, Developing efficient circularity for construction and demolition waste management in fast emerging economies: Lessons learned from Shenzhen, China, Science of the Total Environment 724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138264. |
| [98] | Z. Bao, W. Lu, B. Chi, H. Yuan, J. Hao, Procurement innovation for a circular economy of construction and demolition waste: Lessons learnt from Suzhou, China, Waste Management 99 (2019) 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.031. |
| [99] | P. Ghisellini, M. Ripa, S. Ulgiati, Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production 178 (2018) 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207. |
| [100] | A. Mahpour, Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 134 (2018) 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026. |
| [101] | A. Di Maria, J. Eyckmans, K. van Acker, Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making, Waste Management 75 (2018) 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.028. |
| [102] | S. H. Ghaffar, M. Burman, N. Braimah, Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery, Journal of Cleaner Production 244 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710. |
| [103] | P. Ghisellini, X. Ji, G. Liu, S. Ulgiati, Evaluating the transition towards cleaner production in the construction and demolition sector of China: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production 195 (2018) 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.084. |
| [104] | M. U. Hossain, C. S. Poon, I. Lo, J. Cheng, Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 109 (2016) 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.009. |
| [105] | J. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wang, An environmental assessment model of construction and demolition waste based on system dynamics: a case study in Guangzhou, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (2020) 37237–37259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07107-5. |
| [106] | H. Wu, J. Zuo, G. Zillante, J. Wang, H. Yuan, Status quo and future directions of construction and demolition waste research: A critical review, Journal of Cleaner Production 240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118163. Azubuike, C. P., Adeluola, A. O., Mgboko, M. S., & Madu, S. J. (2018). Physicochemical and microbiological evaluation of acidmodified native starch derived from Borassus aethiopum (Arecaceae) shoot. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 17 (5), 883-890. |
| [107] | Punia, S. (2020). Barley starch modifications: Physical, chemical and enzymatic-A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 144, 578-585. |
| [108] | Whistler R. L. and Paschall E. F. (1965). "Starch Chemistry and Technology", Volume I, "Fundamental Aspects", 4th edition. Academic Press, New York, pp: 465. |
| [109] | Agboola S., Akingbala O., and Oguntimein B. (1990). Processing of cassava starch for adhesive production, 42: 12-15. |
| [110] | Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists International, 18th ed. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD. |
| [111] | Muazu J., Musa H., Isah A., Bhatia, P. and Tom T. (2011): Extraction and characterization of Kaffir Potato starch, a potential source of pharmaceutical raw material, pp: 22-25. |
| [112] | Singh J., Kaur L. and McCarthy O. (2007). Factors influencing the physico-chemical, morphological, thermal and rheological properties of some chemically modified starches for food applications. Food Hydrocolloids, 21: 15-22. |
| [113] | Honhwei Y., Yoan C., Qun F. and Zhikun L. (2015). Effects of treatment temperature on properties of starch based adhesives. Bio resources, 10 (2): 3520-3530. |
| [114] | Lúcia H., Egon S., Manoela E., Thaís S. and Ivo M. (2014). Physicochemical properties of cassava starch oxidized by sodium hypochlorite. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51 (10): 2640-2647. |
| [115] | Islam, M. S., Pickering, K. L., & Foreman, N. J. (2010). Influence of alkali treatment on the interfacial and physico-mechanical properties of industrial hemp fibre reinforced polylactic acid composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41 (5), 596-603. |
| [116] | Hossen S., Sotome I., Takenaka M., Nakajima M. and Okadome H. (2011). Effect of particle size of different crop starches and their flours on pasting properties. Japan Journal of Food Engineering, volume 12, pp: 29-35. |
| [117] | Andrés-Bello, A., Barreto-Palacios, V. I. V. I. A. N., García-Segovia, P., Mir-Bel, J., & Martínez-Monzó, J. (2013). Effect of pH on color and texture of food products. Food Engineering Reviews, 5, 158-170. |
| [118] | Biduski, B., da Silva, W. M. F., Colussi, R., El Halal, S. L. D. M., Lim, L. T., Dias, Á. R. G., & da Rosa Zavareze, E. (2018). Starch hydrogels: The influence of the amylose content and gelatinization method. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 113, 443-449. |
| [119] | Buléon A., Colonna P. and Planchot P. (1998). Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Biomacromolecules, 85; 85-112. |
| [120] | Ciesielski W., Sikora M., Krystyjan M. and Tomasik P. (2008). Quantitative studies on coordination of starches and their polysaccharides to the transition metal atoms and its consequences, in Starch Recent Progress in Biopolymer and Enzyme Technology. Polish Society of Food Technologists, 15: 183-203. |
| [121] | Pérez S. and Bertoft E. (2010). The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: a comprehensive review, 62: 389-420. |
| [122] | Ulbrich M., Wiesner I. and Flöter E. (2015). Molecular characterization of acid-thinned wheat, potato and pea starches and correlation to gel properties, 66: 1-14. |
| [123] | Melissa G., Bauman D. and Anthony H. (2003). Carbohydrates polymer as adhesives. Forests products laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-forest service, Winsconsin, USA. |
| [124] | Abed, M. H., Abbas, I. S., Hamed, M., & Canakci, H. (2022). Rheological, fresh, and mechanical properties of mechanochemically activated geopolymer grout: A comparative study with conventionally activated geopolymer grout. Construction and Building Materials, 322, 126338. |
| [125] | Sotannde O. A., Oluwadare A. O., Ogedoh O. I, and Adeogun P. F. (2012). “Evaluation of Cement-Bonded Particle Board Produced from Afzelia africana Wood Residues”. Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 7 (6): 732-43. |
| [126] | Tako, M., Tamaki, Y., Teruya, T., & Takeda, Y. (2014). The principles of starch gelatinization and retrogradation. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2014. |
| [127] | Zhongli H., Andy W., Lee C., Douglas R. and Chung Y. (2007). Effect of cement/wood ratios and wood storage conditions on hydration temperature, hydration time, and compressive strength of wood-cement mixtures. Wood and fiber science, 19 (3): 262-268. |
| [128] | Anazodo U. N. and Norris E. R. (1981). Effects of genetic and cultural, on the mechanical properties of corncobs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 26: 97-107. |
| [129] | Oberwinkler B. (2011). Modeling the fatigue crack growth behavior of Ti-6Al-4V by considering grain size and stress ratio. Materials Science and Engineering, 528 (18): 5983-5992. |
| [130] | Saheb D. N. and Jog J. P. (1999). Natural fibre polymer composites; a review. Advances in polymer technology, 18 (4): 351-363. |
| [131] | Villalba, J. C., Constantino, V. R., & Anaissi, F. J. (2010). Iron oxyhydroxide nanostructured in montmorillonite clays: Preparation and characterization. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 349 (1), 49-55. |
APA Style
Olaoluwa Ayobami Ogunkunle, Titilope Temidayo Olugbenga, Oluwamumiyo Dorcas Adeojo. (2023). Effect of the Physicochemical Properties of Starch Adhesives on the Mechanical Properties of Composites from Cellulosic Materials Doped with Rust. Composite Materials, 7(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12
ACS Style
Olaoluwa Ayobami Ogunkunle; Titilope Temidayo Olugbenga; Oluwamumiyo Dorcas Adeojo. Effect of the Physicochemical Properties of Starch Adhesives on the Mechanical Properties of Composites from Cellulosic Materials Doped with Rust. Compos. Mater. 2023, 7(1), 7-18. doi: 10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12
AMA Style
Olaoluwa Ayobami Ogunkunle, Titilope Temidayo Olugbenga, Oluwamumiyo Dorcas Adeojo. Effect of the Physicochemical Properties of Starch Adhesives on the Mechanical Properties of Composites from Cellulosic Materials Doped with Rust. Compos Mater. 2023;7(1):7-18. doi: 10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12,
author = {Olaoluwa Ayobami Ogunkunle and Titilope Temidayo Olugbenga and Oluwamumiyo Dorcas Adeojo},
title = {Effect of the Physicochemical Properties of Starch Adhesives on the Mechanical Properties of Composites from Cellulosic Materials Doped with Rust},
journal = {Composite Materials},
volume = {7},
number = {1},
pages = {7-18},
doi = {10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cm.20230701.12},
abstract = {The study examined the potential use of starch obtained from cassava and yam sources for the production of stable industrial adhesives that can be utilized in the production of composites. Cassava and yam tubers used in the study were obtained from Mowe and Ile-Ife (both in southwestern Nigeria) and washed free of sand and impurities before sun-drying. Starch and protein were then extracted from the cassava and yam tubers. The results indicated that both cassava and yam starches were suitable for this purpose. However, the particle size of the starch granules was found to be an important factor in determining the physicochemical properties of the adhesive. Composites produced with cassava starch adhesive were found to be more resistant to moisture than those produced with yam starch. Additionally, cassava adhesive was able to utilize more lignocellulosic fibers while still maintaining stability, provided that its limit was not exceeded. Furthermore, the addition of 2% metal additive (Fe3+ ions) improved the properties of the composites through coordination. Cassava starch-based composites were found to exhibit higher crystallinity than those produced with yam starch. The adhesive produced from these starch samples was found to be competitive with formaldehyde-based resins, with the added advantage of being non-toxic and capable of neutralizing the protons of acids with their excessive hydroxyl groups. Overall, the use of these cellulosic materials in the production of composites presents an environmentally friendly solution to the problem of waste and pollution. The study findings suggest that the starting materials are inexpensive, widely available, and environmentally friendly, and that they can produce products of greater economic importance.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of the Physicochemical Properties of Starch Adhesives on the Mechanical Properties of Composites from Cellulosic Materials Doped with Rust AU - Olaoluwa Ayobami Ogunkunle AU - Titilope Temidayo Olugbenga AU - Oluwamumiyo Dorcas Adeojo Y1 - 2023/05/25 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12 DO - 10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12 T2 - Composite Materials JF - Composite Materials JO - Composite Materials SP - 7 EP - 18 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7103 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cm.20230701.12 AB - The study examined the potential use of starch obtained from cassava and yam sources for the production of stable industrial adhesives that can be utilized in the production of composites. Cassava and yam tubers used in the study were obtained from Mowe and Ile-Ife (both in southwestern Nigeria) and washed free of sand and impurities before sun-drying. Starch and protein were then extracted from the cassava and yam tubers. The results indicated that both cassava and yam starches were suitable for this purpose. However, the particle size of the starch granules was found to be an important factor in determining the physicochemical properties of the adhesive. Composites produced with cassava starch adhesive were found to be more resistant to moisture than those produced with yam starch. Additionally, cassava adhesive was able to utilize more lignocellulosic fibers while still maintaining stability, provided that its limit was not exceeded. Furthermore, the addition of 2% metal additive (Fe3+ ions) improved the properties of the composites through coordination. Cassava starch-based composites were found to exhibit higher crystallinity than those produced with yam starch. The adhesive produced from these starch samples was found to be competitive with formaldehyde-based resins, with the added advantage of being non-toxic and capable of neutralizing the protons of acids with their excessive hydroxyl groups. Overall, the use of these cellulosic materials in the production of composites presents an environmentally friendly solution to the problem of waste and pollution. The study findings suggest that the starting materials are inexpensive, widely available, and environmentally friendly, and that they can produce products of greater economic importance. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: