Program evaluation is an applied science which importance for accountability, efficacy and effectiveness of public policies makes consensus among scientific researchers. So, in developed countries, especially North America’ ones, it is a professional domain with professional associations, standards of practices and development of tools nurturing and improving continuously practices. The goal of this paper is to show that in French speaking African countries, inexistence or bad functioning of a formal frame of exercise and development of the practice impede the evaluation findings to achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. In fact, in most African French-speaking countries like Benin, amateurism is standard gold. Program evaluation in this context is practiced by managers and technocratic civil servants for all sectors who, with their specific experience in their domain, think they were able to judge program in implementation. So, in these conditions of inexistence of formal training in evaluation and standards of practices, the evaluation practice is marked by defects like unrespect of evaluators ‘independence, the glaring conflict of interest, the low rate of evaluation findings utilization, and so one. This result is so evident in Benin because, we know the non-professionalization of a sensitive domain, like education in program evaluation, can lead to disastrous consequences. So, it is urgent that improving evaluation quality and credibility needs a setup of formal framework of practice with qualified trainings, continuous trainings and experiences sharing and to setup standards of practices. The contribution of the most developed program evaluation communities of North America especially those of Canada would bewelcome.
Published in | Central African Journal of Public Health (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16 |
Page(s) | 189-192 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Evaluation, Professionalization, Public Policies, Effectiveness, Accountability
[1] | Champagne F, Contandriopoulos A-P, Brousselle A, et al. L’évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: concepts et méthodes. In: L’Évaluation: Concepts et méthodes. Montréal, Québec, Canada: PUM, 2009, pp. 35–56. |
[2] | Abbot A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, 1988. |
[3] | Bamberger M. The Evaluation of International Development Programs: A View from the Front. American Journal of Evaluation 2000; 21: 95–102. |
[4] | Chaplowe S, Engo-Tjéga R. Civil Society Organizations and Evaluation: Lessons from Africa. Evaluation 2007; 2: 257–275. |
[5] | Scriven M. The nature of evaluation. In: Hard-Won Lessons in Program Evaluation. Vancouver: Jossey-Bass publishers, 1993, pp. 5–48. |
[6] | Chelimsky E. Integrating evaluation units into the political environment of government: The role of evaluation policy. New Directions for Evaluation 2009; 2009: 51–66. |
[7] | Leviton LC. Presidential Address: Building Evaluation’s Collective Capacity. American Journal of Evaluation 2001; 22: 1–12. |
[8] | Baradei LE, Abdelhamid D, Wally N. Institutionalising and streamlining development monitoring and evaluation in post-revolutionary Egypt: A readiness primer. African Evaluation Journal 2014; 2: 16. |
[9] | Patel M. African Evaluation Guidelines. African Evaluation Journal 2013; 1: 5. |
[10] | Rogers PJ. Review of ‘Evaluation management in South Africa and Africa’. African Evaluation Journal 2015; 3: 4. |
[11] | Lomeña-Gelis M. Evaluation development in Senegal. African Evaluation Journal 2013; 1: 8. |
[12] | Beyer JM, Trice HM. The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. Administrative Science Quarterly 1982; 27: 591–622. |
[13] | Stake B. How Far Dare an Evaluator Go Toward Saving the World? American Journal of Evaluation 2004; 25: 103–107. |
[14] | Schwartz R, Mayne J. Assuring the quality of evaluative information: theory and practice. Evaluation and Program Planning 2005; 28: 1–14. |
[15] | Love A, Russon C. Evaluation standards in an international context. New Directions for Evaluation 2004; 2004: 5–14. |
[16] | Adams J, Dickinson P. Evaluation Training to Build Capability in the Community and Public Health Workforce. American Journal of Evaluation 2010; 31: 421–433. |
[17] | Desharnais G. La professionnalisation: entre la protection du public et l’intérêt des professionnels. Maitrise en Droit, Université de Montréal, https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/2350 (2006, accessed 27 March 2021). |
APA Style
Togbedji Maurice Agonnoude, Sègbegnon David Houeto, Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou, Maxime Agbo, Luc Behanzin, et al. (2021). Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy. Central African Journal of Public Health, 7(4), 189-192. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16
ACS Style
Togbedji Maurice Agonnoude; Sègbegnon David Houeto; Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou; Maxime Agbo; Luc Behanzin, et al. Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy. Cent. Afr. J. Public Health 2021, 7(4), 189-192. doi: 10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16
AMA Style
Togbedji Maurice Agonnoude, Sègbegnon David Houeto, Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou, Maxime Agbo, Luc Behanzin, et al. Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy. Cent Afr J Public Health. 2021;7(4):189-192. doi: 10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16
@article{10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16, author = {Togbedji Maurice Agonnoude and Sègbegnon David Houeto and Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou and Maxime Agbo and Luc Behanzin and Corine Yessito Houehanou}, title = {Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy}, journal = {Central African Journal of Public Health}, volume = {7}, number = {4}, pages = {189-192}, doi = {10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cajph.20210704.16}, abstract = {Program evaluation is an applied science which importance for accountability, efficacy and effectiveness of public policies makes consensus among scientific researchers. So, in developed countries, especially North America’ ones, it is a professional domain with professional associations, standards of practices and development of tools nurturing and improving continuously practices. The goal of this paper is to show that in French speaking African countries, inexistence or bad functioning of a formal frame of exercise and development of the practice impede the evaluation findings to achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. In fact, in most African French-speaking countries like Benin, amateurism is standard gold. Program evaluation in this context is practiced by managers and technocratic civil servants for all sectors who, with their specific experience in their domain, think they were able to judge program in implementation. So, in these conditions of inexistence of formal training in evaluation and standards of practices, the evaluation practice is marked by defects like unrespect of evaluators ‘independence, the glaring conflict of interest, the low rate of evaluation findings utilization, and so one. This result is so evident in Benin because, we know the non-professionalization of a sensitive domain, like education in program evaluation, can lead to disastrous consequences. So, it is urgent that improving evaluation quality and credibility needs a setup of formal framework of practice with qualified trainings, continuous trainings and experiences sharing and to setup standards of practices. The contribution of the most developed program evaluation communities of North America especially those of Canada would bewelcome.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy AU - Togbedji Maurice Agonnoude AU - Sègbegnon David Houeto AU - Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou AU - Maxime Agbo AU - Luc Behanzin AU - Corine Yessito Houehanou Y1 - 2021/07/08 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16 DO - 10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16 T2 - Central African Journal of Public Health JF - Central African Journal of Public Health JO - Central African Journal of Public Health SP - 189 EP - 192 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5781 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20210704.16 AB - Program evaluation is an applied science which importance for accountability, efficacy and effectiveness of public policies makes consensus among scientific researchers. So, in developed countries, especially North America’ ones, it is a professional domain with professional associations, standards of practices and development of tools nurturing and improving continuously practices. The goal of this paper is to show that in French speaking African countries, inexistence or bad functioning of a formal frame of exercise and development of the practice impede the evaluation findings to achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. In fact, in most African French-speaking countries like Benin, amateurism is standard gold. Program evaluation in this context is practiced by managers and technocratic civil servants for all sectors who, with their specific experience in their domain, think they were able to judge program in implementation. So, in these conditions of inexistence of formal training in evaluation and standards of practices, the evaluation practice is marked by defects like unrespect of evaluators ‘independence, the glaring conflict of interest, the low rate of evaluation findings utilization, and so one. This result is so evident in Benin because, we know the non-professionalization of a sensitive domain, like education in program evaluation, can lead to disastrous consequences. So, it is urgent that improving evaluation quality and credibility needs a setup of formal framework of practice with qualified trainings, continuous trainings and experiences sharing and to setup standards of practices. The contribution of the most developed program evaluation communities of North America especially those of Canada would bewelcome. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -