A field experiment was carried out during the 2020–2021 growing season to examine how the sweet potato responded to various doses of organic and inorganic fertilizer. The treatment included three levels of farmyard waste and four levels of nitrogen fertilizers (0, 40, 70, and 100 kg N ha-1) (0, 5and 10 FYM t ha-1). The experiment was performed three times and set up using a Randomized Complete Block Design in a factorial layout. Software called SAS (version 9.3) was used to examine the data. The findings showed that the majority of the growth, yield, and yield components were significantly (P 0.01) impacted by the application of N and farmyard manure fertilizers. The highest and lowest vine lengths measured were 160.23 and 112.17 cm, respectively. Other measurements included shoot fresh weight (1009.6 and 109.8 g hill-1), shoot dry weight (141.35 and 61.6 g hill-1), days of bud sprouting (13.27 and 6.34), days of physiological maturity (147.8 and 119), number of branches per plant (7.30 and 4.28), harvest index (0.36 and 0.28%), biomass yield (1009.2 and 579.7), tuberous storage tuber diameter (22.5 and 15.6 cm), total tuber yield (22.45 and 7.05 tha-1), marketable tuber yield (21.85 and 7.65 tha-1), unmarketable tuber yield (3.25 and 0.31 t/ha), marketable storage tuber number (3.2 and 0.83), and un marketable tuber number (0.38 and 0.02) were obtained from 10t ha-1farmyard manure plus 100 kgha-1 N fertilizer. However, the above-mentioned factors were countered by the number of branches per plant, the quantity of unmarketable tubers, and the yield of unmarketable tubers. In conclusion, the findings showed that the application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manure might improve the growth, production, and yield components of sweet potatoes. To get more trustworthy data, though, additional research must be done in various environments and at various times of the year while taking fertilizer rates for nitrogen and FYM into account.
Published in | American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 13, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12 |
Page(s) | 9-16 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Farmyard Manure, Fertilizers, Harvest Index, Nitrogen, Sweet Potato
Treatments | Growth parameter and Phenological variables | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYM (t ha-1) | N (kg ha-1) | VL | SHFW | SHDW | DBS | DPM | NBPP |
0 | 0 | 112.17i | 109.8e | 61.6g | 13.27a | 119g | 4.28i |
40 | 135.05f | 625efg | 121.0cde | 12.00b | 126.3ef | 5.56g | |
70 | 144.44e | 755.0cd | 128.8abc | 9.6cd | 133.8c | 6.28de | |
100 | 153.33bc | 758.3cd | 114.8ab | 7.58ef | 140.3bc | 6.73c | |
5 | 0 | 118.55h | 609fg | 113.6ed | 12.47b | 127f | 5.04h |
40 | 138.38f | 616.3fg | 119.5cde | 10.18c | 130.6de | 5.68f | |
70 | 148.50de | 710.3cdef | 128.2bcd | 9.26d | 134.5c | 6.48cd | |
100 | 153.43b | 870 b | 139a | 6.88fg | 142.3b | 7.06b | |
10 | 0 | 121.3g | 655.2defg | 111.2e | 13.17b | 129.1def | 5.36g |
40 | 132.12f | 718cde | 127bcd | 11.01cd | 132.3d | 5.98ef | |
70 | 151.23cd | 780.0bc | 135.3ab | 8.75e | 135.8c | 6.52c | |
100 | 160.23a | 1009.6a | 141.35a | 6.34g | 147.8a | 7.30a | |
LSD (0.05) | 6.03 | 8.2 | 10.3 | 0.45 | 2.45 | 1.26 | |
CV % | 4.27 | 5.87. | 4.34 | 5.23 | 2.33 | 3.34 |
Treatments | Yield parameter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYM t ha-1 | N Kgha-1 | TSTD | HI | BMY |
0 | 0 | 15.6e | 0.28f | 579.7f |
40 | 16.3d | 0.31e | 741.9d | |
70 | 21.0bc | 0.31cde | 628.8f | |
100 | 20cd | 0.32bcda | 671.0f | |
5 | 0 | 18.2d | 0.30e | 592.0f |
40 | 19.7bc | 0.31de | 741.8d | |
70 | 18.2cd | 0.32cde | 791c | |
100 | 21.4ab | 0.33bc | 776.9c | |
10 | 0 | 20.2abc | 0.31de | 703.3de |
40 | 18.8bcd | 0.33de | 708.3de | |
70 | 21.8abc | 0.34ab | 928b | |
100 | 22.5a | 0.36a | 1009.2a | |
LSD (0.05) | 3.2 | 0.073 | 34.6 | |
CV % | 7.8 | 5.56 | 7.65 |
Treatments | Yield parameter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYM (t ha-1) | N (kg ha-1) | TTY | MTY | UMTY | MSTN | UMSTN |
0 | 0 | 7.05g | 7.65g | 3.25a | 0.83g | 0.38a |
40 | 12.56ef | 11ef | 1.85bcd | 1.86ef | 0.28bcd | |
70 | 15.2cd | 13.05cde | 2.46b | 2.12cde | 0.33b | |
100 | 16cd | 14.2cde | 1.85bcd | 2.12cde | 0.31bcd | |
5 | 0 | 11f | 9f | 1.97bc | 1.57f | 0.25bc |
40 | 15.85de | 13.89de | 1.58bcd | 2.1de | 0.26bcd | |
70 | 17.33bc | 16.56cde | 1.72bcd | 2.37cd | 0.29bcd | |
100 | 20.0ab | 18.34ab | 1.54cd | 3.05ab | 0.21d | |
10 | 0 | 13.75ef | 11.95ef | 1.30d | 1.75ef | 0.21cd |
40 | 16.23cde | 14.55cde | 1.34d | 2.12cde | 0.21cd | |
70 | 21.44bc | 18.45bc | 1.27d | 2.76bc | 0.22cd | |
100 | 22.45a | 21.85a | 0.31e | 3.2a | 0.02e | |
LSD (0.05) | 4.76 | 5.90 | 2.11 | 3.22 | 1.30 | |
CV % | 6.25 | 7.90 | 13.23 | 8.89 | 9.16 |
P | Phosphorus |
T | Tone |
Ha | Hectare |
Kg | Kilogram |
CM | Compost |
[1] | Som, D., (2007): Handbook of horticulture. New Delhi, India Council of Agricultural Research, Pp 512-416. |
[2] | FAOSTAT (2019). Food Agriculture and Organization (FAOSTAT). Retrieved. |
[3] | FAO and WFP (Food and Agriculture Organization, International Fund for Agricultural Development, and World Food Program)., 2014: The state of food insecurity in the world 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. |
[4] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency)., 2018: Ethiopian Agricultural Sample Enumeration, 2015. Report on area and production of major crops, Volume I, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[5] | Abdissa, T., Dechassa, N. and Alemayehu, Y., 2012: Sweet potato growth parameters as affected by farmyard manure and phosphorus application at Adami Tulu, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agricultural Science Research Journal, Pp 2: 1-12. |
[6] | Boru M, W/Tsadik K, Tana T (2017) Effects of Application of Farmyard Manure and Inorganic Phosphorus on Tuberous Root Yield and Yield Related Traits of Sweet Potato [Ipomoea batatas] (L.). |
[7] | Kareem, I., 2013. Fertilizer treatment effects on yield and quality parameters of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). 40-49. |
[8] | Kidane, G. Abegaz, K., Mulugeta, A. and Singh. P., 2013: Nutritional analysis of vitamin A enriched bread from orange flesh Sweet potato and locally available wheat flours at Samre Woreda, Northern Ethiopia. Current Research in Nutrition and Food ScieAnce Journal, 1: 49-57. |
[9] | Teshome, A, Nigussie. D., and Yibekal. A., 2012: Sweet Potato Growth Parameters as Affected by Farmyard Manure and Phosphorus Application at Adami Tulu, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 2: 1 – 12. |
[10] | Zelalem, A., Tekalign, T. and Nigussie, D., 2009: Response of sweet potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisols at Debre Berhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Afr JPlant Sci., 3: 16-24. |
[11] | Hati. K. M., A. Swarup, A. K. Dwivedi, A. K. Misra, and K. K. Bandyopahhyay. (2007). Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 119: 127–134. |
[12] | Koroto, S., Tana, D., & Gedamu, D. (2019). Effect of farmyard manure and mineral NP fertilizers on yield related traits and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Areka, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Ornamental Plants, 5(1), 074-085. |
[13] | Ambecha, O., 2001: Influence of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the yield and yield components and some quality traits of two sweet potatoes [Ipomoea batatas (L)] cultivars. An MSc thesis presented to the school of graduate studies, Alemaya University. |
[14] | Girma Abera, 2001. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on yield, yield components and tuber quality of two potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum L.) on Nitosols in Bako Area. M. Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture. Ethiopia. 124p. |
[15] | Saluzzo, J. A., Echeverria, H. E., Andrade, F. and M. Matoria, 1999. Seca Y de tuberculose de papa (cv. Huinkul Mag en repusta a la fertilization nitrogenada en Balcarce (Argentina). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, 70: 81-89. |
[16] | Gezahegn G, Andergachew G, Kelsa K (2014) Combined effects of inorganic (NP) and farm yard manure fertilizers on root yield and above ground biomass of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (l.) Lam.) at Delbo watershed Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews 3: 28-33. |
[17] | Mujtaba S, Mohammadreza S, Mohammad T (2013) Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and vermicompost on vegetative growth, yield and NPK uptake by tuber of potato (Agria CV.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5: 2033-2040. |
[18] | Abdissa, Y., Tekalign, T. and Pant, L. M., 2011. Growth, bulb yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisol I. growth attribute biomass production and bulb yield. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(14), pp. 3252-3258. |
[19] | Busha, A., 2006: Effect of N and P Application and Seedbed Types on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Content of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) Grown in West Wollega (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya University). |
[20] | Palm, C. A., Myers R. J. K., and Nandwa S. M. 1997. Combined use of organic and inorganic nutrient source for soil fertility maintenance and replenishment. In: Buresh et al (Eds.). Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. Special publication No. 51. Wisconsin, USA. 193-217. |
[21] | Sidhu, A. S, Thind, S. S. Sekhon, N. K., Hira, G. S. (2007). Effect of Farmyard Manure and P application to potato on available P and Crop Yield of Potato-Sunflower Sequence. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 3: 5-15. |
[22] | Ayoola OT, Makinde EA (2008) Performance of green maize and soil nutrient changes with fortified cow dung. African Journal of Plant Science 2: 19- 22. |
APA Style
Deme, A. H., Erandufa, B. A. (2025). Response of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Variety to Nitrogen and Farmyard Manure Fertilizer Application in Mulo District, Ethiopia. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 13(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12
ACS Style
Deme, A. H.; Erandufa, B. A. Response of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Variety to Nitrogen and Farmyard Manure Fertilizer Application in Mulo District, Ethiopia. Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2025, 13(1), 9-16. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12
@article{10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12, author = {Alemu Hailu Deme and Biratu Abeshu Erandufa}, title = {Response of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Variety to Nitrogen and Farmyard Manure Fertilizer Application in Mulo District, Ethiopia }, journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, pages = {9-16}, doi = {10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.20251301.12}, abstract = {A field experiment was carried out during the 2020–2021 growing season to examine how the sweet potato responded to various doses of organic and inorganic fertilizer. The treatment included three levels of farmyard waste and four levels of nitrogen fertilizers (0, 40, 70, and 100 kg N ha-1) (0, 5and 10 FYM t ha-1). The experiment was performed three times and set up using a Randomized Complete Block Design in a factorial layout. Software called SAS (version 9.3) was used to examine the data. The findings showed that the majority of the growth, yield, and yield components were significantly (P 0.01) impacted by the application of N and farmyard manure fertilizers. The highest and lowest vine lengths measured were 160.23 and 112.17 cm, respectively. Other measurements included shoot fresh weight (1009.6 and 109.8 g hill-1), shoot dry weight (141.35 and 61.6 g hill-1), days of bud sprouting (13.27 and 6.34), days of physiological maturity (147.8 and 119), number of branches per plant (7.30 and 4.28), harvest index (0.36 and 0.28%), biomass yield (1009.2 and 579.7), tuberous storage tuber diameter (22.5 and 15.6 cm), total tuber yield (22.45 and 7.05 tha-1), marketable tuber yield (21.85 and 7.65 tha-1), unmarketable tuber yield (3.25 and 0.31 t/ha), marketable storage tuber number (3.2 and 0.83), and un marketable tuber number (0.38 and 0.02) were obtained from 10t ha-1farmyard manure plus 100 kgha-1 N fertilizer. However, the above-mentioned factors were countered by the number of branches per plant, the quantity of unmarketable tubers, and the yield of unmarketable tubers. In conclusion, the findings showed that the application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manure might improve the growth, production, and yield components of sweet potatoes. To get more trustworthy data, though, additional research must be done in various environments and at various times of the year while taking fertilizer rates for nitrogen and FYM into account. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Response of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Variety to Nitrogen and Farmyard Manure Fertilizer Application in Mulo District, Ethiopia AU - Alemu Hailu Deme AU - Biratu Abeshu Erandufa Y1 - 2025/04/22 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12 DO - 10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12 T2 - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering JF - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering JO - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering SP - 9 EP - 16 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5893 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251301.12 AB - A field experiment was carried out during the 2020–2021 growing season to examine how the sweet potato responded to various doses of organic and inorganic fertilizer. The treatment included three levels of farmyard waste and four levels of nitrogen fertilizers (0, 40, 70, and 100 kg N ha-1) (0, 5and 10 FYM t ha-1). The experiment was performed three times and set up using a Randomized Complete Block Design in a factorial layout. Software called SAS (version 9.3) was used to examine the data. The findings showed that the majority of the growth, yield, and yield components were significantly (P 0.01) impacted by the application of N and farmyard manure fertilizers. The highest and lowest vine lengths measured were 160.23 and 112.17 cm, respectively. Other measurements included shoot fresh weight (1009.6 and 109.8 g hill-1), shoot dry weight (141.35 and 61.6 g hill-1), days of bud sprouting (13.27 and 6.34), days of physiological maturity (147.8 and 119), number of branches per plant (7.30 and 4.28), harvest index (0.36 and 0.28%), biomass yield (1009.2 and 579.7), tuberous storage tuber diameter (22.5 and 15.6 cm), total tuber yield (22.45 and 7.05 tha-1), marketable tuber yield (21.85 and 7.65 tha-1), unmarketable tuber yield (3.25 and 0.31 t/ha), marketable storage tuber number (3.2 and 0.83), and un marketable tuber number (0.38 and 0.02) were obtained from 10t ha-1farmyard manure plus 100 kgha-1 N fertilizer. However, the above-mentioned factors were countered by the number of branches per plant, the quantity of unmarketable tubers, and the yield of unmarketable tubers. In conclusion, the findings showed that the application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manure might improve the growth, production, and yield components of sweet potatoes. To get more trustworthy data, though, additional research must be done in various environments and at various times of the year while taking fertilizer rates for nitrogen and FYM into account. VL - 13 IS - 1 ER -