Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia

Amanu Nuguse

doi:doi:10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia

Amanu Nuguse

Published in Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3)

Received: 23 April 2022 Accepted: 28 May 2022 Published: 8 June 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Animal welfare means animal production systems, transport and slaughter of animals, all situations where the perception of animal welfare differs from one region and culture to another, from one person to another. The study was conducted in Bishoftu with the objective of assessingthe community attitude and general awareness toward animals’ welfare. Out of 400 interviewees, only 26 of them were clear with animal welfare concept, 180 of them said they have little knowledge and 194 of them didn’t be heard animal welfare. Majority (92.8%) ofrespondents were never looking for information regarding to animals and the rest 7.8% were uses only three type ofsources (internet, discussion and books). About 50.8% of participants were treating their animal by themselves in a traditional way, while 49.2% of them were calling/advising veterinarians when their animals become sick. About 28.8% of respondentswere perform different action for different purpose. Majority (61.75%) of interviewees were desired to be more informed while, 31% possess at least some familiarities with the condition, or partially interested and only 7.25% of them were not desired to know more about animal welfare. This survey showed animals undergo suffering in various areas of human use and there is less animal welfare consideration, poor animal welfare understanding and there is awareness creation gap and keeping animals under conditions for which they are not genetically suited. In summary, farm animal welfare is not recognized and more efforts are needed to improve the public conception to animal welfare in general.

Published in	Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
Page(s)	61-67
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Animal Welfare, Community, Perception Bishoftu, Awareness

References

[1]	American Veterinary MedicalAssociation (AVMA, 2011). Annual conventionpartnership to promote preventive care of animal, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[2]	Asebe G., Gelayenew B. and Kumar A. 2016. The General Status of Animal Welfare in Developing Countries: The Case of Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Science Technology 7: 332.
[3]	Bekele, T. 2009. An overview on animal welfare situation in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4]	Bimrew, A. 2014. Farm Animal Welfare and Handling in the Tropics: The Ethiopia Case. Department of Animal Production & Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
[5]	Bracke, M. B. M. 2009. Animal welfare in a global perispective. Dutch ministry of agriculture, nature and food quality.
[6]	Broom, D. M. 2003. The evolution of morality and religion (pp. 259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7]	Broom, D. M. 2011. A history of animal welfare science.
[8]	Burrell, A. and B. Vrieze. 2003. "Ethical motivation of Dutch egg consumers." Tijdschrift voor sociaal wetenschappelijk onderzoek voor de landbouw 18 (1): 30-42.
[9]	CSA 2008: Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 142.
[10]	CSA, 2006. Central Statistical Authority, agricultural sample survey, Report on livestock and livestock charachteristics 2004/2005 (1998 E.C). Stastical biotypes suitable for the development of snail bulletin 361. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[11]	CSA, 2015. Populations of all Ethiopia all cities and town. Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia.
[12]	Dawkins, M. S. 1990: From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behav. Brain Sci. (13) 1-61.
[13]	Duncan, I. J. H. and Petherick, J. C. 1993. The implications of cognitiveprocesses for animal welfare. J. Anim. Sci. (69) 5017-5018.
[14]	European Commission, 2006. Attitudes of EU citizens towardsanimal welfare.
[15]	Fraser, D. 2008. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester.
[16]	Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A. and Milligan, B. N. 1997. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 174-186.
[17]	Fraser. D and I. J. H. Duncan, “‘Pleasures’, ‘Pains’ and animal welfare: toward a natural history of affect animal Welfare, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 383–396, 1998.
[18]	Getahun, A. 2016. The general status of animal welfare in developing countries: The case of Ethiopia.
[19]	Herzog, H. (2010). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: Why it's so hard to think straight about animals. New York, NY: Harper. ISBN: 9780061730863.
[20]	Marie, B. 2012. The history of animal welfare law and the future of animal rights.
[21]	Mihreteab B., Bashanun G., Mulualem T., Wondimu Z., Desta G., Tigist M., Alemneh T., Daniel M. 2013. Assessment of human aspect regarding the welfare of cart horses: perispective of Jima town. Research Journal of Veterinary Science 6 (1): 1-10.
[22]	MSA, 2002. Weather condition report.
[23]	OIE, 2011. Sub-regional representation for southern Africa animal welfare in OIE member and territories.
[24]	Rollin, B. E. (1993): Animal welfare, science and value. Agriculture environmental ethics, 6 (2) 44-50.
[25]	Vanhonacker, F., W. Verbeke, Van Poucke, E. and Tuyttens, F. 2007. Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?
[26]	Verhue, D. and Verzeijden, D. 2003. Citizens’ judgement about livestock production, results of apublic research. Research paper. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Veldkamp.
[27]	WVA, 2014. Position on the role of the veterinarian in animal welfare.
[28]	You, X., Li, Y., Zhang, M., Yan, H. and Zhao, R. 2014. A Survey of Chinese Citizens’ Perceptions on Farm Animal Welfare.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Amanu Nuguse. (2022). Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 10(3), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Amanu Nuguse. Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 10(3), 61-67. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Amanu Nuguse. Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia. Anim Vet Sci. 2022;10(3):61-67. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13,
  author = {Amanu Nuguse},
  title = {Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia},
  journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {61-67},
  doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20221003.13},
  abstract = {Animal welfare means animal production systems, transport and slaughter of animals, all situations where the perception of animal welfare differs from one region and culture to another, from one person to another. The study was conducted in Bishoftu with the objective of assessingthe community attitude and general awareness toward animals’ welfare. Out of 400 interviewees, only 26 of them were clear with animal welfare concept, 180 of them said they have little knowledge and 194 of them didn’t be heard animal welfare. Majority (92.8%) ofrespondents were never looking for information regarding to animals and the rest 7.8% were uses only three type ofsources (internet, discussion and books). About 50.8% of participants were treating their animal by themselves in a traditional way, while 49.2% of them were calling/advising veterinarians when their animals become sick. About 28.8% of respondentswere perform different action for different purpose. Majority (61.75%) of interviewees were desired to be more informed while, 31% possess at least some familiarities with the condition, or partially interested and only 7.25% of them were not desired to know more about animal welfare. This survey showed animals undergo suffering in various areas of human use and there is less animal welfare consideration, poor animal welfare understanding and there is awareness creation gap and keeping animals under conditions for which they are not genetically suited. In summary, farm animal welfare is not recognized and more efforts are needed to improve the public conception to animal welfare in general.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia
AU  - Amanu Nuguse
Y1  - 2022/06/08
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
T2  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
JF  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
JO  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
SP  - 61
EP  - 67
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5850
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
AB  - Animal welfare means animal production systems, transport and slaughter of animals, all situations where the perception of animal welfare differs from one region and culture to another, from one person to another. The study was conducted in Bishoftu with the objective of assessingthe community attitude and general awareness toward animals’ welfare. Out of 400 interviewees, only 26 of them were clear with animal welfare concept, 180 of them said they have little knowledge and 194 of them didn’t be heard animal welfare. Majority (92.8%) ofrespondents were never looking for information regarding to animals and the rest 7.8% were uses only three type ofsources (internet, discussion and books). About 50.8% of participants were treating their animal by themselves in a traditional way, while 49.2% of them were calling/advising veterinarians when their animals become sick. About 28.8% of respondentswere perform different action for different purpose. Majority (61.75%) of interviewees were desired to be more informed while, 31% possess at least some familiarities with the condition, or partially interested and only 7.25% of them were not desired to know more about animal welfare. This survey showed animals undergo suffering in various areas of human use and there is less animal welfare consideration, poor animal welfare understanding and there is awareness creation gap and keeping animals under conditions for which they are not genetically suited. In summary, farm animal welfare is not recognized and more efforts are needed to improve the public conception to animal welfare in general.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Amanu Nuguse

College of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, Haramay, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Amanu Nuguse. (2022). Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 10(3), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Amanu Nuguse. Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 10(3), 61-67. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Amanu Nuguse. Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia. Anim Vet Sci. 2022;10(3):61-67. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13,
  author = {Amanu Nuguse},
  title = {Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia},
  journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {61-67},
  doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20221003.13},
  abstract = {Animal welfare means animal production systems, transport and slaughter of animals, all situations where the perception of animal welfare differs from one region and culture to another, from one person to another. The study was conducted in Bishoftu with the objective of assessingthe community attitude and general awareness toward animals’ welfare. Out of 400 interviewees, only 26 of them were clear with animal welfare concept, 180 of them said they have little knowledge and 194 of them didn’t be heard animal welfare. Majority (92.8%) ofrespondents were never looking for information regarding to animals and the rest 7.8% were uses only three type ofsources (internet, discussion and books). About 50.8% of participants were treating their animal by themselves in a traditional way, while 49.2% of them were calling/advising veterinarians when their animals become sick. About 28.8% of respondentswere perform different action for different purpose. Majority (61.75%) of interviewees were desired to be more informed while, 31% possess at least some familiarities with the condition, or partially interested and only 7.25% of them were not desired to know more about animal welfare. This survey showed animals undergo suffering in various areas of human use and there is less animal welfare consideration, poor animal welfare understanding and there is awareness creation gap and keeping animals under conditions for which they are not genetically suited. In summary, farm animal welfare is not recognized and more efforts are needed to improve the public conception to animal welfare in general.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Community Perception Toward Animal’s Welfare in Bishoftu, Centeral Ethiopia
AU  - Amanu Nuguse
Y1  - 2022/06/08
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
T2  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
JF  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
JO  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
SP  - 61
EP  - 67
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5850
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221003.13
AB  - Animal welfare means animal production systems, transport and slaughter of animals, all situations where the perception of animal welfare differs from one region and culture to another, from one person to another. The study was conducted in Bishoftu with the objective of assessingthe community attitude and general awareness toward animals’ welfare. Out of 400 interviewees, only 26 of them were clear with animal welfare concept, 180 of them said they have little knowledge and 194 of them didn’t be heard animal welfare. Majority (92.8%) ofrespondents were never looking for information regarding to animals and the rest 7.8% were uses only three type ofsources (internet, discussion and books). About 50.8% of participants were treating their animal by themselves in a traditional way, while 49.2% of them were calling/advising veterinarians when their animals become sick. About 28.8% of respondentswere perform different action for different purpose. Majority (61.75%) of interviewees were desired to be more informed while, 31% possess at least some familiarities with the condition, or partially interested and only 7.25% of them were not desired to know more about animal welfare. This survey showed animals undergo suffering in various areas of human use and there is less animal welfare consideration, poor animal welfare understanding and there is awareness creation gap and keeping animals under conditions for which they are not genetically suited. In summary, farm animal welfare is not recognized and more efforts are needed to improve the public conception to animal welfare in general.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download