The sole purpose of a hive is to encourage the bees to construct their nests in such a way that it is easy to manage and maintain them. The study was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center to evaluate the performances of honeybee colonies, honey yield and cost incurred in both horizontal beehives as compare to movable frame beehive. A total of 12 honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera bandasii) were established and assigned into four treatment groups. All the established honeybee colonies were managed in uniform manner until they are established properly and acquire uniform strength. Data on bee population, brood area, pollen and nectar stored areas were recorded using Liebefeld method (frame unit area, 10 x10 cm2) at every 21 days. In addition, data on average honey yield per harvest/colony, production costs and profit were recorded for each treatment during the study period. All the recorded data were organized by Microsoft excel and analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis of variance ANOVA of SAS software version 20. Results revealed that there was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between Tensheratach beehive, Modern beehive and Bacho beehive with regarding to honey yield. The highest mean honey yield per hive (24.81±3.24 kg/hive) was recorded from Tensheratach beehive followed by Modern beehive (21.51±2.36 kg/hive) and Bacho beehive (17.3±1.43 kg/hive). Significantly greatest adult bee population, brood area, pollen and nectar stored areas were also recorded from Tensharatech beehive compare to Modern beehive and Bacho beehive. The total costs of production and economic returns of Tensheratach beehive were higher than Modern beehive and Bacho beehive. From this study, it is possible to recommend that Tensheratach beehive can be used as an alternative beehive technology for honey production with full packages in addition to modern beehive.
Published in | Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13 |
Page(s) | 28-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Honeybee, Hive Type, Brood Area, Production Cost, Honey Yield
[1] | Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center metrological data: 1998. |
[2] | Awraris Getachew, Amenay Assefa, HailemariamGizaw, Nuru Adgaba, Dejene Assefa, Zerihun Tajebe and Asrat Tera. 2015. Comparative Analysis of Colony Performance and Profit from Different Beehive Types in Southwest Ethiopia, Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research 3 (1): 178-185. |
[3] | Beyene Tadesse and David Phillips, 2007. Ensuring Small Scale Producers in Ethiopia to Achieve Sustainable and Fair Access to Honey Markets. Paper Prepared for International Development Enterprises (IDE) and Ethiopian Society for Appropriate Technology (ESAT). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Pp 1-64. |
[4] | Bhusal S. J., Thapa R. B.: Response of colony strength to honey production: regression and correlation analysis. J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2006, 27, 133-137. |
[5] | FAO. 2009. Bees and their role in forest livelihoods. A guide to the services provided by bees and the sustainable harvesting, processing and marketing of their products. Rome. |
[6] | Gemechis, L. (2015). Honey Production and Marketing in Ethiopian. American Journal of Life Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 42-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20150301.18. |
[7] | Gezahegne Tadesse, 2001. Beekeeping (In Amharic), Mega Printer Enterprise: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[8] | HBRC. 1997. (Holeta Bee Research Center). Beekeeping Training Manual (unpublished), HBRC, Holeta, Ethiopia. |
[9] | Harbo J. R.: Effect of brood rearing on honey consumption and the survival of worker honey bees. J. Apic. Res. 1993, 32. (1), 11-1. |
[10] | Kerealem, E., Tilahun, G., and Preston, R, 2009. Constraints and Prospects for Apiculture Research and Development in Amhara Region, Andassa Livestock Research Center, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Available at: [accessed on 23/08/2014]. |
[11] | Keller, I., Fluri, P. and Imdorf, A. (2005). Pollen nutrition and colony development in honey bees Part II. Bee World. 86 (2): 27-34. www.ibra.org.uk |
[12] | Neupane K. R., Woyke J., Wilde J.: Effect of initial strength of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) supered in different way for maximizing honey production in Nepal. J. Apicul. Sci. 2012, 56 (2), 5-15. |
[13] | Nuru, A. 2007. Atlas of pollen grains of major honey bee flora of Ethiopia, Holeta Bee Research Center, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, and the Netherlands International Development Organization. |
[14] | Nuru Adgaba, 2002. Geographical Races of the Honeybees (Apis Mellifera L.) of the Northern Regions of Ethiopia. PhD. Dissertation. Rhodes University, South Africa. |
[15] | Shawer, M. B., Z, Shenishen and N. M. El-Dakhakhni, 1986. Effect of colony strength on flight activity and productivity of honey bee colonies. Bull. Soc. Ent. Egypt, 66: 65-73. |
[16] | Szabo, T. and Lefkovitch, L. (1989) Effect of brood production and population size on honey production of honeybee colonies in Alberta, Canada. Apidologie 20: 157- 163. |
[17] | United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 2012. Agricultural Growth Program-Agribusiness and Market Development (AGP-AMDe) Project. Available at: [accessed on 2/8/2014]. |
[18] | Workneh, A., R. Puskur, and R. S. Karippai. 2008. Adopting improved box hive in Atsbi Wemberta district of Eastern Zone, Tigray Region: Determinants and financial benefits. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers project working paper 10. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. |
APA Style
Taye Beyene, Mekonen Woldetsadik, Desta Abi. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Frame Beehives at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center of Oromia, Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 10(2), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13
ACS Style
Taye Beyene; Mekonen Woldetsadik; Desta Abi. Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Frame Beehives at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center of Oromia, Ethiopia. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 10(2), 28-32. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13
AMA Style
Taye Beyene, Mekonen Woldetsadik, Desta Abi. Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Frame Beehives at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center of Oromia, Ethiopia. Anim Vet Sci. 2022;10(2):28-32. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13
@article{10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13, author = {Taye Beyene and Mekonen Woldetsadik and Desta Abi}, title = {Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Frame Beehives at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center of Oromia, Ethiopia}, journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {28-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20221002.13}, abstract = {The sole purpose of a hive is to encourage the bees to construct their nests in such a way that it is easy to manage and maintain them. The study was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center to evaluate the performances of honeybee colonies, honey yield and cost incurred in both horizontal beehives as compare to movable frame beehive. A total of 12 honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera bandasii) were established and assigned into four treatment groups. All the established honeybee colonies were managed in uniform manner until they are established properly and acquire uniform strength. Data on bee population, brood area, pollen and nectar stored areas were recorded using Liebefeld method (frame unit area, 10 x10 cm2) at every 21 days. In addition, data on average honey yield per harvest/colony, production costs and profit were recorded for each treatment during the study period. All the recorded data were organized by Microsoft excel and analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis of variance ANOVA of SAS software version 20. Results revealed that there was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between Tensheratach beehive, Modern beehive and Bacho beehive with regarding to honey yield. The highest mean honey yield per hive (24.81±3.24 kg/hive) was recorded from Tensheratach beehive followed by Modern beehive (21.51±2.36 kg/hive) and Bacho beehive (17.3±1.43 kg/hive). Significantly greatest adult bee population, brood area, pollen and nectar stored areas were also recorded from Tensharatech beehive compare to Modern beehive and Bacho beehive. The total costs of production and economic returns of Tensheratach beehive were higher than Modern beehive and Bacho beehive. From this study, it is possible to recommend that Tensheratach beehive can be used as an alternative beehive technology for honey production with full packages in addition to modern beehive.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Frame Beehives at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center of Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Taye Beyene AU - Mekonen Woldetsadik AU - Desta Abi Y1 - 2022/04/20 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13 DO - 10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13 T2 - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JF - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JO - Animal and Veterinary Sciences SP - 28 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5850 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20221002.13 AB - The sole purpose of a hive is to encourage the bees to construct their nests in such a way that it is easy to manage and maintain them. The study was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center to evaluate the performances of honeybee colonies, honey yield and cost incurred in both horizontal beehives as compare to movable frame beehive. A total of 12 honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera bandasii) were established and assigned into four treatment groups. All the established honeybee colonies were managed in uniform manner until they are established properly and acquire uniform strength. Data on bee population, brood area, pollen and nectar stored areas were recorded using Liebefeld method (frame unit area, 10 x10 cm2) at every 21 days. In addition, data on average honey yield per harvest/colony, production costs and profit were recorded for each treatment during the study period. All the recorded data were organized by Microsoft excel and analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis of variance ANOVA of SAS software version 20. Results revealed that there was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between Tensheratach beehive, Modern beehive and Bacho beehive with regarding to honey yield. The highest mean honey yield per hive (24.81±3.24 kg/hive) was recorded from Tensheratach beehive followed by Modern beehive (21.51±2.36 kg/hive) and Bacho beehive (17.3±1.43 kg/hive). Significantly greatest adult bee population, brood area, pollen and nectar stored areas were also recorded from Tensharatech beehive compare to Modern beehive and Bacho beehive. The total costs of production and economic returns of Tensheratach beehive were higher than Modern beehive and Bacho beehive. From this study, it is possible to recommend that Tensheratach beehive can be used as an alternative beehive technology for honey production with full packages in addition to modern beehive. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -