| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparative Study on Prevalence of Major Reproductive Health Problems of Indigenous and Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia

Received: 7 December 2020     Accepted: 21 April 2021     Published: 29 April 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The objective of the current study was to assess the major reproductive health problems and associated risk factors of dairy cattle in and around Jimma town, South–Western Ethiopia in the current study; out of 343 cows investigated (28%) were found to be positive for at least one reproductive health problems. The major reproductive health problems identified in the current study were retained fetal membrane (8.75%), abortion (7%), dystocia (6.4%), vaginal prolapsed (2.2%), still birth (2.0%), anestrous (0.6%), prolonged calving (0.6%) and repeat breeding (0.6%). The association was statistically significant (p<0.05). The prevalence of major reproductive health problems were found to be 3.72 times higher in Kersa and 1.43 times higher in Dedo district than Jimma town, while in Agaro and Saka were 0.5 and 0.95 times lower than Jimma town and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.029). Furthermore, cross breed cows were 0.55 times less likely prone to reproductive health problems than local breeds and the difference statistically significant (P=0.01). The multi-parous cows were 1.4 times more vulnerable to reproductive health problems than primiparous (P=0.007). Body condition score was also significantly contributing to the presence of reproductive health problems (P=.011). Current study revealed that major reproductive health problems are responsible for the low reproductive performance of dairy cows in the study area. Therefore, creating awareness among farm owners and animal attendants concerning reproductive health problems and their prevention mechanisms, as well as further study on identifying the specific causative agents were recommended of reproductive health problems should be conducted.

Published in Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12
Page(s) 39-45
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cross Breeds, Dairy Cow, Ethiopia, Indigenous, Jimma Zone, Reproductive Health Problem

References
[1] Central Statistical Authority (CSA) (2012). Agricultural sample survey. Volume II: Report on livestock and livestock characteristics. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[2] Shiferaw Y, Tenhagen BA, Bekana M, Kassa T (2005). Reproductive disorders of cross bred dairy cows in the central highlands of Ethiopia and their effect on reproductive performance. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 37 (5): 427-441.
[3] Lobago F, Bekana M, Gustafsson H, Kindahl H (2006). Reproductive performances of dairy cows in s mallholder production system in Selalle, Central Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 38 (4): 333-342.
[4] Hurrissa B, Eshetu J (2002). Challenges and opportunities of livestock marketing in Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 1-13.
[5] Arthur GH, Noakes DE, Pearson H, Perkinson TJ (1996). Veterinary reproduction and obstetrics. Theriogenology 4th ed. Bailliere Tindal. Great Britain. pp. 291-301. Available at: https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=9013413207&sarchurl=kn%3Darthurs%2Bveterinary%2Breproduction%2Band%2Bobstetrics%2Bdavid%2Be%2Bnoakes%26sortby%3D17&cm_sp=snip pet-_-srp1-_-title9
[6] Robert SJ (2000). Veterinary Obstetrics and genital diseases. Theriogenology 5th ed. Edwards‟Brothers, INC., Michigan, Pp. 48-104.
[7] Erb HN, Martin SW (1980). Interrelationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows. Age and seasonal patterns. J. Dairy Sci. 63 (11): 1918-1924.
[8] Juyal PD, Bal MS, Singla LD (2011) Economic impact, diagnostic investigations and management of protozoal abortions in farm animals. In: All India SMVS‟ Dairy Business Directory 11: 39-46.
[9] Msangi BSJ, Bryant MJ, Thorne PJ (2005). Some factors affecting variation in milk yield in crossbred dairy cows on smallholder farms in North-east Tanzania. Trop. Health Prod. 37 (5): 403-412.
[10] Bureau of Planning and Economic Development of Oromia Regional State (BPEDORS) (2000). Physical and Socio-Economical Profile of 180 District of Oromia Region. Bureau of Planning and Economic Development, Council of Regional State of Oromiya. Ethiopia. Available at: http://library.ecsu.edu.et/cgi-bin/koha/opacdetail.pl?biblionumber=13192
[11] Central Statistical Authority (CSA) (2008/2009). Agricultural Sample Survey 2008/2009 [2001 E.C.]. Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Private Peasant Holdings), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. P 120.
[12] Thrusfield M (2005). Veterinary Epidemiology. 3rded. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 345-356.
[13] Nicholson MJ, Butterworth MH (1986). A guide to condition scoring of zebu cattle. International Livestock Ceneter for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 1-5. Available at: http://www.delavidaboran.co.za/temp/article_A%20Guide%20to%20C ondition%20Score%20of%20Zebu%20Cattle%20Pg1.pdf
[14] Bitew M, Prasad S (2011). Study on major reproductive health problems in indigenous and cross breed cows in and around Bedelle, South West Ethiopia. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10: 723-727.
[15] Gashaw A, Worku F, Mulugeta S (2011). Assessment of Small Holder Dairy Production System and Their Reproductive Health Problems in Jimma Town, Southwestern Ethiopia. Available at: http://www.jarvm.com/articles/Vol9Iss1/Vol9%20Iss1Gashaw.pdf
[16] Hadush A, Abdella A and Regassa F (2013). Major pre-partum and postpartum reproductive problems of dairy cattle in Central Ethiopia. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health 5 (4): 118-123.
[17] Temesgen A, Tegegn G (2015). Incidence of major clinical reproductive health problems of dairy cows at Bako livestock research farm over a two-year period (September 2008-December 2010). Anim. Vet. Sci. 3 (6): 158-165.
[18] Mamo T (2004). “Study on major postpartum reproductive problems of smallholder dairy cows in and around DebreZeit. DVM Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, DebreZeit, Ethiopia,” unpublished.
[19] Adane H, Yisehak T, Niguse T (2014). Assessment of major reproductive disorders of dairy cattle in Urban and Per-Urban area of Hosanna, Southern Ethiopia. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2 (5): 135-141.
[20] Tesfaye D, Shamble A (2013). Reproductive health problems of cows under different management systems in Kombolcha, Noetheast Ehiopia. Adv. Biomed. Res. 7: 104-108.
[21] Getachew E, Nibret M (2014). Department of veterinary clinical studies, faculty of veterinary medicine, University of Gondor, Gondor, Ethiopia. 13 (4): 444-449.
[22] Noakes DE (1986). Fertility and Obstetrics in Cattle Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 28-30.
[23] Kidusan K (2009). “Study on major reproductive disorders of dairy cattle in and around Wukro, DVM Thesis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mekelle University, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia,” unpublished.
[24] Molalegn and Shiv (2013): Study on Major Reproductive Health Problems in Indigenous and Cross breed cows in and around Bedelle, South West Ethiopia, Journl of Animal Health and Veterinary Advances 10 (6): 723-727.
[25] Benti AD, Zewdie W (2014). Major reproductive health problems of indigenous Borena cows in Ethiopia. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 1 (4): 182-188.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Galana Abaya, Assefa Kebede, Kula Jilo. (2021). A Comparative Study on Prevalence of Major Reproductive Health Problems of Indigenous and Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 9(2), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Galana Abaya; Assefa Kebede; Kula Jilo. A Comparative Study on Prevalence of Major Reproductive Health Problems of Indigenous and Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2021, 9(2), 39-45. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Galana Abaya, Assefa Kebede, Kula Jilo. A Comparative Study on Prevalence of Major Reproductive Health Problems of Indigenous and Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Anim Vet Sci. 2021;9(2):39-45. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12,
      author = {Galana Abaya and Assefa Kebede and Kula Jilo},
      title = {A Comparative Study on Prevalence of Major Reproductive Health Problems of Indigenous and Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia},
      journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {39-45},
      doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20210902.12},
      abstract = {The objective of the current study was to assess the major reproductive health problems and associated risk factors of dairy cattle in and around Jimma town, South–Western Ethiopia in the current study; out of 343 cows investigated (28%) were found to be positive for at least one reproductive health problems. The major reproductive health problems identified in the current study were retained fetal membrane (8.75%), abortion (7%), dystocia (6.4%), vaginal prolapsed (2.2%), still birth (2.0%), anestrous (0.6%), prolonged calving (0.6%) and repeat breeding (0.6%). The association was statistically significant (p<0.05). The prevalence of major reproductive health problems were found to be 3.72 times higher in Kersa and 1.43 times higher in Dedo district than Jimma town, while in Agaro and Saka were 0.5 and 0.95 times lower than Jimma town and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.029). Furthermore, cross breed cows were 0.55 times less likely prone to reproductive health problems than local breeds and the difference statistically significant (P=0.01). The multi-parous cows were 1.4 times more vulnerable to reproductive health problems than primiparous (P=0.007). Body condition score was also significantly contributing to the presence of reproductive health problems (P=.011). Current study revealed that major reproductive health problems are responsible for the low reproductive performance of dairy cows in the study area. Therefore, creating awareness among farm owners and animal attendants concerning reproductive health problems and their prevention mechanisms, as well as further study on identifying the specific causative agents were recommended of reproductive health problems should be conducted.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Comparative Study on Prevalence of Major Reproductive Health Problems of Indigenous and Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia
    AU  - Galana Abaya
    AU  - Assefa Kebede
    AU  - Kula Jilo
    Y1  - 2021/04/29
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12
    T2  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    JF  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    JO  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    SP  - 39
    EP  - 45
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5850
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210902.12
    AB  - The objective of the current study was to assess the major reproductive health problems and associated risk factors of dairy cattle in and around Jimma town, South–Western Ethiopia in the current study; out of 343 cows investigated (28%) were found to be positive for at least one reproductive health problems. The major reproductive health problems identified in the current study were retained fetal membrane (8.75%), abortion (7%), dystocia (6.4%), vaginal prolapsed (2.2%), still birth (2.0%), anestrous (0.6%), prolonged calving (0.6%) and repeat breeding (0.6%). The association was statistically significant (p<0.05). The prevalence of major reproductive health problems were found to be 3.72 times higher in Kersa and 1.43 times higher in Dedo district than Jimma town, while in Agaro and Saka were 0.5 and 0.95 times lower than Jimma town and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.029). Furthermore, cross breed cows were 0.55 times less likely prone to reproductive health problems than local breeds and the difference statistically significant (P=0.01). The multi-parous cows were 1.4 times more vulnerable to reproductive health problems than primiparous (P=0.007). Body condition score was also significantly contributing to the presence of reproductive health problems (P=.011). Current study revealed that major reproductive health problems are responsible for the low reproductive performance of dairy cows in the study area. Therefore, creating awareness among farm owners and animal attendants concerning reproductive health problems and their prevention mechanisms, as well as further study on identifying the specific causative agents were recommended of reproductive health problems should be conducted.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Veterinary Biotechnology, Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Veterinary Biotechnology, Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Veterinary Epidemiology, Addis Ababa University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Bishoftu, Ethiopia

  • Sections