Growth rate assessment is an important husbandry practice often carried out in livestock breeding and fattening. Meat production is the most important trait in the breeding objectives of sheep production. Useful information on the suitability of the animals for meat production could be evaluated on a morphological basis. The aim of this study was to investigate breed differences in liveweight, carcass traits and muscle distribution for meat characteristics among Balami (BA), Uda (UD), Yankasa (YK) and West African Dwarf rams (WAD). A total of forty-eight rams were randomly assigned into four groups of twelve rams per breed in a completely randomized design. Body linear measurements were obtained weekly during the fattening period. At the end of the feeding trial, animals were subjected to an 18-hours fast and slaughtered for carcass measurements and muscle distribution. Results showed that BA and UD had higher values for body length (115.75±4.25 and110.25±1.89cm), withers height (70.50±5.57and69.00±2.16cm) and heartgirth (92.00±2.94and84.00±1.41cm), than YK (96.50±3.87, 60.75±3.30 and 76.75±0.96cm), respectively which in turn had higher values than WAD (86.50±5.20, 53.25±5.32 and 75.25±3.30cm). Carcass length, pistol length, and leg length were75.75±4.79,60.75±7.14 and 88.00±2.16; 75.50±4.66, 56.00±5.00 and 80.25±5.80; 59.00±7.79, 56.00±10.62 and 71.50±2.65; 60.50±3.11, 53.75±5.91 and 61.00±2.94cm for BA, UD, YK and WAD rams, respectively. BA and UD had higher proportion of muscle distribution and were generally better than the YK and WAD breeds. This may boost their potential for large scale meat production under fattening conditions.
Published in |
Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 5)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Promoting Animal and Veterinary Science Research |
DOI | 10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14 |
Page(s) | 110-116 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hindquarter, Meat, Fattening, Carcass, Pistola, Muscle Distribution
[1] | Agboola, M. O and Balcilar M. (2012). Impact of Food Security on Urban Poverty: A Case Study of Lagos State, Nigeria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol62 (1995): 1225–1229. |
[2] | Karim, S. A. and Rawat, P. S. (1997). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of lambs raised on varying levels of roughage and concentrate. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 67: 902-905. |
[3] | Hernández-Castellano L. E, Morales-dela Nuez A, Moreno-Indias I, Torres A, Sánchez-Macias D, Capote J, Castro N, Argüello A. (2013). Carcass and meat quality determination as a tool to promote local meat consumption in outer most regions of Europe. J Appl Anim Res. 41: 269–276. |
[4] | Yakubu, A. (2010). Fixing multi collinearity instability in the prediction of body weight from morphometric traits of White Fulani cows. J. Cent. Eur. Agr., 11 (4): 487-92. |
[5] | Bee, G, Anderson, A. L, Lonergan, S. M, Huff-Lonergan, E. (2007) Rate and extent of Ph decline affect proteolysis of cytoskeletal proteins and water-holding capacity in pork. Meat Science 76, 359–365. |
[6] | Srivastava, V. K, Raizada, B. O. And Kulkarni, V. A (1968). Carcass quality of Barbari and Jamnapari type goats. Indian Veterinary Journal 45: 219-225. |
[7] | De Boer, H.,B. L. Dumont, R. W. Pomeroy, and J. H. Weniger. (1974). Reference method for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Manual on E. A. A. P. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1: 151–164. |
[8] | MS1500. (2009). Halal food. Production, preparation, handling and storage general guideline. Department of Standards Malaysia; p.1–13. |
[9] | Williams, D. R. And Bergström, P. L. (1980). Anatomical Jointing, Tissue Separation and Weight Recording: E E C Standard Method for Beef, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels Eur 6878 E N, ISBN 070841716. |
[10] | Robelin, J. and Geay, Y. (1975). Estimation dela composition dela carcasse destaurillon sápartir dela composition dela 6 acôte. Bull. Tech. CRZVINRATheix22, 41–43. |
[11] | Purchas, R. W, Davies, A. S, Abdullah, A. Y. (1991). An objective measure of muscularity: changes with animal growth and differences between genetic lines of Southdown sheep. Meat Science, v.30, p.81-94. |
[12] | Purchas, R. W., Morris, S. T. & Grant, D. A., (1992). A comparison of characteristics of the carcasses from Friesian, Piedmontese X Friesian, and Belgian Blue X Friesian bulls. N. Z.J. Agric. Res. 35, 401–409. |
[13] | Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (1999). SAS/STAT. The SAS system for windows, Release 6. 12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N C, USA. |
[14] | Lavvaf, A., Noshari A and Farahvash, T. (2012). Evaluation of the relationship between body measurements and carcass traits of finishing afshari and zandi rams. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7: 187-192. |
[15] | Riva, J., Rizzi, R., Marelli, S., Cavalchini, G. (2002). Body Measurements in Bergamasca Sheep, Small Ruminant Research, 221-227. |
[16] | Sañudo, C., Sanchez, A., and Alfonso, M. (1980c). Small ruminant production systems and factors affecting lamb meat quality. Meat Science, 49 (Suppl.1), 29–64. |
[17] | Thwaites C. J, Yeates N. T. M, Pogue R. F. (1964). Objective appraisal of intact lamb and mutton carcasses. J Agric Sci. 63: 415–420. |
[18] | Negussie, E., Rottmann, O. J., Pirchner, F. And Rege, J. E. O., (2003). Patterns of growth and partitioning of fat depots in tropical fat-tailed Menz and Horro sheep breeds. Meat Sci. 64, 491-498. |
[19] | Cloete, J. J. E, Hoffman, L. C, Cloete, S. W. P. (2012). A comparison between slaughter traits and meat quality of various sheep breeds: Wool, dual-purpose and mutton. Meat Sci; 91: 318-24. |
[20] | Berg, R., and Walters, L., (1983). The meat animal: Changes and challenges. J. Anim. Sci. 57, 133-146. |
[21] | Colomer-Rocher F, Bass, J. J and Johnson, D. L (1980). Beef carcass conformation and some relationship with carcass composition and muscle dimensions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 697–708. |
[22] | Lodge, G. A. (1989). The University experience and per-spective. First International Symposium on Agriculture and Fisheries Development in Oman. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat. |
[23] | Assan, N (2013) Bio prediction of body weight and carcass parameters from morphometric measurements in livestock and poultry. Sci J Rev 2: 140–150. |
[24] | Abbasi, M. A. and Ghafouri-Kesbi, F. (2011) Genetic (co) variance components for body weight and body measurements in Makooei Sheep.Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 24 (6): 739-743. |
APA Style
Akinleye Sule Bamidele, Luka Sabo James, Afolabi Kolawole Daniel, Akinsola Saheed Olatunde, Adeyemi Saheed Abimbade. (2020). Morphological Indices and Carcass Measurements of Indigenous Breeds of Rams Intensively Fattened. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 8(5), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14
ACS Style
Akinleye Sule Bamidele; Luka Sabo James; Afolabi Kolawole Daniel; Akinsola Saheed Olatunde; Adeyemi Saheed Abimbade. Morphological Indices and Carcass Measurements of Indigenous Breeds of Rams Intensively Fattened. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 8(5), 110-116. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14
AMA Style
Akinleye Sule Bamidele, Luka Sabo James, Afolabi Kolawole Daniel, Akinsola Saheed Olatunde, Adeyemi Saheed Abimbade. Morphological Indices and Carcass Measurements of Indigenous Breeds of Rams Intensively Fattened. Anim Vet Sci. 2020;8(5):110-116. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14
@article{10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14, author = {Akinleye Sule Bamidele and Luka Sabo James and Afolabi Kolawole Daniel and Akinsola Saheed Olatunde and Adeyemi Saheed Abimbade}, title = {Morphological Indices and Carcass Measurements of Indigenous Breeds of Rams Intensively Fattened}, journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences}, volume = {8}, number = {5}, pages = {110-116}, doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20200805.14}, abstract = {Growth rate assessment is an important husbandry practice often carried out in livestock breeding and fattening. Meat production is the most important trait in the breeding objectives of sheep production. Useful information on the suitability of the animals for meat production could be evaluated on a morphological basis. The aim of this study was to investigate breed differences in liveweight, carcass traits and muscle distribution for meat characteristics among Balami (BA), Uda (UD), Yankasa (YK) and West African Dwarf rams (WAD). A total of forty-eight rams were randomly assigned into four groups of twelve rams per breed in a completely randomized design. Body linear measurements were obtained weekly during the fattening period. At the end of the feeding trial, animals were subjected to an 18-hours fast and slaughtered for carcass measurements and muscle distribution. Results showed that BA and UD had higher values for body length (115.75±4.25 and110.25±1.89cm), withers height (70.50±5.57and69.00±2.16cm) and heartgirth (92.00±2.94and84.00±1.41cm), than YK (96.50±3.87, 60.75±3.30 and 76.75±0.96cm), respectively which in turn had higher values than WAD (86.50±5.20, 53.25±5.32 and 75.25±3.30cm). Carcass length, pistol length, and leg length were75.75±4.79,60.75±7.14 and 88.00±2.16; 75.50±4.66, 56.00±5.00 and 80.25±5.80; 59.00±7.79, 56.00±10.62 and 71.50±2.65; 60.50±3.11, 53.75±5.91 and 61.00±2.94cm for BA, UD, YK and WAD rams, respectively. BA and UD had higher proportion of muscle distribution and were generally better than the YK and WAD breeds. This may boost their potential for large scale meat production under fattening conditions.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Morphological Indices and Carcass Measurements of Indigenous Breeds of Rams Intensively Fattened AU - Akinleye Sule Bamidele AU - Luka Sabo James AU - Afolabi Kolawole Daniel AU - Akinsola Saheed Olatunde AU - Adeyemi Saheed Abimbade Y1 - 2020/09/28 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14 DO - 10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14 T2 - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JF - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JO - Animal and Veterinary Sciences SP - 110 EP - 116 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5850 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200805.14 AB - Growth rate assessment is an important husbandry practice often carried out in livestock breeding and fattening. Meat production is the most important trait in the breeding objectives of sheep production. Useful information on the suitability of the animals for meat production could be evaluated on a morphological basis. The aim of this study was to investigate breed differences in liveweight, carcass traits and muscle distribution for meat characteristics among Balami (BA), Uda (UD), Yankasa (YK) and West African Dwarf rams (WAD). A total of forty-eight rams were randomly assigned into four groups of twelve rams per breed in a completely randomized design. Body linear measurements were obtained weekly during the fattening period. At the end of the feeding trial, animals were subjected to an 18-hours fast and slaughtered for carcass measurements and muscle distribution. Results showed that BA and UD had higher values for body length (115.75±4.25 and110.25±1.89cm), withers height (70.50±5.57and69.00±2.16cm) and heartgirth (92.00±2.94and84.00±1.41cm), than YK (96.50±3.87, 60.75±3.30 and 76.75±0.96cm), respectively which in turn had higher values than WAD (86.50±5.20, 53.25±5.32 and 75.25±3.30cm). Carcass length, pistol length, and leg length were75.75±4.79,60.75±7.14 and 88.00±2.16; 75.50±4.66, 56.00±5.00 and 80.25±5.80; 59.00±7.79, 56.00±10.62 and 71.50±2.65; 60.50±3.11, 53.75±5.91 and 61.00±2.94cm for BA, UD, YK and WAD rams, respectively. BA and UD had higher proportion of muscle distribution and were generally better than the YK and WAD breeds. This may boost their potential for large scale meat production under fattening conditions. VL - 8 IS - 5 ER -