The study assessed the productive performance of adult indigenous chicken from four Nigerian states of the North Central Zone namely; Nasarawa, Niger, Benue, Kogi and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Data were collected at both Out and On-station. The result showed that flock structure was in proportion of 28, 21.4, 23.2 and 27.5% for cock, hen, growers and chicks. Chi-square showed significant difference (P<0.001) by state. Clutch size ranged from 10.84±0.23 to 11.45±0.23 in FCT and Nasarawa state. On-station clutchsize was 13.11±0.23. There was significant difference (P<0.001) by site while state has similar values. Age at first egg, clutch number and hatchability did not vary significantly. However, there was significant difference (P<0.05) in Chick mortality which ranged from 43.19 to 53.89% in Benue and the FCT. On-stationmortality was 26.78%. Correlation coefficient between egg and production traits showed that most correlation traits were significant at 1%. Only number of chicks hatched, egg wasted, egg width and length and mortality were correlated at 5%. Some common diseases showed that Newcastle is the most prevalent 63.22%. Farmers attached a high preference to keeping male chicken for sale rather than breeding purposes. The high hatchability is an indication of good reproductive performance in the chickens of the study area. Improvement in management practices and vaccination against Newcastle disease should be adopted to curtail its devastating effect on indigenous chicken production in the study area.
Published in |
Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 3)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Promoting Animal and Veterinary Science Research |
DOI | 10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13 |
Page(s) | 60-64 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Clutch, Hatchability, Indigenous Chicken, Mortality, Body Weight, Disease
[1] | K. John (2018). Important factor affecting poultry egg production in poultry. agrihomeph.com https://blog.agrihomegh.com/poultry-egg-production |
[2] | Y. P. Mancha (2004). Characterization of Indigenous Chickens in Northern Part of the Jos Plateau. A Ph.D Thesis Animal Production Programme, School of Agriculture, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University. Bauchi. |
[3] | D. Tadelle, and B. Ogle (2001). Village poultry production systems in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health Production, 33 (6), 521-537. |
[4] | E. Brannangand S. Pearson (1990). Ethiopian Animal Husbandry, Uppsala, Sweden, P 127. |
[5] | S. S. I. Omeje,. and C. C. Nwosu, (1984). Heterosis and superiority in body weight and feed efficiency evaluation of exotic parent stock by indigenous chicken F1 crosses. Nigerian Journal of Genetics, 1: 11-26. |
[6] | G. Williamson and W. J. A. Payne (1978). An Introduction to Animal Husbandryin the Tropics, 4th Ed. LLB and Longman Group Limited, London. |
[7] | E. O., Otchere, A. T. Adeoye, J. O. Gefu, and A. A. Adenuyi, (1990). Preliminary observations on village chicken production in north-central Nigeria. In: Rural Poultry Production in Africa. Editor. Sonaiya, E. B. Proceedings of an International Workshop on Rural Poultry in Africa. Ile-Ife, Nigeria, 13-16 November, 1989. Pp 196-200. |
[8] | F. O. Ajayi, and B. O. Agaviebor, (2006). Fertility and hatchability performance of pure and crossbred indigenous chicken strains in the high rainforest zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Livestock production, 7 (12) 141-144. |
[9] | D. C. Deeming (1995). Large eggs: an incubation challenge. Poultry International. 35 (14): 50-54. |
[10] | Microsoft Encarta, (2008). Geography Search. |
[11] | BSN (Benue State of Nigeria), (1982). The Government and People of Benue State. Benue State Gazette. Benue State Ministry of Information. Onaiviprestery press. Pp 1-9. |
[12] | A. A., Amusan, A. Olayinka, and D. J. Oyedele, (2003). Characterization, classification and evaluation of soil Aeolian sand in the guinea savannah of Nigeria. Proceeding of the 47th Conference of Agricultural society of Nigeria. 24th to 28 October, 2003. Pp 374 -378. |
[13] | TAC (2002). Technical Air Command Makurdi. Meterological Station. Makurdi Weather Elements records. |
[14] | S. T. Mbap and H. Zakar,. (2000). Characterization of local chickens in Yobe State, Nigeria In: The Role of Agriculture in Poverty Alleviation. Abubakar, M. M., Adegbola, T. A. and Butswat, I. S. R. (Editors) Proceeding of the 34th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Society of Nigeria (ASN) October 15-19, 2000, Bauchi, Pp 126-131. |
[15] | J. K. Aichi (1995). Village chicken production systems in rural Africa: Household food security and gender issues; Food and Agricultural Organization. Animal Production and Health paper, 142: 25–57. |
[16] | I. Abdouand J. G. Bell (1992). Dynamique de la volaillevillageoisedans la region de kaita au Niger. In Village Poultry Production in Africa. Proceedings of an International Workshop Held in Rabat Morocco, 7 – 11. Pp. 6 – 11. |
[17] | D. R. Nawathe, and A. G. Lamorde, (1987). Newcastle disease and poultry farming in Nigeria. Journal of National Veterinary Research Institute, 7 (1-4). 7-10. |
[18] | S. A. Adedokun, and E. B. Sonaiya, (2001). Comparison of the performance of Nigerian indigenous chickens from three agro-ecological zones. Livestock Research forRural Development, 3 (2): 34-39. |
[19] | H. H. Mogesse, (2007). Phenotypic and genetic characterization of indigenous chicken population in Northwest Ethiopia. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Science. University of the Free-state, Bloemfontein, South Africa. |
[20] | M. Ali, M. Farooq, F. R. Durrani, N. Chand, K. Sarbiland, and A. Riaz, (2003). Egg production performance and prediction of standard limits for traits of economic importance inbroiler breeders. Journal of Poultry Science, 2 (4) 275-279. |
[21] | A. Barua, and Y. Yoshimura (1997). Rural poultry keeping in Bangladesh. World Poultry Science Journal, 53: 387- 394. |
[22] | P. L. M Msoffe, M. M. A. Mtambo, U. M. Minga, J. E. Olsen, H. R., Juul-Madesen, P. S Gwakisa,, et al. (2004). Productivity and reproductive performance of the free-range indigenous domestic fowl ecotypes in Tanzania. Livestock Research and Rural Development, 16 (9), 160-167. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/9/msof16067.htm |
[23] | R. T. Wilson, (1979). Studies on the livestock of southern Darfur, Sudan. Production of poultry under simulated traditional conditions. Tropical Animal Health Production. 11: 143-150. |
[24] | J. J. Okoh, A. I. Adeka, E. E Idogah, and M. I. Aku, (2010). The Effects of major gene on feather traits of local chickens in Benue State of Nigeria. In: Fast Tracking Animal Agriculture In A Challenging Economy. O. J. Babayemi; O. A. Abu; E. O. Ayeola (Editors). Proceeding of the Nigeria Society for Animal Production 35th Annual Conference, Ibadan, 2010, Pp 95-98. |
APA Style
Okoh Joseph Joseph, Haruna Alkali, Yakubu Ibrahim, Ma’aruf Bashir Sani, Bala Dafur, et al. (2020). Characteristics of Indigenous Chicken of the North Central Agro-ecological Zone of Nigeria. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 8(3), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13
ACS Style
Okoh Joseph Joseph; Haruna Alkali; Yakubu Ibrahim; Ma’aruf Bashir Sani; Bala Dafur, et al. Characteristics of Indigenous Chicken of the North Central Agro-ecological Zone of Nigeria. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 8(3), 60-64. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13
AMA Style
Okoh Joseph Joseph, Haruna Alkali, Yakubu Ibrahim, Ma’aruf Bashir Sani, Bala Dafur, et al. Characteristics of Indigenous Chicken of the North Central Agro-ecological Zone of Nigeria. Anim Vet Sci. 2020;8(3):60-64. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13
@article{10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13, author = {Okoh Joseph Joseph and Haruna Alkali and Yakubu Ibrahim and Ma’aruf Bashir Sani and Bala Dafur and Odiba Arome Abdulkadir and Torhemen Michael}, title = {Characteristics of Indigenous Chicken of the North Central Agro-ecological Zone of Nigeria}, journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, pages = {60-64}, doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20200803.13}, abstract = {The study assessed the productive performance of adult indigenous chicken from four Nigerian states of the North Central Zone namely; Nasarawa, Niger, Benue, Kogi and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Data were collected at both Out and On-station. The result showed that flock structure was in proportion of 28, 21.4, 23.2 and 27.5% for cock, hen, growers and chicks. Chi-square showed significant difference (P<0.001) by state. Clutch size ranged from 10.84±0.23 to 11.45±0.23 in FCT and Nasarawa state. On-station clutchsize was 13.11±0.23. There was significant difference (P<0.001) by site while state has similar values. Age at first egg, clutch number and hatchability did not vary significantly. However, there was significant difference (P<0.05) in Chick mortality which ranged from 43.19 to 53.89% in Benue and the FCT. On-stationmortality was 26.78%. Correlation coefficient between egg and production traits showed that most correlation traits were significant at 1%. Only number of chicks hatched, egg wasted, egg width and length and mortality were correlated at 5%. Some common diseases showed that Newcastle is the most prevalent 63.22%. Farmers attached a high preference to keeping male chicken for sale rather than breeding purposes. The high hatchability is an indication of good reproductive performance in the chickens of the study area. Improvement in management practices and vaccination against Newcastle disease should be adopted to curtail its devastating effect on indigenous chicken production in the study area.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Characteristics of Indigenous Chicken of the North Central Agro-ecological Zone of Nigeria AU - Okoh Joseph Joseph AU - Haruna Alkali AU - Yakubu Ibrahim AU - Ma’aruf Bashir Sani AU - Bala Dafur AU - Odiba Arome Abdulkadir AU - Torhemen Michael Y1 - 2020/06/28 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13 DO - 10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13 T2 - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JF - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JO - Animal and Veterinary Sciences SP - 60 EP - 64 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5850 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20200803.13 AB - The study assessed the productive performance of adult indigenous chicken from four Nigerian states of the North Central Zone namely; Nasarawa, Niger, Benue, Kogi and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Data were collected at both Out and On-station. The result showed that flock structure was in proportion of 28, 21.4, 23.2 and 27.5% for cock, hen, growers and chicks. Chi-square showed significant difference (P<0.001) by state. Clutch size ranged from 10.84±0.23 to 11.45±0.23 in FCT and Nasarawa state. On-station clutchsize was 13.11±0.23. There was significant difference (P<0.001) by site while state has similar values. Age at first egg, clutch number and hatchability did not vary significantly. However, there was significant difference (P<0.05) in Chick mortality which ranged from 43.19 to 53.89% in Benue and the FCT. On-stationmortality was 26.78%. Correlation coefficient between egg and production traits showed that most correlation traits were significant at 1%. Only number of chicks hatched, egg wasted, egg width and length and mortality were correlated at 5%. Some common diseases showed that Newcastle is the most prevalent 63.22%. Farmers attached a high preference to keeping male chicken for sale rather than breeding purposes. The high hatchability is an indication of good reproductive performance in the chickens of the study area. Improvement in management practices and vaccination against Newcastle disease should be adopted to curtail its devastating effect on indigenous chicken production in the study area. VL - 8 IS - 3 ER -