In the last years, it is evidenced of more remarkable way, an increment of the incidence of the cervical cancer and their lesions precursors in young patients. Conization, as an excisional method, is recommended in the treatment of high-grade epithelial lesions, as well as in the microinvasive stage of cervical cancer when satisfied parity has not yet been achieved. In Clinical Medicine, finding a balance between therapeutic effectiveness and iatrogenic intervention by exaggerated treatments is a challenge, a current scenario in which the probability of the appearance of residual lesions after conization is framed. Although factors related with the biggest probability of appearance of residual lesions are described in patient conizadas, models that demonstrate the interrelation between these variables don't exist; most of the studies are limited to the individual analysis of these factors. The current scientific evidences allow to state that the appearance of post-cone residual lesions is a multifactorial phenomenon dependent on elements related to the nature of the lesion, the surgical technique and the competence of the surgeon; even several of these predictive elements are interrelated in the same patient. The knowledge of these predictors factors of residual lesion, starting from the pattern of the three dimensions, allows to trace clinical and formative strategies of intervention.
Published in | Advances in Surgical Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14 |
Page(s) | 28-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Conization, Residual Injury, Predictive Factors
[1] | National Inter-Society Consensus on Uterine Cervical Cancer. Rev Argent Radiol 2017; 81 (2): 157-77. |
[2] | Merlos Gutiérrez AL, Vargas Espinosa JM, González González G, Martínez García M, Sereno Coló JA. Recurrence of cervical intraepithelial lesion in patients after cone resection with diathermic loop. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2016; 84 (2): 95-104. |
[3] | Moradel MA, Crespin MA, Aguilar O. Conization of the cervix in cervical pathology. Rev Med Hond. 1992; 60: 163-6. |
[4] | Bermejo W, Vadallares R, Arnais L. Behavior of Conization by Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Preneoplastic Cervical Lesions. Electronic Magazine Medical Archive of Camagüey 2007; 11 (3) [Internet]: http://www.amc.sld.cu/amc/2007/V11n32007/2205.htm] cited July 20, 2008. |
[5] | Martínez Hiriart BM, Acosta Fernández R, Barrios Rodríguez M, Carbajales León AI. Histological study of conization with diathermic loop in patients with cervical lesions. AMC [Internet]. 2010 Oct; 14 (5). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-02552010000500007&lng =en. Cited March 06, 2021. |
[6] | Jun-Yu C, Zhi-Ling W, Zhao-Yang W, Xing-Sheng Y. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization. Medicine 2018; 97: 41-8. |
[7] | Orellana R, Montero de Celis JC, Olguín F, Sánchez F, Muñoz J, Ramírez A, et al. Viral typing in conization follow-up: Prognostic role of the persistence of postcone HPV with loop. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2018; 83 (2): 130–8. |
[8] | Arbyn M, Redman CH, Verdoodt F, Kyrgiou M, Tzafetas M, Ghaem Maghami S, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 1665–79. |
[9] | Gosvig CF, Huusom LD, Andersen KK, et al. Long-term follow-up of the risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in HPV-negative women after conization. Int J Cancer 2015; 137: 2927-33. |
[10] | Noothong S, Inthasorn P, Warnnissorn M. Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2017; 56: 628-31. |
[11] | Menon S, Wusiman A, Boily MC, Kariisa M, Mabeya H, Luchters S, et al. Epidemiology of HPV genotypes among HIV positive women in Kenya: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11 (10): 1639-65. [Internet]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163965. |
[12] | Carcopino X, Mergui JL, Prendiville W, Taranger Charpin C, Boubli L. Treatment of intraepithelial neoplasms of the cervix: laser, cryotherapy, conization, resection with a diathermy loop. EMC - Gynecology-Obstetrics 2012. [Internet]: doi: 10.1016 / S1283-081X (12) 60837-6. |
[13] | Munro A, Leung Y, Spilsbury K, Stewart C, Semmens J, Codde J, et al. Comparison of cold knife with biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard? Gynecologic Oncology 2015; 137: 258-63. |
[14] | Carvajal Pliego JM, Torres Mendoza RS, González Enciso A, Pérez Montiel D, Lasad F, Cantú de León D. Factors associated with residual disease in the central cone. Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología 2015; 14 (1): 21–7. |
[15] | Manchanda R, Baldwin P, Crawford R, Vowler SL, Moseley R, Latimer J, Welton K, Shafi M. Effect of margin status on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence following LLETZ in women over 50 years. BJOG 2008; 115: 1238-42. |
[16] | Cui Y, SangiHaghpeykar H, Patsner B, Bump J, Williams Brown M, Binder G, et al. Prognostic value of endocervical sampling following loop excision of high grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecologic Oncology 2017; 144: 547–52. |
[17] | Munmany M, Marimon L, Cardona M, Nonell R, Juiz M, Astudillo R, et al. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen. BJOG 2017; 124: 495–502. |
[18] | Demarquet E, Mancini J, Preaubert L, Gondry J, Chevreau J, Lamblin G, et al. Risk factors of recurrent high-grade intraepithelial cervical lesion following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP): A multicentric prospective study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2019; 234: 132–81. |
[19] | Van der Marel J, Rodriguez A, del Pino M, van Baars R, Jenkins D, van de Sandt MM Et al. The value of endocervical curettage in addition to biopsies in women referred to colposcopy. J Lower Gen Tract Dis 2015; 19: 282-7. |
[20] | Grubman J, Lea J. Specimen Fragmentation and Outcomes of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures (LEEP) and Cold Knife Cone Biopsies (CKC) for Cervical Dysplasia. Gynecologic Oncology 2017; 147: 190-236. |
APA Style
Heenry Luis Davila Gomez, Lidia Esther Lorie Sierra, Zaskia Matos Rodriguez. (2021). Contextualization of the Study of Residual Lesions in Conized Patients. Advances in Surgical Sciences, 9(2), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14
ACS Style
Heenry Luis Davila Gomez; Lidia Esther Lorie Sierra; Zaskia Matos Rodriguez. Contextualization of the Study of Residual Lesions in Conized Patients. Adv. Surg. Sci. 2021, 9(2), 28-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14
AMA Style
Heenry Luis Davila Gomez, Lidia Esther Lorie Sierra, Zaskia Matos Rodriguez. Contextualization of the Study of Residual Lesions in Conized Patients. Adv Surg Sci. 2021;9(2):28-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14
@article{10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14, author = {Heenry Luis Davila Gomez and Lidia Esther Lorie Sierra and Zaskia Matos Rodriguez}, title = {Contextualization of the Study of Residual Lesions in Conized Patients}, journal = {Advances in Surgical Sciences}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {28-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ass.20210902.14}, abstract = {In the last years, it is evidenced of more remarkable way, an increment of the incidence of the cervical cancer and their lesions precursors in young patients. Conization, as an excisional method, is recommended in the treatment of high-grade epithelial lesions, as well as in the microinvasive stage of cervical cancer when satisfied parity has not yet been achieved. In Clinical Medicine, finding a balance between therapeutic effectiveness and iatrogenic intervention by exaggerated treatments is a challenge, a current scenario in which the probability of the appearance of residual lesions after conization is framed. Although factors related with the biggest probability of appearance of residual lesions are described in patient conizadas, models that demonstrate the interrelation between these variables don't exist; most of the studies are limited to the individual analysis of these factors. The current scientific evidences allow to state that the appearance of post-cone residual lesions is a multifactorial phenomenon dependent on elements related to the nature of the lesion, the surgical technique and the competence of the surgeon; even several of these predictive elements are interrelated in the same patient. The knowledge of these predictors factors of residual lesion, starting from the pattern of the three dimensions, allows to trace clinical and formative strategies of intervention.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Contextualization of the Study of Residual Lesions in Conized Patients AU - Heenry Luis Davila Gomez AU - Lidia Esther Lorie Sierra AU - Zaskia Matos Rodriguez Y1 - 2021/10/12 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14 T2 - Advances in Surgical Sciences JF - Advances in Surgical Sciences JO - Advances in Surgical Sciences SP - 28 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-6182 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20210902.14 AB - In the last years, it is evidenced of more remarkable way, an increment of the incidence of the cervical cancer and their lesions precursors in young patients. Conization, as an excisional method, is recommended in the treatment of high-grade epithelial lesions, as well as in the microinvasive stage of cervical cancer when satisfied parity has not yet been achieved. In Clinical Medicine, finding a balance between therapeutic effectiveness and iatrogenic intervention by exaggerated treatments is a challenge, a current scenario in which the probability of the appearance of residual lesions after conization is framed. Although factors related with the biggest probability of appearance of residual lesions are described in patient conizadas, models that demonstrate the interrelation between these variables don't exist; most of the studies are limited to the individual analysis of these factors. The current scientific evidences allow to state that the appearance of post-cone residual lesions is a multifactorial phenomenon dependent on elements related to the nature of the lesion, the surgical technique and the competence of the surgeon; even several of these predictive elements are interrelated in the same patient. The knowledge of these predictors factors of residual lesion, starting from the pattern of the three dimensions, allows to trace clinical and formative strategies of intervention. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -