Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan

Published in Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 2, Issue 4)

Received: 19 October 2016 Accepted: 1 November 2016 Published: 25 November 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This study examines the survival and dysfunctions of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Major objective of this study is to analysis functions and practical challenges of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. As well as it tries to find out the solutions which can be used to improve the effectiveness service of bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Bureaucracy is most important role in the world: implementation and formulation of policy, delegated legislation, administrative adjudication, importance to government and governing process, service to the people, etc. In contrast, it has earned a nick name for red tapism, nepotism, and corruption. This study is a qualitative research and data were collected mainly from secondary sources such as books, journals, newspapers, internet articles and relevant research articles. In Sri Lanka, public bureaucracy has earned bad name and ill will of the people, due to challenges of Public Administration Reforms (PAR), inefficiency and ineffectiveness public service delivery, dysfunction of constitutional arrangements, ineffectiveness of Public Service Commission (PSC) and ombudsman, failure and changing the public policies, politicization and family rule of administration, ethnic, regional vise bureaucracy, insufficient resources and capacity, lack of citizen participation and lack of awareness of the citizens, corruption etc. Ensuring provincial autonomy decentralization, ensuring greater communication and accountability between policymakers, citizens, bureaucrats and politicians, ensuring higher salary scale/higher salaries in public sector, strengthening stakeholders and citizen participation, strengthening the Public Private Partnership (PPP), introducing e-government techniques and New Public Management (NPM) reform in governance process, administrators should learn and get the training in other languages (Tamil and Sinhala), strengthening the ombudsman and public service commission and ensuring better financial management and accountability are can be improving public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka.

Published in	Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
Page(s)	31-39
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Bureaucracy, Dysfunction, Survival, Sri Lanka

References

[1]	Chakrabarty, B., & Chand, P., 2012, Public Administration in a Globalizing World Theories and Practices, SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, India.
[2]	Citizen-Client Charter, 2007, Ministry of Public Administration and Home Affairs, Sri Lanka.
[3]	Corruption Perceptions Index, 2015, Transparency International.
[4]	Damayanthi, M. N. K., 2011, Devolution versus Deconcentration: A Study on Land Service Delivery System in Sri Lanka, Master in Public Policy and Governance Programme, Department of General and Continuning Education, North South University, Bangladesh.
[5]	Dick B., 2003, History of bureaucracy, A brief history of organizations, Available From: http://www.aral.com.au/DLitt/DLitt_P21whtb.pdf, [Accessed on 18 May 2016].
[6]	Economic Commission for Africa, 2003, Public Sector Management Reforms in Africa: Lessons Learned, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Development Policy Management Division (DPMD)-Economic Commission for Africa.
[7]	Fernando, A., 2013, Politicisation of the Public Service, Available From: http://www.thesundayleader.lk/2013/12/15/politicisation-of-the-public-service/. [Accessed on 22 May 2016].
[8]	From Citizen’s Charter to Public Service Guarantees: Entitlements to Public Services, 2008, House of Commons, London: The Stationary Office Limited.
[9]	Gunasekara, R., ‎2016, Representative Bureaucracy: Some Reflections of the Colonial Civil Service Administration in Sri Lanka, Available From: http://dlib.pdn.ac.lk/bitstream/123456789/1304/1/Tambiah,%20S.%20J..pdf, [Accessed on 20 May 2016].
[10]	Iqbal, M. C. M., 2002, The Public Service of Sri Lanka, Annual Report in the State of Human Rights in Sri Lanka.
[11]	Iqbal, M. C. M., 2002, The Public Service of Sri Lanka, Annual Report in the State of Human Rights in Sri Lanka. Available From: http://www.ruleoflawsrilanka.org/resources/writings-of-m-c-m-iqbal/the-public-service-of-sri-lanka, [Accessed on 28 April 2016].
[12]	Jabbar, M. A., Sajeetha, T. F., 2015, The Role of Bureaucracy in Building Rural Development: A Study of Addalaichenai Divisional Secretariat, Sri Lanka, Vol. 62, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences.
[13]	Jabes, J., 2005, The Role of Public Administration in Alleviating Poverty and Improving Governance: Selected Papers from the Launching Conference of the Network of Asia-Pacific Schools and Institutes of Public Administration and Governance (NAPSIPAG), Asian Development Bank.
[14]	Joshi, A., 2011, 4 Important Roles of Bureaucracy in Developing Countries Like India, Available From: http://Www.Preservearticles.Com/201106027410/4-Important-Roles-Of-Bureaucracy-In-Developing-Countries-Like-India.Html, [Accessed on 1 May 2016].
[15]	Manivasagar A. V., 2001, Aspects of Public Administration, South Asian Social Science Trust.
[16]	Mooney, Knox, Schacht. 2007, The Three Main Sociological Perspectives, Understanding Social Problems, 5th edition, Available from: https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/content/user/kfrench/sociology/the%20three%20main%20sociological%20perspectives.pdf, [Accessed on 25 May 2016].
[17]	Peters, G., & Pierre, J., 2012, The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, SAGE publication.
[18]	Public Service and the Public Service Commission (PSC) of Sri Lanka, 2014, Transparency International Sri Lanka.
[19]	Public Service Commission-Sri Lanka, Available From: http://www.psc.gov.lk/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=1&lang=en, [Accessed on 24 May 2016].
[20]	Rathod, P. B., 2007, Comparative Public Administration, ABD PUBLISHERS Jaipur, India.
[21]	Sabharwal, M., & Berman, E. M., (eds), 2013, History and Context of Public Administration in Sri Lanka, Chapter 24, Public Administration in South Asia, CRC Press.
[22]	Samaratunge, R., & Bennington, L., 2002, New Public Management: Challenge for Sri Lanka, Vol 24. No 1, Asian Journal of Public Administration.
[23]	Sammanthurai Divisional Secretariat, Available From: http://www.sammanthurai.ds.gov.lk/. [Accessed on 5 May 2016].
[24]	The Ombudsman, 2015, The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, Parliament Secretariat.
[25]	UNDP, 1999, Decentralization: A Sampling of Definitions, Working paper. New York: UNDP.
[26]	Warnapala, W., 2013, Public Administration in Sri Lanka, A Framework for Research, Available From: http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=85721., [Accessed on 20 May 2016].
[27]	What’s The Deal with Colombo’s Port City?, 2016, Available From: http://roar.lk/reports/whats-deal-colombos-port-city/ [Accessed on: 28 April 2016].
[28]	Wickramaratne, J., 2014, Constitutional Reform in Sri Lanka: Issues and Prospects, Colombo Telegraph, Available From: https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/constitutional-reform-in-sri-lanka-issues-and-prospects/, [Accessed on 23 May 2016].

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan. (2016). Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan. Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2016, 2(4), 31-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan. Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Adv Sci Humanit. 2016;2(4):31-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11,
  author = {Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan},
  title = {Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka},
  journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {31-39},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20160204.11},
  abstract = {This study examines the survival and dysfunctions of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Major objective of this study is to analysis functions and practical challenges of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. As well as it tries to find out the solutions which can be used to improve the effectiveness service of bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Bureaucracy is most important role in the world: implementation and formulation of policy, delegated legislation, administrative adjudication, importance to government and governing process, service to the people, etc. In contrast, it has earned a nick name for red tapism, nepotism, and corruption. This study is a qualitative research and data were collected mainly from secondary sources such as books, journals, newspapers, internet articles and relevant research articles. In Sri Lanka, public bureaucracy has earned bad name and ill will of the people, due to challenges of Public Administration Reforms (PAR), inefficiency and ineffectiveness public service delivery, dysfunction of constitutional arrangements, ineffectiveness of Public Service Commission (PSC) and ombudsman, failure and changing the public policies, politicization and family rule of administration, ethnic, regional vise bureaucracy, insufficient resources and capacity, lack of citizen participation and lack of awareness of the citizens, corruption etc. Ensuring provincial autonomy decentralization, ensuring greater communication and accountability between policymakers, citizens, bureaucrats and politicians, ensuring higher salary scale/higher salaries in public sector, strengthening stakeholders and citizen participation, strengthening the Public Private Partnership (PPP), introducing e-government techniques and New Public Management (NPM) reform in governance process, administrators should learn and get the training in other languages (Tamil and Sinhala), strengthening the ombudsman and public service commission and ensuring better financial management and accountability are can be improving public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka
AU  - Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan
Y1  - 2016/11/25
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
SP  - 31
EP  - 39
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0984
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
AB  - This study examines the survival and dysfunctions of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Major objective of this study is to analysis functions and practical challenges of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. As well as it tries to find out the solutions which can be used to improve the effectiveness service of bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Bureaucracy is most important role in the world: implementation and formulation of policy, delegated legislation, administrative adjudication, importance to government and governing process, service to the people, etc. In contrast, it has earned a nick name for red tapism, nepotism, and corruption. This study is a qualitative research and data were collected mainly from secondary sources such as books, journals, newspapers, internet articles and relevant research articles. In Sri Lanka, public bureaucracy has earned bad name and ill will of the people, due to challenges of Public Administration Reforms (PAR), inefficiency and ineffectiveness public service delivery, dysfunction of constitutional arrangements, ineffectiveness of Public Service Commission (PSC) and ombudsman, failure and changing the public policies, politicization and family rule of administration, ethnic, regional vise bureaucracy, insufficient resources and capacity, lack of citizen participation and lack of awareness of the citizens, corruption etc. Ensuring provincial autonomy decentralization, ensuring greater communication and accountability between policymakers, citizens, bureaucrats and politicians, ensuring higher salary scale/higher salaries in public sector, strengthening stakeholders and citizen participation, strengthening the Public Private Partnership (PPP), introducing e-government techniques and New Public Management (NPM) reform in governance process, administrators should learn and get the training in other languages (Tamil and Sinhala), strengthening the ombudsman and public service commission and ensuring better financial management and accountability are can be improving public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka.
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan

Faculty of Islamic Studies and Arabic Language, South Eastern Universitry, Oluvil, Sri Lanka

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan. (2016). Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan. Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2016, 2(4), 31-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan. Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Adv Sci Humanit. 2016;2(4):31-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11,
  author = {Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan},
  title = {Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka},
  journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {31-39},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20160204.11},
  abstract = {This study examines the survival and dysfunctions of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Major objective of this study is to analysis functions and practical challenges of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. As well as it tries to find out the solutions which can be used to improve the effectiveness service of bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Bureaucracy is most important role in the world: implementation and formulation of policy, delegated legislation, administrative adjudication, importance to government and governing process, service to the people, etc. In contrast, it has earned a nick name for red tapism, nepotism, and corruption. This study is a qualitative research and data were collected mainly from secondary sources such as books, journals, newspapers, internet articles and relevant research articles. In Sri Lanka, public bureaucracy has earned bad name and ill will of the people, due to challenges of Public Administration Reforms (PAR), inefficiency and ineffectiveness public service delivery, dysfunction of constitutional arrangements, ineffectiveness of Public Service Commission (PSC) and ombudsman, failure and changing the public policies, politicization and family rule of administration, ethnic, regional vise bureaucracy, insufficient resources and capacity, lack of citizen participation and lack of awareness of the citizens, corruption etc. Ensuring provincial autonomy decentralization, ensuring greater communication and accountability between policymakers, citizens, bureaucrats and politicians, ensuring higher salary scale/higher salaries in public sector, strengthening stakeholders and citizen participation, strengthening the Public Private Partnership (PPP), introducing e-government techniques and New Public Management (NPM) reform in governance process, administrators should learn and get the training in other languages (Tamil and Sinhala), strengthening the ombudsman and public service commission and ensuring better financial management and accountability are can be improving public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Survival and Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy: A Critical Analysis of Public Bureaucracy in Sri Lanka
AU  - Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Irfan
Y1  - 2016/11/25
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
SP  - 31
EP  - 39
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0984
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20160204.11
AB  - This study examines the survival and dysfunctions of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Major objective of this study is to analysis functions and practical challenges of public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. As well as it tries to find out the solutions which can be used to improve the effectiveness service of bureaucracy in Sri Lanka. Bureaucracy is most important role in the world: implementation and formulation of policy, delegated legislation, administrative adjudication, importance to government and governing process, service to the people, etc. In contrast, it has earned a nick name for red tapism, nepotism, and corruption. This study is a qualitative research and data were collected mainly from secondary sources such as books, journals, newspapers, internet articles and relevant research articles. In Sri Lanka, public bureaucracy has earned bad name and ill will of the people, due to challenges of Public Administration Reforms (PAR), inefficiency and ineffectiveness public service delivery, dysfunction of constitutional arrangements, ineffectiveness of Public Service Commission (PSC) and ombudsman, failure and changing the public policies, politicization and family rule of administration, ethnic, regional vise bureaucracy, insufficient resources and capacity, lack of citizen participation and lack of awareness of the citizens, corruption etc. Ensuring provincial autonomy decentralization, ensuring greater communication and accountability between policymakers, citizens, bureaucrats and politicians, ensuring higher salary scale/higher salaries in public sector, strengthening stakeholders and citizen participation, strengthening the Public Private Partnership (PPP), introducing e-government techniques and New Public Management (NPM) reform in governance process, administrators should learn and get the training in other languages (Tamil and Sinhala), strengthening the ombudsman and public service commission and ensuring better financial management and accountability are can be improving public bureaucracy in Sri Lanka.
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download